Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Cardiac pseudotumors and other challenging diagnoses
- Section 2 Cardiac aneurysms and diverticula
- Section 3 Anatomic variants and congenital lesions
- Section 4 Coronary arteries
- Section 5 Pulmonary arteries
- Section 6 Cardiovascular MRI artifacts
- Section 7 Acute aorta and aortic aneurysms
- Case 54 Pitfalls in arterial enhancement timing
- Case 55 Misdiagnosis of acute aortic syndrome in the ascending aorta due to cardiac motion
- Case 56 Aortic pseudodissection from penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer
- Case 57 Ductus diverticulum mimicking ductus arteriosus aneurysm
- Case 58 Pericardial recess mimicking traumatic aortic injury
- Case 59 Neointimal calcifications mimicking displaced intimal calcifications on unenhanced CT
- Case 60 The value of non-contrast CT in vascular imaging
- Case 61 Shearing of branch arteries in intramural hematoma: a mimic of active extravasation
- Case 62 Imaging features of aortic aneurysm instability
- Case 63 Aortoenteric fistula
- Case 64 Infammatory aortic aneurysm
- Case 65 Incorrect aneurysm measurement due to aortic tortuosity
- Section 8 Post-operative aorta
- Section 9 Mesenteric vascular
- Section 10 Peripheral vascular
- Section 11 Veins
- Index
- References
Case 62 - Imaging features of aortic aneurysm instability
from Section 7 - Acute aorta and aortic aneurysms
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2015
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Cardiac pseudotumors and other challenging diagnoses
- Section 2 Cardiac aneurysms and diverticula
- Section 3 Anatomic variants and congenital lesions
- Section 4 Coronary arteries
- Section 5 Pulmonary arteries
- Section 6 Cardiovascular MRI artifacts
- Section 7 Acute aorta and aortic aneurysms
- Case 54 Pitfalls in arterial enhancement timing
- Case 55 Misdiagnosis of acute aortic syndrome in the ascending aorta due to cardiac motion
- Case 56 Aortic pseudodissection from penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer
- Case 57 Ductus diverticulum mimicking ductus arteriosus aneurysm
- Case 58 Pericardial recess mimicking traumatic aortic injury
- Case 59 Neointimal calcifications mimicking displaced intimal calcifications on unenhanced CT
- Case 60 The value of non-contrast CT in vascular imaging
- Case 61 Shearing of branch arteries in intramural hematoma: a mimic of active extravasation
- Case 62 Imaging features of aortic aneurysm instability
- Case 63 Aortoenteric fistula
- Case 64 Infammatory aortic aneurysm
- Case 65 Incorrect aneurysm measurement due to aortic tortuosity
- Section 8 Post-operative aorta
- Section 9 Mesenteric vascular
- Section 10 Peripheral vascular
- Section 11 Veins
- Index
- References
Summary
Imaging description
The diagnosis of aortic aneurysm rupture is straightforward on CT. Both precontrast and post-contrast acquisitions will demonstrate disruption of the aneurysm wall with perianeurysm hemorrhage extending into the retroperitoneum and possibly the peritoneal cavity. Prior to frank rupture, certain findings on CT may reflect instability of an intact abdominal aortic aneurysm or contained rupture. Instability indicators include intramural or intrathrombus hemorrhage (“hyperattenuating crescent” sign), perianeurysmal hemorrhage, and disruption of previously continuous aortic wall calcification. The hyperattenuating crescent sign indicates hemorrhage within aneurysm thrombus or the aneurysm wall, and can be recognized by high-attenuation material within the plaque or the wall (Figure 62.1). A small perianeurysm hematoma may be identified prior to frank rupture, suggesting contained rupture (Figure 62.2).
Contained rupture may also manifest as a new focal outpouching of the aortic wall or the “draped aorta” sign (Figures 62.3, 62.4). The latter appears as loss of the fat plane between the posterior wall of the aortic aneurysm and the adjacent vertebral body, and psoas muscle on axial images, and a focal posterior outpouching on sagittal MPRs. Cognizance of these findings is essential so that the interpreting radiologist can alert the vascular surgeon to guide intervention.
Careful assessment for aneurysm enlargement is equally important. A size threshold of 5.5cm has been defined for repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The typical rate of aneurysm enlargement is 1–4mm/year. Rapid aneurysm enlargement is defined as > 6mm in 6 months or >1cm in one year. Measurement should be tailored to the configuration of the aneurysm and performed on current and prior CT examinations for optimal reproducibility. If available, comparison to older studies is recommended, because changes in size may be more apparent than comparison to recent studies alone.
Importance
Imaging signs that suggest a high risk of rupture are important to recognize to prompt treatment before the occurrence of acute aortic rupture, which has a very high mortality rate.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular ImagingPseudolesions, Artifacts, and Other Difficult Diagnoses, pp. 200 - 203Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015