Book contents
- New Private Law Theory
- New Private Law Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- New Private Law Theory
- Part I Methods and Disciplines
- Part II Social Ordering, Constitutionalism and Private Law
- Part III Transactions and Risk: Private Law and the Market
- Part IV Persons and Organizations
- Part V Private Law (Rule-Setting) beyond the State
- Index
- References
Part II - Social Ordering, Constitutionalism and Private Law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 April 2021
Book contents
- New Private Law Theory
- New Private Law Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- New Private Law Theory
- Part I Methods and Disciplines
- Part II Social Ordering, Constitutionalism and Private Law
- Part III Transactions and Risk: Private Law and the Market
- Part IV Persons and Organizations
- Part V Private Law (Rule-Setting) beyond the State
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- New Private Law TheoryA Pluralist Approach, pp. 129 - 204Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Böhm, Franz, ‘Privatrechtsgesellschaft und Marktwirtschaft’, 17 ORDO 75–151 (1966) (English translation available on the book website)Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge / MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971 (quoted here, revised ed. 1999), mainly chapter 3: ‘The Original Position’Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya, The Idea of Justice (Cambridge / MA: Allen Lane & Harvard University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Mengoni, Luigi, ‘Forma giuridica e materia economica’, in Diritto e Valori (Bologna, Mulino, 1985, first published in two articles of 1963 and 1966) (English translation available on the book website)Google Scholar
Mestmäcker, E. J., ‘Macht – Recht – Wirtschaftsverfassung’, 137 Zeitschrift für Handelsrecht 97–111 (1973).Google Scholar
Mestmäcker, E. J., ‘Auf dem Wege zu einer Ordnungspolitik für Europa’, in E. J. Mestmäcker / H. Möller / H.P. Schwartz (eds.), Eine Ordnungspolitik für Europa: Festschrift für Hans v.d. Groeben (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1987), pp. 9–49Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge / MA: Harvard University Press, 1977), pp. 81–130Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan, ‘The Paradox of American Legalism’, 3 European Law Journal 359–77 (1997) Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert, A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Grechenig, Kristoffel / Gelter, Martin, ‘The Transatlantic Divergence in Legal Thought: American Law and Economics vs. German Doctrinalism’, 31 Hastings International & Comparative Law Review 295–360 (2008)Google Scholar
Kennedy, D/ Joerges, C / Trubek, D. M. (eds.), Critical Legal Thought: An American-German Debate (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1989)Google Scholar
Saleilles, R, De La Personnalité Juridique, Histoire und Théories, Vingt-cinq Leçons d’introduction à un Cours de Droit Civil Comparé sur les Personnes Juridiques (Paris: Dalloz, 1910), (English translation available on the book website)Google Scholar
Canaris, C.-W.‚‘Verfassungs- und europarechtliche Aspekte der Vertragsfreiheit in der Privatrechtsgesellschaft’, in P. Badura and R. Scholz (eds.), Wege und Verfahren des Verfassungslebens: Festschrift für Peter Lerche zum 65. Geburtstag (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1993), pp. 873–91, English translation available on the book websiteGoogle Scholar
Vettori, G, ‘Contratto e concorrenza ’ (2004) 4 Rivista di Diritto Privato 5–37, (English translation available on the book website)Google Scholar
Brüggemeier, G, Colombi Ciacchi, A and Comandé, G (eds.), Fundamental Rights and Private Law in the European Union, Vol. I, A Comparative Overview (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Collins, H, ‘On the (in)compatibility of human rights discourse and private law’, H.-W. Micklitz (ed.), Constitutionalization of European Private Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 26–60Google Scholar
Safjan, M and Düsterhaus, D, ‘A union of effective judicial protection: addressing a multi-level challenge through the lens of Article 47 CFREU’ (2014) 33 Yearbook of European Law 3–40Google Scholar
Ripert, G Le Régime Démocratique et le Droit Civil Moderne, 2nd ed. (Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 1948), (English translation available on the book website)Google Scholar
Kübler, F, ‘Privatrecht und Demokratie: Zur Aktualität gesellschaftstheoretischer Vorstellungen in der Jurisprudenz’, in F. Bauer, J. Esser, F. Kübler, L. Raiser and E. Steindorff (eds.), Funktionswandel der Privatrechtsinstitutionen: Festschrift für Ludwig Raiser (Tübingen: Mohr, 1974), pp. 697–725, (English translation available on the book website)Google Scholar
Wilhelmsson, T, ‘Varieties of welfarism in European contract law’ (2004) 10 European Law Journal 712–33Google Scholar
Hesselink, M, ‘Democratic contract law’, Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014–24Google Scholar
Joerges, C and Ralli, T (eds.), ‘European constitutionalism without private law, private law without democracy’, Arena Report No. 3/11, Recon Report No. 14Google Scholar
Wieacker, Franz, Das Sozialmodell der klassischen Privatrechtsgesetzbücher und die Entwicklung der modernen Gesellschaft (Karlsruhe: C. F. Müller, 1963) (English translation available on the book website)Google Scholar
Atiyah, Patrick Selim, The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Blankenburg, Erhard, ‘The Poverty of Evolutionism: A Critique of Teubner’s Case for “Reflexive Law”’, 18 Law & Society Review 273–89 (1984)Google Scholar
Canaris, Claus-Wilhlem, ‘Wandlungen des Schuldvertragsrechts: Tendenzen zu seiner “Materialisierung”’, 200 Archiv für die civilistische Praxis 273–364 (2000)Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Private Law’, 17 Law & Society Review 239 (1983)Google Scholar
Wiethölter, Rudolf, ‘Proceduralization of the Category of Law’, 12 German Law Journal 465–73 (2011) Google Scholar