Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Detailed table of contents
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The myth of the common law constitution
- 3 Legislative sovereignty and the rule of law
- 4 Homogenising constitutions
- 5 Abdicating and limiting Parliament's sovereignty
- 6 Trethowan's case
- 7 Requirements as to procedure or form for legislating
- 8 Judicial review, legislative override, and democracy
- 9 Parliamentary sovereignty and statutory interpretation
- 10 Challenging parliamentary sovereignty: Past, present and future
- Index
- References
2 - The myth of the common law constitution
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2010
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Detailed table of contents
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The myth of the common law constitution
- 3 Legislative sovereignty and the rule of law
- 4 Homogenising constitutions
- 5 Abdicating and limiting Parliament's sovereignty
- 6 Trethowan's case
- 7 Requirements as to procedure or form for legislating
- 8 Judicial review, legislative override, and democracy
- 9 Parliamentary sovereignty and statutory interpretation
- 10 Challenging parliamentary sovereignty: Past, present and future
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
The relationship between the common law and statute law is a subject of debate. The controversy goes deeper than questions of interpretation, such as – given the doctrine of legislative supremacy over the common law – why, how and to what extent the meaning of a statute can legitimately be governed by common law principles. The answers to those questions depend partly on more basic issues concerning the legal foundations of the two bodies of law, and their respective status. The orthodox view is that because Parliament can enact statutes that override any part of the common law, statute law is superior to common law. But according to an increasingly popular theory, Britain's ‘unwritten’ constitution consists of common law principles, and therefore Parliament's authority to enact statutes derives from the common law. Sir William Holdsworth once expressed the view that ‘our constitutional law is simply a part of the common law’. For Trevor Allan, it follows that ‘the common law is prior to legislative supremacy, which it defines and regulates’. This theory has become so popular that even the British government has endorsed it. When the Attorney-General, Lord Goldsmith, was asked in Parliament what was the government's understanding of ‘the legal sources from which the legislative powers of Parliament are derived’, he replied, ‘The source of the legislative powers is the common law.’
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Parliamentary SovereigntyContemporary Debates, pp. 14 - 56Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
, Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 271Google Scholar
, ‘The Relationship of Parliament and the Courts’ Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 31 (2000) 5 at 26.Google Scholar
, ‘Judicial Supremacy: An Alternative Constitutional Theory’ Auckland University Law Review 7 (1994) 665Google Scholar
(eds.), Judicial Review (2nd edn) (London: Butterworths Law, 1997), para. 4.17
, Jesting Pilate, And Other Papers and Addresses (Woinarski, ed.) (Melbourne: Law Book Co., 1965), p. 203Google Scholar
, ‘The Slumbering Sovereign: Sir Owen Dixon's Common Law Constitution Revisited’ Federal Law Review 29 (2001) 58Google Scholar
, ‘The Common Law Constitution in Canada: Return of the Lex Non Scripta as Fundamental Law’ University of Toronto Law Journal 51 (2001) 91 at 92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Common Law Constitution and Legal Cosmopolitanism’ in (ed.), The Unity of Public Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004), p. 431Google Scholar
, Judges and Unjust Laws; Common Law Constitutionalism and the Foundations of Judicial Review (Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 2008), pp. 188–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Back to the Future? Unearthing the Theory of Common Law Constitutionalism’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23 (2003) 435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Constitutional History of the American Revolution: The Authority to Legislate (Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991)Google Scholar
, The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1957)Google Scholar
, The High Court of Parliament and Its Supremacy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1910), ch. 2Google Scholar
, ‘Magna Carta and Common Law’ in Constitutionalism and the Changing World (New York: Macmillan, 1939), 132 at p. 143Google Scholar
, The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999), pp. 38–45Google Scholar
, The Common Law Mind: Medieval and Early Modern Conceptions (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000), p. 206Google Scholar
, ‘The Ancient Constitution Reassessed: The Common Law, the Court and the Languages of Politics in Early Modern England’ in (ed.), The Stuart Court and Europe: Essays in Politics and Political Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 39–64Google Scholar
, Royalists and Patriots: Politics and Ideology in England 1603–1640 (2nd edn) (London: Longman, 1999), pp. 103–4Google Scholar
, On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Law and Judicial Duty (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2008), ch. 8 and Appendix ICrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Bonham's Case, Judicial Review and the Law of Nature’ J of Legal Analysis (2009) 325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Historical English Constitution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 131–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Constitutional and Administrative Law in New Zealand (3rd edn) (Wellington: Brookers, 2007), pp. 488–9Google Scholar
, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights; a Critical Introduction (4th edn) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), p. 22Google Scholar
, English Constitutional Ideas in the Fifteenth Century (New York: American Scholar Publications, 1966), p. xvi.Google Scholar
