Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:43:37.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Understanding subsurface contamination using conceptual and mathematical models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

John A. Wiens
Affiliation:
PRBO Conservation Science, California and University of Western Australia, Perth
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Petroleum spills and other sources of hydrocarbon contamination represent risks for society. Regardless of whether oil is stranded on a shoreline, spilled from a pipeline, or leaked from underground storage tanks, the same basic physical and chemical principles characterize exposure levels of contaminants. The purpose of this chapter is to explain and illustrate these principles. In particular, we use these principles to explain the apparent paradox of how oil residues persist at some shorelines of Prince William Sound (PWS) as isolated subsurface patches, but yet pose little if any exposure risk to the local ecology. We resolve this apparent paradox using well-established scientific and engineering tools.

One of the biggest challenges of any study of a contaminated site is identifying the most important questions and the most important observations and data needed to answer these questions. This challenge is discussed in this chapter in both a general way and for the PWS study in particular. One of the key lessons learned from this study was the need for experts in multiphase flow in contaminated sediments to be a central part of the team addressing these questions. Our goal is to convey a coherent understanding and perspective that brings all of the observations and measurements by various environmental experts of different scientific disciplines into a consistent explanation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Oil in the Environment
Legacies and Lessons of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill
, pp. 144 - 175
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abriola, L.M. (1989). Modeling multiphase migration of organic chemicals in groundwater systems: a review and assessment. Environmental Health Perspectives 83: 117–143.Google ScholarPubMed
Abriola, L.M. and Pinder, G.F. (1985). A multiphase approach to the modeling of porous media contamination by organic compounds. 2: Numerical simulation. Water Resources Research 21(1): 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M.P. and Woessner, W.W. (1992). Applied Groundwater Modeling. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press. ISBN-10: 0120594854; ISBN-13: 9780120594856.Google Scholar
Atlas, R. and Bragg, J.R. (2009). Evaluation of PAH depletion of subsurface Exxon Valdez oil residues remaining in Prince William Sound in 2007–2008 and their likely bioremediation potential. In Proceedings of the 32nd Arctic and Marine Oilspill Program (AMOP) Technical Seminar, June 9–11, 2009, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Environment Canada; pp. 723–747.Google Scholar
Bear, J. (1979). Hydraulics of Groundwater. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill. ISBN-10: 0486453552; ISBN-13 9780486453552. Also reprinted (2007); Mineola, NY, USA: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Bear, J., Beljin, M.S., and Ross, R.R. (1992). Fundamentals of Ground-Water Modeling. Washington DC, USA: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response; EPA/540/S-92/005.Google Scholar
Boehm, P.D., Neff, J.M., and Page, D.S. (2007). Assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure in the waters of Prince William Sound after the Exxon Valdez oil spill: 1989–2005. Marine Pollution Bulletin 54(3): 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehm, P.D., Page, D.S., Brown, J.S., Neff, J.M., Bragg, J.R., and Atlas, R.M. (2008). Distribution and weathering of crude oil residues on shorelines 18 years after the Exxon Valdez spill. Environmental Science & Technology 42(24): 9210–9216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boehm, P.D., Page, D.S., Brown, J.S., Neff, J.M., and Burns, W.A. (2004). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon levels in mussels from Prince William Sound, Alaska, document the return to baseline conditions. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 23(12): 2916–2929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwer, H. and Rice, R.C. (1976). A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells. Water Resources Research 12(3): 423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, R.H. and Corey, A.T. (1964). Hydraulic Properties of Porous Media. Fort Collins, CO, USA: Colorado State University, Civil Engineering Department; Hydrology Paper 3.Google Scholar
Carls, M.G., Holland, L., Larsen, M., Collier, T.K., Scholz, N.L., and Incardona, J.P. (2008). Fish embryos are damaged by dissolved PAHs, not oil particles. Aquatic Toxicology 88(2): 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charbeneau, R.J. (2000). Ground Water Hydraulics and Pollutant Transport. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall. ISBN-10: 0139756167; ISBN-13:9780139756160.Google Scholar
