Abe, K. & Watanabe, D. (2011). Songbirds possess the spontaneous ability to discriminate syntactic rules. Nature Neuroscience 14(8): 1067–1074.Google Scholar

Abel, T. J., Rhone, A. E., Nourski, K. V., Ando, T. K., Oya, H., Kovach, C. K., Kawasaki, H., Howard III, M. A., & Tranel, D. (2016). Beta modulation reflects name retrieval in the human anterior temporal lobe: an intracranial recording study. Journal of Neurophysiology 115(6): 3052–3061.Google Scholar

Abels, K. (2013). Comments on Hornstein. Mind & Language 28(4): 421–429.Google Scholar

Aboitiz, F. (2012). Gestures, vocalizations, and memory in language origins. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience 4: 2.Google Scholar

Aboitiz, F. (2017). A Brain for Speech: A View from Evolutionary Neuroanatomy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Abraham, A., von Cramon, D. Y., & Schubotz, R. I. (2008). Meeting George Bush versus meeting Cinderella: the neural response when telling apart what is real from what is fictional in the context of our reality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20: 965–976.Google Scholar

Abutalebi, J. & Cappa, S. F. (2008). Language disorders. In Cappa, S. F., Abutalebi, J., Démonet, J.-F., Fletcher, P. C., & Garrard, P. (eds.). Cognitive Neurology: A Clinical Textbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 43–66.Google Scholar

Ackermann, H. & Ziegler, W. (2010). Brain mechanisms underlying speech motor control. In Hardcastle, W. J., Laver, J., & Gibbon, F. E. (eds.). The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 202–250.Google Scholar

Ackermann, H. & Ziegler, W. (2013). A ‘birdsong perspective’ on human speech production. In Bolhuis, J. J. & Everaert, M. (eds.). Birdsong, Speech, and Language: Exploring the Evolution of Mind and Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 331–352.Google Scholar

Acsády, L. (2017). The thalamic paradox. Nature Neuroscience 20: 901–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Adams, N. E., Teige, C., Mollo, G., Karapanagiotidis, T., Cornelissen, P. L., Smallwood, J., Traub, R. D., Jefferies, E., & Whittington, M. A. (2019). Theta/delta coupling across cortical laminae contributes to semantic cognition. Journal of Neurophysiology 121(4): 1150–1161.Google Scholar

Adger, D. (2013). A Syntax of Substance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Adger, D. (2017). A Memory Architecture for Merge. Ms. Queen Mary University of London. ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003440.Google Scholar

Adger, D. (2019a). Language Unlimited: The Science behind Our Most Creative Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Adger, D. (2019b). Linguistic Representations: A Note on Terminology vs. Ontology. Ms. Queen Mary University of London. ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/004616.Google Scholar

Adger, D. & Svenonius, P. (2011). Features in minimalist syntax. In Boeckx, C. (ed.). The Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: Blackwell. 27–51.Google Scholar

Ainsworth, M., Lee, S., Cunningham, M. O., Roopun, A. K., Traub, R. D., Kopell, N. J., & Whittington, M. A. (2011). Dual gamma rhythm generators control interlaminar synchrony in auditory cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 31: 17040–17051.Google Scholar

Akam, T. & Kullmann, D. M. 2014. Oscillatory multiplexing of population codes for selective communication in the mammalian brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 15: 111–122.Google Scholar

Akimoto, Y., Takahashi, H., Gunji, A., Kaneko, Y., Asano, M., Matsuo, J. et al. (2017). Alpha band event related desynchronization underlying social situational context processing during irony comprehension: a magnetoencephalography source localization study. Brain and Language 175: 42–46.Google Scholar

Akiyama, M., Tero, A., Kawasaki, M., Nishiura, Y., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2017). Theta-alpha EEG phase distributions in the frontal area for dissociation of visual and auditory working memory. Scientific Reports 7: 42776.Google Scholar

Alcalá-López, D., Smallwood, J., Jefferies, E., Van Overwalle, F., Vogeley, K., Mars, R. B., Turetsky, B. I., Laird, A. R., Fox, P.T., Eickhoff, S.B., & Bzdok, D. (2018). Computing the social brain connectome across systems and states. Cerebral Cortex 28(7): 2207–2232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alexander, D. M., Nikolaev, A. R., Jurica, P., Zvyagintsev, M., Mathiak, K., & van Leeuwen, C. (2016). Global neuromagnetic cortical fields have non-zero velocity. PloS ONE 11(3): e0148413.Google Scholar

Alexandrou, A. M., Saarinen, T., Mäkelä, S., Kujala, J., & Salmelin, R. (2017). The right hemisphere is highlighted in connected natural speech production and perception. NeuroImage 152: 623–638.Google Scholar

Allen, K. & Monyer, H. (2015). Interneuron control of hippocampal oscillations. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 31: 81–87.Google Scholar

Amalric, M. & Dehaene, S. (2018). Cortical circuits for mathematical knowledge: evidence for a major subdivision within the brain’s semantic networks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 373: 20160515.Google Scholar

Amalric, M. & Dehaene, S. (2019). A distinct cortical network for mathematical knowledge in the human brain. NeuroImage 189: 19–31.Google Scholar

Amundson, R. (1998). Typology reconsidered: two doctrines on the history of evolutionary biology. Biology and Philosophy 13: 153–177.Google Scholar

Amundson, R. (2006). EvoDevo as cognitive psychology. Biological Theory 1(1): 10–11.Google Scholar

Amzica, F. (2002). In vivo electrophysiological evidences for cortical neuron-glia interactions during slow (<1 Hz) and paroxysmal sleep oscillations. Journal of Physiology Paris 96(3–4): 209–219.Google Scholar

Anderson, F., Anjum, R. L., & Rocca, E. (2019). Philosophical bias is the one bias that science cannot avoid. eLife 8: e44929.Google Scholar

Anderson, M. L. (2016). Précis of After Phrenology: Neural Reuse and the Interactive Brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39: e120.Google Scholar

Andics, A. & Miklósi, Á. (2018). Neural processes of vocal social perception: dog-human comparative fMRI studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 85: 54–64.Google Scholar

Antzoulatos, E. G. & Miller, E. K. (2016). Synchronous beta rhythms of frontoparietal networks support only behaviorally relevant representations. eLife 5: e17822.Google Scholar

Arbib, M. A. (ed.). (2006). From Action to Language via the Mirror Neuron System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ardila, A., Bernal, B., & Rosselli, M. (2016). Why Broca’s area damage does not result in classical Broca’s aphasia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10: 249.Google Scholar

Armeni, K., Willems, R. M., van den Bosch, A., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2019). Frequency-specific brain dynamics related to prediction during language comprehension. NeuroImage 198: 283–295.Google Scholar

Arnal, L. H., Doelling, K. B., & Poeppel, D. (2014). Delta-beta coupled oscillations underlie temporal prediction accuracy. Cerebral Cortex 25: 3077–3085.Google Scholar

Aronov, D., Nevers, R., & Tank, D. W. (2017). Mapping of a non-spatial dimension by the hippocampal-entorhinal circuit. Nature 543: 719–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Artoni, F., d’Orio, P., Catricalà, E., Conca, F., Bottoni, F., Pelliccia, V., Sartori, I., Lo Russo, G., Cappa, S. F., Micera, S., & Moro, A. (2019). Electrophysiological correlates of syntactic structures. bioRxiv. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/660415Google Scholar

Aru, J., Aru, J., Priesemann, V., Wibral, M., Lana, L., Pipa, G., Singer, W., & Vicente, R. (2015). Untangling cross-frequency coupling in neuroscience. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 31: 51–61.Google Scholar

Asano, E. & Gotman, J. (2016). Is electrocorticography-based language mapping ready to replace stimulation? Neurology 86(13): 1174–1176.Google Scholar

