Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:00:44.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Databases and Surgical Quality Improvement: Pooling Our Data

from Section 3 - Reporting and Databases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2023

By
Manon Haché  and
Cindy B. Katz
Edited by
Sally E. Rampersad  and
Cindy B. Katz
Sally E. Rampersad
Affiliation:
University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
Cindy B. Katz
Affiliation:
Seattle Children’s Hospital, Washington
Get access

Summary

Most hospitals participate in national and international collaborative programs, contributing data in an attempt to better understand adverse events. Some of these databases and their purpose will be described in this chapter.

Type
Chapter
Information
Patient Safety and Quality Improvement in Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine , pp. 77 - 81
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Zhan, C and Miller, MR. Administrative data based patient safety research: A critical review. Quality & Safety in Health Care. 2003;12(Suppl 2):ii58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischut, PM, Mazumdar, M, and Memtsoudis, SG. Perioperative database research: Possibilities and pitfalls. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2013;111(4):532–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morray, JP, Geiduschek, JM, Ramamoorthy, C, et al. Anesthesia-related cardiac arrest in children: Initial findings of the Pediatric Perioperative Cardiac Arrest (POCA) Registry. Anesthesiology. 2000;93(1):6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhananker, SM, Ramamoorthy, C, Geiduschek, JM, et al. Anesthesia-related cardiac arrest in children: Update from the Pediatric Perioperative Cardiac Arrest Registry. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2007;105(2):344–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurth, CD, Tyler, D, Heitmiller, E, Tosone, SR, Martin, L, and Deshpande, JK. National pediatric anesthesia safety quality improvement program in the United States. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2014;119(1):112–121.Google Scholar
Rampersad, S, Rossi, MG, Yarnell, C, and Uejima, T. Wrong site frenulectomy in a child: A serious safety event. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2014;119(1):141–144.Google Scholar
Buck, D, Kreeger, R, and Spaeth, J. Case discussion and root cause analysis: Bupivacaine overdose in an infant leading to ventricular tachycardia. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2014;119(1):137–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, AC, Reduque, LL, Luban, NL, Ness, PM, Anton, B, and Heitmiller, ES. Transfusion-associated hyperkalemic cardiac arrest in pediatric patients receiving massive transfusion. Transfusion. 2014;54(1):244–254.Google Scholar
Christensen, RE, Lee, AC, Gowen, MS, Rettiganti, MR, Deshpande, JK, and Morray, JP. Pediatric perioperative cardiac arrest, death in the off hours: A report from wake up safe, the pediatric quality improvement initiative. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2018;127(2):472–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, RE, Haydar, B, and Voepel-Lewis, TD. Pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest in the postanesthesia care unit, rare but preventable: Analysis of data from wake up safe, the pediatric anesthesia quality improvement initiative. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2017;124(4):1231–1236.Google Scholar
Lobaugh, LMY, Martin, LD, Schleelein, LE, Tyler, DC, and Litman, RS. Medication errors in pediatric anesthesia: A report from the Wake up Safe quality improvement initiative. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2017;125(3):936–942.Google Scholar
Shahian, DM, Jacobs, JP, Edwards, FH, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons national database. Heart. 2013;99(20):1494–1501.Google Scholar
www.sts.org/quality-safety/performance-measures (Accessed 7/13/22).Google Scholar
Thourani, VH, Badhwar, V, Shahian, DM, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons adult cardiac surgery database: 2019 update on research. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. August 2019;108(2):334–342.Google Scholar
Hall, BL, Hamilton, BH, Richards, K, Bilimoria, KY, Cohen, ME, and Ko, CY. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: An evaluation of all participating hospitals. Annals of Surgery. 2009;250(3):363–376.Google Scholar
Cohen, ME, Liu, Y, Ko, CY, and Hall, BL. Improved surgical outcomes for ACS NSQIP hospitals over time: Evaluation of hospital cohorts with up to 8 years of participation. Annals of Surgery. 2016;263(2):267–273.Google Scholar
Liau, A, Havidich, JE, Onega, T, and Dutton, RP. The national anesthesia clinical outcomes registry. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2015;121(6):1604–1610.Google Scholar
Berger, ML, Mamdani, M, Atkins, D, and Johnson, ML. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: Defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: The ISPOR good research practices for retrospective database analysis task force report – Part I. Value Health. 2009;12(8):1044–1052.Google Scholar
Cox, E, Martin, BC, Van Staa, T, Garbe, E, Siebert, U, and Johnson, ML. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: Approaches to mitigate bias and confounding in the design of nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: The international society for pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research good research practices for retrospective database analysis task force report – Part II. Value Health. 2009;12(8):1053–1061.Google Scholar
Johnson, ML, Crown, W, Martin, BC, Dormuth, CR, and Siebert, U. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: Analytic methods to improve causal inference from nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: The ISPOR good research practices for retrospective database analysis task force report – Part III. Value Health. 2009;12(8):1062–1073.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×