Book contents
- Morphogenesis Answers Its Critics
- Morphogenesis Answers Its Critics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- 1 The Morphogenetic Approach and Its Trajectory: A First-Person Account by the Author
- Part I Culture
- Part II Structure
- 5 Misrepresenting SAC as Dualism
- 6 The Majority of Agents Are the Dead: Implications for Central Conflation
- 7 Can Structuration and Morphogenesis Be Compatible?
- Part III Agency
6 - The Majority of Agents Are the Dead: Implications for Central Conflation
from Part II - Structure
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2024
- Morphogenesis Answers Its Critics
- Morphogenesis Answers Its Critics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- 1 The Morphogenetic Approach and Its Trajectory: A First-Person Account by the Author
- Part I Culture
- Part II Structure
- 5 Misrepresenting SAC as Dualism
- 6 The Majority of Agents Are the Dead: Implications for Central Conflation
- 7 Can Structuration and Morphogenesis Be Compatible?
- Part III Agency
Summary
Analytical dualism is possible because of temporality.In M/M all structural influencess are transmitted by shaping the context for agents and mediated by what agents make of them.Instead, this author as an avowed Central Conflationist, deals with current practices alone.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Morphogenesis Answers Its Critics , pp. 122 - 141Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024