Patient-Centered Assisted Reproduction How to Integrate Exceptional Care with Cutting-Edge Technology
Book contents
- Patient-Centered Assisted Reproduction
- Patient-Centered Assisted Reproduction
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Access to Infertility Care
- Chapter 2 The Patient Evaluation of the Future: Genetics, New Diagnostics, and Prediction Modeling
- Chapter 3 Advances in ART Pharmacology: Drug Delivery Systems and the Pipeline
- Chapter 4 ART Monitoring: An End to Frequent Clinic Visits and Needle Sticks?
- Chapter 5 The IVF Cycle to Come: Laboratory Innovations
- Chapter 6 Integrative Care
- Chapter 7 Psychological Counseling: Ethical Challenges of the Future
- Chapter 8 Using Technology to Enhance Communication in Medically Assisted Reproductive Care
- Chapter 9 The Economics of IVF: Evaluating the Necessity and Value of Public Funding
- Chapter 10 Medical and Elective Fertility Preservation: Options and Suggestions for a Patient-Centered Approach
- Chapter 11 Patient Retention, Nursing Retention: The Importance of Empathic Communication and Nursing Support
- Chapter 12 Patient-Centered IVF Care
- Chapter 13 The IVF Patient Journey of the Future
- Index
- References
Chapter 12 - Patient-Centered IVF Care
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 March 2020
Book contents
- Patient-Centered Assisted Reproduction
- Patient-Centered Assisted Reproduction
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Access to Infertility Care
- Chapter 2 The Patient Evaluation of the Future: Genetics, New Diagnostics, and Prediction Modeling
- Chapter 3 Advances in ART Pharmacology: Drug Delivery Systems and the Pipeline
- Chapter 4 ART Monitoring: An End to Frequent Clinic Visits and Needle Sticks?
- Chapter 5 The IVF Cycle to Come: Laboratory Innovations
- Chapter 6 Integrative Care
- Chapter 7 Psychological Counseling: Ethical Challenges of the Future
- Chapter 8 Using Technology to Enhance Communication in Medically Assisted Reproductive Care
- Chapter 9 The Economics of IVF: Evaluating the Necessity and Value of Public Funding
- Chapter 10 Medical and Elective Fertility Preservation: Options and Suggestions for a Patient-Centered Approach
- Chapter 11 Patient Retention, Nursing Retention: The Importance of Empathic Communication and Nursing Support
- Chapter 12 Patient-Centered IVF Care
- Chapter 13 The IVF Patient Journey of the Future
- Index
- References
Summary
The notion that health professionals should try to understand illness and its treatments from the patients’ perspective instead of solely relying on scientific knowledge first emerged in the nursing profession during the 1960s. It was only in the new millennium that this perspective came into use within infertility and assisted reproductive technology (ART), when the argument was made that patient centeredness was as important in defining high-quality ART as other treatment dimensions, such as effectiveness, efficiency, or safety.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Patient-Centered Assisted ReproductionHow to Integrate Exceptional Care with Cutting-Edge Technology, pp. 156 - 169Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Whelan, E. Negotiating Science and Experience in Medical Knowledge: Gynaecologists on Endometriosis. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 68: 1489–97.Google Scholar
van Empel, IWH, et al. Coming Soon to Your Clinic: High-Quality ART. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23: 1242–5.Google Scholar
Dancet, EAF, et al. The Patients’ Perspective on Fertility Care: A Systematic Review. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16: 467–87.Google Scholar
Dancet, EAF, et al. Patient-Centred Infertility Care: A Qualitative Study to Listen to the Patient’s Voice. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(4): 827–33.Google Scholar
Aarts, JWM, et al. Professionals’ Perceptions of Their Patients’ Experiences with Fertility Care. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(5): 1119–27.Google Scholar
Aarts, JWM, et al. How Patient-Centred Care Relates to Patients’ Quality of Life and Distress: A Study in 427 Women Experiencing Infertility. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27: 488–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gameiro, S, Canavarro, MC, Boivin, J Patient Centred Care in Infertility Health Care: Direct and Indirect Associations with Wellbeing During Treatment. Patient Educ Couns. 2013; 93(3): 646–54.Google Scholar
