Scripture and reform

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521860062.032

30 - Scripture and reform

from Part III - The Bible Interpreted

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 May 2012

Richard Marsden and

E. Ann Matter

Mary Dove

Show author details

Richard Marsden: Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
E. Ann Matter: Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Throughout the church's history reformers have worked to bring the vis-ible church into closer alignment with a scriptural ideal. The Epistle to the Ephesians (5:25–7) indicates that at least one writer within the infant church interpreted the immaculate bride of the Song of Songs, to whom the bridegroom says ‘there is no spot in thee’ (Song 4:7), as a figure for ecclesial perfection. In the understanding of the writer of Ephesians, of the writer of the Apocalypse, of the church fathers and of the western church throughout the Middle Ages, the church in its perfected state was written into the Hebrew scriptures by the man who built the temple at Jerusalem, Solomon son of David, nearly 1,000 years before the birth of Christ. The history of the church, in medieval understanding, was one long struggle to approximate more closely to the stainlessness affirmed by Christ, the bridegroom of the Song of Songs.

In the apostolic and patristic ages, reform typically meant renewal of the individual Christian believer in the image of Christ rather than reform of the body of the church. For Gregory VII, on the other hand, who was pope from 1073 to 1085, reform was principally structural, and was a top-down process. Jean Leclercq argued that the Gregorian reformers, looking to the Bible for authority, too readily related Old Testament narratives to situations never encountered in Jewish history bce, and made the New Testament provide answers to questions never asked in the first century ce. Consequently, in Leclercq's opinion, they interpreted the Old Testament too literally and the New Testament not literally enough. If, however, the eleventh-century reformers sometimes asked the Bible to speak too immediately to the situation of the church they knew (a fault by no means peculiar to them), they were ever aware of the distance between the vexatious imperfections of the visible body and the perfect church inscribed in Jewish and Christian scripture.

Type: Chapter
Information: The New Cambridge History of the Bible , pp. 579 - 595

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521860062.032 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Riedlinger, H., Die Makellosigkeit der Kirche in den lateinischen Hohenliedkommentären des Mittelalters, Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters 38.3 (Münster: Aschendorff, 1958)Google Scholar

Ladner, G. B., The Idea of Reform. Its Impact on Christian Thought and Action in the Age of the Fathers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1959), pp. 49–62CrossRef Google Scholar

Lourdaux, W. and Verhelst, D. (eds.), The Bible and Medieval Culture (LeuvenUniversity Press, 1979), pp. 89–108Google Scholar

Matter, E. A., The Voice of My Beloved. The Song of Songs in Western Medieval Christianity (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990), pp. 106–11Google Scholar

Bruschi, C. and Biller, P. (eds.), Texts and the Repression of Medieval Heresy (Woodbridge: York Medieval Press, 2003), pp. 4–9.Google Scholar

Lambert, M., Medieval Heresy. Popular Movements from the Gregorian Reform to the Reformation, 3rd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 2002), p. 38Google Scholar

Pegg, M. G., The Corruption of Angels. The Great Inquisition of 1245–1246 (PrincetonUniversity Press, 2001), pp. 141–51Google Scholar

Lambert, M., The Cathars (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998), p. 30Google Scholar

Hamilton, B., ‘Wisdom from the East. The Reception by the Cathars of Eastern Dualist Texts’, in P. Biller and A. Hudson (eds.), Heresy and Literacy, 1000–1530 (CambridgeUniversity Press, 1994), pp. 38–60, at pp. 49–50Google Scholar

Biller, P., ‘The Cathars of Languedoc and Written Materials’, in Biller and Hudson (eds.), Heresy and Literacy, pp. 61–82, at p. 74; Hamilton, ‘Wisdom from the East’, pp. 53–6

Russell, J. B., Religious Dissent in the Middle Ages (New York: Wiley, 1971), pp. 60–3Google Scholar

On the Song of Songs III, trans. Walsh, K. and Edmonds, I. M., Cistercian Fathers 31 (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1979), ch. 65, p. 183.Google Scholar

Light, L., ‘The New Thirteenth-Century Bible and the Challenge of Heresy’, Viator, 18 (1987), 275–88, and in this volume, ch. 21CrossRef Google Scholar

Cameron, E., Waldenses. Rejections of Holy Church in Medieval Europe (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000), pp. 216–20Google Scholar

McSheffrey, S. and Tanner, N. (eds. and trans.), Lollards of Coventry 1486–1522 (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2003), p. 45Google Scholar

Smalley, B., The Study of the Bible in the Middle Ages, 3rd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 1983), pp. 170–1Google Scholar

Geneva, Bibliothèque Publique Universitaire, Ge l.e. 207; ‘Cantica. Waldensischer Text der Auslegung des Hohen Liedes’, ed. Herzog, J. J., Zeitschrift für die historische Theologie 40 (1870), 516–620Google Scholar

Six Vaudois Poems from the Waldensian MSS in the University Libraries of Cambridge, Dublin and Geneva, ed. Chaytor, H. J. (CambridgeUniversity Press, 1930), pp. 38–9Google Scholar