Assaneo, M. F. & Poeppel, D. (2018). The coupling between auditory and motor cortices is rate-restricted: evidence for an intrinsic speech-motor rhythm. Science Advances 4: eaao3842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Atasoy, S., Donnelly, I., & Pearson, J. (2016). Human brain networks function in connectome-specific harmonic waves. Nature Communications 7: 10340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Attaheri, A., Kikuchi, Y., Milne, A. E., Wilson, B., Alter, K., & Petkov, C. I. (2015). EEG potentials associated with artificial grammar learning in the primate brain. Brain & Language 148: 74–80.Google Scholar

Attal, Y. & Schwartz, D. (2013). Assessment of subcortical source localization using deep brain activity imaging model with minimum norm operators: a MEG study. PLoS ONE 8(3): e59856.Google Scholar

Aumann, T. D. & Prut, Y. (2015). Do sensorimotor β-oscillations maintain muscle synergy representations in primary motor cortex? Trends in Neuroscience 38(2): 77–85.Google Scholar

Axmacher, N. (2016). A useful code for sequences. Nature Neuroscience 19(10): 1276–1277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Axmacher, N., Henseler, M. M., Jensen, O., Weinreich, I., Elger, C. E., & Fell, J. (2010). Cross-frequency coupling supports multi-item working memory in the human hippocampus. PNAC 107: 3228–3233.Google Scholar

Babiloni, C., Babiloni, F., Carducci, F., Cincotti, F., Cocozza, G., Del Percio, C., Moretti, D. V., & Rossini, P. M. (2002). Human cortical electroencephalography (EEG) rhythms during the observation of simple aimless movements: a high-resolution EEG study. NeuroImage 17: 559–572.Google Scholar

Backus, A. R., Schoffelen, J.-M., Szebényi, S., Hanslmayr, S., & Doeller, C. F. (2016). Hippocampal-prefrontal theta oscillations support memory integration. Current Biology 26(4): 450–457.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A., Eysenck, M. W., & Anderson, A. C. (2014). Memory. 2nd ed. Abingdon, Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Badin, A-S., Fermani, F., & Greenfield, S. A. (2017). The features and functions of neuronal assemblies: possible dependency on mechanisms beyond synaptic transmission. Frontiers in Neural Circuits 10: 114.Google Scholar

Badre, D. & Wagner, A. D. (2007). Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory. Neuropsychologia 45(13): 2883–2901.Google Scholar

Baggio, G., Cherubini, P., Pischedda, D., Blumenthal, A., Haynes, J-D., & Reverberi, C. (2016). Multiple neural representations of elementary logical connectives. NeuroImage 135: 300–310.Google Scholar

Bahramisharif, A., Jensen, O., Jacobs, J., & Lisman, J. (2018). Serial representation of items during working memory maintenance at letter-selective cortical sites. PLoS Biology 16(8): e2003805.Google Scholar

Bahramisharif, A., Mazaheri, A., Levar, N., Schuurman, P. R., Figee, M., & Denys, D. (2016). Deep brain stimulation diminishes cross-frequency coupling in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Biological Psychiatry 80(7): e57–58.Google Scholar

Baillet, S. (2017). Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging. Nature Neuroscience 20: 327–333.Google Scholar

Bakker, I., MacGregor, L. J., Pulvermüller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2013). Past tense in the brain’s time: neurophysiological evidence for dual-route processing of past-tense verbs. NeuroImage 71: 187–195.Google Scholar

Balaban, H. & Luria, R. (2016). Object representations in visual working memory change according to the task context. Cortex 81: 1–13.Google Scholar

Balari, S. & Lorenzo, G. (2013). Computational Phenotypes: Towards an Evolutionary Developmental Biolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Balari, S., Boeckx, C., & Lorenzo, G. (2012). On the feasibility of biolinguistics: Koster’s word-based challenge and our ‘natural computation’ alternative. Biolinguistics 6(2): 205–21.Google Scholar

Balezeau, F., Wilson, B., Gallardo, G., Dick, F., Hopkins, W., Anwander, A., Friederici, A. D., Griffiths, T. D., & Petkov, C. I. (2020). Primate auditory prototype in the evolution of the arcuate fasciculus. Nature Neuroscience 23: 611–614.Google Scholar

Bartolo, R., Prado, L., & Merchant, H. (2014). Information processing in the primate basal ganglia during sensory-guided and internally driven rhythmic tapping. Journal of Neuroscience 34: 3910–3923.Google Scholar

Bartolo, R. & Merchant, H. (2015). β oscillations are linked to the initiation of sensory-cued movement sequences and the internal guidance of regular tapping in the monkey. The Journal of Neuroscience 35(11): 4635–4640.Google Scholar

Bartos, M., Vida, I., & Jonas, P. (2007). Synaptic mechanisms of synchronized gamma oscillations in inhibitory interneuron networks. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8: 45–56.Google Scholar

Başar, E. (2006). The theory of the whole-brain-network. International Journal of Psychophysiology 60: 133–138.Google Scholar

Başar, E. & Stampfer, H. G. (1985). Important associations among EEG-dynamics, event related potentials, short-term memory and learning. International Journal of Neuroscience 26: 161–180.Google Scholar

Bassett, D. S. & Sporns, O. (2017). Network neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience 20(3): 353–364.Google Scholar

Bastiaanse, R. & Thompson, C. K. (eds.) (2012). Perspectives on Agrammatism. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Bastiaansen, M. & Hagoort, P. (2015). Frequency-based segregation of syntactic and semantic unification during online sentence level language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 27(11): 2095–2107.Google Scholar

Bastiaansen, M., Van Berkum, J. J., & Hagoort, P. (2002). Event-related theta power increases in the human EEG during online sentence processing. Neuroscience Letters 323: 13–16.Google Scholar

Bastiaansen, M. C. M., Magyari, L., & Hagoort, P. (2010). Syntactic unification operations are reflected in oscillatory dynamics during on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22: 1333–1347.Google Scholar

Bastiaansen, M. C. M., van der Linden, Marieke., ter Keurs, M., Dijkstra, T., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Theta responses are involved in lexical-semantic retrieval during language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17(3): 530–541.Google Scholar

Bastos, A. M., Martin Usrey, W., Adams, R. A., Mangun, G. R., Fries, P., Friston, K. J. (2012). Canonical microcircuits for predictive coding. Neuron 76: 695–711.Google Scholar

Bastos, A. M., Vezoli, J., & Fries, P. (2015). Communication through coherence with inter-areal delays. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 31: 173–180.Google Scholar

Bates, E. (1999). Plasticity, localization and language development. Broman, S.H., & Fletcher, J.M. (Eds.). The Changing Nervous System: Neurobehavioral Consequences of Early Brain Disorders. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 214–253.Google Scholar

Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1979). The Emergence of Symbols: Cognition and Communication in Infancy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bauer, A.-K. R., Bleichner, M. G., Jaeger, M., Thorne, J. D., & Debener, S. (2018). Dynamic phase alignment of ongoing auditory cortex oscillations. NeuroImage 167: 396–407.Google Scholar

Bays, P. M. (2015). Spikes not slots: noise in neural populations limits working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19: 431–438.Google Scholar

Bechtel, W. (1994). Levels of description and explanation in cognitive science. Minds and Machines 4: 1–25.Google Scholar

Beese, C., Meyer, L., Vassileiou, B., Friederici, A. D. (2017). Temporally and spatially distinct theta oscillations dissociate a language-specific from a domain-general processing mechanism across the age trajectory. Scientific Reports 7(1): 11202.Google Scholar

Bell, P. T. & Shine, J. M. (2016). Subcortical contributions to large-scale network communication. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 71: 313–322.Google Scholar

Bellmund, J. L. S., Gärdenfors, P., Moser, E. I., & Doeller, C. F. (2018). Navigating cognition: spatial codes for human thinking. Science 362: eaat6766.Google Scholar

Belluscio, M. A., Mizuseki, K., Schmidt, R., Kempter, R., & Buzsáki, G. (2012). Cross-frequency phase-phase coupling between θ and γ oscillations in the hippocampus. Journal of Neuroscience 32: 423–435.Google Scholar

Bemis, D. K. & Pylkkänen, L. (2013). Basic linguistic composition recruits the left anterior temporal lobe and left angular gyrus during both listening and reading. Cerebral Cortex 23: 1859–1873.Google Scholar

