Adams, Sean A. “Luke, Josephus, and Self-Definition: The Genre of Luke–Acts and Its Relationship to Apologetic Historiography and Collected Biography.” In Christian Origins and Hellenistic Judaism: Social and Literary Contexts for the New Testament, edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Pitts, Andrew W., 439–59. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar

Adler, Eric. Valorizing the Barbarians: Enemy Speeches in Roman Historiography. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Aesop, . Aesop without Morals: The Famous Fables, and a Life of Aesop. Translated by Daly, Lloyd William. New York: Thomas Yoseloff, 1961.Google Scholar

Aesop, . Aesop’s Fables: With a Life of Aesop. Translated by Keller, John Esten and Keating, L. Clark. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1993.Google Scholar

Alexander, Loveday. “Fact, Fiction and the Genre of Acts.” New Testament Studies 44 (1998): 380–99.Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl, ed. The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Anderson, Paul N., Just, Felix, and Thatcher, Tom, eds. John, Jesus, and History: Aspects of Historicity in the Fourth Gospel. Vol. 2. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2009.Google Scholar

Apuleius, . The Golden Ass, or A Book of Changes. Translated by Relihan, Joel. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2007.Google Scholar

Armstrong, David, Fish, Jeffrey, Johnson, Patricia A., and Skinner, Marilyn B., eds. Vergil, Philodemus and the Augustans. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Arnal, William. Jesus and the Village Scribes. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Arnal, William. “A Parting of the Ways? Scholarly Identities and a Peculiar Species of Ancient Mediterranean Religion.” In Identity and Interaction in the Ancient Mediterranean: Jews, Christians and Others: Essays in Honour of Stephen G. Wilson, edited by Crook, Zeba A. and Harland, Philip A., 253–75. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2007.Google Scholar

Arnal, William. “The Gospel of Mark as Reflection on Exile.” In Introducing Religion: Essays in Honor of Jonathan Z. Smith, edited by Braun, Willi and McCutcheon, Russell T., 57–67. London: Equinox, 2008.Google Scholar

Arnal, William. “The Collection and Synthesis of ‘Tradition’ and the Second-Century Invention of Christianity.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 23 (2011): 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnal, William. The Symbolic Jesus: Historical Scholarship, Judaism, and the Construction of Contemporary Identity. Oakville: Equinox, 2014.Google Scholar

Arnal, William. “Mark, War, and Creative Imagination.” In Redescribing the Gospel of Mark, edited by Crawford, Barry S. and Miller, Merrill P., 401–82. Atlanta: SBL Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Asad, Talal. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Ascough, Richard S. “Matthew and Community Formation.” In The Gospel of Matthew in Current Study: Studies in Memory of William G. Thompson, edited by Aune, David E., 96–126. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2001.Google Scholar

Ash, Rhiannon. “Fractured Vision: Josephus and Tacitus on Triumph and Civil War.” In Roman Rule in Greek and Latin Writing: Double Vision, edited by Madsen, Jesper Majbom and Rees, Roger, 144–62. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar

Aune, David E. The New Testament in Its Literary Environment. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1987.Google Scholar

Bagnani, Gilbert. Arbiter of Elegance: A Study of the Life and Works of C. Petronius. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Balch, David L. Roman Domestic Art and Early House Churches. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008.Google Scholar

Baldick, Christopher. “Biography.” In The Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author.” In Image, Music, Text, translated by Heath, Stephen, 142–48. New York: Macmillan, 1977.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. The Gospels for All Christians: Rethinking the Gospel Audiences. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony, 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2017.Google Scholar

Beneker, Jeffrey. “Nepos’ Biographical Method in the Lives of Foreign Generals.” The Classical Journal 105, no. 2 (2009): 109–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, Andrew. “Expressivity: The Romantic.” In Literary Theory and Criticism: An Oxford Guide, edited by Waugh, Patricia. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. Three Critics of the Enlightenment: Vico, Hamann, Herder. Edited by Hardy, Henry. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Bieler, Ludwig. Theios aner: Das Bild des “Göttlichen Menschen” in Spätantike und Frühchristentum. Vienna: Höfels, 1935.Google Scholar

Bird, Michael F. “Sectarian Gospels for Sectarian Christians? The Non-Canonical Gospels and Bauckham’s The Gospels for All Christians.” In The Audience of the Gospels: The Origin and Function of the Gospels in Early Christianity, edited by Klink, Edward W., 27–48. London: T&T Clark, 2010.Google Scholar

Bloom, Harold. The Ringers in the Tower: Studies in Romantic Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Bodel, John. “The Cena Trimalchionis.” In Latin Fiction: The Latin Novel in Context, edited by Hofmann, Heinz, 38–51. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar

Bodel, John. “Death on Display: Looking at Roman Funerals.” In The Art of Ancient Spectacle, edited by Bergmann, B. and Kondoleon, C., 258–81. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Boecker, Bettina. “Groundlings, Gallants, Grocers: Shakespeare’s Elizabethan Audience and the Political Agendas of Shakespeare Criticism.” In Shakespeare and European Politics, edited by Delabastita, Dirk, de Vos, Jozef, and Franssen, Paul, 220–32. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Bolina, Jaswinder. Phantom Camera. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, 2013.Google Scholar

Bolina, Jaswinder. “Color Coded: On the Poetics of Donald Trump, the Progress of Poetry, and Reverse Racism.” Accessed May 11, 2016. www.poetryfoundation.org.Google Scholar

Bonner, Stanley. Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Bonz, Marianne Palmer. The Past as Legacy: Luke–Acts and Ancient Epic. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Boorstin, Daniel. The Lost World of Thomas Jefferson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Bordwell, David. Making Meaning: Inference and Rhetoric in the Interpretation of Cinema. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Borgen, Peder, et al., eds. The Philo Index: A Complete Greek Word Index to the Writings of Philo of Alexandria. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans; Leiden: Brill, 2000.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. The Logic of Practice. Translated by Nice, Richard. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Edited by Johnson, Randal. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Translated by Nice, Richard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, and Wacquant, Loïc J. D.. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Bovon, François. Luke 1: A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 1:1–9:50. Edited by Koester, Helmut and translated by Thomas, Christine M.. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. W. Fiction as History: Nero to Julian. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Bowie, Andrew. “Romanticism and Music.” In The Cambridge Companion to German Romanticism, edited by Saul, Nicholas, 243–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Boyd, Barbara Weiden. “Virgil’s Camilla and the Traditions of Catalogue and Ecphrasis (Aeneid 7.803–17).” The American Journal of Philology 113, no. 2 (Summer 1992): 213–34.Google Scholar

Boyer, Pascal. Tradition as Truth and Communication: A Cognitive Description of Traditional Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Braun, Willi. “Schooled Intelligence, Social Interests, and the Sayings Gospel Q.” Paper presented at Westar Seminar on Christian Origins. Santa Rosa, October 2007.Google Scholar

