References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 September 2019
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- More Examples, Less TheoryHistorical Studies of Writing Psychology, pp. 258 - 281Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J. and Sanford, R. N. (1951). The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Ahnert, T. and Manning, S. (eds) (2011). Character, Self, and Sociability in the Scottish Enlightenment. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Alban, G. M. E. (2017). The Medusa Gaze in Contemporary Women’s Fiction. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Alexander, B. K. and Shelton, C. P. (2014). A History of Psychology in Western Civilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, R. C. (1999). David Hartley on Human Nature. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Angell, J. R. (1911/1996). William James. In Simon, L. (ed), William James Remembered. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Annual Register of the History, Politics and Literature for the Year 1774. (1775). London: J. Dodsley.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1973). Walter Benjamin: 1892–1940. In Benjamin, W. (ed), Illuminations. London: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . (1909). The Rhetoric of Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Asendorpf, J. B., Warkentin, V. and Baudonnière, P. M. (1996). Self-awareness and other-awareness. II. Mirror self-recognition, social contingency awareness, and synchronic imitation. Developmental Psychology, 32, 313–21.Google Scholar
Ash, M. G. (1992). Cultural contexts and scientific change in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 198–207.Google Scholar
Ash, M. G. (1998). Gestalt Psychology in German Culture, 1890–1967. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ashworth, P. D. (2009). William James’s ‘psychologist’s fallacy’ and contemporary human science research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 4, 195–206.Google Scholar
Bailey, A. R. (1999). Beyond the fringe: William James on the transitional parts of the stream of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 141–53.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1895). Mental Development in the Individual and the Race. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1897). Social and Ethical Interpretations in Mental Development: a Study in Social Psychology. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1930). Autobiography of James Mark Baldwin. In Murchison, C. (ed), History of Psychology in Autobiography, vol. 1. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
Balibar, E. (2014). Consciousness. In Cassin, B. (ed), Dictionary of Untranslatables. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bénabou, M., Cornaz, L., de Liège, D. and Pélissier, Y. (2002). 789 Néologismes de Jacques Lacan. Paris: EPEL.Google Scholar
Benveniste, D. (2014). The Interwoven Lives of Sigmund, Anna and W. Ernest Freud. New York: The American Institute for Psychoanalysis.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, L. (1969). The frustration-aggression hypothesis revisited. In Berkowitz, L. (ed), The Roots of Aggression. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, L. (1974). Some determinants of impulsive aggression: the role of mediated associations with reinforcements for aggression. Psychological Review, 81, 165–76.Google Scholar
Bernstein, F. (1926). Der Antisemitismus als eine Gruppenerscheinung: Versuch einer Soziologie des Judenhasses. Berlin: Jüdischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Bernstein, P. F. (1951). Jew-Hate as a Sociological Problem. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Bernstein, P. F. (1980). Der Antisemitismus als eine Gruppenerscheinung: Versuch einer Soziologie des Judenhasses. Königstein: Jüdischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Bernstein, P. F. (2009). The Social Roots of Discrimination: the Case of the Jews. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Biber, D. and Conrad, S. (2009). Register, Genre and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D. and Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 2–20.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1996). Remembering the background of social identity theory. In Robinson, W. P. (ed), Social Groups and Identities. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1999). Freudian Repression: Conversation Creating the Unconscious. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (2000). Freud’s different versions of forgetting ‘Signorelli’: rhetoric and repression. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81, 483–98.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (2002). Henri Tajfel’s ‘Cognitive aspects of prejudice’ and the psychology of bigotry. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 171–88.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (2006a). A psychoanalytic discursive psychology: from consciousness to unconsciousness. Discourse Studies, 8, 17–24.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (2006b). Lacan’s misuse of psychology: evidence, rhetoric and the mirror stage. Theory, Culture & Society, 23, 1–26.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (2008b). The language of critical discourse analysis: the case of nominalization. Discourse & Society, 19, 783–800.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (2008c). Social representations and repression: examining the first formulations of Freud and Moscovici. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38, 355–68.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (2011). Writing social psychology: fictional things and unpopulated texts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 4–20.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (2013). Learn to Write Badly: How to Succeed in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (2015a). Kurt Lewin’s leadership studies and his legacy to social psychology: Is there nothing as practical as a good theory? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45, 440–60.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (2015b). The myth of Kurt Lewin and the rhetoric of collective memory in social psychology textbooks. Theory & Psychology, 25, 703–18.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (2018a). Positive psychology, humour and the virtues of negative thinking. In Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., Vanhamme, J., Angell, R. J. and Memery, J. (eds), Not All Claps and Cheers: Humour in Business and Society Relationships. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (2018b). Those who only know of social psychology know not social psychology: a tribute to Gustav Jahoda’s historical approach. Culture & Psychology, 24, 282–93.Google Scholar
Billig, M. and Marinho, C. (2017). The Politics and Rhetoric of Commemoration: How the Portuguese Parliament Celebrates the April Revolution. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bloom, H. (1986). Freud the greatest modern writer. New York Times Book Review, March 23, 1, 26–7.Google Scholar
Boag, S. (2010). Repression, suppression and conscious awareness. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 27, 164–81.Google Scholar
Boag, S. (2012), Freudian Repression, the Unconscious and the Dynamics of Repression, London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
