Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T16:04:40.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Is the natural rate hypothesis consistent with hysteresis?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

Rod Cross
Affiliation:
ICMM, Strathclyde
Rod Cross
Affiliation:
University of Strathclyde
Get access

Summary

Hysteresis effects are distinct in that they remain after the initial causes are removed. The term itself is derived from the Greek ύστερέω meaning to come later, and was first coined for the explanation of scientific phenomena by the physicist James Alfred Ewing (1881a). The initial application was to the thermo-electric properties of metals when subjected to stress by loading and unloading, the more celebrated application being to the behaviour of electromagnetic fields in ferric metals (Ewing, 1881b, 1885, 1893). The non-hysteretic account of electromagnetic fields in Maxwell's equations had the property that the application of a once-off magnetising force would have no remaining effect on field characteristics once the force was removed. Ewing's studies revealed that this was not the case for ferric metals, and the term ‘hysteresis’ was coined to describe this phenomenon (see Cross and Allan, 1988; Cross, 1993).

The standard definition of the natural rate of unemployment (Phelps, 1967; Friedman, 1968) as depending on ‘the actual structural characteristics of the labour and commodity markets, including market imperfections, stochastic variability in demands and supplies, the cost of gathering information about job vacancies and labour availabilities, the costs of mobility, and so on’ (Friedman, 1968, p. 8) does not in itself preclude hysteresis: temporary shocks affecting actual unemployment, for example, could have permanent effects on the ‘structural characteristics of labour and commodity markets’, and consequently on the natural rate.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Natural Rate of Unemployment
Reflections on 25 Years of the Hypothesis
, pp. 181 - 200
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×