Book contents
- Morphological Diversity and Linguistic Cognition
- Morphological Diversity and Linguistic Cognition
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 At the Intersection of Cognitive Processes and Linguistic Diversity
- Part I In What Ways Is Language Processing Tuned to the Morphological Structure of a Language?
- Part II What Role Does Cue Informativity Play in Learning and How the Lexicon Evolves Over Time?
- Part III How Do System-Level Principles of Morphological Organization Emerge?
- 8 Morphology Gets More and More Complex, Unless It Doesn’t
- 9 Network Structure and Inflection Class Predictability: Modeling the Emergence of Marginal Detraction
- 10 Rule Combination, Potentiation, Affix Telescoping
- References
- Language Index
- General Index
10 - Rule Combination, Potentiation, Affix Telescoping
from Part III - How Do System-Level Principles of Morphological Organization Emerge?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 May 2022
- Morphological Diversity and Linguistic Cognition
- Morphological Diversity and Linguistic Cognition
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 At the Intersection of Cognitive Processes and Linguistic Diversity
- Part I In What Ways Is Language Processing Tuned to the Morphological Structure of a Language?
- Part II What Role Does Cue Informativity Play in Learning and How the Lexicon Evolves Over Time?
- Part III How Do System-Level Principles of Morphological Organization Emerge?
- 8 Morphology Gets More and More Complex, Unless It Doesn’t
- 9 Network Structure and Inflection Class Predictability: Modeling the Emergence of Marginal Detraction
- 10 Rule Combination, Potentiation, Affix Telescoping
- References
- Language Index
- General Index
Summary
A number of scholars have argued for the need to postulate principles of rule combination in morphological theory; according to such principles, two rules may combine to produce a more complex rule. Several kinds of evidence motivate the postulation of such principles, which afford new and revelatory explanations for a range of familiar morphological phenomena. Central to these explanations is a set of four characteristics (component independence, phonological transparency, semantic transparency, and domain subsectiveness) that combined rules possess by default but from which they may also deviate. This set of characteristics has both synchronic and diachronic significance. Synchronically, they elucidate the nature of potentiation, the relation between two affixes A and B such that stems created by means of A extend the domain of stems to which B may subsequently attach (Aronoff , Williams ). Diachronically, they illuminate the nature of affix telescoping, the diachronic correspondence of a sequence of two affixes at one stage in a language’s history to a single affix at a later stage (Booij , Haspelmath ). The evidence discussed here lends additional strength to the conclusion that principles of rule combination are a necessary addition to morphological theory.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Morphological Diversity and Linguistic Cognition , pp. 282 - 306Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
- 1
- Cited by