Benítez-Burraco, A. & Boeckx, C. (2015). Possible functional links among brain- and skull-related genes selected in modern humans. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 794. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00794Google Scholar

Benítez-Burraco, A., Mineiro, A., & Castro-Caldas, A. (2014). The emergence of modern communication in primates: a computational approach. In Pina, M., & Gontier, N. (eds.). The Evolution of Social Communication in Primates: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Cham: Springer. 289–311.Google Scholar

Benítez-Burraco, A. & Murphy, E. (2016). The oscillopathic nature of language deficits in autism: from genes to language evolution. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10: 120.Google Scholar

Benítez-Burraco, A., & Murphy, E. (2019). Why brain oscillations are improving our understanding of language. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 13: 190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benson-Amram, S., Dantzer, B., Stricker, G., Swanson, E. M., & Holekamp, K. E. (2015). Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores. PNAS 113(9): 2532–2537.Google Scholar

Berger, H. (1929). Uber das elektrenephalogramm des menschen. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten 87: 527–570.Google Scholar

Berger, J. I., Gander, P. E., Kumar, S., Banks, M. I., Nourski, K. V., Oya, H., Kawasaki, H., Howard III, M. A., & Griffiths, T. D. (2019). Oscillatory correlates of auditory working memory in human intracranial EEG. Poster presented at the 49th Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Chicago, 19–23 October.Google Scholar

Bergmann, T. O. & Born, J. (2017). Phase-amplitude coupling: a general mechanism for memory processing and synaptic plasticity? Neuron 97: 10–13.Google Scholar

Bergson, H. (1911). Creative Evolution. London: H. Holt.Google Scholar

Berkeley, G. (1992). “The Analyst”. 1734. Reprinted in Jesseph, D. M. “De Motu and The Analyst: A Modern Edition, with Introductions and Commentary”. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Bertossa, R. (2011). Morphology and behaviour: functional links in development and evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 366: 2056–68.Google Scholar

Berwick, R. C. (2017). A feeling for the phenotype. In McGilvray, J. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 87–109.Google Scholar

Berwick, R. C. & Chomsky, N. (2016). Why Only Us: Language and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Beukema, P. & Verstynen, T. (2018). Predicting and binding: interacting algorithms supporting the consolidation of sequential motor skills. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 20: 98–103.Google Scholar

Bhattasali, S., Hale, J., Pallier, C., Brennan, J. R., Luh, W-M., & Spreng, R. N. (2018). Differentiating phrase structure parsing and memory retrieval in the brain. Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (SCiL) 2018 74–80.Google Scholar

Bianchi, S., Stimpson, C. D., Duka, T., Larsen, M. D., Janssen, W. G., Collins, Z., Bauernfeind, A. L., Schapiro, S. J., Baze, W. B., McArthur, M. J., Hopkins, W. D., Wildman, D. E., Lipovich, L., Kazuwa, C. W., Jacobs, B., Hof, P. R., & Sherwood, C. C. (2013). Synaptogenesis and development of pyramidal neuron dendritic morphology in the chimpanzee neocortex resembles humans. PNAS 110(Supplement 2): 10395–10401.Google Scholar

Biasiucci, A., Franceschiello, B., & Murray, M. M. (2019). Electroencephalography. Current Biology 29: R80-R85.Google Scholar

Bichakjian, B. H. (2017). Language evolution: how language was built and made to evolve. Language Sciences 63: 119–129.Google Scholar

Billeke, P., Ossandon, T., Stockle, M., Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Kahane, P., Lachaux, J.-P., & Fuentealba, P. (2017). Brain state-dependent recruitment of high-frequency oscillations in the human hippocampus. Cortex 94: 87–99.Google Scholar

Binder, J. R. & Desai, R. H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15: 527–536.Google Scholar

Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex 19: 2767–2796.Google Scholar

Binney, R. J., Embleton, K. V., Jefferies, E., Parker, G. J., & Ralph, M. A., (2010). The ventral and inferolateral aspects of the anterior temporal lobe are crucial in semantic memory: evidence from a novel direct comparison of distortion-corrected fMRI, rTMS, and semantic dementia. Cerebral Cortex 20: 2728–2738.Google Scholar

Bitar, M. & Barry, G. (2018). Multiple innovations in genetic and epigenetic mechanisms cooperate to underpin human brain evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(2): 263–268.Google Scholar

Blank, I., Duff, M. C., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Fedorenko, E. (2016a). Expanding the language network: domain-specific hippocampal recruitment during high-level linguistic processing. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/091900Google Scholar

Blank, I., Balewski, Z., Mahowald, K., & Fedorenko, E. (2016b). Syntactic processing is distributed across the language system. NeuroImage 127: 307–323.Google Scholar

Bloom, H. (1997). The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blümel, A. (2017). Exocentric root declaratives: evidence from V2. In Bauke, L. & Blümel, A. (eds.). Labels and Roots. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 263–289.Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. (2011). Approaching paramaters from below. In Di Sciullo, A. M. & Boeckx, C. (eds.). The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 205–221.Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. (2013). Merge: biolinguistic considerations. English Linguistics 30(2): 463–484.Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. (2014a). Elementary Syntactic Structures: Prospects of a Feature-Free Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. (2014b). Our brain’s language-readiness. El País. 7 February.Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. (2017). A conjecture about the neural basis of recursion in light of descent with modification. Journal of Neurolinguistics 43(B): 193–198.Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. & Benítez -Burraco, A. (2014a). The shape of the human language-ready brain. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 282.Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. & Benítez-Burraco, A. (2014b). Globularity and language-readiness: generating new predictions by expanding the set of genes of interest. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1324.Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. & Fujita, K. (2014). Syntax, actions, comparative cognitive science, and Darwinian thinking. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 627.Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. & Grohmann, K. K. (2007). The Biolinguistics manifesto. Biolinguistics 1: 1–8.Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. & Theofanopoulou, C. (2015). Cognitive phylogenies, the Darwinian logic of descent, and the inadequacy of cladistic thinking. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 3: 64.Google Scholar

Bohsali, A. A., Triplett, W., Sudhyadhom, A., Gullett, J. M., McGregor, K., FitzGerald, D. B., Mareci, T., White, K., & Crosson, B. (2015). Broca’s area – thalamic connectivity. Brain and Language 141: 80–88.Google Scholar

Bolhuis, J. & Wynne, C. D. L. (2009). Can evolution explain how minds work? Nature 458(7240): 832–833.Google Scholar

Bolhuis, J. J., Beckers, G. J. L., Huybregts, M. A. C., Berwick, R. C., & Everaert, M. B. H. (2018) Meaningful syntactic structure in songbird vocalizations? PLoS Biology 16(6): e2005157.Google Scholar

Bolhuis, J. J. & Gahr, M. (2006). Neural mechanisms of birdsong memory. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7: 347–357.Google Scholar

Bolhuis, J. J. Tattersall, I., Chomsky, N., & Berwick, R. C. (2014). How could language have evolved? PLoS ONE 12: e1001934.Google Scholar

Bolker, J. A. (2008). Developing a history of evo‐devo. BioScience 58: 461–463.Google Scholar

Bonhage, C. E., Meyer, L., Gruber, T., Friederici, A. D., & Mueller, J. L. (2017). Oscillatory EEG dynamics underlying automatic chunking during sentence processing. NeuroImage 152: 647–657.Google Scholar

Bornkessel, I., Zysset, S., Friederici, A. D., von Cramon, D., & Schlesewsky, M. (2005). Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension. NeuroImage 26(1): 221–233.Google Scholar

Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Schlesewsky, M., & Small, S. L. (2014). Implementation is crucial but must be neurobiologically grounded. Comment on ‘Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: Unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition’ by W. Tecumseh Fitch. Physics of Life Reviews 11: 365–366.Google Scholar

Bosman, C. A., Lansink, C. S., & Pennartz, C. M. A. (2014). Functions of gamma-band synchronization in cognition: from single circuits to functional diversity across cortical and subcortical systems. European Journal of Neuroscience 39: 1982–1999.Google Scholar

