
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Cardiac pseudotumors and other challenging diagnoses
- Section 2 Cardiac aneurysms and diverticula
- Section 3 Anatomic variants and congenital lesions
- Section 4 Coronary arteries
- Section 5 Pulmonary arteries
- Section 6 Cardiovascular MRI artifacts
- Section 7 Acute aorta and aortic aneurysms
- Section 8 Post-operative aorta
- Section 9 Mesenteric vascular
- Section 10 Peripheral vascular
- Case 85 Superficial femoral artery occlusions
- Case 86 Popliteal artery entrapment
- Case 87 Suboptimal bolus timing in CT angiography of the extremities
- Case 88 Lower extremity arteriovenous fistula
- Case 89 Persistent sciatic artery
- Section 11 Veins
- Index
- References
Case 86 - Popliteal artery entrapment
from Section 10 - Peripheral vascular
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2015
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Cardiac pseudotumors and other challenging diagnoses
- Section 2 Cardiac aneurysms and diverticula
- Section 3 Anatomic variants and congenital lesions
- Section 4 Coronary arteries
- Section 5 Pulmonary arteries
- Section 6 Cardiovascular MRI artifacts
- Section 7 Acute aorta and aortic aneurysms
- Section 8 Post-operative aorta
- Section 9 Mesenteric vascular
- Section 10 Peripheral vascular
- Case 85 Superficial femoral artery occlusions
- Case 86 Popliteal artery entrapment
- Case 87 Suboptimal bolus timing in CT angiography of the extremities
- Case 88 Lower extremity arteriovenous fistula
- Case 89 Persistent sciatic artery
- Section 11 Veins
- Index
- References
Summary
Imaging description
Popliteal artery entrapment is a developmental abnormality that results in compression of the popliteal artery due to abnormal relationships between the vessel and adjacent soft tissues within the popliteal fossa. Several types of developmental abnormalities that may result in entrapment have been identified. In most cases, the popliteal artery is medially displaced. In some cases, this is due to an anomalous course of the vessel, which can wrap around the medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle. In other patients, the artery is deviated medially by anomalous muscular or fibrous bands or anomalous lateral insertion of the medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle. Finally, in some patients there are no anomalous structures but the artery is compressed by hypertrophied gastrocnemius muscles.
Conventional angiography in neutral, dorsi- and plantar flex maneuvers is the traditional gold standard for the diagnosis of popliteal entrapment as it can identify the site of arterial injury. However, it is not commonly used due to its invasiveness and inability to delineate surrounding anatomy. Color Doppler sonography demonstrates popliteal artery narrowing, changes in color flow, or increased peak systolic velocity on flexion maneuvers but may have a significant false positive rate.
CT angiography with three separate intravenous injections in neutral, dorsi- and plantar flexion along with maximum intensity projection and volume-rendered images provide excellent contrast and spatial resolution of the surrounding abnormalities as well as the presence of occlusion and collateral formation.
MR imaging and MR angiography with gadolinium is used to evaluate the anatomy of the popliteal fossa and the presence of any vascular compromise during compression maneuvers with superior capability of demonstrating surrounding soft tissue abnormality compared to CTA (Figure 86.1). Although MRI is comparable to conventional angiography, its main limitation is the underestimation of < 50% narrowing.
Importance
Popliteal artery entrapment is an uncommon clinical syndrome seen in young adults, causing ischemic symptoms in the lower extremities. It occurs as a result of compression of the popliteal artery due to abnormal development resulting in abnormal anatomic relationship between the vessel and surrounding musculoskeletal structures.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular ImagingPseudolesions, Artifacts, and Other Difficult Diagnoses, pp. 266 - 268Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015