Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Notes on contributors
- Introduction
- Part 1 Fighting for the nation?
- Part 2 The varieties of nationalist experience
- Part 3 Empires and nation-states
- 6 Empire and ethnicity
- 7 The role of nationalism in the two world wars
- 8 Empire, ethnicity and power
- 9 Is nationalism the cause or consequence of the end of empire?
- 10 Obliterating heterogeneity through peace
- Part 4 Empty shells, changed conditions
- Index
- References
9 - Is nationalism the cause or consequence of the end of empire?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2013
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Notes on contributors
- Introduction
- Part 1 Fighting for the nation?
- Part 2 The varieties of nationalist experience
- Part 3 Empires and nation-states
- 6 Empire and ethnicity
- 7 The role of nationalism in the two world wars
- 8 Empire, ethnicity and power
- 9 Is nationalism the cause or consequence of the end of empire?
- 10 Obliterating heterogeneity through peace
- Part 4 Empty shells, changed conditions
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter addresses the question of whether and to what degree nationalism was the cause or the consequence of imperial collapse. We go about this task in four steps. The first three steps use quantitative data that cover most of the world since 1816. In the first step, we simply analyze the temporal relationship between the transition from empire to nation-state and the foundation of nationalist organizations. We find that in the overwhelming majority, the latter precedes the former. We then proceed to a more fine-grained analysis and ask whether these nationalist organizations were perhaps inspired by imperial retreat from other parts of the empire, such that a partial imperial breakdown would further fuel the flames of nationalism elsewhere. No such effect emerges, however. In the third step, we determine whether nationalist mobilization is a cause for the individual transitions from empire to nation-state observed in the history of today's countries and find this to be the case, even if we take a host of other factors into account (including the weakening of empire through wars).
In the fourth and most important step, we go beyond these coarse quantitative analyses and shift to empires as units of analysis, asking to what degree nationalism caused imperial collapse. Discussing the demise of the Ottoman, Habsburg, French, British, Portuguese and Soviet empires, we assess the varying degrees to which nationalist movements contributed to each imperial collapse and the extent to which each transition was due to other, unrelated factors, including the voluntary retreat of empire or the breakdown of empire due to defeat in international wars. We find that in all cases of imperial collapse nationalist movements played an important, and sometimes, crucial role (for the opposing view, see Betts 1991; Burbank and Cooper 2010; Flint 1983; Sked 2001; Solnick 1998). There is little evidence – with a handful of exceptions such as the Central Asian republics and some African countries – for the idea that imperial breakdown produces nationalist movements or nation-states without a previous agitation for them.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Nationalism and War , pp. 212 - 254Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
References
- 11
- Cited by