Brown, Jonathan, ed. Picasso and the Spanish Tradition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E., and Meier, John P.. Antioch and Rome: New Testament Cradles of Catholic Christianity. New York: Paulist Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Brubaker, Rogers. Ethnicity without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. Roman Imperial Themes. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf. “The New Approach to the Synoptic Problem.” Journal of Religion 6 (1926): 337–62.Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf. Theology of the New Testament. Translated by Grobel, Kendrick. New York: Scribner, 1951.Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf. Primitive Christianity in Its Contemporary Setting. Translated by Fuller, R. H.. London: Thames & Hudson, 1956.Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf. Rudolf Bultmann: Interpreting Faith for the Modern Era. Edited by Johnson, Roger A.. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf. The History of the Synoptic Tradition. Translated by Marsh, John. Peabody: Hendrickson, 1994 [1963].Google Scholar

Burke, Seán. The Death and Return of the Author: Criticism and Subjectivity in Barthes, Foucault and Derrida, 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Burridge, Richard A. What Are the Gospels? A Comparison with Graeco-Roman Biography, 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2004.Google Scholar

Burridge, Richard A. “Reading the Gospels as Biography.” In The Limits of Ancient Biography, edited by McGing, B. C. and Mossman, Judith, 31–49. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 2006.Google Scholar

Cabaniss, Allen. “A Footnote to the ‘Petronian Question.’” Classical Philology 49, no. 2 (1954): 98–102.Google Scholar

Cabaniss, Allen. “The Satiricon and the Christian Oral Tradition.” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 3, no. 1 (1960): 36–39.Google Scholar

Cappon, Lester Jesse, ed. The Adams-Jefferson Letters: The Complete Correspondence between Thomas Jefferson and Abigail and John Adams. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Cartlidge, David R., and Dungan, David L., eds. Documents for the Study of the Gospels. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Casey, Maurice. Is John’s Gospel True?. New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, S. D. “The End of Orality: Transmission of Gospel Tradition in the Second and Third Centuries.” In Between Orality and Literacy: Communication and Adaptation in Antiquity, Orality and Literacy in the Ancient World, edited by Scodel, Ruth, 10:331–55. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar

Clark, Elizabeth A. History, Theory, Text: Historians and the Linguistic Turn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Clark, Gillian. “Philosophic Lives and Philosophic Life: Porphyry and Iamblichus.” In Greek Biography and Panegyric in Late Antiquity, edited by Hägg, Tomas and Rousseau, Philip, 29–51. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Clark Keating, Louis. Aesop’s Fables: With a Life of Aesop. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1993.Google Scholar

Clarke, John. “Augustus’s and Trajan’s Messages to Commoners.” In Art in the Lives of Ordinary Romans: Visual Representation and Non-Elite Viewers in Italy, 100 B.C.E. –A.D. 315, 19–41. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Cody, Jane M. “Conquerors and Conquered on Flavian Coins.” In Flavian Rome: Culture, Image, Text, edited by Boyle, A. J. and Dominik, W. J., 103–23. Leiden: Brill, 2003.Google Scholar

Cohen, Shaye J. D. Josephus in Galilee and Rome: His Vita and Development as a Historian. Leiden: Brill, 1979.Google Scholar

Colish, Marcia L. “Stoicism and the New Testament: An Essay in Historiography.” ANRW 26, no. 1 (1992): 334–79.Google Scholar

Collins, Adela Yarbro. Is Mark’s Gospel a Life of Jesus? The Question of Genre. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Collins, Adela Yarbro. Mark: A Commentary. Edited by Attridge, Harold W.. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Conte, Gian Biagio. “Petronius.” In Latin Literature: A History, edited by Fowler, Don and Most, Glenn W., translated by Solodow, Joseph B., 453–66. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. A Companion to Petronius. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Crossley, James G. The Date of Mark’s Gospel: Insight from the Law in Earliest Christianity. London: T&T Clark, 2004.Google Scholar

Curtius, Ernst. “Rom und die Deutschen.” In Alterthum und Gegenwart: Gesammelte Reden und Vorträge. Vol. 1. Berlin, 1875.Google Scholar

Davies, Margaret. Rhetoric and Reference in the Fourth Gospel. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Davies, Penelope. Death and the Emperor: Roman Imperial Funerary Monuments from Augustus to Marcus Aurelius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Deissmann, Adolf. Licht vom Osten: Das Neue Testament und die neuentdeckten Texte aus dem hellenistisch-römischen Welt. Tübingen: Verlag von J. C. B. Mohr Siebeck, 1908.Google Scholar

Delff, Heinrich Karl Hugo, ed. Johann Georg Hamann: Lichtstrahlen aus seinen Schriften und Briefen. Leipzig: Brockhaus, 1874.Google Scholar

Denzey Lewis, Nicola. “The Limits of Ethnic Categories.” In Handbook of Early Christianity: Social Science Approaches, edited by Blasi, Anthony J., Turcotte, Paul-André, and Duhaime, Jean, 489–507. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Detering, Hermann. “The Dutch Radical Approach to the Pauline Epistles.” Journal of Higher Criticism 3, no. 2 (1996): 169–93.Google Scholar

Dietler, Michael. “‘Our Ancestors the Gauls’: Archaeology, Ethnic Nationalism, and the Manipulation of Celtic Identity in Modern Europe.” American Anthropologist 96, no. 3 (1994): 584–605.Google Scholar

Diggins, John P. The Lost Soul of American Politics: Virtue, Self-Interest, and the Foundations of Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Douglas, Mary. Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar

Dowden, Ken. Death and the Maiden: Girls’ Initiation Rites in Greek Mythology. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar

Drake, Hal A. A Century of Miracles: Christians, Pagans, Jews, and the Supernatural, 312–410. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Ducrot, Oswald, and Todorov, Tzvetan. Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1972.Google Scholar

Duff, Tim. Plutarch’s Lives: Exploring Virtue and Vice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Dupont, Florence. “Recitatio and the Space of Public Discourse.” In The Roman Cultural Revolution, edited by Habinek, Thomas and Schiesaro, Alessandro, 44–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. J. “Birth, Death, and Divinity in Porphyry’s Life of Plotinus.” In Greek Biography and Panegyric in Late Antiquity, edited by Hägg, Tomas and Rousseau, Philip, 52–71. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Ehrman, Bart D. Forged: Writing in the Name of God: Why the Bible’s Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are. New York: HarperOne, 2011.Google Scholar

Ehrman, Bart D. Jesus before the Gospels: How the Earliest Christians Remembered, Changed, and Invented Their Stories of the Savior. New York: HarperOne, 2016.Google Scholar

Ehrman, Bart D. The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to Early Christian Writings. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, Anne F. “Negotiating the Social Landscape to Create Social Change.” In Illuminating Social Life: Classical and Contemporary Theory Revisited, 5th ed., edited by Kivisto, Peter, 371–394. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Emerson, Ralph Waldo. The Annotated Emerson. Edited by Mikics, David. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. Paul and the Stoics. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2000.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. ed. Paul beyond the Judaism/Hellenism Divide. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. ed. Paul in His Hellenistic Context. London: T&T Clark, 2004.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. Cosmology and Self in the Apostle Paul: The Material Spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Eyl, Jennifer. “By the Power of Signs and Wonders: Paul, Divinatory Practices, and Symbolic Capital.” PhD diss., Brown University, 2012.Google Scholar

Eyl, Jennifer. , “Why Thekla Does Not See Paul: Visual Perception and the Displacement of Erōs in the Acts of Paul and Thekla.” In The Ancient Novel and the Early Christian and Jewish Narrative: Fictional Intersections, edited by Pinheiro, Marília P. Futre, Perkins, Judith, and Pervo, Richard, 3–12. Groningen: Barkhuis Publishing; Groningen University Library, 2012.Google Scholar

