This chapter examines the sophisticated descriptivist responses to the referentialist revolution. These responses include versions of haecceitic descriptivism, wide-scope conventionalism, actualised and Dthat-descriptivism, the view that names are synonymous with referential uses of descriptions, and causal and metalinguistic descriptivism - all of which fail. The chapter gradually introduces important distinctions between various notions of rigidity, defines the concept of Direct Reference, and progressively gathers the pieces of a causal picture of the reference of names.