Boasson, C. (1973/1991). The UNESCO tensions Project, conflict residues and Bernstein’s sociology of anti-Semitism. In In Search of Peace Research. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bond, A. H. and Maciejewski, F. (2007). Did Freud sleep with his wife’s sister? An expert interview with Franz Maciejewski, PhD. Medscape, May 4. www.medscape.com/viewarticle/555692#vp_1 (Accessed 17 November 2018).Google Scholar
Boring, E. G. (1929). A History of Experimental Psychology. New York: D. Appleton Century.Google Scholar
Breger, L. (2009). A Dream of Undying Fame: How Freud Betrayed His Mentor and Invented Psycho-analysis. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. and Hewstone, M. (eds) (2004). Self and Social Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Broad, J. (2006). A woman’s influence? John Locke and Damaris Masham on moral accountability. Journal of the History of Ideas, 67, 489–510.Google Scholar
Brock, A. C. (1994). Whatever happened to Karl Bühler? Canadian Psychology, 35, 319–29.Google Scholar
Brock, A. C. (2006a). Introduction. In Brock, A. C., Louw, J. and van Hoorn, W. (eds), Rediscovering the History of Psychology. New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Brock, A. C. (2006b). Rediscovering the history of psychology: interview with Kurt Danziger. History of Psychology, 9, 1–16.Google Scholar
Brock, A. C. (2016a). The universal and the particular in psychology and the role of history in explaining both. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, 14, 29–46.Google Scholar
Brock, A. C. (2016b). The differing paths of an immigrant couple. Monitor on Psychology, 47 (2), 74.Google Scholar
Brock, A. C. (2016c). Introduction: the future of the history of psychology revisited. History of Psychology, 19, 175–91.Google Scholar
Bromwich, D. (1999). Hazlitt: the Mind of a Critic. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R., Schipper, A. and Wandersleben, N. (1996). Bibliography of publications of Henri Tajfel. In Robinson, W. P. (ed), Social Groups and Identities. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
Burke, K. (1974). The Philosophy of Literary Form. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: a re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 977–1002.Google Scholar
Burnes, B. and Bargal, D. (2017). Kurt Lewin: 70 years on. Journal of Change Management, 17, 91–100.Google Scholar
Burnes, B. and Cooke, B. (2013). Kurt Lewin’s field theory: a review and re-evaluation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 408–25.Google Scholar
Byford, J. and Tileagă, C. (2014). Conclusion: barriers to and promises of interdisciplinary dialogue between psychology and history. In Tileagă, C. and Byford, J. (eds), Psychology and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carini, L. (1973). Ernest Cassirer’s psychology: II. The nature of thinking. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 9, 266–9.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1923/1955). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms: Vol. 1. Language. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1925/1999). Two letters to Kurt Goldstein. Science in Context, 12, 661–7.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1932/1951). Philosophy of the Enlightenment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1932/1953). The Platonic Renaissance in England. Edinburgh: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1996). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms: Vol. 4. The Metaphysics of Symbolic Forms. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Christie, R. and Jahoda, M. (eds) (1954). Studies in the Scope and Method of ‘The Authoritarian Personality’. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Colucci, F. P. and Colombo, M. (2018). Dewey and Lewin: a neglected relationship and its current relevance to psychology. Theory & Psychology, 28, 20–37.Google Scholar
Colucci, F. P. and Montali, L. (2013). The origins, development and characteristics of critical social psychology in Italy. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 10, 596–621.Google Scholar
Condor (2003). ‘The least doubtful promise for the future’? The short history of Tajfel’s ‘sociopsychological’ approach to laboratory experimentation. In Lázló, J. and Wagner, W. (eds), Theories and Controversies in Societal Psychology. Budapest: New Mandate.Google Scholar
Connolly, P. J. (2017). The idea of power and Locke’s taxonomy of ideas. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 95, 1–16.Google Scholar
Cook, D. J. (1998). Leibniz on enthusiasm. In Coudert, A. P., Popkin, R. H. and Weiner, G. H. (eds), Leibniz, Mysticism and Religion. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Cook, S. W. (1990). Marie Jahoda. In O’Connell, A. N. and Russo, N. F. (eds), Women in Psychology. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, B. V., Kern, A. C. and Needleman, M. H. (2007). American Literature. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Crews, F. (1995). The Memory Wars: Freud’s Legacy in Dispute. New York: New York Review of Books.Google Scholar
Cudworth, R. (1731/1996). A Treatise Concerning Eternal and Immutable Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cummings, S., Bridgman, T. and Brown, K. G. (2016). Unfreezing change as three steps: rethinking Kurt Lewin’s legacy for change management. Human Relations, 69, 33–60.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (1994a). Constructing the Subject. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (1994b). Does the history of psychology have a future? Theory & Psychology, 4, 467–84.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (2000). Making social psychology experimental: a conceptual history 1920–1970. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 36, 329–47.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (2002). How old is psychology, particularly concepts of memory? History and Philosophy of Psychology, 4, 1–12.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (2003). Prospects of a historical psychology. History and Philosophy of Psychology Bulletin, 15 (2), 4–10.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (2006). Universalism and indigenization in the history of modern psychology. In Brock, A. C. (ed), Internationalizing the History of Psychology. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (2009). The holy grail of universality. In Teo, T., Stenner, P. and Rutherford, A. (eds), Varieties of Theoretical Psychology. Ontario: Captus.Google Scholar
Darwall, S. (1995). The British Moralists and the Internal ‘Ought’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1872). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Davidoff, L. (2011). Thicker than Water: Siblings and Their Relations, 1780–1920. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Delfour, F. and Marten, K. (2001). Mirror image processing in three marine mammal species: killer whales (Orcinus orca), false killer whales (Pseudorca crassidens) and California sea lions (Zalophus californianus). Behavioral Processes, 53, 181–90.Google Scholar
Delouvée, S., Kalampalikis, N. and Pétard, J.-P. (2011). There is nothing so practical as a good … history: Kurt Lewin’s place in the historical chapters of French language social psychology textbooks. Estudios de Psychologia, 32, 243–55.Google Scholar
Derry, W. (1966). Dr Parr: a Portrait of the Whig Dr Johnson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1954). Field theory in social psychology. In Lindzey, G. (ed), Handbook of Social Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
