Book contents
- Morality as Legislation
- Morality as Legislation
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations with Method of Citation
- Introduction
- Part I The Emergence of the Rule-Consequentialist Paradox
- Part II Contemporary Approaches to the Rule-Consequentialist Paradox
- Works Cited
- Index
- References
Works Cited
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2021
Book contents
- Morality as Legislation
- Morality as Legislation
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations with Method of Citation
- Introduction
- Part I The Emergence of the Rule-Consequentialist Paradox
- Part II Contemporary Approaches to the Rule-Consequentialist Paradox
- Works Cited
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Morality as LegislationRules and Consequences, pp. 217 - 225Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Works Cited
Albee, Ernest. (1901) 1962. A History of English Utilitarianism. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Anscombe, Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret. 1958. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy 33: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, John. (1832) 1995. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Edited by Rumble, Wilfrid E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, Annette. 2010. The Cautious Jealous Virtue: Hume on Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. (1789) 1988. The Principles of Morals and Legislation. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. (1822) 2003. The Influence of Natural Religion on the Temporal Happiness of Mankind. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. (1834) 1983. Deontology Together with a Table of the Springs of Action and Article on Utilitarianism. Edited by Goldworth, Amnon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Fred R. 1984. Happiness, Justice, and Freedom: The Moral and Political Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkeley, George. (1712) 1901. “Passive Obedience, or the Christian Doctrine of Not Resisting the Supreme Power, Proved and Vindicated upon the Principles of the Law of Nature.” In The Works of George Berkeley, Volume Four. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Birks, Thomas Rawson. 1874. Modern Utilitarianism: Or the Systems of Paley, Bentham, and Mill Compared. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Brandt, Richard. 1959. Ethical Theory: The Problem of Normative and Critical Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Brandt, Richard. 1988. “Fairness to Indirect Optimific Theories in Ethics.” Ethics 98: 341–60.Google Scholar
Brandt, Richard. (1967) 1992. “Some Merits of One Form of Rule-Utilitarianism.” In Brandt, Richard, Morality, Utilitarianism, and Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broad, Charlie Dunbar. 1916. “On the Function of False Hypotheses in Ethics.” International Journal of Ethics 26(3): 377–97.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Roberts, Adam. 1990. Hugo Grotius and International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Joseph. (1867) 2006. The Works of Joseph Butler: Containing the Analogy of Religion and Sixteen Celebrated Sermons. London: William Tegg [reprinted by Elibron Classics].Google Scholar
Campbell, Charles Arthur. 1948. “Moral Intuition and the Principle of Self-Realization.” Annual Philosophical Lecture, Henriette Hertz Trust, Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol. 34. London: G. Cumberlege.Google Scholar
Cohen, Gerald Allan 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cohon, Rachel. 2008. Hume’s Morality: Feeling and Fabrication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crimmins, James E. 1990. Secular Utilitarianism: Social Science and the Critique of Religion in the Thought of Jeremy Bentham. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger. 1997. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Mill on Utilitarianism. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger. 2015. The Cosmos of Duty: Henry Sidgwick’s Methods of Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumberland, Richard. (1672) 2005. A Treatise of the Laws of Nature. Translated by John Maxell and edited by Parkin, John. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. 1995a. The British Moralists and the Internal “Ought” 1640–1740. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. 1995b. “Hume and the Invention of Utilitarianism.” In Hume and Hume’s Connexions, edited by Stewart, Michael Alexander and Wright, John P., 58–82. Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Kevin R. 1991. “Kantian ‘Publicity’ and Political Justice.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 8(4): 409–21.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel and Steglich-Petersen, Asbjørn. 2008. The Philosophical Lexicon. www.philosophicallexicon.com.Google Scholar
Donner, Wendy. 1998. “Mill’s Utilitarianism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Mill, edited by Skorupski, John, 255–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Donner, Wendy. 2009. “Mill’s Moral and Political Philosophy.” In Mill, edited by Donner, Wendy and Fumerton, Richard, 13–143. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Donner, Wendy. 2011. “Morality, Virtue, and Aesthetics.” In John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life, edited by Eggleston, Ben, Miller, Dale E., and Weinstein, David, 146–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eggleston, Ben. 2011. “Rules and Their Reasons: Mill on Morality and Instrumental Rationality.” In John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life, edited by Eggleston, Ben, Miller, Dale E., and Weinstein, David, 71–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ewing, Alfred Cyril. 1953a. “What Would Happen If Everybody Acted Like Me?” Philosophy 28: 16–29.Google Scholar
Ewing, Alfred Cyril. 1959. Second Thoughts in Moral Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.Google Scholar
Forbes, Duncan. 1975. Hume’s Philosophical Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forde, Steven. 1998. “Hugo Grotius on the Ethics of War.” The American Political Science Review 92(3): 639–48.Google Scholar
Forsyth, Murray. 1982. “The Place of Richard Cumberland in the History of Natural Law.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 20(1): 23–42.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Alan E. 2006. “Mill’s Theory of Morally Correct Action.” In The Blackwell Guide to Mill’s Utilitarianism, edited by West, Henry R., 139–58. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gert, Bernard. 2005. Morality: Its Nature and Justification, Revised Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, Allan. 1984. “Utilitarianism and Human Rights.” Social Philosophy and Policy 1(2): 92–102.Google Scholar
Gill, Michael B. 2006. The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 1995. Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, John. 1996. Mill on Liberty: A Defense, Second Edition. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. (1625) 1925. The Law of War and Peace. Translated by Francis W. Kelsey. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. 2000. “The Character and Obligation of Natural Law According to Richard Cumberland.” In English Philosophy in the Age of Locke, edited by Stewart, Matthew A., 29–47. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 2007. David Hume: Moral and Political Theorist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hare, Richard Mervyn. 1981. Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hare, Richard Mervyn. 1982. “Ethical Theory and Utilitarianism.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, edited by Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard, 23–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hare, Richard Mervyn. 1988. “Comment.” In Hare and Critics, edited by Seanor, Douglas and Fotion, Nicholas, 199–203. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. 1977. The Nature of Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Jonathan. 1952–1953. “Utilitarianism, Universalization, and Our Duty to Be Just.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 53: 105–34.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John. 1976. “Ethics in Terms of Hypothetical Imperatives.” In Harsanyi, John, Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior, and Scientific Explanation. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John. 1982a. “Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, edited by Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard, 39–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John, 1982b. “Rule Utilitarianism, Rights, Obligation, and the Theory of Rational Behavior.” In Harsanyi, John, Papers in Game Theory. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John. 1988. “Problems with Act-Utilitarianism and with Malevolent Preferences.” In Hare and Critics, edited by Seanor, Douglas and Fotion, Nicholas, 89–99. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hebblethwaite, Brian. 1992. “Butler on Conscience and Virtue.” In Joseph Butler’s Moral and Religious Thought: Tercentenary Essays, edited by Cunliffe, Christopher, 197–207. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Jr. Thomas, E. 1992. Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant’s Moral Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Jr. Thomas, E. 2000. Respect, Pluralism, and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Jr. Thomas, E. 2012. Virtue, Rules, and Justice: Kantian Aspirations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hooker, Brad. 2000. Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule-Consequentialist Theory of Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hooker, Brad and Little, Margaret Olivia, eds. 2000. Moral Particularism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. (1739) 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by Selby-Bigge, Lewis A. and Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. (1748) 1998. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. Edited by Beauchamp, Tom L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. (1777a) 1994. Political Writings. Edited by Warner, Stuart D. and Livingston, Donald W.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hume, David. (1777b) 1985. Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary, Revised Edition. Edited by Miller, Eugene F.. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. (1725) 2008. An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue in Two Treatises, Revised Edition. Edited by Leidhold, Wolfgang. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. (1728) 2002. An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections, with Illustrations from on the Moral Sense. Edited by Garrett, Aaron. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. (1745) 2007. Philosophiae Moralis Institutio Compendiaria, with a Short Introduction to Moral Philosophy. Edited by Turco, Luigi. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. 1755. A System of Moral Philosophy, in Three Books. Glasgow: R. and A. Foulis.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terrance. 2008. The Development of Ethics: A Historical and Critical Study. Volume II: From Suarez to Rousseau. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Conrad. 1991. Moral Legislation: A Legal-Political Model for Indirect Consequentialist Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (1785) 1997. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Edited by Gregor, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (1797) 1996. The Metaphysics of Morals. Edited by Gregor, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaye, Frederick Benjamin, ed. 1988. Introduction to The Fable of the Bees or Private Vices, Publick Benefits by Bernard Mandeville. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Kirk, Linda. 1987. Richard Cumberland and Natural Law: Secularization of Thought in Seventeenth-Century England. Cambridge: James Clarke & Co.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. 1996a. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. 1996b. “The Reasons We Can Share: An Attack on the Distinction between Agent-Relative and Agent-Neutral Values.” In Korsgaard, Christine, Creating the Kingdom of Ends, 275–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lazari-Radek, Katarzyna de and Singer, Peter. 2014. The Point of View of the Universe: Sidgwick and Contemporary Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leidhold, Wolfgang, ed. 2008. Introduction to An Inquiry into the Original of our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue by Francis Hutcheson, Revised Edition. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Locke, John. (1689a) 1983. A Letter Concerning Toleration. Edited by Tully, James. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Locke, John. (1689b) 1988. Two Treatises of Government. Edited by Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. (1690) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Nidditch, Peter. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Locke, John. (1703) 1997. Political Essays. Edited by Goldie, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. (1706) 1996. Some Thoughts Concerning Education and of the Conduct of the Understanding. Edited by Grant, Ruth W. and Tarcov, Nathan. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Locke, John. (1823) 1963. Works of John Locke, 10 vols. London: Thomas Tegg [reprinted by Scientia Verlag Aalen].Google Scholar
Mabbott, John David. 1953. “Moral Rules.” Proceedings of the British Academy 39, 97–117.Google Scholar
Mack, Eric. 1999. “The Alienability of Lockean Natural Rights.” In Persons and Their Bodies: Rights, Responsibilities, Relationships, edited by Cherry, Mark J., 143–176. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Mackie, John L. 1982. The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and against the Existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, John L. 1985. “The Disutility of Act-Utilitarianism.” In Persons and Values edited by Mackie, John L. and Mackie, Penelope, Vol. 2, 91–104. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard. (1732) 1988. The Fable of the Bees or Private Vices, Public Benefits (2 vols), edited by Kaye, Frederick Benjamin. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Henry John. 1957. “An Examination of Restricted Utilitarianism.” The Philosophical Review 66: 466–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKown, Delos B. 2004. Behold the Antichrist: Bentham on Religion. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. (1969) 1985. Collected Works. Edited by Robson, John M.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul and Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Millar, Alan. 1992. “Butler on God and Human Nature.” In Joseph Butler’s Moral and Religious Thought: Tercentenary Essays, edited by Cunliffe, Christopher, 294–315. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Dale E. 2011. “Mill, Rule Utilitarianism, and the Incoherence Objection.” In John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life, edited by Eggleston, Ben, Miller, Dale E., and Weinstein, David, 94–119. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Dale E. 2013. “Hooker on Rule-Consequentialism and Virtue.” Utilitas 25(3): 421–32.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 2013. Justice for Earthlings: Essays in Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Montague, Phillip. 2000. “Why Rule Consequentialism Is Not Superior to Ross-Style Pluralism.” In Morality, Rules, and Consequences: A Critical Reader, edited by Hooker, Brad, Mason, Elinor, and Miller, Dale E.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Moore, George Edward. (1903) 1954. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Flaherty, Niall. 2019. Utilitarianism in the Age of Enlightenment: The Moral and Political Thought of William Paley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paley, William. (1785) 2002. The Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Paley, William. (1802) 2008. Natural Theology, edited by Eddy, Matthew D. and Knight, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 2011–2017. On What Matters (3 volumes). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parkin, Jon. 1999. Science, Religion and Politics in Restoration England: Richard Cumberland’s De Legibus Naturae. Woodbridge, UK: The Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Parrish, John M. 2007. Paradoxes of Political Ethics: From Dirty Hands to the Invisible Hand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 1989. “Consequentialism and Respect for Persons.” Ethics 100(1): 116–26.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Government and Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Portmore, Douglas W. 2001. “Can an Act-Consequentialist Theory Be Agent Relative?” American Philosophical Quarterly 38(4): 363–77.Google Scholar
Portmore, Douglas W. 2003. “Position-Relative Consequentialism. Agent-Centered Options, and Supererogation.” Ethics 113: 303–32.Google Scholar
Proast, Jonas. 1691. A Third Letter Concerning Toleration. Oxford: Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership, http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A55926.0001.001.Google Scholar
Rosen, Frederick. 2003. Classical Utilitarianism from Hume to Mill. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick F. 1991. Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Schneewind, Jerome B. 1977. Sidgwick’s Ethics and Victorian Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Schneewind, Jerome B. 1998. The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, Thomas Philip. 1987. “A Comparison of the Moral Theories of William Paley and Jeremy Bentham.” The Bentham Newsletter 11: 4–22.Google Scholar
Schultz, Bart. 2004. Henry Sidgwick – Eye of the Universe: An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Bart. 2017. The Happiness Philosophers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, William Robert. 1900. Francis Hutcheson: His Life, Teaching, and Position in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard. 1982. Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaftesbury, Third Earl of (Anthony Ashley Cooper). (1711) 1999. Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times, edited by Klein, Lawrence E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. (1902) 1988. Outlines of the History of Ethics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. (1907) 1981. The Methods of Ethics, Seventh Edition. Foreword by John Rawls. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 1992. The Lockean Theory of Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 2010. “Ideal and Nonideal Theory.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 38(1): 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Marcus George. 1958. “Moral Rules and Principles.” In Essays in Moral Philosophy, edited by Melden, Abraham Irving. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Smart, John Jamieson Carswell. 1956. “Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism.” Philosophical Quarterly 6: 344–54.Google Scholar
Sobel, Jordan H. 2009. Walls and Vaults: A Natural Science of Morals (Virtue Ethics According to David Hume). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Stephen, Leslie. 1900. The English Utilitarians (in three volumes). London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Stewart, John B. 1992. Opinion and Reform in Hume’s Political Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stout, Alan Ker. 1954. “But Suppose Everyone Did the Same.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 32: 1–29.Google Scholar
Temkin, Larry S. 2019. “Being Good in a World of Need: Some Empirical Worries and an Uncomfortable Philosophical Possibility.” Journal of Practical Ethics 7(1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen. 1950. The Place of Reason in Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1979. Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1999. The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuckness, Alex. 1999. “The Coherence of a Mind: John Locke and the Law of Nature.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 37(1): 73–90.Google Scholar
Tuckness, Alex. 2002. Locke and the Legislative Point of View. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tuckness, Alex. 2008. “Locke’s Main Argument for Toleration.” Nomos (Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy) 48: 114–38.Google Scholar
Tuckness, Alex. 2010. “Retribution and Restitution in Locke’s Theory of Punishment.” Journal of Politics 72(3): 720–32.Google Scholar
Urmson, James Opie. 1953. “The Interpretation of the Philosophy of J. S. Mill.” The Philosophical Quarterly 3: 33–9.Google Scholar
Voitle, Robert B. 1984. The Third Earl of Shaftesbury, 1671–1713. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. Jay. 2009. “The Publicity of Reasons.” Philosophical Perspectives 23: 471–97.Google Scholar
Whelan, Frederick G. 1985. Order and Artifice in Hume’s Political Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Whewell, William. 1852. Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy in England. London: John W. Parker and Cambridge: John Deighton.Google Scholar
White, Morton. 1978. The Philosophy of the American Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1981. “Persons, Character, and Morality.” In Williams, Bernard, Moral Luck, 1–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1988. “The Structure of Hare’s Theory.” In Hare and Critics, edited by Seanor, Douglas and Fotion, Nicholas. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1953) 1958. Philosophical Investigations, Third Edition. Translated by Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Zamzow, J. L. 2015. “Rules and Principles in Moral Decision Making: An Empirical Objection to Moral Particularism.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18: 123–34.Google Scholar