Bosman, C. A., Womelsdorf, T., Desimone, R., & Fries, P. (2009). A microsaccadic rhythm modulates gamma-band synchronization and behavior. Journal of Neuroscience 29: 9471–9480.Google Scholar

Bota, M., Sporns, O., & Swanson, LW. (2015). Architecture of the cerebral cortical association connectome underlying cognition. PNAS 112: E2093-101.Google Scholar

Bouchard, K .E. & Chang, E. F. (2014). Neural decoding of spoken vowels from human sensory-motor cortex with high-density electrocorticography. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 6782–6785.Google Scholar

Boucher, V. J., Gilbert, A. C., & Jemel, B. (2019). The role of low-frequency neural oscillations in speech processing: revisiting delta entrainment. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 31(8): 1205–1215.Google Scholar

Bradley, C. R., Siskind, J. M., & Wilbur, R. B. (2017). Neural representation of minimal syntactic units. Annual Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience (CCN), New York. 6–8 September.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, A. R., Thompson, P. A., Wilson, A. C., Bishop, D. V. M., & Woodhead, Z. V. J. (2017). Measuring language lateralisation with different language tasks: a systematic review. PeerJ 5: e3929.Google Scholar

Bragin, A., Jando, G., Nadasdy, Z., Hetke, J., Wise, K., & Buzsáki, G. (1995). Gamma (40–100 Hz) oscillation in the hippocampus of the behaving rat. Journal of Neuroscience 15: 47–60.Google Scholar

Brandon, M. P., Koenig, J., Leutgeb, J. K., & Leutgeb, S. (2014). New and distinct hippocampal place codes are generated in a new environment during septal inactivation. Neuron 82: 789–796.Google Scholar

Brennan, J. R. & Martin, A. E. (2019). Delta-gamma phase-locking indexes composition of predicates. Poster presented at 23rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, San Fransisco, 23–26 March.Google Scholar

Brennan, J. R. & Pylkkänen, L. (2017). MEG evidence for incremental sentence composition in the anterior temporal lobe. Cognitive Science 41(S6): 1515–1531.Google Scholar

Brennan, J. R., Stabler, E. P., Van Wagenen, S. E., Luh, W.-M., & Hale, J. T. (2016). Abstract linguistic structure correlates with temporal activity during naturalistic comprehension. Brain & Language 157–158: 81–94.Google Scholar

Bressler, S. L. & Menon, V. (2010). Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14: 277–290.Google Scholar

Bressler, S. L. & Richter, C. G. (2015). Interareal oscillatory synchronization in top-down neocortical processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 31: 62–66.Google Scholar

Brilmayer, I., Sassenhagen, J., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2017). Domain-general neural correlates of dependency formation: using complex tones to simulate language. Cortex 93: 50–67.Google Scholar

Brincat, S. L. & Miller, E. K. (2015). Frequency-specific hippocampal-prefrontal interactions during associative learning. Nature Neuroscience 18(4): 576–581.Google Scholar

Brodbeck, C., Gwilliams, L., & Pylkkänen, L. (2016). Language in context: MEG evidence for modality-general and -specific responses to reference resolution. eNeuro 3(6): e0145–16.2016.Google Scholar

Brookes, M. J., Groom, M. J., Liuzzi, L., Hill, R. M., Smith, H. J. F., Briley, P. M., Hall, E. L., Hunt, B. A. E. et al. (2018). Altered temporal stability in dynamic neural networks underlies connectivity changes in neurodevelopment. NeuroImage 174: 563–575.Google Scholar

Brookes, M. J., Liddle, E. B., Hale, J. R., Woolrich, M. W., Luckhoo, H., Liddle, P. F., & Morris, P. G. (2012). Task induced modulation of neural oscillations in electrophysiological brain networks. NeuroImage 63: 1918–1930.Google Scholar

Brookshire, G., Lu, J., Nusbaum, H. C., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Casasanto, D. (2017). Visual cortex entrains to sign language. PNAS 114(24): 6352–6357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brown, J. W. (2014). The tale of the neuroscientists and the computer: why mechanistic theory matters. Frontiers in Neuroscience 8: 349.Google Scholar

Bruner, E. (2004). Geometric morphometrics and paleoneurology: brain shape evolution in the genus homo. Journal of Human Evolution 47(5): 279–303.Google Scholar

Bruner, E. & Gleeson, B. T. (2019). Body cognition and self-domestication in human evolution. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 1111.Google Scholar

Bruner, E., Preuss, T. M., Chen, X., & Rilling, J. K. (2017). Evidence for expansion of the precuneus in human evolution. Brain Structure and Function 222(2):1053–1060.Google Scholar

Brunetti, E., Maldonado, P. E., & Aboitiz, F. (2013). Phase synchronization of delta and theta oscillations increase during the detection of relevant lexical information. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 308.Google Scholar

Bryant, K. L. & Preuss, T. M. (2018). A comparative perspective on the human temporal lobe. In Bruner, E., Ogihara, N., & Tanabe, H. (eds.). Digital Endocasts: From Skulls to Brains. Replacement of Neanderthals by Modern Humans Series. Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar

Buffalo, E. A., Fries, P., Landman, R., Buschman, T. J., & Desimone, R. (2011). Laminar differences in gamma and alpha coherence in the ventral stream. PNAS 108: 11262–11267.Google Scholar

Buffat, S., Plantier, J., Roumes, C., & Lorenceau, J. (2013). Repetition blindness for natural images of objects with viewpoint changes. Frontiers in Psychology 3: 622.Google Scholar

Bufill, E. & Carbonell, E. (2004). Are symbolic behavior and neuroplasticity an example of gene-culture evolution? Revista de Neurologia 39: 48–55.Google Scholar

Bulut, T., Hung, Y. H., Tzeng, O., & Wu, D. H. (2017). Neural correlates of processing sentences and compound words in Chinese. PLoS ONE 12(12): e0188526.Google Scholar

Burgaleta, M., Sanjuán, A., Ventura-Campos, N., Sebastian-Galles, N., & Ávila, C. (2016). Bilingualism at the core of the brain. Structural differences between bilinguals and monolinguals revealed by subcortical shape analysis. NeuroImage 125: 437–445.Google Scholar

Burgess, N. & Hitch, G. J. (1992). Towards a network model of the articulatory loop. Journal of Memory and Language 31(4): 429–460.Google Scholar

Büring, D. (2015). Unalternative semantics. Proceedings of SALT 25: 550–575.Google Scholar

Burkhardt, P. & Sprecher, S. G. (2017). Evolutionary origin of synapses and neurons – bridging the gap. Bioessays 39: 1700024.Google Scholar

Burnett, D. (2016). The Idiot Brain. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar

Buschman, T. J. & Miller, E. K. (2007). Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices. Science 315: 1860–1862.Google Scholar

Bush, D. & Burgess, N. (2019). Neural oscillations: phase coding in the absence of rhythmicity. Current Biology 29: R50–R70.Google Scholar

Buzsáki, G. (2006). Rhythms of the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Buzsáki, G. (2010). Neural syntax: cell assemblies, synapsembles, and readers. Neuron 68: 362–385.Google Scholar

Buzsáki, G. & Draguhn, A. (2004). Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science 304: 1926–1929.Google Scholar

Buzsáki, G. & Freeman, W. (2015). Editorial overview: brain rhythms and dynamic coordination. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 31: v–ix.Google Scholar

Buzsáki, G. & Llinás, R. (2017). Space and time in the brain. Science 358: 482–485.Google Scholar

Buzsáki, G. & Wang, W.-J. (2012). Mechanisms of gamma oscillations. Annual Review of Neuroscience 35: 203–225.Google Scholar

Buzsáki, G., Logothetis, N., & Singer, W. (2013). Scaling brain size, keeping timing: evolutionary preservation of brain rhythms. Neuron 80: 751–764.Google Scholar

Bybee, J. L. (2011). Domain-general processes as the basis for grammar. In Gibson, K. R. & Tallerman, M. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 528–536.Google Scholar

Byrne, R. W. & Russon, A. E. (1998). Learning by imitation: a hierarchical approach. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21: 667–721.Google Scholar

