Book contents
- The New Handbook of Political Sociology
- The New Handbook of Political Sociology
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- I Theories of Political Sociology
- II Media Explosion, Knowledge as Power, and Demographic Reversals
- 10 “Old” Media, “New” Media, Hybrid Media, and the Changing Character of Political Participation
- 11 The Sociology of Official Information Gathering
- 12 The Dark and Light Sides of Big Data
- 13 States, Parties, and Expertise
- 14 Toward a Political Sociology of Demography
- III The State and Its Political Organizations
- IV Civil Society: The Roots and Processes of Political Action
- V Established and New State Policies and Innovations
- VI Globalization and New and Bigger Sources of Power and Resistance
- Index
- References
10 - “Old” Media, “New” Media, Hybrid Media, and the Changing Character of Political Participation
from II - Media Explosion, Knowledge as Power, and Demographic Reversals
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 February 2020
Book contents
- The New Handbook of Political Sociology
- The New Handbook of Political Sociology
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- I Theories of Political Sociology
- II Media Explosion, Knowledge as Power, and Demographic Reversals
- 10 “Old” Media, “New” Media, Hybrid Media, and the Changing Character of Political Participation
- 11 The Sociology of Official Information Gathering
- 12 The Dark and Light Sides of Big Data
- 13 States, Parties, and Expertise
- 14 Toward a Political Sociology of Demography
- III The State and Its Political Organizations
- IV Civil Society: The Roots and Processes of Political Action
- V Established and New State Policies and Innovations
- VI Globalization and New and Bigger Sources of Power and Resistance
- Index
- References
Summary
What is the role of media, especially the news media, in influencing citizens’ political beliefs, values, and political or civic action?
Clearly, many people for several hundred years have believed the media to be powerful agents of political persuasion and instruments of political action. In the early United States, both George Washington and Thomas Jefferson wrote scathingly of the press because they thought it caused harm to government (Schudson 1998). In Europe as in North America, individuals founded news organizations to influence political outcomes.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The New Handbook of Political Sociology , pp. 269 - 289Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Allcott, Hunt and Gentzkow, Matthew. 2017. “Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(2): 211–236.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance. 1998. “The Uncivic Culture: Communication, Identity and the Rise of Lifestyle Politics.” Political Science & Politics 31: 741–761.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance. 2008. “Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age” pp. 1–24 in Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance and Segerberg, Alexandra. 2012. “The Logic of Connective Action.” Information, Communication & Society 15: 739–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, Bernard. “What ‘Missing the Newspaper’ Means” in Lazarsfeld, Paul and Stanton, Frank (eds.) Communications Research, 1948–1949. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Blumler, Jay G. and McQuail, Denis. 1968. Television in politics: Its uses and influence. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Clark, Lynn and Marchi, Regina. 2017. Young People and the Future of News. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Esaiasson, Peter and Narud, Hanne Marthe (eds.). 2013. Between-Election Democracy. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Gans, Herbert J. 1979.Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew and Shapiro, Jesse M.. 2011. “Ideological Segregation Online and Offline.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(4): 1799–1836.Google Scholar
Gottfried, Jeffrey and Shearer, Elisa. 2016. “News Use across Social Media Platforms 2016.” Pew Research Center, May 26. https://pewrsr.ch/27TOfhzGoogle Scholar
Guess, Andrew. 2016. “Media Choice and Moderation: Evidence from Online Tracking Data.” Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved May 26, 2017. www.dropbox.com/s/uk005hhio3dysm8/GuessJMP.pdf?dl=0Google Scholar