Eyl, Jennifer. , “Semantic Voids, New Testament Translation, and Anachronism: The Case of Paul’s Use of Ekklēsia.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 26, nos. 4–5 (2014): 315–39.Google Scholar

Eyl, Jennifer. , Signs, Wonders, and Gifts: Divination in the Letters of Paul. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Fantham, Elaine. Roman Literary Culture: From Cicero to Apuleius. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Feldman, Burton, and Richardson, Robert D., eds. The Rise of Modern Mythology, 1680–1860. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, John T., ed. Passions and Moral Progress in Greco-Roman Thought. London: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar

Fox, Matthew. Roman Historical Myths: The Regal Period in Augustan Literature. New York: Clarendon, 1996.Google Scholar

Frazier, Françoise. Histoire et morale dans les Vies parallèles de Plutarque. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1996.Google Scholar

Frye, Northrop. The Secular Scripture: A Study of the Structure of Romance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Fulford, Robert. “‘Lions mate with lions’: Introducing Françoise Gilot, the Woman Who Said No to Pablo Picasso.” National Post (May 10, 2016). Accessed February 16, 2020. https://nationalpost.com/entertainment/books/lions-mate-with-lions-introducing-francoise-gilot-the-woman-who-said-no-to-pablo-picasso.Google Scholar

Gabba, Emilio. “True History and False History in Classical Antiquity.” The Journal of Roman Studies 71 (1981): 50–62.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method, 2nd rev. ed. Edited by Weinsheimer, Joel and Marshall, Donald G.. New York: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar

Gager, John G. Kingdom and Community: The Social World of Early Christianity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1975.Google Scholar

Gager, John G. ed. Curse Tablets and Binding Spells from the Ancient World. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Gathercole, Simon. “The Alleged Anonymity of the Canonical Gospels.” Journal of Theological Studies 69 (2018): 447–76.Google Scholar

Gerdmar, Anders. Roots of Theological Anti-Semitism: German Biblical Interpretation and the Jews, from Herder and Semler to Kittel and Bultmann. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar

Gerstenberg, Heinrich Wilhelm. Briefe über Merkwürdigkeiten der Literatur. Schleswig: Joachim Friedrich Hansen, 1766.Google Scholar

Gill, Christopher. The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Gillespie, Gerald, Engel, Manfred, and Dieterle, Bernard, eds. Romantic Prose Fiction. Philadelphia: Benjamins, 2008.Google Scholar

Gilot, Françoise, and Lake, Carlton. Vivre avec Picasso. Paris: Calmann-Lévy, 1965.Google Scholar

Gilot, Françoise, and Richardson, John. Interview by Charlie Rose. Charlie Rose LLC, May 17, 2012.Google Scholar

Goethe, J. W.. Goethes Werke, Naturwissenschaftliche Schriften 1, Hamburger Ausgabe. Edited by Trunz, Erich. 14 vols. Munich: Beck, 1981.Google Scholar

Goodenough, Erwin. Jewish Symbols in the Greco-Roman Period: Pagan Symbols in Judaism. Vol. 8. New York: Pantheon Books, 1958.Google Scholar

Goodman, Russell B. American Philosophy and the Romantic Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Gowers, Emily. The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Grafton, Anthony. Defenders of the Text: The Traditions of Scholarship in an Age of Science, 1450–1800. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Grau Guijarro, Sergi. La imatge del filòsof i de l’activitat filosòfica a la Grècia antiga: Anàlisi dels tòpics biografics presents a les Vides i doctrines dels filòsofs més il·lustres de Diògenes Laerci. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona, 2009.Google Scholar

Graziosi, Barbara. Inventing Homer: The Early Reception of Epic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Grethlein, Jonas. Experience and Teleology in Ancient Historiography: “Futures Past” from Herodotus to Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Grimm, Jacob. “Gedanken über Mythos, Epos und Geschichte.” In Deutsches Museum, edited by Schlegel, Friedrich, 3:53–75. Vienna, 1813.Google Scholar

Grimm, Jacob, Grimm, Wilhelm, and Grimm, Herman Friedrich. Briefwechsel zwischen Jacob und Wilhelm Grimm aus der Jugendzeit. Weimar: H. Böhlaus, 1881.Google Scholar

Gruen, Erich S. Diaspora: Jews amidst Greeks and Romans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Gunkel, Hermann. “Ein Notschrei aus Anlaß des Buches Himmelsbild und Weltanschauung im Wandel der Zeiten.” Die Christliche Welt 14 (1900): 56–61.Google Scholar

Gutzwiller, Kathryn J. Theocritus’ Pastoral Analogies: The Formation of a Genre. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Hadot, Pierre. “Théologie, exégèse, révélation, écriture dans la philosophie grecque,” edited by Tardieu, M., 13–34. Paris: Le Cerf, 1987.Google Scholar

Hagen, Friedrich. Die Nibelungen: Ihre Bedeutung für die Gegenwart und für immer. Breslau: Josef Max, 1819.Google Scholar

Hägg, Tomas. The Art of Biography in Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hahn, Hans-Joachim. “Germany: Historical Survey.” In Encyclopedia of the Romantic Era, 1760–1850, edited by Murray, Christopher John, 418–21. New York: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2004.Google Scholar

Hall, Edith. Inventing the Barbarian: Greek Self-Definition through Tragedy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Hamann, Johann Georg. Sämtliche Werke. Edited by Nadler, Josef. Vol. 3. 6 vols. Wien: Thomas-Morus Presse, 1949.Google Scholar

Hamann, Johann Georg. Briefwechsel. Edited by Ziesemer, Walther and Henkel, Arthur. Vol. 5. 8 vols. Wiesbaden: Insel-Verlag, 1955.Google Scholar

Hammer, Dean. Roman Political Thought: From Cicero to Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Hansen, William, trans. and ed. Phlegon of Tralles’ Book of Marvels. Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Hansen, William, Anthology of Greek Popular Literature. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Harnack, Adolf, ed. Die Lehre der zwölf Apostel: nebst Untersuchungen zur ältesten Geschichte der Kirchenverfassung und des Kirchenrechts. Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1884.Google Scholar

Hengel, Martin. Between Jesus and Paul: Studies in the Earliest History of Christianity. London: SCM Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Hengel, Martin. The Four Gospels and One Gospel of Jesus Christ. London: SCM Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Abhandlung Über den Ursprung der Sprache. Berlin, 1772.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit. Hartknoch, 1786.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Sämmtliche Werke: Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit. Berlin: Weidmann, 1877, 1887, 1891.Google Scholar

Hezser, Catherine. Jewish Literacy in Roman Palestine. Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism 81. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001.Google Scholar

Hezser, Catherine. “Ancient ‘Science Fiction’: Journeys into Space and Visions of the World in Jewish, Christian, and Greco-Roman Literature of Antiquity.” In Christian Origins and Hellenistic Judaism: Social and Literary Contexts for the New Testament, edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Pitts, Andrew W., 397–438. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, Eric J. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Hodge, Caroline E. Johnson. If Sons, then Heirs: A Study of Kinship and Ethnicity in the Letters of Paul. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holzmeister, Angela. “Ekphrasis in the Ancient Novel.” In The Ancient Novel and the Frontiers of Genre, edited by Pinheiro, Marilia P. Futre, Schmeling, Gareth, and Cueva, Edmund P., 411–23. Eelde: Barkhuis, 2014.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Keith. “Christian Number and Its Implications.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 6, no. 2 (1998): 185–226.Google Scholar