De Veer, M. W., Gallup, G. G., Theall, L. A., van den Bos, R. and Povinelli, D. J. (2003). An 8-year longitudinal study of mirror self-recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Neuropsychologia, 41, 229–34.Google Scholar
Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O. H. and Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and Aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dumont, K. and Louw, J. (2009). A citation analysis of Henri Tajfel’s work on intergroup relations. International Journal of Psychology, 44, 46–59.Google Scholar
Eiser, J. R. (1996). Accentuation revisited. In Robinson, W. P. (ed), Social Groups and Identities. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
Ellemers, N., Spears, R. and Doosje, B. (eds) (1999). Social Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Erwin, E. (1996). A Final Accounting: Philosophical and Empirical Issues in Freudian Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Evans, D. H. (2015). Unstiffening all our theories: William James and the culture of modernism. In Evans, D. H. (ed), Understanding James, Understanding Modernism. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Fleck, C. (1998). The choice between market research and sociography, or: what happened to Lazarsfeld in the United States? In Lautman, J. and Lécuyer, B.-P. (eds), Paul Lazarsfeld (1901–1976): la Sociologie de Vienne à New York. Paris: l’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Fleck, C. (2002). Introduction to the Transaction edition. In Jahoda, M., Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Zeisel, H. (eds), Marienthal: the Sociography of an Unemployed Community. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Fleck, L. (1935/1986). Scientific observation and perception in general. In Cohen, R. S. and Schnelle, T. (eds), Cognition and Fact. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. S. Reidel.Google Scholar
Forrester, J. (1997). Lacan’s debt to Freud: how the Ratman paid off his debt. In Dufresne, T. (ed), Returns of the ‘French Freud’: Freud, Lacan and Beyond. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1898/1948). Zum psychischen Mechanismus der Vergesslichkeit. In Gesammelte Werke, vol. 1. London: Imago. (Originally published in Monatsschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie, 1, 436–43).Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1901/1948). Zur Psychopathologie des Alltagslebens. In Gesammelte Werke, vol. 4. London: Imago.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1901/1975). The Psychopathology of Everyday Life. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1905/1991). Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1909/1990). Analysis of a phobia in a five-year-old boy (‘Little Hans’). In Case Histories, I. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1911/1991). From the history of an infantile neurosis (the ‘Wolf Man’). In Case Histories, II. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1913/1993). The claims of psychoanalysis to scientific interest. In Historical and Expository Works on Psychoanalysis. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1914/1993). On the history of the psychoanalytic movement. In Historical and Expository Works on Psychoanalysis. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1915/1991). Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1920/1991). Beyond the pleasure principle. In On Metapsychology. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1921/1985). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. In Civilization, Society and Religion. Harmondswoth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1925/1993). An autobiographical study. In Historical and Expository Works on Psychoanalysis. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1926/1993). The question of lay analysis. In Historical and Expository Works on Psychoanalysis. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1930/1990). The Goethe prize: address delivered in the Goethe House at Frankfurt. In Art and Literature. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1985). The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess, 1887–1904. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, S. and Breuer, J. (1895/1952). Studien über Hysterie. In Gesammelte Werke, vol. 1. London: Imago.Google Scholar
Freud, S. and Breuer, J. (1895/1991). Studies on Hysteria. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freud Museum (1998). 20 Maresfield Gardens: a Guide to the Freud Museum. London: Serpent’s Tail.Google Scholar
Fryer, D. (1986). The social psychology of the invisible: an interview with Marie Jahoda. New Ideas in Psychology, 4, 107–18.Google Scholar
Fryer, D. (2002). A social scientist for and in the real world: an introduction to the address by Professor Marie Jahoda. In Isaksson, K., Hogstedt, C., Eriksson, C. and Theorell, T. (eds), Health Effects of the New Labour Market. Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
Fryer, D. (2008). Some questions about ‘the history of community psychology’. Journal of Community Psychology, 36, 572–86.Google Scholar
Gale, B. G. (2016). Love in Vienna: The Sigmund Freud-Minna Bernays Affair. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. and Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 493–501.Google Scholar
Gallup, G. G. and Suarez, S. D. (1991). Social responding to mirrors in rhesus-monkeys (Macaca-mulatta): effects of temporary mirror removal. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 105, 376–9.Google Scholar
Gallup, G. G., Anderson, J. R. and Shillito, D. J. (2002). The mirror test. In Bekoff, M., Allen, C. and Burghardt, G. M. (eds), The Cognitive Animal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gallup, G. G., Povinelli, D. J., Suarez, S. D., Anderson, J. R., Lethmate, J. and Menzel, E. W. (1995). Further reflections on self-recognition in primates. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1525–32.Google Scholar
Gentile, B. F. and Miller, B. O. (eds) (2009). Foundations of Psychological Thought. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gerard, N. (2017). ‘Marx was right’: lessons from Lewin. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 54 (4), 83–6.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309–20.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1983). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gibson, S. (2018). Arguing, Obeying and Defying: a Rhetorical Perspective on Stanley Milgram’s Obedience Experiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (1996). From tools to theories: discoveries in cognitive psychology. In Graumann, C. F. and Gergen, K. J. (eds), Historical Dimensions of Psychological Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (2008a). Gut Feelings: Short Cuts to Better Decision Making. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (2008b). Why heuristics work. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 20–29.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (2010). Personal reflections on theory and psychology. Theory & Psychology, 20, 733–43.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. and Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 107–43.Google Scholar
Gitre, E. J. K. (2006). William James on divine intimacy: psychical research, cosmological realism and a circumscribed re-reading of The Varieties of Religious Experience. History of the Human Sciences, 19, 1–21.Google Scholar