, Fundamental Authority in Late Medieval English Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
, ‘The Age of Bracton’ in (ed.), The History of English Law: Centenary Essays on ‘Pollock and Maitland’, Proceedings of the British Academy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
, ‘The Origins of the Constitutional Tradition in England’ in Holt, Magna Carta and Medieval Government (London: Hambledon Press, 1985), 1 at p. 13Google Scholar
, The Radical Face of the Ancient Constitution: St. Edward's ‘Laws’ in Early Modern Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, From Kingdom to Commonwealth: The Development of Civic Consciousness in English Political Thought (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Law's Two Bodies: Some Evidential Problems in English Legal History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Sir Matthew Hale 1609–1676: Law, Religion and Natural Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 14–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Right to be King: The Succession to the Crown of England 1603–1714 (North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press, 1995), pp. 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘The Right to Rule in England: Depositions and the Kingdom's Authority, 1327–1485’ American Historical Review 81 (1976) 738 at 750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Studies in the Constitutional History of Medieval England 1216–1399 (vol. 2) (London: Longmans, 1952), pp. 280 and 282Google Scholar
and (eds.), Select Documents of English Constitutional History 1307–1485 (London: Adam & Charles Black, 1961), pp. 146–9
, The Civil Lawyers in England 1603–1641: A Political Study (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973), p. 143Google Scholar
, Law and Politics in Jacobean England: The Tracts of Lord Chancellor Ellesmere (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977), p. 297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The “Imperial Crown” and the Liberty of the Subject: The English Constitution from Magna Carta to the Bill of Rights’ in and (eds.), Court, Country and Culture: Essays on Early Modern British History in Honor of Perez Zagorin (Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 1992), 65 at pp. 72–3Google Scholar
(ed.), King James VI and I: Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 212 at p. 213Google Scholar
, The History of the Common Law of England (, ed.) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971), p. 4Google Scholar
, Commentaries on the Laws of England (vol. 1) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1765), p. 15Google Scholar
, ‘Parliament, Liberty, and the Law’ in (ed.), Parliament and Liberty: From the Reign of Elizabeth to the English Civil War (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992), 155 at pp. 162–3Google Scholar
, ‘The Constitutionalist Revolution: The Transformation of Political Culture in Early Stuart England’, (1999) 163 Past and Present76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Reading of that Famous and Learned Gentleman Robert Callis; Sergeant at Law, upon the Statute of 23 Henry VIII, cap. 5 of Sewers (London: William Leak, 1647), pp. 85–6Google Scholar
(ed.), Proceedings in Parliament 1610 (vol. 2) (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966), p. 174Google Scholar
, and (eds.), Public Duty and Private Conscience in Seventeenth-Century England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), 101 at p. 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.), Constitutional Documents of the Reign of James I 1603–1625 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1930), 221 at 224Google Scholar
and , Subjects and Sovereigns: The Grand Controversy over Legal Sovereignty in Stuart England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), p. 87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity’ in (ed.), The Works of Mr. Richard Hooker (7th edn) (vol. 3) (Georg Olms Verlag, 1977), p. 443Google Scholar
, (ed.), Divine Right and Democracy: An Anthology of Political Writing in Stuart England (Penguin, 1986), p. 129Google Scholar
, and (eds.), The Works of Francis Bacon (vol. 10) (London: Longman, 1858–1874), p. 371Google Scholar
, The Political Works of James I (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1918), p. 333Google Scholar
(ed.), The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 374 at p. 377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Treachery and Disloyalty of Papists to their Sovereigns in Doctrine & Practice (Cambridge University Press, 1643), pp. 35–6Google Scholar
(ed.), Patriarcha and Other Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 54Google Scholar
(ed.), The Mental World of the Jacobean Court (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 71 at pp. 83–5
, Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), pp. 96 and 99–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Reflections on Hobbes’ Dialogue' in (ed.), History of English Law (vol. 5) (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1945), 500 at p. 505Google Scholar
, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (10th edn) (London: Macmillan, 1959), p. 196Google Scholar
, The Law and the Constitution (2nd edn) (London: University of London Press, 1938), pp. 38–40Google Scholar
, The Law and the Constitution (2nd edn) (London: University of London Press, 1938), pp. 38–9Google Scholar
, The Law and the Constitution (5th edn) (London: University of London Press, 1959), p. 39Google Scholar
, ‘The Common Law and Legal Theory’ in (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Second Series) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973)Google Scholar
, ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty and the New Constitutional Order: Legislative Freedom, Political Reality and Convention’ Legal Studies 22 (2002) 340 at 362–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Relationship of Parliament and the Courts’ Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 5 (2000) 31 at 14 and 19 respectivelyGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by