Horrell, David G. “Aliens and Strangers? The Socio-Economic Location of the Addressees of 1 Peter.” In Becoming Christian: Essays on 1 Peter and the Making of Christian Identity, 100–132. Library of New Testament Studies 394. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2013.Google Scholar

Horsley, Richard A. Jesus and Empire: The Kingdom of God and the New World Disorder. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Horsley, Richard A. Jesus and the Politics of Roman Palestine. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Iggers, Georg G. The German Conception of History: The National Tradition of Historical Thought from Herder to the Present. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Jankuhn, Herbert, and Timpe, Dieter. Beiträge zum Verständnis der Germania des Tacitus: Bericht über die Kolloquien der Kommission für die Altertumskunde Nord- und Mitteleuropas. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1989.Google Scholar

Jay, Jeff. The Tragic in Mark: A Literary-Historical Interpretation. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014.Google Scholar

Johnson, Luke Timothy. “On Finding the Lukan Community: A Cautious Cautionary Essay.” In Contested Issues in Christian Origins and the New Testament: Collected Essays, 129–43. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar

Johnson, William A. Readers and Reading Culture in the High Roman Empire: A Study of Elite Communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Johnson, William A. “Learning to Read and Write.” In A Companion to Ancient Education, edited by Bloomer, W. Martin, 137–48. Malden: Wiley Blackwell, 2015.Google Scholar

Jones, William. The Works of Sir William Jones. Edited by Teignmouth, John. Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Josephson-Storm, Jason Ānanda. The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Josephus, Flavius. Flavius Josephus: Translation and Commentary, Volume 10 against Apion. Edited by Mason, Steve and translated by Barclay, John M. G.. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar

Jouanno, Corinne. “Novelistic Lives and Historical Biographies: The Life of Aesop and the Alexander Romance as Fringe Novels.” In Fiction on the Fringe: Novelistic Writing in the Post-Classical Age, edited by Karla, Grammatiki, 33–48. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar

Kamenetsky, Christa. The Brothers Grimm and Their Critics: Folktales and the Quest for Meaning. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Kant, Immannuel. Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays. Edited by Guyer, Paul and translated by Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Karla, Grammatiki A., ed. Vita Aesopi: Überlieferung, Sprache und Edition einer frühbyzantinischen Fassung des Äsopromans. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 2001.Google Scholar

Karla, Grammatiki A., ed. Fiction on the Fringe: Novelistic Writing in the Post-Classical Age. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar

Kazanjian, Dodie. “Life after Picasso: Françoise Gilot,” Vogue (April 27, 2012). Accessed February 16, 2020. www.vogue.com/article/life-after-picasso-franoise-gilot.Google Scholar

Kee, Howard Clark. Community of the New Age: Studies in Mark’s Gospel. Macon: Mercer University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

King, Karen L. What Is Gnosticism? Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

King, Karen L. “Factions, Variety, Diversity, Multiplicity: Representing Early Christian Differences for the 21st Century.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 23, nos. 3–4 (2011): 216–37.Google Scholar

Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, Malcolm, eds. The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Klein, Jürgen. “Genius, Ingenium, Imagination: Aesthetic Theories of Production from the Renaissance to Romanticism.” In England und der Kontinent: Subjektivität und Imagination von der Renaissance bis zur Moderne, 47–97. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2008.Google Scholar

Kloppenborg, John S. Excavating Q: The History and Setting of the Sayings Gospel. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Kloppenborg, John S. Q, the Earliest Gospel: An Introduction to the Original Stories and Sayings of Jesus. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2008.Google Scholar

Kloppenborg, John S. “Greco-Roman Thiasoi, the Ekklēsia at Corinth, and Conflict Management.” In Redescribing Paul and the Corinthians, edited by Cameron, Ron and Miller, Merrill P., 187–218. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2011.Google Scholar

Koester, Helmut. Ancient Christian Gospels: Their History and Development. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 1990.Google Scholar

Koester, Helmut. History, Culture, and Religion of the Hellenistic Age, vol. 1: Introduction to the New Testament, 2nd ed. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1995.Google Scholar

Konstan, David. “The Alexander Romance: The Cunning of the Open Text.” Lexis 16 (1998): 123–38.Google Scholar

Konstan, David. “The Active Reader and the Ancient Novel.” In Readers and Writers in the Ancient Novel, edited by Paschalis, Michael, Panayotakis, Stelios, and Schmeling, Gareth, 1–17. Groningen: Barkhuis Publishing; Groningen University Library, 2009.Google Scholar

Konstan, David, and Walsh, Robyn. “Civic and Subversive Biography in Antiquity.” In Writing Biography in Greece and Rome: Narrative Technique and Fictionalization, edited by de Temmerman, Koen and Demoen, Kristoffel, 26–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Konstantakos, Ioannis. Akicharos: He Diegese tou Ahikar sten archaia Hellada. 3 vols. Athens: Stigme, 2008.Google Scholar

Kotrosits, Maia. Rethinking Early Christian Identity: Affect, Violence, and Belonging. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Kraemer, Ross Shepard. Unreliable Witnesses: Religion, Gender, and History in the Greco-Roman Mediterranean. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Kurke, Leslie. Aesopic Conversations: Popular Tradition, Cultural Dialogue, and the Invention of Greek Prose. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Kysar, Robert. “The Contribution of D. Moody Smith to Johannine Scholarship.” In Exploring the Gospel of John: In Honor of D. Moody Smith, edited by Culpepper, R. Alan and Black, Carl Clifton, 3–17. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1996.Google Scholar

Lacher, Irene. “A Place of Her Own: Culture: Françoise Gilot, Picasso’s former Lover and Jonas Salk’s Wife, Wants to Be Known Not as the Companion of Great Men, but as Their Equal.” Los Angeles Times (March 6, 1991).Google Scholar

Lachmann, Karl. Betrachtungen über Homers Ilias. Berlin, 1847.Google Scholar

Laird, Andrew. “The True Nature of the Satyricon?” In The Greek and the Roman Novel: Parallel Readings, edited by Paschalis, Michael, Frangoulidis, Stavros, Harrison, Stephen, and Zimmerman, Maaike, 151–67. Groningen: Barkhuis, 2007.Google Scholar

Larsen, Matthew D. C. Gospels before the Book. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Last, Richard. “The Social Relationships of Gospel Writers: New Insights from Inscriptions Commending Greek Historiographers.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 37, no. 3 (2015): 223–52.Google Scholar

Law, Timothy Michael, and Halton, Charles, eds. Jew and Judean: A Marginalia Forum on Politics and Historiography in the Translation of Ancient Texts. Los Angeles: Marginalia Review of Books, 2014.Google Scholar

LeVen, Pauline A. The Many-Headed Muse: Tradition and Innovation in Late Classical Greek Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Lewis, James R., ed. The Oxford Handbook of New Religious Movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Lincoln, Bruce. Theorizing Myth: Narrative, Ideology, and Scholarship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Lissarrague, François. “Aesop, between Man and Beast: Ancient Portraits and Illustrations.” In Not the Classical Ideal: Athens and the Construction of the Other in Greek Art, edited by Cohen, Beth, translated by Gage, Jennifer Curtiss, 132–49. Leiden: Brill, 2000.Google Scholar