Glassman, R. B. and Buckingham, H. W. (2007). David Hartley’s neural vibrations and psychological associations. In Whitaker, H., Smith, C. U. M. and Finger, S. (eds), Brain, Mind and Medicine. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Gloy, T. (2015). Fritz Bernsteins Soziologie des Judenshasses. In Hahn, H. J. and Kistenmacher, O. (eds), Beschreibungsversuche der Judenfeindschaft: Zur Geschichte der Antisemitismusforschung vor 1944. Oldenbourg: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gold, M. (ed) (1999). The Complete Social Scientist: a Kurt Lewin Reader. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Goldstein, K. (1940). The Organism: a Holistic Approach to Biology. New York: American Book Co.Google Scholar
Goldstein, K. (1948). Language and Language Disturbances. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Gottfried, P. E. (2005). The Strange Death of Marxism. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Granzotto, E. (1974). ‘This so-called crisis. It does not exist’ – Interview with Jacques Lacan. Panorama. www.critical-theory.com/this-so-called-crisis-it-does-not-exist-jacques-lacan-on-psychoanalysis-in-1974/ (Accessed 21 October 2018).Google Scholar
Grayling, A. C. (2000). The Quarrel of the Age: the Life and Times of William Hazlitt. London: Phoenix Press.Google Scholar
Grayling, A. C. (2002). Freud’s genius as author and ideologue. Guardian Review, June 22, 5–7.Google Scholar
Greenwood, J. D. (2015). A Conceptual History of Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1984). The Foundations of Psychoanalysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Guillaume, P. (1926/1971). Imitation in Children. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halawa, M. A. (2009). Karl Bühler’s and Ernst Cassirer’s semiotic conceptions of man. Verbum, 31, 65–88.Google Scholar
Hartley, D. (1749/1834). Observations on Man, His Frame, His Duty and His Expectations. London: Thomas Tegg.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, W. (1807). Preface. In Hazlitt, W. (ed), An Abridgement of ‘The Light of Nature Pursued’ by Abraham Tucker. London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
Henderson, G. E. (2017). Dialogism versus monologism: Burke, Bakhtin, and the languages of social change. Journal of the Kenneth Burke Society, 13 (1). http://kbjournal.org/henderson-on-burke-and-bakhtin (Accessed 28 January 2019).Google Scholar
Henley, T. B. (2007). Remembering William James. In Brook, A. (ed), The Prehistory of Cognitive Psychology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G. (1765/2008). How philosophy can become more universal and more useful for the benefit of the people. In Philosophical Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hergenhahn, B. R. (2001). An Introduction to the History of Psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson.Google Scholar
Hermans, H. and Gieser, T. (eds) (2014). Handbook of Dialogical Self Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hermans, H. and Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Dialogical Self Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hilgard, E. R. (1987). Psychology in America. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Hirschmüller, A. (2007). Evidence for a sexual relationship between Sigmund Freud and Minna Bernays? American Imago, 64, 125–9.Google Scholar
Hodgson, S. H. (1870). The Theory of Practice. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer.Google Scholar
Horley, J. (2001). After ‘the Baltimore Affair’: James Mark Baldwin’s life and work, 1908–1934. History of Psychology, 4, 24–33.Google Scholar
Hux, S. (2017). Freud again. New English Review, November. www.newenglishreview.org/Samuel_Hux/Freud_Again/ (Accessed 28 January 2018).Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. (2015). The Frankfurt School, Jewish Lives and Antisemitism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, A. J. (2007). Doing it his way: Hume’s theory of ideas and contemporary cognitive science. In Brook, A. (ed), The Prehistory of Cognitive Psychology. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jahoda, G. (2004). Henri Tajfel. In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jahoda, G. (2016). Seventy years of social psychology: a cultural and personal critique. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4, 364–80.Google Scholar
Jahoda, M. (1959). Conformity and independence: a psychological analysis. Human Relations, 12, 99–120.Google Scholar
Jahoda, M. (1963). Some notes on the influence of psycho-analytic ideas on American psychology. Human Relations, 16, 111–29.Google Scholar
Jahoda, M. (1969). The migration of psychoanalysis: its impact on American psychology. In Fleming, D. and Bailyn, B. (eds), The Intellectual Migration: Europe and America, 1930–1960. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jahoda, M. (1970). A time to speak or a time to keep silent? International Journal of Psychology, 5, 145–8.Google Scholar
Jahoda, M. (1981a). To publish or not to publish? Journal of Social Issues, 37, 208–20.Google Scholar
Jahoda, M. (1981b). Review: H. Tajfel. Human Groups and Social Categories. Psychological Medicine, 11, 860–61.Google Scholar
Jahoda, M. (1982a). Reflections on Marienthal and after. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 355–8.Google Scholar
Jahoda, M. (1982b). Employment and Unemployment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jahoda, M. (1983). The emergence of social psychology in Vienna: an exercise in long term memory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 343–9.Google Scholar
Jahoda, M. (1989). Why a non-reductionist social psychology is almost too difficult to be tackled, but too fascinating to be left alone. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 71–8.Google Scholar
Jahoda, M., Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Zeisel, H. (2002). Marienthal: the Sociography of an Unemployed Community. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Janlert, U. and Hammarström, A. (2009). Which theory is best? Explanatory models of the relationship between unemployment and health. BMC Public Health, 9, 235.Google Scholar
Janover, M. (2011). Politics and worldliness in the thought of Hannah Arendt. In Yeatman, A., Hansen, P., Zolkos, M. and Barbour, C. (eds), Action and Appearance. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
John, M., Eckardt, G. and Hiebsch, H. (1989). Kurt Lewin’s early intentions (dedicated to his 100th birthday). European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 163–9.Google Scholar
Kaposi, D. (2017). The resistance experiments: morality, authority and obedience in Stanley Milgram’s account. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 47, 382–401.Google Scholar
Kardas, E. P. (2014). History of Psychology: the Making of a Science. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. P., Gallup, G. G. and Falk, D. (2003). The Face in the Mirror. New York: Ecco.Google Scholar
Kellner, D. (1977). Korsch’s revolutionary Marxism. In Kellner, D. (ed), Karl Korsch: Revolutionary Theory. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
King, D. B. and Wertheimer, M. (2005). Max Wertheimer and Gestalt Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Klein, L. (2009). Jahoda, Marie. In Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Korsch, K. (1975). What is socialization? A programme of practical socialism. New German Critique, 6, 60–81.Google Scholar