Cai, D. J., Aharoni, D., Shuman, T., Shobe, J., Biane, J., Song, W., Wei, B. et al. (2016). A shared neural ensemble links distinct memories encoded close in time. Nature 534: 115–118.Google Scholar

Calabrese, A. & Woolley, S. M. N. (2015). Coding principles of the canonical cortical microcircuit in the avian brain. PNAS 112(11): 3517–3522.Google Scholar

Campion, G. & Elliot-Smith, G. (1934). The Neural Basis of Thought. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Cannon, J., McCarthy, M. M., Lee, S., Lee, J., Börgers, C., Whittington, M. A., & Kopell, N. (2014). Neurosystems: brain rhythms and cognitive processing. European Journal of Neuroscience 39(5): 705–719.Google Scholar

Canolty, R. T. & Knight, R. T. (2010). The functional role of cross-frequency coupling. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14: 506–515.Google Scholar

Canolty, R. T., Edwards, E., Dalal, S. S., Soltani, M., Nagarajan, S. S., Kirsch, H. E., Berger, M. S., Barbaro, N. M., & Knight, R. T. (2006). High gamma power is phase-locked to theta oscillations in human neocortex. Science 313: 1626–1628.Google Scholar

Canolty, R. T., Ganguly, K., Kennerley, S. W., Cadieu, C. F., Koepsell, K., Wallis, J. D., & Carmena, J. M. (2010). Oscillatory phase coupling coordinates anatomically dispersed functional cell assemblies. PNAS 107(40): 17356–17361.Google Scholar

Cao, H., Dixson, L., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., & Tost, H. (2016). Functional connectivity measures as schizophrenia intermediate phenotypes: advances, limitations, and future directions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 36: 7–14.Google Scholar

Cardin, J. A., Palmer, L. A., & Contreras, D. (2005). Stimulus-dependent γ (30–50 Hz) oscillations in simple and complex fast rhythmic bursting cells in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 25: 5339–5350.Google Scholar

Carracedo, L. M., Kjeldsen, H., Cunnington, L., Jenkins, A., Schofield, I., Cunningham, M. O. et al. (2013). A neocortical delta rhythm facilitates reciprocal interlaminar interactions via nested theta rhythms. Journal of Neuroscience 33: 10750–10761.Google Scholar

Carroll, S. B. (2006). The Making of the Fittest: DNA and the Ultimate Forensic Record of Evolution. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (2010). The Evolution of Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Castejon, C. & Nuñez, A. (2016). Cortical neural computation by discrete results hypothesis. Frontiers in Neural Circuits 10: 81.Google Scholar

Catani, M. & Bambini, V. (2014). Amodel for social communication and language evolution and development (SCALED). Current Opinion in Neurobiology 28: 165–171.Google Scholar

Catani, M., Mesulam, M. M., Jakobsen, E., Malik, F., Martersteck, A., Wieneke, C., Thompson, C. K., Thiebaut de Schotten, M., Dell’Acqua, F., Weintraub, S., & Rogalski, E. (2013). A novel frontal pathway underlies verbal fluency in primary progressive aphasia. Brain 136: 2619–2628.Google Scholar

Catchpole, C. K., & Slater, P. J. B. (2008). Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Caton, R. (1875). The electric currents of the brain. British Medical Journal 2: 278.Google Scholar

Cecchetto, C. & Donati, C. (2015). (Re)labeling. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cervenka, M. C., Boatman-Reich, D. F., Ward, J., Franaszczuk, P. J., & Crone, N. E. (2011). Language mapping in multilingual patients: electrocorticography and cortical stimulation during naming. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5: 13.Google Scholar

Chacko, R. V., Kim, B., Woo Jung, S., Daitch, A. L., Roland, J. L., Metcalf, N. V., Corbetta, M., Shulman, G. L., & Leuthardt, E. C. (2018). Distinct phase-amplitude couplings distinguish cognitive processes in human attention. NeuroImage 175: 111–121.Google Scholar

Chaieb, L., Leszczynski, M., Axmacher, N., Höhne, M., Elger, C. E., & Fell, J. (2015). Theta-gamma phase-phase coupling during working memory maintenance in the human hippocampus. Cognitive Neuroscience 6: 149–157.Google Scholar

Chaitin, G. (1977). Algorithmic information theory. IBM Journal of Research and Development 21: 350–359.Google Scholar

Chang, A., Bosnyak, D. J., & Trainor, L. J. (2016). Unpredicted pitch modulates beta oscillatory power during rhythmic entrainment to a tone sequence. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 327.Google Scholar

Chang, Le. & Tsao, D. Y. (2017). The code for facial identity in the primate brain. Cell 169: 1013–1028.Google Scholar

Chao, Z. C., Takaura, K., Wang, L., Fujii, N., & Dehaene, S. (2018). Large-scale cortical networks for hierarchical prediction and prediction error in the primate brain. Neuron 100: 1252–1266.Google Scholar

Chapeton, J. I., Haque, R., Wittig, J. H. Jr., Inati, S. K., & Zaghloul, K. A. (2019). Large-scale communication in the human brain is rhythmically modulated through alpha coherence. Current Biology 29: 1–11.Google Scholar

Charvet, C. J., Hof, P. R., Raghanti, M. A., van der Kouwe, A. J., Sherwood, C. C., & Takahashi, E. (2016). Combining diffusion magnetic resonance tractography with stereology highlights increased cross-cortical integration in primates. Journal of Comparative Neurology 525(5): 1075–1093.Google Scholar

Chen, C. C., Kiebel, S. J., & Friston, K. J. (2008). Dynamic causal modelling of induced responses. NeuroImage 41(4): 1293–1312.Google Scholar

Chen, L., Junjie, W., Yongben, F., Kang, H., & Feng, L. (2019). Neural substrates of word category information as the basis of syntactic processing. Human Brain Mapping 40(2): 451–464.Google Scholar

Chen, L., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Rogers, T. T. (2017). A unified model of human semantic knowledge and its disorders. Nature Human Behaviour 1: 39.Google Scholar

Cherniak, C. (1994). Philosophy and computational neuroanatomy. Philosophical Studies 73: 89–107.Google Scholar

Cherniak, C. (2010). Brain wiring optimization and non-genomic nativism. In Piattelli-Palmarini, M., Salaburu, P., & Uriagereka, J. (eds.). Of Minds and Language: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 108–119.Google Scholar

Chiarello, C. (2003). Parallel systems for processing language: hemispheric complementarity in the normal brain. In Banich, M. T. & Mack, M. (eds.). Mind, Brain, and Language: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 229–47.Google Scholar

Chklovskii, D. B., Schikorski, T., & Stevens, C. F. (2002). Wiring optimization in cortical circuits. Neuron 34: 341–347.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1956a). On the limits of finite-state description. Quarterly Progress Report 42: 65–65.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1956b). Three models for the description of language. IRE Transactions on Information Theory 2: 113–124.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1959). On certain formal properties of grammars. Information and Control 2: 137–167.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1963). Formal properties of grammars. In Luce, R. D., Bush, R. R., & Galanter, E. (eds.). Handbook of Mathematical Psychology. Vol. 2. New York: Wiley. 323–418.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1968). Quine’s empirical assumptions. Synthese 19(1): 53–68.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1998). Comments: Galen Strawson, Mental Reality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58(2): 437–441.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2001a). Derivation by phase. Kenstowicz, M. (ed.). Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1–52.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2001b). Beyond explanatory adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20: 1–28.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 1–22.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. Freidin, R., Otero, C. P., & Zubizarreta, M. L. (eds.). Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 133–166.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2010). Some simple evo devo theses: how true might they be for language? In Larson, R. K., Déprez, V., & Yamakido, H. (eds.). The Evolution of Human Language: Biolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 45–62.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2012). The Science of Language: Interviews with James McGilvray. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2013). Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 33–49.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2014). Minimal recursion: exploring the prospects. In Roeper, T. & Speas, M. (eds.). Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 43. Recursion: Complexity in Cognition. London: Springer. 1–15.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2015a). Problems of projection: extensions. Di Domenico, E., Hamann, C., & Matteini, S. (eds.). Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–16.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2015b). Some core contested concepts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 44(1): 91–104.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2018a). Science, mind, and limits of understanding. In Gallego, Á. J. & Martin, R. (eds.). Language, Syntax, and the Natural Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2018b). Mentality beyond consciousness. Caruso, G. (ed.). Ted Honderich on Consciousness, Determinism, and Humanity. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 33–46.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2019a). Puzzles about phases. Franco, L. & Belliuci, G. (eds.). Linguistics Variation: Structure and Interpretation – A Feschrift in Honour of M. Rita Manzini. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2019b). Lecture at MIT. April 10. http://whamit.mit.edu/2019/05/06/noam-chomskys-lectures-now-onlineGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N., Gallego, Á. J., & Ott, D. (2019). Generative grammar and the faculty of language: insights, questions, and challenges. In Gallego, Á. J. & Ott, D. (eds.). Generative Syntax: Questions, Crossroads, and Challenges. Special issue of Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 226–261.Google Scholar