Litwa, M. David. Iesus Deus: The Early Christian Depiction of Jesus as a Mediterranean God. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Litwa, M. David. How the Gospels Became History: Jesus and Mediterranean Myths. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Livingston, James C. Modern Christian Thought, vol. 1: The Enlightenment and the Nineteenth Century, 2nd ed. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Luijendijk, AnneMarie, “The Gospel of Mary at Oxyrhynchus (P. Oxy. L 3525 and P. Ryl. III 463): Rethinking the History of Early Christianity through Literary Papyri from Oxyrhynchus.” In Re-Making the World: Christianity and Categories, edited by Petrey, Taylor G., 391–418. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019.Google Scholar

MacDonald, Dennis R. The Homeric Epics and the Gospel of Mark. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

MacDonald, Margaret Y. “Rereading Paul: Early Interpreters of Paul on Women and Gender.” In Women and Christian Origins, edited by Kraemer, Ross Shepard and D’Angelo, Mary Rose, 236–52. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Mack, Burton L. A Myth of Innocence: Mark and Christian Origins. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Mack, Burton L. “On Redescribing Christian Origins.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 8 (1996): 247–69.Google Scholar

Mack, Burton L. The Christian Myth: Origins, Logic, and Legacy. New York: Continuum, 2001.Google Scholar

Madsen, Jesper Majbom. “Patriotism and Ambitions: Intellectual Response to Roman Rule in the High Empire.” In Roman Rule in Greek and Latin Writing: Double Vision, edited by Madsen, Jesper Majbom and Rees, Roger, 16–38. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar

Malherbe, Abraham J. “‘Gentle as a Nurse’: The Lyric Background to I Thessalonians Ii.” Novum Testamentum 12 (1970): 203–17.Google Scholar

Malherbe, Abraham Social Aspects of Early Christianity. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Malherbe, Abraham“Hellenistic Moralists and the New Testament.” ANRW 26, no. 1 (1992): 267–333.Google Scholar

Mann, Thomas. Pro and Contra Wagner. London: Faber and Faber, 1985.Google Scholar

Mann, Thomas. Paul and the Thessalonians: The Philosophic Tradition of Pastoral Care. Mifflintown, PA: Sigler, 1987.Google Scholar

Mann, Thomas. Paul and the Popular Philosophers. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Marchand, Suzanne L. Down from Olympus: Archaeology and Philhellenism in Germany, 1750–1970. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Marchand, Suzanne L. German Orientalism in the Age of Empire: Religion, Race, and Scholarship. Washington, DC: German Historical Institute; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Mason, Steve. “Jews, Judaeans, Judaizing, Judaism: Problems of Categorization in Ancient History.” Journal for the Study of Judaism 38, nos. 4–5 (2007): 457–512.Google Scholar

Mason, Steve. Josephus, Judea, and Christian Origins: Methods and Categories. Peabody: Hendrickson, 2009.Google Scholar

McCutcheon, Russell T. “Myth.” In Guide to the Study of Religion, edited by Braun, Willi and McCutcheon, Russell T., 190–280. London: Cassell, 2000.Google Scholar

McCutcheon, Russell T. Critics Not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001.Google Scholar

McGill, Scott. Plagiarism in Latin Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Meggitt, Justin. Paul, Poverty and Survival. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1998.Google Scholar

Menninghaus, Winfried. In Praise of Nonsense: Kant and Bluebeard. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Miller, Richard C. “Mark’s Empty Tomb and Other Translation Fables in Classical Antiquity.” Journal of Biblical Literature 129, no. 4 (2010): 759–76.Google Scholar

Miller, Stephen G. “Excavations at Nemea, 1979.” Hesperia 49, no. 2 (1980): 178–205.Google Scholar

Möhler, Johann Adam. Die Einheit in der Kirche, oder das Princip des Katholicismus: Dargestellt im Geiste der Kirchenväter der drei ersten Jahrhunderte. Tübingen: Laupp, 1825.Google Scholar

Möhler, Johann Adam. Symbolik, Oder, Darstellung der Dogmatischen Gegensätze der Katholiken und Protestanten nach ihren öffentlichen Bekenntnissschriften. Mainz, 1888.Google Scholar

Moore, Gregory. Introduction to Shakespeare, by Herder, Johann Gottfried, translated and edited by Moore, Gregory, vii–xlii. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Morris, Ian, and Powell, Barry B., eds. A New Companion to Homer. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar

Moss, Candida R. The Myth of Persecution: How Early Christians Invented a Story of Martyrdom. New York: HarperCollins, 2013.Google Scholar

Mosse, George L. The Nationalization of the Masses: Political Symbolism and Mass Movements in Germany from the Napoleonic Wars through the Third Reich. New York: H. Fertig, 1975.Google Scholar

Most, Glenn W. “A Cock for Asclepius.” The Classical Quarterly 43, no. 1 (1993): 96–111.Google Scholar

Moxnes, Halvor. Jesus and the Rise of Nationalism: A New Quest for the Nineteenth-Century Historical Jesus. London: Taurus, 2012.Google Scholar

Mroczek, Eva. The Literary Imagination in Jewish Antiquity. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Nagy, Gregory. Homer’s Text and Language. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Nanos, Mark D. The Irony of Galatians: Paul’s Letter in First-Century Context. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Nasrallah, Laura Salah. Christian Responses to Roman Art and Architecture: The Second-Century Church Amid the Spaces of Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Niehoff, Maren. The Figure of Joseph in Post-Biblical Jewish Literature. Leiden: Brill, 1992.Google Scholar

Niehoff, Maren. Jewish Exegesis and Homeric Scholarship in Alexandria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. Die fröhliche Wissenschaft. Chemnitz: Verlag von Ernst Schmeitzner; New York: E. Steige, 1882.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. Briefwechsel: Kritische Gesamtausgabe. Edited by Colli, Giorgio, Montinari, Mazzino, and Anania-Hess, Helga. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1975.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. Sämtliche Werke: Kritische Studienausgabe. Edited by Colli, Giorgio and Montinari, Mazzino. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1988.Google Scholar

Nongbri, Brent. “Dislodging ‘Embedded’ Religion: A Brief Note on a Scholarly Trope.” Numen 55, no. 4 (2008): 440–60.Google Scholar

Nongbri, Brent. Before Religion: A History of a Modern Concept. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Nongbri, Brent. God’s Library: The Archaeology of the Earliest Christian Manuscripts. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Norton, Robert Edward. Herder’s Aesthetics and the European Enlightenment. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Norton, Robert Edward. “The Ideal of a Philosophical History of Aesthetics.” In Herder’s Aesthetics and the European Enlightenment, 51–81. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Novalis, . Schriften: Die Werke Friedrich von Hardenbergs, vol. 3: Das philosophische Werk II. Edited by Samuel, Richard, Kluckhohn, Paul, Schulz, Gerhard, and Rommel, Gabriele.. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1968.Google Scholar

