Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:28:03.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Participation in the Divine in Gregory of Nyssa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2024

Douglas Hedley
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Daniel J. Tolan
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Gregory of Nyssa is the most philosophically minded of the Cappadocian Fathers and one of the most insightful interpreters of Origen.1 Harold Cherniss (1930–1971) considered Gregory a Platonist thinker thinly plated with Christianity; Jean Daniélou and others thought that Gregory progressively abandoned Platonism and/or Origen; I suspect that the latter option is not really the case (2018b), but Cherniss’s thesis is not tenable either. Von Balthasar (1942) and other scholars have seen Gregory as a great innovator with respect to Greek metaphysics.2 I have detected a consistency in his Christian Platonism3 – a consistency that has been denied: Gregory has been represented as confused and contradictory as a philosopher (e.g. Stead 1976); however, this position does not take into account that Gregory’s philosophical theology was not simply Platonism, but Christian Platonism,4 specifically Patristic Platonism, like that of Origen.5

Type
Chapter
Information
Participation in the Divine
A Philosophical History, From Antiquity to the Modern Era
, pp. 99 - 127
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annas, Julia. 1999. Platonic Ethics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. 2004. “Plato on Assimilating to God.Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26: 171–83.Google Scholar
Balás, David L. 1966a. “Christian Transformation of Greek Philosophy Illustrated by Gregory of Nyssa’s Use of the Notion of Participation.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 40: 152–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balás, David L. 1966b. Metousia Theou: Man’s Participation in God’s Perfections According to St. Gregory of Nyssa. Rome: Herder.Google Scholar
Balás, David L. 1969. “Participation in the Specific Nature According to Gregory of Nyssa: Aristotelian Logic or Platonic Ontology?” In Actes du quatrième congrès international de philosophie médiévale, 10791085. Montreal: Institute d’Études Médiévales.Google Scholar
Balthasar, Hans Urs von. 1942. Présence et pensée: essai sur la philosophie religieuse de Grégoire de Nysse. Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar
Beatrice, PierFranco, ed. 2001. Anonymi Monophysitae Theosophia. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Hans. 2013. Embodiment and Virtue in Gregory of Nyssa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhm, Thomas. 2002. “Origenes—Theologe und (Neu-)Platoniker?Adamantius 8: 723.Google Scholar
Böhm, Thomas. 2003. “Unbegreiflichkeit Gottes bei Origenes und Unsagbarkeit des Einen bei Plotin.” In Origeniana Octava, edited by Perrone, Lorenzo, 451–63. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Böhm, Thomas. 2004. “Denken des Einen: die platonischen Voraussetzungen der ‘sethianischen’ Gnosis.” In Pensées de l’Un dans l’histoire de la philosophie, edited by Narbonne, Jean-Marc and Reckermann, Alfons, 123–39. Paris: Saint Nicolas.Google Scholar
Busine, Aude. 2016. “The Theosophy of Tübingen.” In Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, ed. Goulet, Richard, Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Calma, Dragos, ed. 2022. Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes, 3, On Causes and the Noetic Triad. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrara, Laura, and Männlein-Robert, Irmgard, eds. 2018. Die Tübinger Theosophie: Eingeleitet, übersetzt und kommentiert. Stuttgart: Hiersemann.Google Scholar
Cherian, John. 2008. “Being Human Becoming Divine: A Sacramentological Re-interpretation of Theosis on Micro-macrocosmic.” PhD diss., KUL (Catholic University of Leuven) (http://hdl.handle.net/1979/1880).Google Scholar
Cherniss, Harold. 1971 [1930]. The Platonism of Gregory of Nyssa. New York: Burt Franklin.Google Scholar
Dillon, John, and Daniel, Tolan. 2021. “The Ideas as Thoughts of God.” In Christian Platonism: A History, edited by Hampton, Alexander and Kenney, John Peter, 3452, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckhart, Meister. 1963–2023. Die deutschen Werke, i–v, edited by Quint, Josef and Steer, Georg. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Eckhart, Meister 1936. Die Lateinischen Werke i, edited by Benz, Ernst, Christ, Karl, Decker, Bruno, et al. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark. 2015. “One Origen or Two?Symbolae Osloenses 89: 81103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Mark J. 2018. “Origen and Gregory of Nyssa on the Song of Songs.” In Exploring Gregory of Nyssa: Philosophical, Theological and Historical Studies, edited by Marmodoro, Anna and McLynn, Neil B., 7492. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark, Pallis, Dimitrios, and Steiris, Georgios, eds. 2022. The Oxford Handbook of Dionysius the Areopagite. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greig, Jonathan. 2022. “Proclus’ Reception in Maximus the Confessor, Mediated through John Philoponus and Dionysius.” In Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes, 3, On Causes and the Noetic Triad, edited by Calma, Dragos, 117–67. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart G. 2014. “Gregory of Nyssa, Against Eunomius Book Three (Translation).” In Gregory of Nyssa: Contra Eunomium iii. An English Translation with Commentary and Supporting Studies, edited by Leemans, Johan and Cassin, Matthieu, 42233. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, Alexander, and Kenney, John Peter, eds. 2021. Christian Platonism: A History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hauschild, Wolf-Dieter. 1967. Die Pneumatomachen: Eine Untersuchung zur Dogmengeschichte des vierten Jahrhunderts. Hamburg: Hauschild.Google Scholar