Korsch, K. (1977). Fundamentals of socialization. In Kellner, D. (ed), Karl Korsch: Revolutionary Theory. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Krah, F. (2016). Ein Ungeheuer, das wenigstens theoretisch besiegt sein muss: Pioniere der Antisemitismusforschung in Deutschland. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Krois, J. M. (2004). Ernst Cassirer’s philosophy of biology. Sign Systems Studies, 32, 277–95.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. (1948). L’agressivité en psychanalyse. Revue Française de Psychanalyse, 12, 367–88.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. (1949). Le stade du miroir comme formateur de la fonction du je, telle qu’elle nous est révélée, dans l’expérience psychanalytique. Revue Française de Psychanalyse, 13, 449–55.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. (1970). Le Séminaire, Livre I: les Écrits techniques de Freud. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. (1980). Television, trans. D. Hollier, R. Krauss and A. Michelson. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. (1988). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book 1, Freud’s Papers on Technique 1953–1954, trans. J.-A. Miller. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. (1991). The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis, trans. A. Sheridan. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. (1993). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book III, The Psychoses, trans. R. Grigg. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. (2007). Écrits: the First Complete Edition in English, trans. B. Fink. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lähteenmäki, V. (2014). Locke and active perception. In Silva, J. F. and Yrjönsuuri, M. (eds), Active Perception in the History of Philosophy. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Laplanche, J. and Pontalis, J.-B. (1983). The Language of Psycho-Analysis. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1969). An episode in the history of social research: a memoir. In Fleming, D. and Bailyn, B. (eds), The Intellectual Migration: Europe and America, 1930–1960. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (2002). Foreword to the American edition: forty years later. In Jahoda, M., Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Zeisel, H. (eds), Marienthal: the Sociography of an Unemployed Community. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Leahey, T. H. (2017). A History of Psychology from Antiquity to Modernity. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leary, D. E. (1990). William James on the self and personality: clearing the ground for subsequent theorists, researchers and practitioners. In Johnson, M. G. and Henley, T. B. (eds), Reflections on ‘The Principles of Psychology’. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Leary, D. E. (2007). Instead of Erklären and Verstehen: William James on human understanding. In Feest, U. (ed), Historical Perspectives on Erklären and Verstehen. Berlin: Max Plank.Google Scholar
Leary, D. E. (2013). A moralist in an age of scientific analysis and scepticism: habit in the life and work of William James. In Sparrow, T. and Hutchinson, A. (eds), A History of Habit, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Leary, D. E. (2018). The Routledge Guidebook to James’s ‘Principles of Psychology’. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ledlow, G. R. and Coppola, M. N. (2011). Leadership for Health Professionals. London: Jones and Bartlett Learning.Google Scholar
Leventhal, R. S. (1990). Critique of subjectivity: Herder’s foundation of the human sciences. In Mueller-Vollmer, K. (ed), Herder Today. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Levine, R. (2008). Introduction. In Levine, R., Rodrigues, A. and Zelezny, L. (eds), Journeys in Social Psychology. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Levine, R., Rodrigues, A. and Zelezny, L. (eds) (2008). Journeys in Social Psychology. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Lewin, G. and Lewin, K. (1941/1999). Democracy and the school. In Gold, M. (ed), The Complete Social Scientist: a Kurt Lewin Reader. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1920/1999). Socializing the Taylor system. In Gold, M. (ed), The Complete Social Scientist: a Kurt Lewin Reader. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1926/1938). Will and needs. In Ellis, W. D. (ed), A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology. London: Kegan Paul, French, Trubner.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1931/1999). The conflict between Aristotelian and Galileian modes of thought in contemporary psychology. In Gold, M. (ed), The Complete Social Scientist: a Kurt Lewin Reader. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1932). Book review: Murphy, Gardner, and Louis Barclay Murphy, Experimental Social Psychology. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, 1, 169–70.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1938). The Conceptual Representation and the Measurement of Psychological Forces. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1946/1997). Behaviour and development as a function of the total situation. In Resolving Social Conflicts and Field Theory in Social Science. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1947/1997). Frontiers in group dynamics. In Resolving Social Conflicts and Field Theory in Social Science. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1949/1999). Cassirer’s philosophy of science and the social sciences. In Gold, M. (ed), The Complete Social Scientist: a Kurt Lewin Reader. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1951/1997). Field Theory in Social Science. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. and Korsch, K. (1976). Mathematical constructs in psychology and sociology. The Journal of Unified Science (Erkenntnis), 8, 397–403.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. and Lippitt, R. (1938). An experimental approach to the study of autocracy and democracy: a preliminary note. Sociometry, 1, 292–300.Google Scholar
Lewin, K., Lippitt, R. and White, R. K. (1939/1999). Patterns of aggressive behaviour in experimentally created ‘social climates’. In Gold, M. (ed), The Complete Social Scientist: a Kurt Lewin Reader. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. (Originally published in Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271–99).Google Scholar
Lewin, K., Meyers, C. E., Kalhorn, J., Farber, M. L. and French, J. R. P. (1944). Authority and Frustration. University of Iowa Studies in Child Welfare 20. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
Lewin, M. A. (1977). Kurt Lewin’s view of social psychology: the crisis of 1977 and the crisis of 1927. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 159–72.Google Scholar
Lewin, M. A. (1998). Kurt Lewin: his psychology and a daughter’s recollections. In Kimble, G. A. and Wertheimer, M. (eds), Portraits of Pioneers of Psychology, vol. III. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Lezaun, J. and Calvillo, N. (2014). In the political laboratory: Kurt Lewin’s atmospheres. Journal of Cultural Economy, 7, 434–57.Google Scholar
Liberman, Z., Woodward, A. L. and Kinzler, K. D. (2017). The origins of social categorization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 556–68.Google Scholar
Lippitt, R. (1940). An experimental study of the effect of democratic and authoritarian group atmospheres. University of Iowa Studies in Child Welfare, 16, 43–195.Google Scholar