Olender, Maurice. The Languages of Paradise: Race, Religion, and Philology in the Nineteenth Century. Translated by Goldhammer, Arthur. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Page, D. L., ed. Poetae Melici Graeci. New York: Oxford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Papadēmētriou, Iōannēs-Theophanēs A. Aesop as an Archetypal Hero. Athens: Hellenic Society for Humanistic Studies, 1997.Google Scholar

Paratore, E. “Il problema degli Pseudepigrapha.” In La critica del testo. Atti del II Congresso internazionale della Società Italiana di storia del diritto, 5–32. Reprinted in Romanae Litterae. Rome, 1976.Google Scholar

Parker, Peter. “Life’s Little Lacunae.” The Times Literary Supplement (April 30, 2010). www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/private/lifes-little-lacunae/.Google Scholar

Passannante, Gerard Paul. The Lucretian Renaissance: Philology and the Afterlife of Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Patton, Kimberley C. The Sea Can Wash Away All Evils: Modern Marine Pollution and the Ancient Cathartic Ocean. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Pearson, Alfred Chilton. The Fragments of Zeno and Cleanthes with Introduction and Explanatory Notes. London: C. J. Clay & Sons, 1891.Google Scholar

Pease, Arthur S. “Some Aspects of Invisibility.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 53 (1942): 1–36.Google Scholar

Peirano, Irene. The Rhetoric of the Roman Fake: Latin Pseudepigrapha in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Pelliccia, Hayden. “‘Where Does His Wit Come From?’ Review of Aesopic Conversations: Popular Tradition, Cultural Dialogue, and the Invention of Greek Prose, by Leslie Kurke.” The New York Review of Books (November 8, 2012).Google Scholar

Pelling, Christopher. “Plutarch’s Adaptation of His Source-Material.” In Essays on Plutarch’s Lives, edited by Scardigli, Barbara, 125–54. Oxford: Clarendon, 1995.Google Scholar

Pelling, Christopher. “Biography, Greek.” In The Oxford Classical Dictionary, 4th ed., edited by Hornblower, Simon, Spawforth, Antony, and Eidinow, Esther, 232–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Pervo, Richard I. “Wisdom and Power: Petronius’ Sat. and the Social World of Early Christianity.” Anglican Theological Review 67 (1985): 307–25.Google Scholar

Pervo, Richard I. “A Nihilist Fabula: Introducing the Life of Aesop.” In Ancient Fiction and Early Christian Narrative, edited by Hock, Ronald F., Chance, J. Bradley, and Perkins, Judith, 77–120. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Pervo, Richard I. Dating Acts: Between the Evangelists and the Apologists. Santa Rosa: Polebridge Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Peterson, Dwight N. The Origins of Mark: The Markan Community in Current Debate. Leiden: Brill, 2000.Google Scholar

Pfanner, M. Der Titusbogen. Mainz am Rhein: Philipp von Zabern, 1983.Google Scholar

Pinheiro, Marília P. Futre, Perkins, Judith, and Pervo, Richard I., eds. The Ancient Novel and Early Christian and Jewish Narrative: Fictional Intersections. Groningen: Barkhuis, 2012.Google Scholar

Plato, . Euthyphro. Apology. Crito. Phaedo. Phaedrus. Translated by Fowler, Harold North. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914.Google Scholar

Plutarch, . Lives, VII. Translated by Perrin, Bernadotte. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914.Google Scholar

Poloczek, Sławomir. “Pusty grób Kalliroe i Chrystusa.” U schyłku starożytności - Studia źródłoznawcze 13 (2014): 9–32.Google Scholar

Popescu, Valentina. “Lucian’s True Stories: Paradoxography and False Discourse.” In The Ancient Novel and the Frontiers of Genre, edited by Pinheiro, Marilia P. Futre, Schmeling, Gareth, and Cueva, Edmund P., 39–58. Eelde: Barkhuis, 2014.Google Scholar

Prag, J., and Repath, I., eds. Petronius: A Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Preuschen, Erwin. “Die Salbung Jesu in Bethanien.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 3, no. 1 (1902): 67–70.Google Scholar

Priestly, Joseph. Socrates and Jesus Compared. Philadelphia: P. Byrne, 1803.Google Scholar

Pseudo-Callisthenes. The Greek Alexander Romance. Translated by Stoneman, Richard. London: Penguin Books, 1991.Google Scholar

Pummer, Reinhard. The Samaritans in Flavius Josephus. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. “The Ancient Novels and the New Testament: Possible Contacts.” Ancient Narrative 5 (2007): 41–68.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria, and Konstan, David. “The Use of Χαρα in the New Testament and Its Background in Hellenistic Moral Philosophy.” Exemplaria Classica 14 (2010): 185–204.Google Scholar

Rasimus, Tuomas, Engberg-Pedersen, Troels, and Dunderberg, Ismo, eds. Stoicism in Early Christianity. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2010.Google Scholar

Ratner-Rosenhagen, Jennifer. American Nietzsche: A History of an Icon and His Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Reardon, B. P., trans. Collected Ancient Greek Novels. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Richard, Carl J. The Founders and the Classics: Greece, Rome, and the American Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Richardson, John. “Picasso’s Apocalyptic Whorehouse.” New York Times Review of Books (April 23, 1987), 40–46.Google Scholar

Riggsby, Andrew M. Caesar in Gaul and Rome: War in Words. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Ripat, Pauline. “Expelling Misconceptions: Astrologers at Rome.” Classical Philology 106, no. 2 (2011): 115–54.Google Scholar

Robbins, Vernon K. Jesus the Teacher: A Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation of Mark. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Roberts, Erin. “Anger, Emotion, and Desire in the Gospel of Matthew.” PhD diss., Brown University, 2010.Google Scholar

Roberts, Erin. Emotion, Morality, and Matthew’s Mythic Jesus. Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Robertson, Paul. Paul’s Letters and Contemporary Greco-Roman Literature: Theorizing a New Taxonomy. Boston: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar

Robinson, James M., Hoffmann, Paul, and Kloppenborg, John S., eds. The Critical Edition of Q. Leuven: Peeters, 2000.Google Scholar

Rollens, Sarah. Framing Social Criticism in the Jesus Movement: The Ideological Project in the Sayings Gospel Q. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014.Google Scholar

Rose, K. F. C. The Date and Author of the Satyricon. Leiden: Brill, 1971.Google Scholar

Rosen, Ralph M., and Keane, Catherine C.. “Greco-Roman Satirical Poetry.” In A Companion to Greek and Roman Sexualities, edited by Hubbard, Thomas K., 381–97. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.Google Scholar

Roth, Ulrike. “An(other) Epitaph for Trimalchio: Sat. 30.2.” The Classical Quarterly 64, no. 1 (2014): 422–25.Google Scholar

Roth, Ulrike. “Liberating the Cena.” The Classical Quarterly 66, no. 2 (2017): 614–34.Google Scholar

Rowe, C. Kavin. One True Life: The Stoics and Early Christians as Rival Traditions. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Rubenson, Samuel. “Philosophy and Simplicity: The Problem of Classical Education in Early Christian Biography.” In Greek Biography and Panegyric in Late Antiquity, edited by Hägg, Tomas and Rousseau, Philip, 110–39. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Rudd, Niall, trans. Juvenal: The Satires. Oxford: Clarendon, 1991.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. “De imitatione.” In Creative Imitation and Latin Literature, edited by West, David and Woodman, Tony, 1–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. “On Reading Plutarch’s Lives.” In Essays on Plutarch’s Lives, edited by Scardigli, Barbara, 75–94. Oxford: Clarendon, 1995.Google Scholar