Hamilton, James F. 2016. “Hybrid News Practices” pp. 164–178 in Witschge, Tamara,Anderson, Chris W., Domingo, David, and, Hermida, Alfred (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Hindman, Matthew. 2008. The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Philip N. 2005. New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchison, Marc L., Schiano, Salvatore, and Whitten-Woodring, Jenifer. 2016. “When the Fourth Estate Becomes a Fifth Column: The Effect of Media Freedom and Social Intolerance on Civil Conflict.” International Journal of Press/Politics 21(2): 165–187.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1971. “The Silent Revolution in Europe: International Change in Post-Industrial Societies.” American Political Science Review 65: 991–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Josephi, Beate. 2016. “Digital Journalism and Democracy” pp. 9–24 in Witschge, Tamara, Anderson, Chris W., Domingo, David, and Hermida, Alfred (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpf, David. 2016. Analytical Activism: Digital Listening and the New Political Strategy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kruikemeier, Sanne, van Noort, Guda, Vliegenthart, Rens, and de Vreese, Claes H.. 2014. “Unraveling the Effects of Active and Passive Forms of Political Internet Use: Does It Affect Citizens’ Political Involvement?” New Media & Society 16(6): 903–920.Google Scholar
Kümpel, Anna Sophie, Karnowski, Veronika, and Keyling, Till. 2015. “News Sharing in Social Media: A Review of Current Research on News Sharing Users, Contents, and Networks.” Social Media + Society 1(2): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew. 2016. “(Mis)Perceptions of Political Polarization in the American Public.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80(S1): 378–391.Google Scholar
Meyer, David S. and Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. “A Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century” pp. 1–28 in Meyer, David S. and Tarrow, Sidney (eds.) The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Amy, Gottfried, Jeffrey, and Barthel, Michael. 2017. “Trump, Clinton Voters Divided in Their Main Source for Election News.” Pew Research Center, January 18. Retrieved June 19, 2019. https://pewrsr.ch/2joeTvaGoogle Scholar
Neumann, W. Russell, Bimber, Bruce, and Hindman, Matthew. 2011. “The Internet and Four Dimensions of Citizenship” pp. 22–42 in Shapiro, Robert Y. and Jacobs, Lawrence R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nicey, Jeremie. 2016. “Semi-Professional Amateurs” pp. 222–235 in Witschge, Tamara,Anderson, Chris W., Domingo, David, and Hermida, Alfred (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis. 2012. Ground Wars: Personalized Communication in Political Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis. 2013. “Mundane Internet Tools, the Risk of Exclusion, and Reflexive Movements – Occupy Wall Street and Political Uses of Digital Networked Technologies.” The Sociological Quarterly 54: 159–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2014. “Watchdog Journalism” pp. 525–541 in Bovens, Mark, Goodin, Robert E., and Schillemans, Thomas (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oser, Jennifer, Hooghe, Marc, and Marien, Sofie. 2013. “Is Online Participation Distinct from Offline Participation? A Latent Class Analysis of Participation Types and Their Stratification.” Political Research Quarterly 66(1): 91–101.Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Zizi A. 2010. A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Pariser, Eli. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pingree, Raymond. 2015. “Effects of Online Political Messages on Their Senders” pp. 139–151 in de Zuniga, Homero Gil (ed.) New Technologies and Civic Engagement: New Agendas in Communication. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Postman, Neil. 1985. Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Project for Excellence in Journalism. 2010. “How News Happens: A Study of the News Ecosystem of One American City.” Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved June 19, 2019. www.journalism.org/2010/01/11/how-news-happens/Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Robinson, Sue. 2007. “‘Someone’s Gotta Be in Control Here’: The Institutionalization of Online News and the Creation of a Shared Journalistic Authority.” Journalism Practice (1–3): 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2008. Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael. 1998. The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, Craig. 2016. “This Analysis Shows how Fake Election News Stories Outperformed Real News on Facebook.” BuzzFeed News, November 16. Retrieved June 19, 2019. https://bit.ly/31GpLujGoogle Scholar
Silverman, Craig and Singer-Vine, Jeremy. 2016. “Most Americans Who See Fake News Believe It, New Survey Says.” BuzzFeed News, December 6. Retrieved June 19, 2019. https://bit.ly/2ZBSYVAGoogle Scholar
Spenkuch, Jörg L. and Toniatti, David. 2016. “Political Advertising and Election Outcomes.” CESifo Working Paper Series, No. 5780.Google Scholar
Stolle, Dietlind and Micheletti, Michele. 2013. Political Consumerism: Global Responsibility in Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 2017. #republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tufekci, Zeynep. 2017. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Waisbord, Silvio and Amado, Adriana. 2017. “Populist Communication by Digital Means: Presidential Twitter in Latin America.” Information, Communication & Society 20(9): 1330–1346.Google Scholar
Zukin, Cliff, Keeter, Scott, Andolina, Molly, Jenkins, Krista, and Delli Carpini, Michael X.. 2006. A New Engagement? Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by