Lippitt, R. and White, R. K. (1958). An experimental study of leadership and group life. In Maccoby, E. E., Newcomb, T. M. and Hartley, E. L. (eds), Readings in Social Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Lippman, R. (2008). Freud’s failure to recall the name of Luca Signorelli. International Psychoanalysis. http://internationalpsychoanalysis-net.ipbooks.net/2008/07/17/freud%E2%80%99s-failure-to-recall-the-name-of-luca-signorelli-by-robert-lippman/ (Accessed 25 November 2018).Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1694). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. 3nd edn. London: Awnsham and John Churchil.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1700). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. 4th edn. London: Awnsham and John Churchil.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1706). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. 5th edn. London: Awnsham and John Churchil.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1824/2002). Collected Works of John Locke. Carmel: Liberty Fund. https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/locke-the-works-of-john-locke-in-nine-volumes (Accessed 25 November 2018).Google Scholar
Lothane, Z. (2007). Sigmund Freud and Minna Bernays: primal curiosity, primal scenes, primal fantasies: and prevarication. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 24, 487–95.Google Scholar
Lothane, Z. (2009). Sigmund Freud and Minna Bernays: primal curiosity, primal scenes, primal fantasies: and prevarication. Forum, 53, 17–19.Google Scholar
Ludwig, D. (2012). Language and human nature: Kurt Goldstein’s neurolinguistic foundation of a holistic philosophy. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 48, 40–54.Google Scholar
Maciejewski, F. (2008). Minna Bernays as ‘Mrs. Freud’: what sort of relationship did Sigmund Freud have with his sister-in-law? American Imago, 65, 1–21.Google Scholar
MacMartin, C. and Winston, A. C. (2000). The rhetoric of experimental social psychology, 1930–1960: from caution to enthusiasm. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 36, 349–64.Google Scholar
Mandler, G. (2007). A History of Modern Experimental Psychology: from James and Wundt to Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marková, I. (ed) (2018). Across culture, mind and history [special issue]. Culture & Psychology, 24 (3).Google Scholar
Marková, I. and Jesuino, J. C. (2018). Social psychology as a developmental discipline in the dynamics of practical life: Gustav Jahoda’s pioneering studies on children’s social thinking. Culture & Psychology, 24, 343–57.Google Scholar
Marrow, A. J. (1969). The Practical Theorist: the Life and Work of Kurt Lewin. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Marten, K. and Psarakos, S. (1995). Using self-view television to distinguish between self-examination and social behaviour in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops Truncatus). Consciousness and Cognition, 4, 205–24.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1848/2004). Communist manifesto. In Karl Marx (with Friedrich Engels). London: Collectors’ Library of Essential Thinkers.Google Scholar
Mayer, A. (2001–2). Introspective hypnotism and Freud’s self-analysis: procedures of self-observation in clinical practice. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences Humaines, 5, 171–96.Google Scholar
McLeod, S. (2007). Social psychology. Simply Psychology, www.simplypsychology.org/social-psychology.html (Accessed 4 September 2018).Google Scholar
Mercier, H. and Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 57–111.Google Scholar
Mildmay, H. P. St. J. (1831). Some account of the life of Abraham Tucker, Esq. In A. Tucker, The Light of Nature Pursued, vol. 1. Cambridge: Hilliard and Brown.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. W. (1997). Kinesthetic-visual matching and the self-concept as explanations of mirror-self-recognition. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 27, 17–39.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. and Lee, N. (2006). Double reification: the process of universalizing psychology in the three worlds. In Brock, A. C. (ed), Internationalizing the History of Psychology. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, R. and Reiss, D. (2018). Precocious development of self-awareness in dolphins. Plos One, 13 (1), e0189813.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. and Marková, I. (2006). The Making of Modern Social Psychology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Müller, R. (2012). The Marienthal study. University of Graz. http://agso.uni-graz.at/marienthal/e/study/00.htm (Accessed 28 September 2018).Google Scholar
Mulligan, K. (1997). The essence of language: Wittgenstein’s builders and Bühler’s bricks. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 2, 193–216.Google Scholar
Mummendey, A., Linneweber, W. and Löschper, G. (1984). Aggression: from act to interaction. In Mummendey, A. (ed), Social Psychology of Aggression. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Münsterberg, H. (1907/1996). Professor James as a psychologist. In Simon, L. (ed), William James Remembered. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, G. and Murphy, L. B. (1931). Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Murphy, G., Murphy, L. B. and Newcomb, T. M. (1937). Experimental Social Psychology. 2nd edn. New York: Harper and BrothersGoogle Scholar
Myers, G. E. (1997). Pragmatism and introspective psychology. In Putnam, R. A. (ed), The Cambridge Companion to William James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Neurath, P. (1995). Sixty years since ‘Marienthal’. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 20, 91–105.Google Scholar
Nobus, D. (2016). Psychoanalysis as gai saber: toward a new episteme of laughter. In Gherovici, P. and Steinkoler, M. (eds), Lacan, Psychoanalysis and Comedy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nobus, D. (2017a). Preface. In Nobus, D. (ed), Key Concepts of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
Nobus, D. (2017b). Life and death in the glass: a new look at the mirror stage. In Nobus, D. (ed), Key Concepts of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
O’Brien, E (2017). Jacques Lacan. In O’Brien, E. (ed), Oxford Bibliographies in Literary and Critical Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, M. T. (1991). Freud’s affair with Minna Bernays: his letter of June 4, 1896. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 51, 173–84.Google Scholar
Owens, M. E. (2004). Forgetting Signorelli: monstrous visions of the resurrection of the dead. American Imago, 61, 7–33.Google Scholar
Paley, W. (1791). The Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy. London: R. Fauldner.Google Scholar
Palombo, J, Bendicsen, H. K. and Koch, B. J. (2009). Guide to Psychoanalytic Developmental Theories. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J. and Panksepp, J. A. (2013). Toward a cross-species understanding of empathy. Trends in Neurosciences, 36, 489–96.Google Scholar
Parker, I. (2003). Jacques Lacan, barred psychologist. Theory & Psychology, 13, 95–115.Google Scholar
Parker, I. (2005). Lacanian discourse analysis in psychology: seven theoretical elements. Theory & Psychology, 15, 163–82.Google Scholar
Parr, S. (ed) (1837). Metaphysical Tracts by English Philosophers of the Eighteenth Century. London: E. Lumley.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. (2015). Anti-Semitism and Its Metaphysical Origins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pavlidou, T. S. (2014). Constructing collectivity with ‘we’: an introduction. In Pavlidou, T. S. (ed), Constructing Collectivity: ‘We’ across Languages and Contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Perelman, C. (1979). The New Rhetoric and the Humanities. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Perry, G. (2018). The Lost Boys: Inside Muzafer Sherif’s Robbers Cave Experiment. London: Scribe Books.Google Scholar
