Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on the contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I The phenomenon of language change
- Part II Linguistic models and language change
- 3 Metaphors, models and language change
- 4 Log(ist)ic and simplistic S-curves
- 5 Regular suppletion
- 6 On not explaining language change: Optimality Theory and the Great Vowel Shift
- Part III Grammaticalisation
- Part IV The social context for language change
- Part V Contact-based explanations
- Part VI The typological perspective
- Index
- References
4 - Log(ist)ic and simplistic S-curves
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on the contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I The phenomenon of language change
- Part II Linguistic models and language change
- 3 Metaphors, models and language change
- 4 Log(ist)ic and simplistic S-curves
- 5 Regular suppletion
- 6 On not explaining language change: Optimality Theory and the Great Vowel Shift
- Part III Grammaticalisation
- Part IV The social context for language change
- Part V Contact-based explanations
- Part VI The typological perspective
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
The technical term S-curve goes back at least to 1839 (OED, as two words), and in the context of linguistic change certainly to 1954 (Altmann et al. 1983: 105). The importance of S-curves is now generally taken for granted in historical linguistics. Devitt, for example, asserts that ‘[t]he S-curve pattern of diffusion occurred throughout [her] data’ (1989: 75). Here is a more recent example concerning early Modern English morphosyntax (Nevalainen 2000: 339):
I need to be able to measure the degree of supralocalisation and subsequent standardisation of a linguistic variable. The measure I shall use will be the completion of an S-curve by the feature in question in the data examined.
In Nevalainen's paper, many graphs need just five or six data-points to reveal a jagged but nevertheless recognisably S-shaped form. I myself have long assumed ‘that the time course of the propagation of a language change typically follows an S-curve’, as Croft expresses it (2000: 183). In this chapter I wish to question why this might be so, what it means and why perhaps, in the end, it is actually rather unexpected. In touching on explanations of language change and notably the shape that changes take, there is a risk (or one might well say, the hope) of echoing some of Roger Lass's published work: there can be few topics in historical linguistics that he has not profitably addressed at some time or other.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Motives for Language Change , pp. 54 - 70Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003
References
Aitchison, Jean. 1991. Language change: progress or decay?, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press
Allen, Cynthia L. 2000. ‘Obsolescence and sudden death in syntax: the decline of verb-final order in early Middle English’, in Bermúdez-Otero et al. (eds.), 3–25
Altmann, Gabriel, H. von Buttlar, W. Rott and U. Strauss. 1983. ‘A law of change in language’, in B. Brainerd (ed.), Historical linguistics. Quantitative Linguistics 18. Bochum: Brockmeyer, 104–15
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo, David Denison, Richard M. Hogg, C. B. McCully (eds.). 2000. Generative theory and corpus studies: a dialogue from 10 ICEHL. Topics in English Linguistics 31. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter
Blake, Norman F. 1994. ‘Premisses and periods in a history of English’, in Francisco Fernández, Miguel Fuster and Juan José Calvo (eds.), English historical linguistics 1992: papers from the 7th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Valencia, 22–26 September 1992. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 113. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 37–46
Briscoe, Ted. 2000a. ‘An evolutionary approach to (logistic-like) language change’, MS, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge
Briscoe, Ted. 2000b. ‘Evolutionary perspectives on diachronic syntax’, in Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas and Anthony Warner (eds.), Diachronic syntax: models and mechanisms. Oxford University Press, 75–105
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach. Longman Linguistics Library. London and New York: Longman
Denison, David. 1993. English historical syntax: verbal constructions. Longman Linguistics Library. London and New York: Longman
Denison, David. 1999. ‘Slow, slow, quick, quick, slow: the dance of language change?’, in Ana Bringas López et al. (eds.), ‘Woonderous Ænglissce’: SELIM Studies in Medieval English Language. Vigo: Universidade de Vigo (Servicio de Publicacións), 51–64
Devitt, Amy J. 1989. Standardizing written English: diffusion in the case of Scotland, 1520–1659. Cambridge University Press
Ellegård, Alvar. 1953. The auxiliary ‘do’: the establishment and regulation of its growth in English. Gothenburg Studies in English 2. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell
Kroch, Anthony S. 1989a. ‘Function and grammar in the history of English: periphrastic do’, in Ralph Fasold and Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), Language change and variation. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 52. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 132–72
1989b. ‘Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change’, Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony and Ann Taylor. 1997. ‘Verb movement in Old and Middle English: dialect variation and language contact’, in Ans van Kemenade and Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change. Cambridge University Press, 297–325
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 1: Internal factors. Language in Society. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell
Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 81. Cambridge University Press
Lass, Roger. 2001. ‘Language periodization and the concept “middle” ’, in Irma Taavitsainen, Terttu Nevalainen, Päivi Pahta and Matti Rissanen (eds.), Placing Middle English in context. Topics in English Linguistics 35. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 7–41
Milroy, James. 1993. ‘On the social origins of language change’, in Charles Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics: problems and perspectives. London and New York: Longman, 215–36
Milroy, Lesley. 1987. Language and social networks, 2nd edition. Language in Society 2. Oxford: Blackwell
Nakamura, Fujio. 1998. ‘A word on the history of the English passive progressive’, paper read at the 10th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Manchester
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2000. ‘Processes of supralocalisation and the rise of Standard English in the early Modern period’, in Bermúdez-Otero et al. (eds.), 329–71
and . 1997. ‘A dynamical systems model of language change’, Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 697–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 1998. ‘The logical problem of language change: a case study of European Portuguese’, Syntax 1: 192–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nurmi, Arja. 2000. ‘The rise and fall of periphrastic do in early Modern English, or “Howe the Scotts will declare themselv's” ’, in Bermúdez-Otero et al. (eds.), 373–94
. 1993. ‘The development of periphrastic do in English: a case of lexical diffusion in syntax’, Diachronica 10: 51–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1984. ‘Word frequency and the actuation of sound change’, Language 60: 320–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2000. ‘The language of the Southey-Coleridge circle’, Language Sciences 22: 401–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. 1991. ‘Spoken language and the history of do-periphrasis’, in Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Historical English syntax. Topics in English Linguistics 2. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 321–42
Simpson, John A. and Edmund S. C. Weiner. 1992. OED = The Oxford English Dictionary: CD-ROM Version, 2nd edition. Oxford University Press
Stein, Dieter. 1990. The semantics of syntactic change: aspects of the evolution of ‘do’ in English. Trends in Linguistics/Studies and Monographs 47. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 1990. ‘The origin and development of periphrastic auxiliary do: a case of destigmatisation’, NOWELE 16: 3–52 [originally published in Dutch Working Papers in English Language and Linguistics 3, 1988]
Visser, F. Th. 1963–73. An historical syntax of the English language, 4 vols. Leiden: E. J. Brill
1995. ‘Predicting the progressive passive: parametric change within a lexicalist framework’, Language 71: 533–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Anthony R. 2000. ‘Change and rate of change in do’, plenary lecture given at the 11th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Santiago
- 49
- Cited by