Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:09:36.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - The separation of prosodies: comments on Kohler's paper

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2010

John Kingston
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Mary E. Beckman
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Get access

Summary

Kohler's experiments concern the mapping between the acoustic/phonetic detail of spoken utterances and their underlying phonological structure. A core problem in describing spoken language is that some patterns that are almost identical are perceived as being quite different, while at the same time other patterns that differ immensely are nevertheless classified by listeners as being the same. Kohler addresses two specific manifestations of this problem in the relationship between F0 contours and the utterances that carry them.

Macro F0

His first experiment utilizes the minimal stress pair UMlagern and umLAGern (meaning roughly “to relocate” and “to surround,” respectively). When an F0 peak occurs between the first and second syllables – on the boundary between the /m/ and the / I / – then this can indicate either a “late peak” associated with UMlagern or an “early peak” associated with umLAGern. Hence two different underlying intonational categories, when combined with two different lexical stress locations, will result in apparently the same F0 pattern. Yet listeners are able to recognize the intended word. Kohler explores the question of how listeners recover the underlying forms (specifically where the primary lexical stress falls) from the combination of F0 with other characteristics of the acoustic signal; he uses linear predictive synthesis technology to produce versions of the utterances in which the F0 peak occurs earlier and later than the syllable boundary. The main result seems to me to challenge the widespread assumption that perception of F0 proceeds in parallel with and more or less independently of perception of the rest of the speech signal.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×