The Holy Bible Containing the Old and New Testaments with the Apocryphal Books, in the Earliest English Versions Made from the Latin Vulgate by John Wycliffe and his Followers, ed. Forshall, J. and Madden, F., 4 vols. (OxfordUniversity Press, 1850; repr. New York: AMS Press, 1982), vol. i, pp. xxxiii–xxxivGoogle Scholar

Wyclif, De veritate sacrae scripturae, i, 6; ed. Buddensieg, R., 2 vols. (London: Wyclif Society, 1905), vol. i, pp. 109–10Google Scholar

Levy, I. C., John Wyclif. Scriptural Logic, Real Presence, and the Parameters of Orthodoxy (Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 2003), pp. 87–91Google Scholar

Levy, I. C., ‘John Wyclif and the Primitive Papacy’, Viator 38 (2007), 159–89CrossRef Google Scholar

Levy, I. C., ‘Defining the Responsibility of the Late Medieval Theologian. The Debate between John Kynyngham and John Wyclif’, Carmelus 49 (2002), 5–29Google Scholar

Oberman, H. A., The Harvest of Medieval Theology. Gabriel Biel and Late Medieval Nominalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963), pp. 371–8Google Scholar

Netter, Doctrinale antiquitatum fidei Catholicae Ecclesiae [1423–30], ii, xx; ed. Blanciotti, B., 3 vols. (Venice: Antonini Bassanesius, 1757–9), vol. i, pp. 343–8Google Scholar

Bose, M., ‘The Opponents of John Wyclif’, in I. C. Levy (ed.), A Companion to John Wyclif. Late Medieval Theologian (Leiden: Brill, 2006), pp. 407–56Google Scholar

Dove, M., The First English Bible. The Text and Context of the Wycliffite Versions (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2007), pp. 68–82Google Scholar

Enarrationes in Psalmos, ed. Dekkers, E. and Fraipont, J., CCSL 38–40 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1956), pp. 668–9Google Scholar

Deanesly, M., The Lollard Bible and Other Medieval Biblical Versions (CambridgeUniversity Press, 1920), p. 425Google Scholar

Thomas à Kempis, De imitatione Christi; The Earliest English Translation of the First Three Books of the De imitatione Christi, ed. Ingram, J. K., EETS es 63 (London: Kegan Paul, 1893; repr. Millwood, NY: Kraus, 1987), p. 7Google Scholar

Jean Gerson, Oeuvres complètes, ed. Glorieux, P., vol. vii (Paris: Desclée, 1966), p. 194Google Scholar

Ghosh, K., The Wycliffite Heresy. Authority and the Interpretation of Texts (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2001), p. 108CrossRef Google Scholar

Hudson, A., ‘The Debate on Bible Translation, Oxford 1401’, in her Lollards and their Books (London and Ronceverte: Hambledon, 1985), pp. 67–84Google Scholar

Gregory, the Great, Homiliae in Hiezechielem prophetam, ed. M. Adriaen, CCSL 142 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1971), pp. 420–2Google Scholar

Minnis, A. J. and Scott, A. B. with D. Wallace (eds.), Medieval Literary Theory and Criticism c. 1100–c. 1375. The Commentary Tradition, 2nd edn (Oxford: Clarendon, 1991), p. 268Google Scholar

Hargreaves, H., ‘The Latin Text of Purvey's Psalter’, Medium Ævum 24 (1955), 73–90CrossRef Google Scholar

Hargreaves, H., ‘Popularising Biblical Scholarship. The Role of the Wycliffite Glossed Gospels’, in Lourdaux and Verhelst (eds.), The Bible and Medieval Culture, pp. 171–89

Hudson, A., ‘The Variable Text’, in A. J. Minnis and C. Brewer (eds.), Crux and Controversy in Middle English Textual Criticism (CambridgeUniversity Press, 1992), pp. 49–60, at pp. 55–8Google Scholar

Krey, P. D. W. and Smith, L. (eds.), Nicholas of Lyra. The Senses of Scripture, Studies in the History of Christian Thought 90 (Leiden: Brill, 2000)Google Scholar

Augustine, De doctrina christiana, iii, xxxiii (1); ed Martin, J., CCSL 32 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1962), p. 105Google Scholar

Augustine, Epistulae, xciii, viii, 24; ed. Goldbacher, A., CSEL 34 (Vienna: Tempsky, 1898), pp. 469–70

Šmahel, F., ‘Literacy and Heresy in Hussite Bohemia’, in Biller and Hudson (eds.), Heresy and Literacy, pp. 237–54

Simpson, J., The Oxford English Literary History. Vol. ii: 1350–1547. Reform and Cultural Revolution (OxfordUniversity Press, 2002), p. 475Google Scholar

Adriaen, M., S. Hieronymi presbyteri opera, i. 6: Commentarii in prophetas minores, CCSL 76 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1969), p. 219Google Scholar

McSheffrey, S., ‘Heresy, Orthodoxy and English Vernacular Religion’, Past and Present 186 (2005), 47–80CrossRef Google Scholar