Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Section 1 Diaphragm and adjacent structures
- Section 2 Liver
- Section 3 Biliary system
- Section 4 Spleen
- Section 5 Pancreas
- Section 6 Adrenal glands
- Section 7 Kidneys
- Section 8 Retroperitoneum
- Case 49 Retrocrural pseudotumor due to the cisterna chyli
- Case 50 Pseudothrombosis of the inferior vena cava
- Case 51 Pseudoadenopathy due to venous anatomic variants
- Case 52 Pseudomass due to duodenal diverticulum
- Case 53 Segmental arterial mediolysis
- Section 9 Gastrointestinal tract
- Section 10 Peritoneal cavity
- Section 11 Ovaries
- Section 12 Uterus and vagina
- Section 13 Bladder
- Section 14 Pelvic soft tissues
- Section 15 Groin
- Section 16 Bone
- Index
- References
Case 52 - Pseudomass due to duodenal diverticulum
from Section 8 - Retroperitoneum
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2011
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Section 1 Diaphragm and adjacent structures
- Section 2 Liver
- Section 3 Biliary system
- Section 4 Spleen
- Section 5 Pancreas
- Section 6 Adrenal glands
- Section 7 Kidneys
- Section 8 Retroperitoneum
- Case 49 Retrocrural pseudotumor due to the cisterna chyli
- Case 50 Pseudothrombosis of the inferior vena cava
- Case 51 Pseudoadenopathy due to venous anatomic variants
- Case 52 Pseudomass due to duodenal diverticulum
- Case 53 Segmental arterial mediolysis
- Section 9 Gastrointestinal tract
- Section 10 Peritoneal cavity
- Section 11 Ovaries
- Section 12 Uterus and vagina
- Section 13 Bladder
- Section 14 Pelvic soft tissues
- Section 15 Groin
- Section 16 Bone
- Index
- References
Summary
Imaging description
Duodenal diverticula are congenital anatomic variants and are found in up to 22% of the population at autopsy [1]. Fluid-filled or collapsed duodenal diverticula may mimic cystic or soft-tissue retroperitoneal or pancreatic masses at cross-sectional imaging (Figures 52.1–52.3) [2,3]. Increased uptake of FDG within a duodenal diverticulum at PET imaging has also been reported [4].
Importance
Misdiagnosis of retroperitoneal adenopathy or a pancreatic mass may result in unnecessary surgery or treatment [2].
Typical clinical scenario
Duodenal diverticula are incidental findings that are likely to cause most diagnostic confusion when seen in patients with known malignancy (when they may suggest metastatic spread) or in the postoperative period (when they may resemble an abscess).
Differential diagnosis
Duodenal diverticula can usually be diagnosed by recognizing the characteristic location near the duodenum and by examination of all available studies that may allow identification of intradiverticular air [3].
Teaching point
The possibility of a duodenal diverticulum should be considered when an apparent cystic or soft-tissue mass or collection is seen adjacent to the duodenum. Comparison with prior studies or repeat examination after oral contrast may facilitate correct diagnosis.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Pearls and Pitfalls in Abdominal ImagingPseudotumors, Variants and Other Difficult Diagnoses, pp. 178 - 179Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010