Hupsch, Piet Hein. 2020. The Glory of the Spirit in Gregory of Nyssa’s Adversus Macedonianos. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ivánka, Erdre von. 1964. Plato Christianus: Übernahme und Umgestaltung des Platonismus durch die Väter. Einsiedeln: Johannes.Google Scholar
Kobusch, Theo. 2014. “Das Johannesevangelium.Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 81: 213–35.Google Scholar
Konstantinou, E. 1966. Die Tugendlehre Gregors von Nyssa im Verhältnis zu der antike-philosophischen und Jüdisch-Christlichen Tradition. Würzburg: Echter.Google Scholar
Lavecchia, Salvatore. 2005. “Die Ὁμοίωσις Θεῷ in Platons Philosophie.” In Perspektiven der Philosophie, edited by Schrader, Wiebke, 321–94. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Louth, Andrew. 2007. The Origins of the Christian Mystical Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maspero, Giulio. 2013. Essere e relazione: L’ontologia trinitaria di Gregorio di Nissa. Rome: Città Nuova.Google Scholar
Maspero, Giulio, Brugarolas, Miguel, and Vigorelli, Ilaria, eds. 2018. Gregory of Nyssa: In Canticum Canticorum: Analytical and Supporting Studies. Proceedings of the 13th International Colloquium on Gregory of Nyssa (Rome, 17–20 September 2014). Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateo-Seco, Lucas. 2010. “Virtues.” In Brill Dictionary of Gregory of Nyssa, edited by Mateo-Seco, Lucas and Maspero, Giulio, 784–87. Brill: Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinn, Bernard. 1991. The Presence of God: A History of Western Christian Mysticism, vol. 1. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
Menn, Stephen. 1995. Plato on God as Nous. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
Mieth, Dietmar. 2017. Lectura Eckhardi IV: Predigten Meister Eckharts von Fachgelehrten Gelesen und Gedeutet, edited by Steer, Georg and Sturlese, Loris, 95122. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Merki, Hubert. 1952. Ὁμοίωσις Θεῷ. Freiburg: Paulus.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kathryn A. 2010. “Inspiration, Recollection, and Mimesis in Plato’s Phaedrus.” In Ancient Models of Mind, edited by Nightingale, Andrea and Sedley, David, 4563. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrone, Lorenzo, ed., 2015. Die neuen Psalmenhomilien, Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Plaxco, Kellen. 2016a. “I Will Pour Out My Spirit: Didymus against Eunomius in Light of John 16:14’s History of Reception.Vigiliae Christianae 70: 479508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plaxco, Kellen. 2016b. “Participation and Trinity in Origen and Didymus the Blind.” In Origeniana Undecima: Origen and Origenism in the History of Western Thought, Aarhus University, August 2013, edited by Jacobsen, Anders-Christian, 76782. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2007a. Gregorio di Nissa sullanima e la resurrezione. Milan: Bompiani–Catholic University.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2007b. “Christian Soteriology and Christian Platonism: Origen, Gregory of Nyssa, and the Biblical and Philosophical Basis of the Doctrine of Apokatastasis.Vigiliae Christianae 61: 313–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2010. “Aἰώνιος and αἰών in Origen and Gregory of Nyssa.Studia Patristica 47: 5762.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2011a. “Baptism in Gregory of Nyssa’s Theology and its Orientation to Eschatology.” In Ablution, Initiation, and Baptism, edited by Hellholm, David, Vegge, Tor, and Norderval, Oyvind, vol. 2: 1205–32. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2011b. “Origen’s Anti-Subordinationism and Its Heritage in the Nicene and Cappadocian Line.Vigiliae Christianae 65: 2149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2012a. “Origen, Greek Philosophy, and the Birth of the Trinitarian Meaning of Hypostasis.Harvard Theological Review 105: 302–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2012b. “Forgiveness in Patristic Philosophy: The Importance of Repentance and the Centrality of Grace.” In Ancient Forgiveness: Classical, Judaic, and Christian Concepts, edited by Griswold, Charles and Konstan, David, 195215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2013a. The Christian Doctrine of Apokatastasis: A Critical Assessment from the New Testament to Eriugena. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2013b. “Harmony between arkhē and telos in Patristic Platonism.International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 7: 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2013c. “Evagrius and Gregory: Nazianzen or Nyssen? A Remarkable Issue that Bears on the Cappadocian (and Origenian) Influence on Evagrius.” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 53: 117–37.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2014a. “The Stoic Doctrine of Oikeiosis and Its Transformation in Christian Platonism.Apeiron 47: 116–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2014b. “Philo’s Doctrine of Apokatastasis: Philosophical Sources, Exegetical Strategies, and Patristic Aftermath.The Studia Philonica Annual 26: 2955.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2014c. “The Divine as Inaccessible Object of Knowledge in Ancient Platonism: A Common Philosophical Pattern across Religious Traditions.Journal of the History of Ideas 75.2: 167–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2015. Evagrius’ Kephalaia Gnostica. Leiden: Brill; Atlanta: SBL.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2016a. Social Justice and the Legitimacy of Slavery: The Role of Philosophical Asceticism from Ancient Judaism to Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2016b. “The Reception of Origen’s Ideas in Western Theological and Philosophical Traditions.” In Origeniana Undecima: Origen and Origenism in the History of Western Thought, Aarhus University, August 2013, edited by Jacobsen, Anders-Christian, 443–67. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2017a. “Divine Power in Origen of Alexandria: Sources and Aftermath.” In Divine Powers in Late Antiquity, edited by Marmodoro, Anna and Fotini Viltanioti, Irini, 177–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2017b. “Proclus and Apokatastasis.” In Proclus and His Legacy, edited by Butorac, David and Layne, Danielle, 95122. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2017c. “The Eucharist in Gregory of Nyssa as Participation in Christ’s Body and Preparation of the Restoration and Theōsis.” In The Eucharist: Its Origins and Contexts, edited by Hellholm, David and Sänger, Dieter, 1165–84. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2017d. “Gregory Nyssen’s and Evagrius’s Relations: Origen’s Heritage and Neoplatonism.Studia Patristica 84: 165231.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2018a. “Gregory of Nyssa on the Soul (and the Restoration): From Plato to Origen.” In Exploring Gregory of Nyssa: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives, edited by Marmodoro, Anna and McLynn, Neil, 110–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2018b. “Apokatastasis and Epektasis.” In Gregory of Nyssa: In Canticum Canticorum, edited by Maspero, Giulio, Brugarolas, Miguel, and Vigorelli, Ilaria, 312–39. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2018c. “Gregory of Nyssa.” In A History of Mind and Body in Late Antiquity, edited by Cartwright, Sophie and Marmodoro, Anna, 283305. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2018d. “Origen to Evagrius.” In The Reception of Plato in Antiquity, edited by Tarrant, Harold, Layne, Danielle A., Baltzly, Dirk, and Renaud, François, 271–91. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2019. “Philo’s Dialectics of Apophatic Theology, His Strategy of Differentiation, and His Impact on Patristic Exegesis and Theology.” Philosophy 3: 3692.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2020. “Sources and Reception of Dynamic Unity in ‘Pagan’ and Christian Platonism.Journal of the Bible and Its Reception 7: 3166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021a. “‘Pagan’ and Christian Platonism in Dionysius: The Double-Reference Scheme and Its Meaning.” In Byzantine Platonists, edited by Lauritzen, Frederick and Wear, Sarah, 92112. Steubenville, OH: Franciscan–CUA.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021b. “The Logos/Nous One-Many between ‘Pagan’ and Christian Platonism.Studia Patristica 102: 1144.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021c. “Origen on the Unity of Soul and Body in the Earthly Life and Afterwards.” In The Unity of Soul and Body in Patristic and Byzantine Thought, edited by Ulrich, Jörg et al., 3877. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021d. “Soma (Σῶμα).” In Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum vol. 30, 814–47. Stuttgart: Hiersemann.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021e. “From God to God: Eriugena’s Protology and Eschatology against the Backdrop of His Patristic Sources.” In Eriugenas Christian Platonism and Its Sources in Patristic and Ancient Philosophy, edited by Ramelli, Ilaria, 99123. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021f. “Why Were Christians Obsessed with Dogmas?” In Handbook to the Early Church, edited by Ramelli, Ilaria, McGuckin, John A. and Ashwin, Piotr, 420–47. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021g. “Gregory and Evagrius on Mysticism.Studia Patristica 101: 177206.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2022a. “Gregory of Nyssa’s Purported Criticism of Origen’s Purported Doctrine of the Preexistence of Souls.” In Lovers of the Soul and Lovers of the Body, edited by Giffin, Svetla S. and Ramelli, Ilaria L.E., 277308. