Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Conceptual Framework
- Part II Framing Effects Research
- 3 Designing the Studies
- 4 Converging Cues and the Spread of Activation
- 5 Cognitive Complexity and Attitude Structure
- 6 Security Concerns and Tolerance Judgments
- 7 Group Perceptions and Expressive Action
- Part III Implications and Conclusions
- Bibliography
- Index
4 - Converging Cues and the Spread of Activation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2014
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Conceptual Framework
- Part II Framing Effects Research
- 3 Designing the Studies
- 4 Converging Cues and the Spread of Activation
- 5 Cognitive Complexity and Attitude Structure
- 6 Security Concerns and Tolerance Judgments
- 7 Group Perceptions and Expressive Action
- Part III Implications and Conclusions
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
“The USA PATRIOT Act and Homeland Security, while aimed at immigrants especially from the Middle East, is a threat to the civil rights and liberties of all people. How do you end racial profiling and stop police racist harassment in this atmosphere? How do you end racist discrimination when someone can be picked up, their phones can be tapped or they can be kicked off airplanes because they look Middle Eastern?”
– Jarvis Tyner Executive Vice Chair, American Communist Party February 16, 2002“The federal government can and must protect Americans from the threat of terrorism without eroding our constitutional liberties. Today, Arab Americans are especially vulnerable to abuses of government power. Yet ultimately all Americans are put at risk when our rights come under attack. We must work to preserve our constitutional rights and roll back the most egregious infringements of our individual freedoms.”
– Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) 2004The above quotations share a common concern that the war on terrorism has exacerbated perceptions that people of Arab descent constitute a threat to public safety. Moreover, such threat perceptions have provided an impetus to generate public support for the policies of the USA PATRIOT Act that in turn has threatened the civil liberties of Muslims and Arab-Americans. For most citizens, the mass media provide the primary source of information upon which to base judgments about potential threats. As such, the nature of news coverage and its effects become important concerns for researchers seeking to understand the dynamics of political judgments.
In the discussion of our integrated Message Framing Model (Figure 1.2) in Chapter 1, we noted that news frames and cues have much in common in that they both describe ways in which journalists give meaning to text. They differ in terms of the unit of text to which they are applied. Both frames (i.e., organizing devices used by journalists to structure press accounts) and cues (i.e., the labels used to characterize issues, groups, and figures in the news) have received considerable attention from mass communication researchers interested in understanding how subtle changes in news reports influence audience understanding (Shah et al., 2002).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- News Frames and National SecurityCovering Big Brother, pp. 99 - 114Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014