Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:50:01.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Tonality and the Analysis of Sub-Minimal Words in Ao

from Phonology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2011

T. Temsunungsang
Affiliation:
The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad
Stephen Morey
Affiliation:
Research Fellow, La Trobe University, Australia
Mark Post
Affiliation:
Research Fellow, La Trobe University, Australia
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Chungli and Mongsen are two of the three major dialects of the Ao language spoken by the Aos in Nagaland. These two labels refer both to the group as well as the dialect that they speak. The tradition of these groups has been oral and hence, most of the historical legends cannot be verified from written records. One such legend claims that the Chungli and the Mongsen were two separate groups initially. Clark (1911) notes that the Mongsen were overcome in a raid by the Chungli and had to submit to them by moving into their village. For long, they lived together but followed their own traditions and customs with clear geographical demarcations within the village. However, intermarriage brought these two groups together. At present, there are a few villages where these two groups live together occupying two different parts of the village while in some villages we see that one of the two no longer exists. However, there are villages which have been purely monolingual too. A rough estimate given by Coupe is that 50% of the Ao population speak Chungli while 40% speak Mongsen. The remaining 10% speak other Ao dialects.

Given the close proximity and language contact situation these two groups share, we attempt to look at these dialects from a comparative perspective. This paper aims to look at the phonological word in Chungli and Mongsen, more specifically at monosyllabic words which are past tense forms. It examines the conditions imposed on the minimal word in the two dialects by looking at the phonetic evidence available.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Foundation Books
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×