Chow, B. Y., Han, X., Dobry, A. S., Qian, X., Chuong, A. S., Li, M., Henninger, M. A., Belfort, G. M., Lin, Y., Monahan, P. E., & Boyden, E. S. (2010). High-performance genetically targetable optical neural silencing by light-driven proton pumps. Nature 463: 98–102.Google Scholar

Christiansen, M. H. & Chater, N. (2016). Creating Language: Integrating Evolution, Acquisition, and Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Christiansen, M. H. & Chater, N. (2017). Towards an integrated science of language. Nature Human Behavior 1: 0163.Google Scholar

Chuderski, A. & Andrelczyk, K. (2015). From neural oscillations to complex cognition: simulating the effect of the theta-to-gamma cycle length ratio on analogical reasoning. Cognitive Psychology 76: 78–102.Google Scholar

Chuderski, A. (2016). Fluid intelligence and the cross-frequency coupling of neuronal oscillations. Spanish Journal of Psychology 19(e91): 1–13.Google Scholar

Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Citko, B. (2011). Symmetry in Syntax: Merge, Move, and Labels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clancy, K. J., Baisley, S. K., Albizu, A., Kartvelishvili, N., Ding, M., & Li, W. (2017). Transcranial alternating current stimulation induces long-term augmentation of neural connectivity and sustained anxiety reduction. bioRxiv. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/204222Google Scholar

Clarke, A. (2015). Dynamic information processing states revealed through neurocognitive models of object semantics. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30(4): 409–419.Google Scholar

Clarke, A. & Tyler, L. K. (2015). Understanding what we see: how we derive meaning from vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(11): 677–687.Google Scholar

Clarke, E., Reichard, U. H., & Zuberbühler, K. (2006). The syntax and meaning of wild gibbon songs. PLoS ONE 1(1): e73.Google Scholar

Clay, Z., Archbold, J., & Zuberbühler, K. (2015). Functional flexibility in wild bonobo vocal behaviour. PeerJ 3: e1124.Google Scholar

Clos, M., Amunts, K., Laird, A. R., Fox, P. T., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2013). Tackling the multifunctional nature of Broca’s region meta-analytically: co-activation-based parcellation of area 44. NeuroImage 83: 174–188.Google Scholar

Clouter, A., Shapiro, K. L., & Hanslmayr, S. (2017). Theta phase synchronization is the glue that binds human associative memory. Current Biology 27: 1–6.Google Scholar

Clowry, Gavin J. (2014). Seeking clues in brain development to explain the extraordinary evolution of language in humans. Language Sciences 46: 220–231.Google Scholar

Cocchi, L., Sale, M. V., Lord, A., Zalesky, A., Breakspear, M., Mattingley, J. B. (2015). Dissociable effects of local inhibitory and excitatory theta-burst stimulation on large-scale brain dynamics. Journal of Neurophysiology 113: 3375–3385.Google Scholar

Coetzee, J., Monti, M., Iacoboni, M., Wu, A., & Johnson, M. (2019). Separability of logic and language: a TMS study. Brain Stimulation 12(2): 543.Google Scholar

Cole, S. R. & Voytek, B. (2017). Brain oscillations and the importance of waveform shape. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 21(2): 137–149.Google Scholar

Colgin, L. L. (2013). Mechanisms and functions of theta rhythms. Annual Review of Neuroscience 36: 295–312.Google Scholar

Collins, J. (2015a). Naturalism without metaphysics. In Fischer, E. & Collins, J. (eds.). Experimental Philosophy, Rationalism, and Naturalism. London: Routledge. 85–109.Google Scholar

Collins, J. (2015b). Review of the minimalist program: the nature and plausibility of Chomsky’s biolinguistics by Fahad Rashed Al-Mutairi. Language 91(3): 738–740.Google Scholar

Collins, J. (2020). Conjoining meanings without losing our heads. Mind & Language 35: 224–236.Google Scholar

Comrie, B. (1992). Before complexity. In Hawkins, J. A. & Gell-Mann, M. (eds.). The Evolution of Human Language. Proceedings of the Workshop on the Evolution of Human Languages, August 1989, Santa Fe, New Mexico. Santa Fe, NM: Addison‐Wesley Publishing Company. 193–211.Google Scholar

Constantinescu, A. O., O’Reilly, J. X., & Behrens, T. E. J. (2016). Organizing conceptual knowledge in humans with a gridlike code. Science 352(6292): 1464–1468.Google Scholar

Copernicus, N. (1952). On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres. Hutchins, R. M. (ed.), Great Books of the Western World. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica.Google Scholar

Corcoran, A. W., Alday, P. M., Schlesewsky, M., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2018a). Toward a reliable, automated method of individual alpha frequency (IAF) quantification. Psychophysiology 55(7):e13064.Google Scholar

Corcoran, A. W., Pezzulo, G., & Hohwy, J. (2018b). Commentary: respiration-entrained brain rhythms are global but often overlooked. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 12: 25.Google Scholar

Cornélio, A. M., de Bittencourt-Navarrete, R. E., de Bittencourt Brum, R., Queiroz, C. M., & Costa, M. R. (2016). Human brain expansion during evolution is independent of fire control and cooking. Frontiers in Neuroscience 10: 167.Google Scholar

Covington, N. V. & Duff, M. C. (2016). Expanding the language network: direct contributions from the hippocampus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20(12): 869–870.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(1): 87–114.Google Scholar

Cowan, N., Blume, C. L., & Saults, J. S. (2013). Attention to attributes and objects in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 39(3): 731–747.Google Scholar

Crandall, S. R., Cruikshank, S. J., & Connors, B. W. (2015). A cortico-thalamic switch: Controlling the thalamus with dynamic synapses. Neuron 86: 768–782.Google Scholar

Crick, F. & Koch, C. (1995). Why neuroscience may be able to explain consciousness. Scientific American 273: 84–85.Google Scholar

Cross, Z. R., Kohler, M. J., Schlesewsky, M., Gaskell, M. G., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2018). Sleep-dependent memory consolidation and incremental sentence comprehension: computational dependencies during language learning as revealed by neuronal oscillations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12: 18.Google Scholar

Cruikshank, S. J., Ahmed, O. J., Stevens, T. R., Patrick, S. L., Gonzalez, A. N., Elmaleh, M., & Connors, B. W. (2012). Thalamic control of layer 1 circuits in prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 32(49): 17813–17823.Google Scholar

Crunelli, V., David, F., Lőrincz, M. L., & Hughes, S. W. (2015). The thalamocortical network as a single slow wave-generating unit. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 31: 72–80.Google Scholar

Cynx, J. (1990). Experimental determination of a unit of song production in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Journal of Comparative Psychology 104: 3–10.Google Scholar

Daffertshofer, A., Ton, R., Kringelbach, M. L., Woolrich, M., & Deco, G. (2018). Distinct criticality of phase and amplitude dynamics in the resting brain. NeuroImage 180(B): 442–447.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Davey, J., Thompson, H. E., Hallam, G., Karapanagiotidis, T., Murphy, C., De Caso, I., & Jefferies, E. (2016). Exploring the role of the posterior middle temporal gyrus in semantic cognition: integration of anterior temporal lobe with executive processes. NeuroImage 137: 165–177.Google Scholar