Sage, Evan T., and Gilleland, Brady B., eds. The Satiricon. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.Google Scholar

Saldarini, Anthony J. “Reading Matthew without Anti-Semitism.” In The Gospel of Matthew in Current Study: Studies in Memory of William G. Thompson, edited by Aune, David E., 166–84. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2001.Google Scholar

Sandnes, Karl Olav. The Gospel “According to Homer and Virgil”: Cento and Canon. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar

Sarri, Antonia. Material Aspects of Letter Writing in the Graeco-Roman World: 500 BC–AD 300. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2018.Google Scholar

Schauer, M., and Merkle, S.. “Aesop und Sokrates.” In Der Äsop-Roman, 90–96. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar

Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph. Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling sämmtliche Werke: 1802–1803. Edited by Schelling, Karl Friedrich August. Vol. 5. Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta, 1859.Google Scholar

Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph. Werke. Auswahl in drei Bänden. Edited by Weiss, Otto. Leipzig: Fritz Eckardt, 1907.Google Scholar

Schenck, Kenneth. A Brief Guide to Philo. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2005.Google Scholar

Schilbrack, Kevin. “Religions: Are There Any?” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 78, no. 4 (2010): 1112–38.Google Scholar

Schildgen, Brenda Deen. Crisis and Continuity: Time in the Gospel of Mark. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1998.Google Scholar

Schlegel, August Wilhelm. “Ueber das Lied der Nibelungen.” In Deutsches Museum, edited by Schlegel, Friedrich, 1:9–36. Vienna, 1812.Google Scholar

Schlegel, August Wilhelm. Kritische Schriften und Briefe, vol. 4: Geschichte der romantischen Literatur. Edited by Lohner, Edgar. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1965.Google Scholar

Schlegel, August Wilhelm. Kritische Ausgabe der Vorlesungen: Vorlesungen über Ästhetik 1803–1827, edited by Jolles, Frank and Behler, Ernst. Paderborn: Schöningh, 2007.Google Scholar

Schlegel, August Wilhelm, and Schlegel, Friedrich. “Fragmente.” In Athenaeum: Eine Zeitschrift. Vol. 1.2:28–30 (frag. 116). Berlin: Rütten & Loening, 1960.Google Scholar

Schmeling, Gareth. “The Satyrica of Petronius.” In The Novel in the Ancient World, edited by Schmeling, Gareth, 457–90. Leiden: Brill, 1996.Google Scholar

Schmeling, Gareth. “Petronius and the Satyrica.” In Latin Fiction: The Latin Novel in Context, edited by Hofmann, Heinz, 23–37. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar

Schmeling, Gareth. A Commentary on the Satyrica of Petronius. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm. Philosophia Perennis: Historical Outlines of Western Spirituality in Ancient, Medieval and Early Modern Thought. Archives Internationales d’histoire Des Idées = International Archives of the History of Ideas 189. Dordrecht: Springer, 2004.Google Scholar

Schmitz, Thomas. Bildung und Macht: zur sozialen und politischen Funktion der zweiten Sophistik in der griechischen Welt der Kaiserzeit. Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck, 1997.Google Scholar

Schultz, Rima, and Hast, Adele, eds. Women Building Chicago 1790–1990: A Biographical Dictionary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Sherwin-White, Adrian Nicholas. The Epistles of Pliny: A Historical and Social Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985 [1966].Google Scholar

Slater, Niall W. Reading Petronius. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Smallwood, E. Mary. The Jews under Roman Rule: From Pompey to Diocletian: A Study in Political Relations. Boston: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar

Smith, E. P. Priestly in America: 1794–1804. Philadelphia: Blakiston, 1920.Google Scholar

Smith, Jonathan Z. Drudgery Divine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Smith, Jonathan Z. Relating Religion: Essays in the Study of Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2004.Google Scholar

Smith, Jonathan Z. On Teaching Religion. Edited by Lehrich, Christopher I.. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. “The Study of Religion and the Study of the Bible.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 39, no. 2 (1971): 131–40.Google Scholar

Snyder, H. Gregory. Teachers and Texts in the Ancient World: Philosophers, Jews and Christians. New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar

Sparling, Robert Alan. Johann Georg Hamann and the Enlightenment Project. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Spittler, Janet, Animals in the Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles. WUNT 247. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008.Google Scholar

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Translator’s Preface to Of Grammatology, by Jacques Derrida, translated by Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, ix–lxxxvii. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Staël, Mme. De l’Allemagne. New York: Roe Lockwood & Son, 1860.Google Scholar

Stark, Rodney. The Rise of Mormonism. Edited by Neilson, Reid L.. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Starr, Raymond. “The Circulation of Literary Texts in the Roman World.” The Classical Quarterly 17, no. 1 (1987): 213–223.Google Scholar

Stevenson, Jane. Women Latin Poets: Language, Gender, and Authority, from Antiquity to the Eighteenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Stoneman, Richard. The Greek Alexander Romance. London: Penguin, 1991.Google Scholar

Stowers, Stanley K. A Rereading of Romans: Justice, Jews, and Gentiles. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Stowers, Stanley K. “The Ontology of Religion.” In Introducing Religion: Essays in Honor of Jonathan Z. Smith, edited by Braun, Willi and McCutcheon, Russell T., 434–49. Oakville: Equinox, 2008.Google Scholar

Stowers, Stanley K. “The Apostle Paul.” In The History of Western Philosophy of Religion, vol. 1: Ancient Philosophy of Religion, edited by Oppy, Graham Robert and Trakakis, Nick, 145–57. Durham: Acumen, 2009.Google Scholar

Stowers, Stanley K. “Jesus the Teacher and Stoic Ethics in the Gospel of Matthew.” In Stoicism in Early Christianity, edited by Rasimus, Tuomas, Engberg-Pedersen, Troels, and Dunderberg, Ismo, 59–76. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2010.Google Scholar

Stowers, Stanley K. “The Concept of ‘Community’ and the History of Early Christianity.” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 23, nos. 3–4 (2011): 238–56.Google Scholar

Stowers, Stanley K. “Kinds of Myths, Meals and Power: Paul and Corinthians.” In Redescribing Paul and the Corinthians, edited by Cameron, Ron and Miller, Merrill P., 105–49. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2011.Google Scholar

Stowers, Stanley K. “Paul and the Terrain of Philosophy.” Early Christianity 6 (2015): 141–56.Google Scholar

Struck, Peter T. Birth of the Symbol: Ancient Readers at the Limits of Their Texts. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Struck, Peter T. “The Genealogy of the Symbolic.” In Birth of the Symbol: Ancient Readers at the Limits of Their Texts, 1–20. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Struthers Malbon, Elizabeth. “Galilee and Jerusalem: History and Literature in Marcan Interpretation.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 44, no. 2 (April 1, 1982): 242.Google Scholar

Tacitus, . Agricola. Germania. Dialogue on Oratory. Translated by Peterson, William and Hutton, Maurice. LCL 35. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914.Google Scholar