Huppelschoten, AG, et al. Predicting Dropout in Fertility Care: A Longitudinal Study on Patient-Centredness. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(8): 2177–86.Google Scholar
Pedro, J, et al. Positive Experiences of Patient-Centred Care Are Associated with Intentions to Comply with Fertility Treatment: Findings from the Validation of the Portuguese Version of the PCQ-Infertility Tool. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(9): 2462–72.Google Scholar
Dancet, EA, et al. “Patient-Centered Fertility Treatment”: What Is Required? Fertil Steril. 2014; 101(4): 924–6.Google Scholar
Huppelschoten, AG, et al. Improving Patient-Centredness in Partnership with Female Patients: A Cluster Rct in Infertility Care. Hum Reprod. 2015; 30(5): 1137–45.Google Scholar
Garcia, D, et al. Training in Empathic Skills Improves the Patient–Physician Relationship During the First Consultation in a Fertility Clinic. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99: 1413–18.Google Scholar
Gameiro, S, et al. ESHRE Guideline: Routine Psychosocial Care in Infertility and Medically Assisted Reproduction – a Guide for Fertility Staff. Hum Reprod. 2015; 30(11): 2476–85.Google Scholar
van Empel, IWH, et al. Physicians Underestimate the Importance of Patient-Centredness to Patients: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Fertility Care. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(3): 584–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gameiro, S, et al. Why Do Patients Discontinue Fertility Treatment? A Systematic Review of Reasons and Predictors of Discontinuation in Fertility Treatment. Hum Reprod. 2012; 18(6): 652–69.Google Scholar
Benyamini, Y, Gozlan, M, Kokia, E Variability in the Difficulties Experienced by Women Undergoing Infertility Treatments. Fertil Steril. 2005; 83: 275–83.Google Scholar
Boivin, J, et al. Perceived Challenges of Working in a Fertility Clinic: A Qualitative Analysis of Work Stressors and Difficulties Working with Patients. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32(2): 403–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leone, D, et al. Breaking Bad News in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Proposal for Guidelines. Reprod Health. 2017; 14: 87.Google Scholar
Dancet, EAF, et al. Patients from Across Europe Have Similar Views on Patient-Centred Care: An International Multilingual Qualitative Study in Infertility Care. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(6): 1702–11.Google Scholar
American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines for advertising by ART programs. 2004; Birmingham, AL.: American Society for Reproductive Medicine.Google Scholar
Gameiro, S, et al. DrawingOut – An Innovative Drawing Workshop Method to Support the Generation and Dissemination of Research Findings. PLoS ONE. 2018; 13(9): e0203197.Google Scholar
Tarasoff, LA, et al. Using Interactive Theatre to Help Fertility Providers Better Understand Sexual and Gender Minority Patients. Medical Humanities. 2014; 40: 135–41.Google Scholar
Boivin, J, Griffiths, E, Venetis, CA Emotional Distress in Infertile Women and Failure of Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Psychosocial Studies. BMJ. 2011; 342(d223).Google Scholar
Nicoloro-SantaBarbara, J, et al. Just Relax and You’ll Get Pregnant? Meta-Analysis Examining Women’s Emotional Distress and the Outcome of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Soc Sci Med. 2018; 213: 54–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gameiro, S, Finnigan, A. Long-Term Adjustment to Unmet Parenthood Goals Following ART: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2017; 23(3): 322–37.Google Scholar
Coulter, A, et al. Personalised Care Planning for Adults with Chronic or Long-Term Health Conditions (Review). Cochrane Library 2015; 3: Art. No.: CD010523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, AM, et al. Decision Aids for Patients Facing Health Treatment or Screening Decisions: Systematic Review. BMJ 1999; 319: 731.Google Scholar
van de Belt, TH, et al. Wikis to Facilitate Patient Participation in Developing Information Leaflets: First Experiences. Inform Health Soc Care. 2014; 39(2): 124–39.Google Scholar