David, O., Maess, B., Eckstein, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2011). Dynamic causal modeling of subcortical connectivity of language. Journal of Neuroscience 31: 2712–2717.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. J. & Indefrey, P. (2007). An inverse relation between event-related and time frequency violation responses in sentence processing. Brain Research 1158: 81–92.Google Scholar

Davis, H. (2010). A unified analysis of relative clauses in St’at’imcets. North-West Journal of Linguistics 4: 1–43.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1976). Hierarchical organization: a candidate principle for ethology. In Bateson, P. P. G. & Hinde, R. A. (eds.). Growing Points in Ethology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 7–54.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (2006). Climbing Mount Improbable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (2015). A Brief Candle in the Dark: My Life in Science. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Dayan, P. & Abbott, L. F. (2001). Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

De Diego-Balaguer, R., Martinez-Alvarez, A., & Pons, F. (2016). Temporal attention as a scaffold for language development. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 44.Google Scholar

De Heer, W. A., Huth, A. G., Griffiths, T. L., Gallant, J. L., & Theunissen, F. E. (2017). The hierarchical cortical organization of human speech processing. Journal of Neuroscience 37(27): 6539–6557.Google Scholar

De Lange, S. C., van den Heuvel, M. P., & de Reus, M. A. (2016). The role of symmetry in neural networks and their Laplacian spectra. NeuroImage 141: 357–365.Google Scholar

De Pasquale, F., Della Penna, S., Snyder, A. Z., Marzetti, L., Pizzella, V., Luca Romani, G., & Corbetta, M. (2012). A cortical core for dynamic integration of functional networks in the resting human brain. Neuron 74: 753–764.Google Scholar

Dean, H. L., Hagan, M. A., & Pesaran, B. (2012). Only coherent spiking in posterior parietal cortex coordinates looking and reaching. Neuron 73(4): 829–841.Google Scholar

Deco, G., Cabral, J., Woolrich, M. W., Stevner, A. B. A., van Hartevelt, T. J., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2017). Single or multi-frequency generators in on-going brain activity: a mechanistic whole-brain model of empirical MEG data. NeuroImage 152: 538–550.Google Scholar

Deco, G., van Hartevelt, T. J., Fernandes, H. M., Stevner, A., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2017). The most relevant human brain regions for functional connectivity: evidence for a dynamical workspace of binding nodes from whole-brain computational modelling. NeuroImage 146: 197–210.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S. & Cohen, L. (2007). Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron 56: 384–398.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S., Charles, L., King, J-R., & Marti, S. (2014). Toward a computational theory of conscious processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 25: 76–84.Google Scholar

Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2017). The human infant brain: a neural architecture able to learn language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24: 48.Google Scholar

Dehaene-Lambertz, G. & Spelke, E. S. (2015). The infancy of the human brain. Neuron 88: 93–109.Google Scholar

Deisz, R. A. & Prince, D. A. (1989). Frequency-dependent depression of inhibition in guinea-pig neocortex in vitro by GABAB receptor feed-back on GABA release. Journal of Physiology 412: 513–541.Google Scholar

Dejean, C., Arbuthnott, G., Wickens, J. R., Le Moine, C., Boraud, T. & Hyland, B. I. (2011). Power fluctuations in beta and gamma frequencies in rat globus pallidus: association with specific phases of slow oscillations and differential modulation by dopamine D1 and D2 receptors. Journal of Neuroscience 31: 6098–6107.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. (1987). The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meaning of Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. (2018). From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Deutscher, G. (2005). The Unfolding of Language: The Evolution of Mankind’s Greatest Invention. London: Arrow Books.Google Scholar

Di Liberto, G. M., Lalor, E. C., & Millman, R. E. (2018). Causal cortical dynamics of a predictive enhancement of speech intelligibility. NeuroImage 166: 247–258.Google Scholar

Di Sciullo, A. M., Nicolis, M., & Somesfalean, S. (2013). Evo-devo language universals. Paper presented at the International Linguists Conference 19, University of Geneva.Google Scholar

Diaz, M. T. & McCarthy, G. (2009). A comparison of brain activity evoked by single content and function words: an fMRI investigation of implicit word processing. Brain Research 1282: 38–49.Google Scholar

Ding, N. & Simon, J. Z. (2013). Adaptive temporal encoding leads to a background insensitive cortical representation of speech. Journal of Neuroscience 33(13): 5728–5735.Google Scholar

Ding, N. & Simon, J. Z. (2014). Cortical entrainment to continuous speech: functional roles and interpretations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 311.Google Scholar

Ding, N., Melloni, L., Zhang, H., Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2016). Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech. Natural Neuroscience 19: 158–164.Google Scholar

Ding, N., Melloni, L., Yang, A., Wang, Y., Zhang, W., & Poeppel, D. (2017). Characterizing neural entrainment to hierarchical linguistic units using electroencephalography (EEG). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11: 481.Google Scholar

Dipoppa, M. & Gutkin, B. S. (2013). Flexible frequency control of cortical oscillations enables computations required for working memory. PNAS 110(31): 12828–12833.Google Scholar

Dipoppa, M., Szwed, M., & Gutkin, B. S. (2016). Controlling working memory operations by selective gating: the roles of oscillations and synchrony. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 12(4): 209–232.Google Scholar

Dobson, C. W. & Lemon, R. E. (1979). Markov sequences in songs of American thrushes. Behaviour 68: 86–105.Google Scholar

Doelling, K. B. & Poeppel, D. (2015) Cortical entrainment to music and its modulation by expertise. PNAS 112(45),E6233–6242.Google Scholar

Doesburg, S. M., Vinette, S. A., Cheung, M. J., & Pang, E. W. (2012). Theta-modulated gamma-band synchronization among activated regions during a verb generation task. Frontiers in Psychology 3: 195.Google Scholar

Dor, D. (2017). The role of the lie in the evolution of human language. Language Sciences 63: 44–59.Google Scholar

Doumas, L. A. A., Hummel, J. E., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2008). A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts. Psychological Review 115: 1–43.Google Scholar

Dragoi, G. & Tonegawa, S. (2013). Selection of preconfigured cell assemblies for representation of novel spatial experiences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369(1635): 20120522.Google Scholar

Dubbledam, J. L. & den Boer-Visser, A. M. (2002). The central mesencephalic grey in birds: nucleus intercollicularis and substantia grisea centralis. Brain Research Bulletin 57: 349–352.Google Scholar

Dubois, J., de Berker, A. O., & Tsao, D. Y. (2015). Single-unit recordings in the macaque face patch system reveal limitations of fMRI MVPA. Journal of Neuroscience 35(6): 2791–2802.Google Scholar

Duff, M. C. & Brown-Schmidt, S. (2012). The hippocampus and the flexible use and processing of language. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6: 69.Google Scholar

Duffy, J. R. (2005). Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.Google Scholar

Duncan, J. (2013). The structure of cognition: attentional episodes in mind and brain. Neuron 80: 35–50.Google Scholar

Edelman, G. M. (1989). The Remembered Present: A Biological Theory of Consciousness. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Egidi, G. & Caramazza, A. (2014). Mood-dependent integration in discourse comprehension: happy and sad moods affect consistency processing via different brain networks. NeuroImage 103: 20–32.Google Scholar

Eklund, A., Nichols, T. E., & Knutsson, H. (2016). Cluster failure: why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. PNAS 113: 7900–7905.Google Scholar

Eliav, T., Geva-Sagiv, M., Yartsev, M. M., Finkelstein, A., Rubin, A., Las, L., & Ulanovsky, N. (2018). Nonoscillatory phase coding and synchronization in the bat hippocampal formation. Cell 175: 1–12.Google Scholar

Ellamil, M., Fox, K. C., Dixon, M. L., Pritchard, S., Todd, R. M., Thompson, E., & Christoff, K. (2016). Dynamics of neural recruitment surrounding the spontaneous arising of thoughts in experienced mindfulness practitioners. NeuroImage 136: 186–196.Google Scholar