Coats, K. (1982). Reservoir simulation: state of the art. Journal of Petroleum Technology 34(8): 1633–1642; SPE Paper 10020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cygan, R.T., Stevens, C.T., Puls, R.W., Yabusaki, S.B., Wauchope, R.D., McGrath, C.J., Curtis, G.P., Siegel, M.D., Veblen, L.A., and Turner, D.R. (2007). Research activities at US government agencies in subsurface reactive transport modeling. Vadose Zone Journal 6(4): 805–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delshad, M. and Pope, G.A. (1989). Comparison of the three-phase oil relative permeability models. Transport in Porous Media 4(1): 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delshad, M., Pope, G.A., and Sepehrnoori, K. (1996). A compositional simulator for modeling surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation. 1. Formulation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 23(4): 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domenico, P.A. and Schwartz, W. (1998). Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology, 2nd edn. Indianapolis, IN, USA: Wiley. ISBN-10: 0471597629; ISBN-13: 9780471597629.Google Scholar
Douglas, J., Peaceman, D.W., and Rachford, H.H. (1959). A method for calculating multidimensional immiscible displacement. Transactions of the American Institute of Mechanical Engineers 216: 297–308.Google Scholar
Dwarakanath, V., Jackson, R.E., and Pope, G.A. (2002). Influence of wettability on the recovery of NAPLs from alluvium. Environmental Science & Technology 36(2): 227–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farr, A.M., Houghtalen, R.J., and McWhorter, D.B. (1990). Volume estimation of light nonaqueous phase liquids in porous media. Ground Water 28(1): 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, S. and Cherry, J.A. (1988). Subsurface contamination by dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) chemicals. In Proceedings of the International Groundwater Symposium, International Association of Hydrogeologists, May 1–5, 1988, Halifax, Nova Scotia. C.L. Lin, ed. Goring, Reading, UK: International Association of Hydrogeologists; pp. 62–69.Google Scholar
Fetter, C.W. (1993). Contaminant Hydrogeology. New York, NY, USA: Macmillan Publishing Company. ISBN-10: 0023371358; ISBN-13: 9780023371356.Google Scholar
Freeze, R.A. and Cherry, J.A. (1979). Groundwater. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall. ISBN-10 0133653129; ISBN-13: 9780133653120.Google Scholar
Guo, Q., Li, H.., Boufadel, M.C., and Sharifi, Y. (2010). Hydrodynamics in a gravel beach and its impact on the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Journal of Geophysical Research, Oceans 115: C02717; .Google Scholar
Hayes, M.O. and Michel, J. (1999). Factors determining the long-term persistence of Exxon Valdez oil in gravel beaches. Marine Pollution Bulletin 38(2): 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, M.C. (2006). The practical use of simplicity in developing ground water models. Ground Water 44(6): 775–781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lake, L.W. (1989). Enhanced Oil Recovery. Old Tappan, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall. ISBN-10: 0132816016; ISBN-13: 978155563305–9. Also reprinted (2010): Allen, TX, USA: Society of Petroleum Engineers (original edition).Google Scholar
Li, H. and Boufadel, M.C. (2010). Long-term persistence of oil from the Exxon Valdez spill in two-layer beaches. Nature Geoscience 3(2): 96–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, D.M., Roberts, P.V., and Cherry, J.A. (1985). Transport of organic contaminants in groundwater. Environmental Science & Technology 19(5): 384–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mariner, P.E., Jin, M., and Jackson, R.E. (1997). An algorithm for the estimation of NAPL saturation and composition from typical soil chemical analyses. Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation 17(2): 122–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, J.W. and Cohen, R.W. (1990). A review of immiscible fluids in the subsurface: Properties, models, characterization and remediation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 6(2): 107–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, J.W. and Faust, C.R. (1980). Ground-water modeling: an overview. Ground Water 18(3): 212–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, J., Nixon, Z., and Cotsapas, L. (2006). Evaluation of Oil Remediation Technologies for Lingering Oil from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill in Prince William Sound. Juneau, AK, USA: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service; Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Restoration Project 050778 Final Report.Google Scholar
Muskat, M. (1949). Physical Principles of Oil Production. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Newell, C.J., Acree, S.D., Ross, R.R., and Huling, S.G. (1995). Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids. Ada, OK, USA: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory; EPA/540/5-95/500.Google Scholar