Pickren, W. E. and Rutherford, A. (2010). A History of Modern Psychology in Context. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Pierrakos, M. (2006). Transcribing Lacan’s Seminars: Memoirs of a Disgruntled Keybasher Turned Psychoanalyst. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Plotnik, J. M., de Waal, F. B. M. and Reiss, D. (2006). Self-recognition in an Asian elephant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 17053–7.Google Scholar
Pons, A. (2014). Genius. In Cassin, B. (ed), Dictionary of Untranslatables. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Poole, B. (2002). Bakhtin and Cassirer: the philosophical origins of Bakhtin’s carnival. In Gardiner, M. E. (ed), Mikhail Bakhtin, vol. 1. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Povinelli, D. J., Gallup, G. G., Eddy, T. J., Bierschwale, D. T., Engstrom, M. C., Perilloux, H. K. and Toxopeus, I. B. (1997). Chimpanzees recognize themselves in mirrors. Animal Behaviour, 53, 1083–8.Google Scholar
Preyer, W. (1889). The Mind of the Child, Part II: the Development of the Intellect. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
Prince, M. B. (2004). Editing Shaftesbury’s Characteristicks. Essays in Criticism, 54, 38–59.Google Scholar
Prior, H., Schwarz, A. and Güntürkün, O. (2008). Mirror-induced behaviour in the magpie (Pica pica): evidence of self-recognition. PLoS Biology, 6, E202.Google Scholar
Rabaté, J.-M. (2003a). Lacan’s turn to Freud. In Rabaté, J.-M. (ed), Cambridge Companion to Lacan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rabaté, J.-M. (2003b). Preface. In Rabaté, J.-M. (ed), Cambridge Companion to Lacan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Radden, G. and Kövecses, Z. (2007). Towards a theory of metonymy. In Evans, V., Bergen, B. and Zinken, J. (eds), The Cognitive Linguistics Reader. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Reicher, S. D. (1996). Social identity and social change: rethinking the context of social psychology. In Robinson, W. P. (ed), Social Groups and Identities. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
Reicher, S. D. and Haslam, S. A. (2011). After shock? Towards a social identity explanation of the Milgram ‘obedience’ studies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 163–9.Google Scholar
Reicher, S. D., Spears, R. and Haslam, S. A. (2010). The social identity approach in social psychology. In Wetherell, M. and Mohanty, C. T. (eds), Sage Handbook of Identities. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Reiss, D. and Marino, L. (2001). Mirror self-recognition in the bottlenose dolphin: a case of cognitive convergence. PNAS, 98, 5937–42.Google Scholar
Richardson, R. D. (2007). William James: in the Maelstrom of American Modernism. Boston: Mariner.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G. and Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 167–92.Google Scholar
Roazen, P. (1997). Nietzsche, Freud and the history of psychoanalysis. In Dufresne, T. (ed), Returns of the ‘French Freud’. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. P. (ed) (1996). Social Groups and Identities: Developing the Legacy of Henri Tajfel. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
Rösing, L. M. (2016). Pixar with Lacan: the Hysteric’s Guide to Animation. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Roudinesco, É. (2003). The mirror stage: an obliterated archive. In Rabaté, J.-M. (ed), Cambridge Companion to Lacan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, A. (2010). Profile of Marie Jahoda. In A. Rutherford (ed), Psychology’s Feminist Voices Multimedia Digital Archive. www.feministvoices.com/marie-jahoda/ (Accessed 6 November 2018).Google Scholar
Rutherford, A. (2011). The life and politics of an early woman leader: Marie Jahoda (1907–2001). The Feminist Psychologist, Newsletter for the Society of the Psychology of Women (Division 35, APA), 38, 10–11.Google Scholar
Rutherford, A., Unger, R. and Cherry, F. (2011). Reclaiming SPSSI’s sociological past: Marie Jahoda and the immersion tradition in social psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 42–58.Google Scholar
Sage, D. (2018). Reversing the negative experience of unemployment: a mediating role for social policies? Social Policy and Administration, 52, 1043–59.Google Scholar
Santayana, G. (1933). Some Turns of Thought in Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schafer, R. (1976). A New Language for Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scheff, T. J. (2006). Goffman Unbound! A New Paradigm for Social Science. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Scheff, T. J. (2010). Instances and general ideas: parts and wholes. New English Review. www.newenglishreview.org/custpage.cfm/frm/60404/sec_id/60404 (Accessed 16 November 2018).Google Scholar
Schiller, F. C. S. (1930/1996). William James. In Simon, L. (ed), William James Remembered. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Schilpp, P. A. (1949). Preface. In Schilpp, P. A. (ed), The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer. New York: Tudor.Google Scholar
Schools Council History Project. (1977). Arab-Israeli Conflict. Edinburgh: Holmes McDougall.Google Scholar
Schultz, D. P. and Schultz, S. E. (2016). A History of Modern Psychology. Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Scubla, L. (2011). Lévi-Strauss, Lacan, and the symbolic order. Revue de Mauss, 25, 253–67.Google Scholar
Sellars, J. (2016). Shaftesbury, stoicism, and philosophy as a way of life. Sophia, 55, 395–408.Google Scholar
Shaftesbury, third Earl of. (1711). Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times. N.p.Google Scholar
Shaftesbury, third Earl of. (1714/2001). Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaftesbury, third Earl of. (1900). The Life, Unpublished Letters and Philosophical Regime, ed. Rand, B.. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Shillito, D. J., Gallup, G. G. and Beck, B. B. (1999). Factors affecting mirror behaviour in Western Lowland gorillas, Gorilla Gorilla. Animal Behaviour, 57, 999–1004.Google Scholar
Shotter, J. (2003). Cultural Politics of Everyday Life. Buckingham, UK: Open University.Google Scholar
Shotter, J. (2005a). Moving on by backing away. In Yancy, G. and Hadley, S. (eds), Narrative Identities. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Shotter, J. (2005b). Goethe and the refiguring of intellectual inquiry: from ‘aboutness’-thinking to ‘withness’-thinking in everyday life. Janus Head, 8, 132–58.Google Scholar
Silverstein, B. (2007). What happens in Maloja stays in Maloja: inference and evidence in the ‘Minna wars’. American Imago, 64, 283–9.Google Scholar
Simons, H. W. (2007). The rhetorical legacy of Kenneth Burke. In Jost, W. and Olmstead, W. (eds), A Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Skidelsky, E. (2011). Ernst Cassirer: the Last Philosopher of Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Slaughter, S. and Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic Capitalism and the New Economy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1983). Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, M. K. (2001). Kurt Lewin, groups, experiential learning and action research. Encyclopedia of Informal Education. www.infed.org/thinkers/et-lewin.htm (Accessed 30 December 2018).Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1988). Does the history of psychology have a subject? History of the Human Sciences, 1, 147–77.Google Scholar