Elmer, S. & Kühnis, J. (2016). Functional connectivity in the left dorsal stream facilitates simultaneous language translation: an EEG study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10: 60.Google Scholar

Embick, D. & Poeppel, D. (2015). Towards a computational(ist) neurobiology of language: correlational, integrated and explanatory neurolinguistics. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30(4): 357–366.Google Scholar

Enel, P., Procyk, E., Quilodran, R., & Dominey, P. F. (2016). Reservoir computing properties of neural dynamics in prefrontal cortex. PLoS Computational Biology 12 (6): e1004967.Google Scholar

Engel, A. K. & Fries, P. (2010). Beta-band oscillations – signalling the status quo? Current Opinion in Neurobiology 20(2): 156–165.Google Scholar

Epstein, R. A., Patai, E. Z., Julian, J. B., & Spiers, H. J. (2017). The cognitive map in humans: spatial navigation and beyond. Nature Neuroscience 20(11): 1504–1513.Google Scholar

Epstein, S., Kitahara, H., & Seely, D. (2014). Labeling by minimal search: implications for successive-cyclic A-movement and the conception of the postulate ‘phase’. Linguistic Inquiry 45(3): 463–481.Google Scholar

Epstein, S. D., Kitahara, H., & Seely, T. D. (2017a). Is the faculty of language a ‘perfect solution’ to the interface systems? In McGilvray, J. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 50–68.Google Scholar

Epstein, S. D., Kitahara, H., & Seely, T. D. (2017b). Merge, labeling and their interactions. In Bauke, L. & Blümel, A. (eds.). (2017). Labels and Roots. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 17–46.Google Scholar

Esghaei, M., Mohammad Reza, D., & Stefan, T. (2015). Attention decreases phase-amplitude coupling, enhancing stimulus discriminability in cortical area MT. Frontiers in Neural Circuits 9: 82.Google Scholar

Everaert, M. B. H., Huybregts, M. A. C., Chomsky, N., Berwick, R. C., & Bolhuis, J. J. (2015). Structures, not strings: Linguistics as part of the cognitive sciences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(12): 729–743.Google Scholar

Ewerdwalbesloh, J. A., Palva, S., Rösler, F., & Khader, P. H. (2016). Neural correlates of maintaining generated images in visual working memory. Human Brain Mapping 37(12): 4349–4362.Google Scholar

Farias-Virgens, M. & White, S. A. (2017). A sing-song way of vocalizing: generalization and specificity in language and birdsong. Neuron 96(5): 958–960.Google Scholar

Fecteau, S., Armony, J. L., Joanette, Y., & Belin, P. (2004). Is voice processing species-specific in human auditory cortex? An fMRI study. Neuroimage 23: 840–848.Google Scholar

Fedorenko, E. & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2014). Reworking the language network. Trends Cognitive Sciences 18: 120–126.Google Scholar

Fedorenko, E. & Varley, R. (2016). Language and thought are not the same thing: evidence from neuroimaging and neurological patients. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1369(1): 132–153.Google Scholar

Fedorenko, E., Scott, T. L., Brunner, P., Coon, W. G., Pritchett, B., Schalk, G., & Kanwisher, N. (2016). Neural correlate of the construction of sentence meaning. PNAS 113(41): E6256–E6262.Google Scholar

Fell, J. & Axmacher, N. (2011). The role of phase synchronization in memory processes. Nature Neuroscience 12: 105–118.Google Scholar

Fellner, M-C., Gollwitzer, S., Rampp, S., Kreiselmeyr, G., Bush, D., Diehl, B., Axmacher, N., Hamer, H., & Hanslmayr, S. (2019). Spectral fingerprints or spectral tilt? Evidence for distinct oscillatory signatures of memory formation. PLoS Biology 17(7): e3000403.Google Scholar

Fernández-Ruiz, A. & Oliva, A. (2016). Distributed representation of ‘what’ and ‘where’ information in the parahippocampal region. Journal of Neuroscience 36(32): 8286–8288.Google Scholar

Fernández-Ruiz, A., Oliva, A., Fermino de Oliveira, E., Rocha-Almeida, F., Tingley, D., & Buzsáki, G. (2019). Long-duration hippocampal sharp wave ripples improve memory. Science 364(6445): 1082–1086.Google Scholar

Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., Lohmann, G., Von Cramon, D. Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Revisiting the role of Broca’s area in sentence processing: syntactic integration versus syntactic working memory. Human Brain Mapping 24: 79–91.Google Scholar

Fiebach, C. J., Vos, S. H., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Neural correlates of syntactic ambiguity in sentence comprehension for low and high span readers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16: 1562–1575.Google Scholar

Fiebelkorn, I. C., Pinsk, M. A., & Kastner, S. (2018). A dynamic interplay within the frontoparietal network underlies rhythmic spatial attention. Neuron 99: 842–853.Google Scholar

Finlay, B. L., Darlington, R. B., & Nicastro, N. (2001). Developmental structure in brain evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 263–278.Google Scholar

Fisher, S. E. (2016). A molecular genetic perspective on speech and language. In Hickok, G. & Small, S. (eds.). Neurobiology of Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 13–24.Google Scholar

Fisher, S. E. & Vernes, S. (2015). Genetics and the language sciences. Annual Review of Linguistics 1: 289–310.Google Scholar

Fitch, W. T. (2009). Prolegomena to a future science of biolinguistics. Biolinguistics 3: 283–320.Google Scholar

Fitch, W. T. (2010a). The Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fitch, W. T. (2010b). Three meanings of ‘recursion’: key distinctions for biolinguistics. In Larson, R., Deprez, V., & Yamakido, H. (eds.). The Evolution of the Human Language Faculty: Biolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 73–90.Google Scholar

Fitch, W. T. (2014a). Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition. Physics of Life Reviews 11: 329–364.Google Scholar

Fitch, W. T. (2014b). Attending to the forest and the trees. Reply to comments on ‘Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: Unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition’. Physics of Life Reviews 11: 391–399.Google Scholar

Fitch, W. T. (2017). On externalization and cognitive continuity in language evolution. Mind & Language 32: 597–606.Google Scholar

Fitch, W. T. & Friederici, A. D. (2012). Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 367(1598): 1933–1955.Google Scholar

Fitch, W. T. & Hauser, M. (2004). Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science 303(337): 377–80.Google Scholar

Fitch, W. T. & Martins, M. D. (2014). Hierarchical processing in music, language, and action: Lashley revisited. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1316: 87–104.Google Scholar

Fitch, W. T., de Boer, B., Mathur, N., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2016). Monkey vocal tracts are speech-ready. Science Advances 2(12): e1600723.Google Scholar

Flanagan, S. & Goswami, U. (2018). The role of phase synchronisation between low frequency amplitude modulations in child phonology and morphology speech tasks. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 143: 1366–1375.Google Scholar

Florez, C. M., McGinn, R. J., Lukankin, V., Marwa, I., Sugumar, S., Dian, J. et al. (2013). In vitro recordings of human neocortical oscillations. Cerebral Cortex 25: 578–597.Google Scholar

Fogerson, P. M. & Huguenard, J. R. (2016). Tapping the breaks: cellular and synaptic mechanisms that regulate thalamic oscillations. Neuron 92: 687–704.Google Scholar

Foubet, O., Trejo, M., & Toro, R. (2019). Mechanical morphogenesis and the development of neocortical organisation. Cortex 118: 315–326.Google Scholar

Frank, S. L. & Christiansen, M. H. (2018). Hierarchical and sequential processing of language. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 33(9): 1213–1218.Google Scholar

Frank, S. L. & Yang, J-B. (2017). Non-syntactic processing explains cortical entrainment during speech perception. Talk presented at the 30th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: http://tedlab.mit.edu/cuny_abstracts/12_Final_Manuscript.pdfGoogle Scholar

Frank, S. L. & Yang, J-B. (2018). Lexical representation explains cortical entrainment during speech comprehension. PLoS ONE 13(5): e0197304.Google Scholar