Owens, E.H., Taylor, E., and Humphrey, B. (2008). The persistence and character of stranded oil on coarse-sediment beaches. Marine Pollution Bulletin 56(1): 14–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Page, D.S., Boehm, P.D., and Neff, J.M. (2008). Shoreline type and subsurface oil persistence in the Exxon Valdez spill zone of Prince William Sound, Alaska. In Proceedings of the 31st Arctic and Marine Oilspill Program (AMOP) Technical Seminar, June 3–5, 2008, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Environment Canada; pp. 545–563.Google Scholar
Panday, S. and Huyakorn, P.S. (2008). MODFLOW SURFACT: a state-of-the-art use of vadose zone flow and transport equations and numerical techniques for environmental evaluations. Vadose Zone Journal 7(2): 610–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pankow, J.F. and Cherry, J.A. (1996). Dense Chlorinated Solvents and other DNAPLs in Groundwater. Portland, OR, USA: Waterloo Press. ISBN-10: 0964801418; ISBN-13: 9780964801417.Google Scholar
Poeter, E. and Gaylord, D.R. (1990). Influence of aquifer heterogeneity on contaminant transport at the Hanford site. Ground Water 28(6): 900–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, G.A., Gordon, K.D., and Bragg, J.R. (2011a). Fundamental reservoir engineering principles explain lenses of shoreline oil residue twenty years after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In Proceedings of the Society of Petroleum Engineers’ Americas E&P Health, Safety, Security, and Environmental Conference, March 21–23, 2011, Houston, Texas. Houston, TX, USA: Society for Petroleum Engineers; SPE Paper 141809.Google Scholar
Pope, G.A., Gordon, K.D., and Bragg, J.R. (2011b). Using fundamental practices to explain field observations twenty-one years after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Oil Spill Conference (Promoting the Science of Spill Response), May 24–26, 2011, Portland, Oregon, USA. Washington DC, USA: American Petroleum Institute.Google Scholar
Pruess, K. (2004). The TOUGH codes: a family of simulation tools for multiphase flow and transport processes in permeable media. Vadose Zone Journal 3(3): 738–746.Google Scholar
Pruess, K. and Narasimhan, T.N. (1985). A practical method for modeling fluid and heat flow in fractured porous media. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal 25: 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saenton, S., Illangasekare, T.H., Soga, K., and Saba, T. (2002). Effects of source zone heterogeneity on surfactant enhanced NAPL dissolution and resulting remediation end-points. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 59(1–2): 27–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwille, F. (1975). Groundwater pollution by mineral oil products. In Groundwater Pollution Symposium, Proceedings of the Moscow Symposium, August 1971. Washington DC, USA: International Association of Hydrological Sciences; IAHS-AISH Publication No. 103; pp. 226–240.Google Scholar
Shepherd, R.G. (1989). Correlations of permeability and grain-size. Ground Water 27(5): 633–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, J.W., Lindeberg, M.R., Harris, P.M., Maselko, J.M., Pella, J.J., and Rice, S.D. (2004). Estimate of oil persisting on beaches of Prince William Sound, 12 years after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Environmental Science & Technology 38(1): 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, K.W. (1968). Effects of the Alaska Earthquake of March 27, 1964, on Shore Processes and Beach Morphology. Denver, CO, USA: US Geological Survey, Information Services; USGS Professional Paper 543-J.
Taylor, E. and Reimer, P.D. (2008). Oil persistence on beaches in Prince William Sound: a review of SCAT surveys conducted from 1989 to 2002. Marine Pollution Bulletin 56(3): 458–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theis, C.V., Brown, R.H., and Meyer, R.R. (1963). Estimating the transmissivity of aquifers from the specific capacity of wells. In Methods of Determining Permeability, Transmissibility and Drawdown: Ground-Water Hydraulics. Bentall, R., compiler. Alexandria, VA, USA: USGeological Survey, Distribution Branch; Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1536-I; pp. 331–341.Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency (1988). Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies under CERCLA. Washington DC, USA: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response; Final Interim; EPA/540/G-89/004, OSWER Directive 9355.3–01; October 1988.Google Scholar
van Bavel, C.H.M. and Kirkham, D. (1948). Field measurement of soil permeability using auger holes. Soil Science Society of America Journal 13(C): 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Genuchten, M.Th. (1980). A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44(5): 892–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venosa, A.D., Campo, P., and Suidan, M.T. (2010). Biodegradability of lingering crude oil 19 years after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Environmental Science & Technology 44(19): 7613–7621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xia, Y., Li, H.., Boufadel, M.C, and Sharifi, Y. (2010). Hydrodynamic actors affecting the persistence of the Exxon Valdez oil in a shallow bedrock beach. Water Resources Research 46: W10528; .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×