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2022b. “The Study of Late Ancient Philosophy: Philosophy and Religion – ‘Pagan’ and Christian Platonism.” In Lovers of the Soul and Lovers of the Body, edited by Giffin, Svetla S. and Ramelli, Ilaria L.E., 397402. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2022c. “Some Overlooked Sources of the Elements of Theology.” In Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes, 3, On Causes and the Noetic Triad, edited by Calma, Dragos, 406476. Brill, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2022d. “Origen, Evagrius and Dionysius.” In The Oxford Handbook of Dionysius the Areopagite, edited by Edwards, Mark, Pallis, Dimitrios, and Steiris, Georgios, 94108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2022e. “La triade Ousia – Dynamis – Energeia in Gregorio di Nissa e nei Cappadoci: Paralleli filosofici e ascendenze origeniane.” In La triade dellEssere. Essenza–Potenza–Atto, edited by D’Onofrio, Giulio, Mainoldi, Ernesto, and De Filippis, Renato, 153–79. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2022f. “Origen’s Philosophical Theology, Allegoresis, and Connections to Platonism.” In Hellenism, Early Judaism and Early Christianity: Transmission and Transformation of Ideas, Academy of Sciences, Prague, 12–13 September 2019, edited by Kitzler, Petr, Fialova, Radka, and Hoblík, Jiří, 85110. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2023a. “Christian Slavery in Theology and Practice: Its Relation to God, Sin, and Justice.” In The Cambridge History of Ancient Christianity, edited by Longenecker, Bruce and Wilhite, David, 586612. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2023b. Review of Hampton and Kenney 2021, The Thomist 86.4: 684–9.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. forthcoming a. “Secular and Christian Commentaries in Late Antiquity.” In The Cambridge History of Later Latin Literature, edited by Kelly, Gavin and Pelttari, Aaron, ch. 22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. forthcoming b. “‘Plato Was Right!’ Platonism, Greek Philosophy, Greek Religion, and Christian Philosophical Theology according to Origen of Alexandria.” In Platonism and Christian Thought in Late Antiquity and Byzantium: Rivals, Alliances, or Merely a Continuum? edited by Cvetkovic, Vladimir and Pavlos, Panagiotis. Washington: CUA Press.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. Forthcoming c. “The Spirit as Paraclete in 3rd to 5th-Century Debates and the Use of John 14–17 in the Pneumatology of That Time.” In Receptions of the Fourth Gospel in Antiquity, edited by Frey, Jörg and Nicklas, Tobias, 199–221. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. Forthcoming d. “Being, The First Created Thing: The Background in Origen.” In Being, the First Created Thing: Prop. IV of the Book of Causes, edited by Calma, Dragos and Malgieri, Evelina. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria L.E. and Konstan, David, 2007–21. Terms for Eternity. Αἰώνιος and ἀίδιος in Classical and Christian Authors. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias. New editions Logos Bible Software 2013; Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Riel, Gerd van, 2013. Platos Gods. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Scott, Jessica Grace. 2020. “A Theological Exploration of the Shape of Life and Death in Dialogue with the Biographical Works of Gregory of Nyssa.” PhD Diss. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sedley, David. 1999. “The Ideal of Godlikeness.” In Plato, vol. 2, edited by Fine, Gail, 309–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stang, Charles. 2012. Apophasis and Pseudonymity in Dionysius the Areopagite. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stead, Christopher. 1976. “Ontology and Terminology in Gregory of Nyssa.” In Gregor von Nyssa und die Philosophie, edited by Doerrie, Heinrich, 107–27. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, Torstein. 2008. The Christocentric Cosmology of Maximus the Confessor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollefsen, Torstein. 2012. Activity and Participation in Late Antique and Early Christian Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollefsen, Torstein. 2021. “Christian Platonism in Byzantium.” In Christian Platonism: A History, edited by Hampton, Alexander and Kenney, John Peter, 207–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trigg, Joseph W. “The anēr ekklēsiastikos and ‘Origen the Neoplatonist’ in the Homilies on Psalms.” Lecture at Origeniana Tertia Decima, Münster, 15–19 August 2022, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Tzamalikos, Panayiotis. 2016. Anaxagoras, Origen, and Neoplatonism: The Legacy of Anaxagoras to Classical and Late Antiquity, 12. Berlin: DeGruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
YungWen, Clement. 2017. “Maximus and the Problem of Participation.Heythrop Journal 58: 316.Google Scholar
Zachhuber, Johannes. 2015. Human Nature in Gregory of Nyssa: Philosophical Background and Theological Significance. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Zachhuber, Johannes. 2020. The Rise of Christian Theology and the End of Ancient Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×