Sofer, S. (2009). Zionism and the Foundations of Israeli Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spence, D. P. (1994). The Rhetorical Voice of Psychoanalysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stamenov, M. I. and Gallese, V. (eds) (2002). Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Stavrakakis, Y. (2007). Wallon, Lacan and the Lacanians: citation practices and repression. Theory, Culture & Society, 24, 131–8.Google Scholar
Stephen, L. (1876). History of English Thought in the Eighteenth Century, vol. II. London: Smith Elder.Google Scholar
Stroud, S. R. (2012). William James and the impetus of Stoic rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 45, 246–68.Google Scholar
Sułek, A. (2007). The Marienthal 1931/1932 study and contemporary studies on unemployment in Poland. Polish Sociological Review, 157, 3–25.Google Scholar
Swales, P. (1982). Freud, Minna Bernays and the conquest of Rome. New American Review, 1, 1–23.Google Scholar
Swales, P. (2003). Freud, death and sexual pleasures: on the psychical mechanism of Dr. Sigm. Freud. Arc de Cercle, 1, 4–74.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 79–97.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 233, 96–102.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1972). Experiments in a vacuum. In Israel, J. and Tajfel, H. (eds), The Context of Social Psychology. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1975). The exit of social mobility and the voice of social change: notes on the social psychology of intergroup relations. Social Science Information, 14, 101–18.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1976). Exit, voice and intergroup relations. In Strickland, L., Aboud, F. and Gergen, K. (eds), Social Psychology in Transition. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1980). Foreword. Published as ‘Nachwort zur Neuauflage’ in Bernstein, F. P., Der Antisemitismus als eine Gruppenerscheinung: Versuch einer Soziologie des Judenhasses. Königstein: Jüdischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1982a). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1982b). Instrumentality, identity and social comparisons. In Tajfel, H. (ed), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1984). Intergroup relations, social myths and social justice in social psychology. In Tajfel, H. (ed), The Social Dimension, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. and Billig, M. (1974). Familiarity and categorization in intergroup behaviour. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 159–70.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R. P. and Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–78.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin, W. G. and Worchel, S. (eds), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. and Wilkes, A. L. (1963). Classification and quantitative judgment. British Journal of Psychology, 54, 101–14.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2002). Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tileagă, C. and Byford, J. (2014). Social psychology, history and the study of the Holocaust: the perils of interdisciplinary ‘borrowing’. Journal of Peace Psychology, 20, 349–64.Google Scholar
Trepte, S. (2006). Social identity theory. In Bryant, J. and Vorderer, P. (eds), Psychology of Entertainment. Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tucker, A. (Anon.) (1755). The Country Gentleman’s Advice to His Son. London: W. Owen.Google Scholar
Tucker, A. (Search, E.) (1763). Freewill, Foreknowledge and Fate: a Fragment. London: R. and J. Dodsley.Google Scholar
Tucker, A. (1763/1837). Man in quest of himself. In Parr, S. (ed), Metaphysical Tracts by English Philosophers of the Eighteenth Century. London: E. Lumley.Google Scholar
Tucker, A. (Search, E.) (1768). The Light of Nature Pursued, vols. I and II. London: T. Payne.Google Scholar
Tucker, A. (1777). The Light of Nature Pursued by Edward Search: Vol. III. The Posthumous Work of Abraham Tucker. London: T. Payne and Son.Google Scholar
Tucker, A. (1807). An Abridgement of ‘The light of Nature Pursued’ by Abraham Tucker, ed. Hazlitt, W.. London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In Tajfel, H. (ed), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1987). A self-categorization theory. In Rediscovering the Social Group. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ulmer, W. A. (2006). The alienation of the elect in Coleridge’s Unitarian prophecies. Review of English Studies, 57, 526–44.Google Scholar
van Elteren, M. (1992). Karl Korsch and Lewinian social psychology: failure of a project. History of the Human Sciences, 5, 33–61.Google Scholar
van Praag, B. M. S. (2009). Introduction to the Transaction edition. In P. F. Bernstein, The Social Roots of Discrimination: the Case of the Jews. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Vaughan, G. M. (2018). Henri Tajfel: Polish-born British social psychologist. Encyclopaedia Britannica. www.britannica.com/biography/Henri-Tajfel (Accessed 12 September 2018).Google Scholar
Veblen, T. (1914). The Instinct of Workmanship and the State of the Industrial Arts. New York: B. W. Huebsch.Google Scholar
Voitle, R. (1984). The Third Earl of Shaftesbury. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Vyt, A. (2001). Processes of visual self-recognition in infants: experimental induction of ‘mirror’ experience via video self-image presentation. Infant and Child Development, 10, 173–87.Google Scholar
Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M. and von der Heydt, R. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1172–217.Google Scholar
Wallon, H. (1934/1949). Les Origines du Caractère chez l’Enfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Walsh, R. T. G., Teo, T. and Baydala, A. (2014). A Critical History and Philosophy of Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (2003). Theory and practice in the real world. In Tsoukas, H. and Knudsen, C. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory: Metatheoretical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, M. (1987). A Brief History of Psychology. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Wettersten, J. (1988). Kulpe, Bühler, Popper. In Eschbach, A. (ed), Karl Bühler’s Theory of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wolters, E. (2013). Noam Chomsky calls Jacques Lacan a ‘charlatan’. Critical Theory, February 28. www.critical-theory.com/noam-chomsky-calls-jacques-lacan-a-charlatan/ (Accessed 21 October 2018).Google Scholar
Yaffe, G. (2002). Earl of Shaftesbury. In Nadler, S. (ed), A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Young, B. W. (2004). Tucker, Abraham (1705–1774). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, R. M. (1973). The role of psychology in the nineteenth century evolutionary debate. In Henle, M., Jaynes, J. and Sullivan, J. L. (eds), Historical Conceptions of Psychology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (2001). Enjoy Your Symptom! Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and Out. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zwart, H. (2014). The elephant, the mirror and the Ark: rereading Lacan’s animal philosophy in an era of ontological violence and mass extinction. Journal of Critical Animal Studies, 12, 1–32.Google Scholar