Tartar, Maria. The Hard Facts of the Grimms’ Fairy Tales. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Temmerman, Koen. Crafting Characters: Heroes and Heroines in the Ancient Greek Novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Theissen, Gerd. Sociology of Early Palestinian Christianity. Translated by Bowden, John. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Theissen, Gerd. “Social Stratification in the Corinthian Community: A Contribution to the Sociology of Early Hellenistic Christianity.” In The Social Setting of Pauline Christianity: Essays on Corinth, translated by Schütz, John H., 69–119. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Theissen, Gerd. The Gospels in Context: Social and Political History in the Synoptic Tradition. Translated by Maloney, Linda M.. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Theissen, Gerd. “The Wandering Radicals: Light Shed by Sociology of Literature on the Early Transmission of the Jesus Sayings.” In Social Reality and the Early Christians: Theology, Ethics, and the World of the New Testament, translated by Kohl, Margaret, 33–59. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Theissen, Gerd. The Religion of the Earliest Churches: Creating a Symbolic World. Translated by Bowden, John. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Theissen, Gerd. Die Religion der ersten Christen: Eine Theorie des Urchristentums. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 2000.Google Scholar

Thom, Johan. “Cleanthes Hymn to Zeus and Early Christian Literature.” In Antiquity and Humanity: Essays on Ancient Religion and Philosophy, edited by Collins, Adela Yarbro and Mitchell, Margaret M., 477–99. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001.Google Scholar

Thom, Martin. Republics, Nations, and Tribes. London: Verso, 1995.Google Scholar

Thomas, Christine M. “Stories without Texts and without Authors: The Problem of Fluidity in Ancient Novelistic Texts and Early Christian Literature.” In Ancient Fiction and Early Christian Narrative, edited by Hock, Ronald F., Chance, J. Bradley, and Perkins, Judith, 273–91. SBL Symposium Series 6. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Thomas, Richard F. Lands and Peoples in Roman Poetry, Cambridge Philological Society Supp. Vol. 7. Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society, 1982.Google Scholar

Thorsteinsson, Runar M. Roman Christianity and Roman Stoicism: A Comparative Study of Ancient Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Tomashevsky, Boris. “Literary Genres.” In Formalism: History, Comparison, Genre, edited by O’Toole, L. M. and Shukman, Ann, 52–93. Russian Poetics in Translation 5. Oxford: Holdan Books, 1978.Google Scholar

Trautmann, Thomas R. Aryans and British India. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Trevor-Roper, Hugh. “The Invention of Tradition: The Highland Tradition of Scotland.” In The Invention of Tradition, edited by Hobsbawm, E. J. and Ranger, T. O., 15–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Tuckett, Christopher. From the Sayings to the Gospels. WUNT 328. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014.Google Scholar

Turner, Frank M. The Greek Heritage in Victorian Britain. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Tyson, Joseph B. Marcion and Luke–Acts: A Defining Struggle. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Urbano, Arthur P. The Philosophical Life: Biography and the Crafting of Intellectual Identity in Late Antiquity. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Vayntrub, Jacqueline. Beyond Orality: Biblical Poetry on Its Own Terms. London: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar

von Groningen, Bernard A. “ΕΚΔΟΣΙΣ.” Mnemosyne 16 (1963): 1–17.Google Scholar

Vorster, Willem S. “Kerygma/History and the Gospel Genre.” In Speaking of Jesus: Essays on Biblical Language, Gospel Narrative and the Historical Jesus, edited by Botha, J. Eugene, 129–38. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar

Waite, Charles B. “Notes of Travel.” In Chicago Law Times, vol. 2, edited by Waite, Catharine V., 326–28. Chicago: C. V. Waite, 1888.Google Scholar

Walbank, Frank W. “Profit or Amusement: Some Thoughts on the Motives of Hellenistic Historians.” In Polybius, Rome and the Hellenistic World: Essays and Reflections, 231–41. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew. Suetonius: The Scholar and His Caesars. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Walsh, P. G. Petronius: The Satyricon. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Walsh, Robyn Faith. “The Influence of the Romantic Genius in Early Christian Studies.” Relegere 5, no. 1 (2015): 31–60.Google Scholar

Walsh, Robyn. “Q and the ‘Big Bang’ Theory of Christian Origins.” In Redescribing the Gospel of Mark, edited by Crawford, Barry S. and Miller, Merrill P., 483–533. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2017.Google Scholar

Walsh, Robyn. “Religion Is a ‘Private Matter.’” In Stereotyping Religion: Critiquing Clichés, edited by Stoddard, Brad and Martin, Craig, 69–81. London: Bloomsbury, 2017.Google Scholar

Walsh, Robyn. “IVDAEA DEVICTA: The Gospels as Imperial ‘Captive Literature.’” In The Bible and Class Struggle, edited by Myles, Robert, 89–114. London: Lexington Books, 2019.Google Scholar

Walsh, Robyn. “The Satyrica and the Gospels in the Second Century,” The Classical Quarterly, 70, no. 1 (2020): 356–367.Google Scholar

Walsh, Robyn. “Revisiting Paul’s Letter to the Laodiceans: Rejected Literature and Useful Books.” To appear in volume dedicated to François Bovon. Edited by Landau, Brent et al. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Wasserman, Emma. The Death of the Soul in Romans 7: Sin, Death, and the Law in Light of Hellenistic Moral Psychology. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008.Google Scholar

Wästberg, Per. The Journey of Anders Sparrman: A Biographical Novel. London: Granta Books, 2010.Google Scholar

Wendt, Heidi. At the Temple Gates: The Religion of Freelance Experts in the Early Roman Empire. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, M. L. The Orphic Poems. Oxford: Clarendon, 1983.Google Scholar

West, M. L. “The Invention of Homer.” The Classical Quarterly 49, no. 2 (1999): 364–82.Google Scholar

White, Hayden V. The Fiction of Narrative: Essays on History, Literature, and Theory, 1957–2007. Edited by Doran, Robert. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, Hayden V. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, Tim. Greek Literature and the Roman Empire: The Politics of Imitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, Tim. The Second Sophistic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Ulrich. Homerische untersuchungen. Berlin: Weidmann, 1884.Google Scholar

Williams, Craig A. Reading Roman Friendship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Williams, Gordon. “Phases in Political Patronage of Literature in Rome.” In Literary and Artistic Patronage in Ancient Rome, edited by Gold, Barbara K., 3–49. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Williamson, George S. The Longing for Myth in Germany: Religion and Aesthetic Culture from Romanticism to Nietzsche. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Wilson, Emily R. “Pain and Revelation: The Death of Socrates and the Death of Jesus.” In The Death of Socrates, 141–69. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Winn, Adam. The Purpose of Mark’s Gospel: An Early Christian Response to Roman Imperial Propaganda. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008.Google Scholar

Wolf, F. A. Prolegomena to Homer, 1795. Translated by Grafton, Anthony, Most, Glenn W., and Zetzel, James E. G.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. Rhetoric in Classical Historiography: Four Studies. Portland: Areopagitica Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Wrede, William. The Messianic Secret. Translated by Greig, J. C. G.. Cambridge: J. Clarke, 1971.Google Scholar

Wright, N. T. The New Testament and the People of God. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Young, Iris Marion. “The Ideal of Community and the Politics of Difference.” In Feminism/Postmodernism, edited by Nicholson, Linda J., 300–323. New York: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar

Zammito, John H. Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar