Book contents
- Modernising Legal Education
- Modernising Legal Education
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- About the Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- 1 Do Lawyers Need to Learn to Code?
- 2 Experiential Legal Education
- 3 Skills Swap?
- 4 Scaling the Gap
- 5 Bringing ODR to the Legal Education Mainstream
- 6 Design Comes to the Law School
- 7 Developing ‘NextGen’ Lawyers through Project-Based Learning
- 8 Same As It Ever Was?
- 9 Ludic Legal Education from Cicero to Phoenix Wright
- 10 The Gamification of Written Problem Questions in Law
- 11 Virtually Teaching Ethics
- 12 Paths to Practice
- 13 ‘Complicitous and Contestatory’
- Afterword
- References
11 - Virtually Teaching Ethics
Experiencing the Discrepancy between Abstract Ethical Stands and Actual Behaviour Using Immersive Virtual Reality
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 December 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- Modernising Legal Education
- Modernising Legal Education
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- About the Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- 1 Do Lawyers Need to Learn to Code?
- 2 Experiential Legal Education
- 3 Skills Swap?
- 4 Scaling the Gap
- 5 Bringing ODR to the Legal Education Mainstream
- 6 Design Comes to the Law School
- 7 Developing ‘NextGen’ Lawyers through Project-Based Learning
- 8 Same As It Ever Was?
- 9 Ludic Legal Education from Cicero to Phoenix Wright
- 10 The Gamification of Written Problem Questions in Law
- 11 Virtually Teaching Ethics
- 12 Paths to Practice
- 13 ‘Complicitous and Contestatory’
- Afterword
- References
Summary
The CAVE experience is an immersive virtual reality (IVR) environment employing high-resolution, 3D video and audio technology. Using the CAVE, researchers at University College London designed an IVR scenario intended to echo the logical structure of a traditional ‘trolley scenario’ problem, and deployed this activity within an undergraduate Law and Ethics Course. In this chapter we explore how the use of virtual reality can offer students an unparalleled opportunity to reflect on the dissonance between the behaviour they adopt when faced with an ethical dilemma, and the theoretical stance they propose during class discussion. We explore how this personalisation gives rise to sustained student engagement borne out of a desire to understand the discrepancy between principle and practice. Our chapter considers the potential of IVR technology when teaching ethics to future and current professionals. We conclude by considering how such technology can offer more dynamic opportunities for student reflection and how IVR might be sensibly integrated into a broader legal ethics curriculum.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Modernising Legal Education , pp. 204 - 220Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Bazerman, MH and Tenbrunsel, AE, Blind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What’s Right and What to Do about It (Princeton University Press 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavkin, DF, ‘Experience Is the Only Teacher: Bringing Practice to the Teaching of Ethics’ in Robertson, Michael and others (eds.), The Ethics Project in Legal Education (Routledge 2010)Google Scholar
Chugh, D, Bazerman, MH and Banaji, MR, ‘Bounded Ethicality as a Psychological Barrier to Recognizing Conflicts of Interest’ in Moore, Don A and others (eds.), Conflicts of Interest: Challenges and Solutions in Business, Law, Medicine and Public Policy (Cambridge University Press 2005)Google Scholar
Crowley-Cyr, L, ‘Towards Ethical Literacy by Enhancing Reflexivity in Law Students’ in Robertson, Michael and others (eds.), The Ethics Project in Legal Education (Routledge 2010)Google Scholar
Cunningham, CD and Alexander, C, ‘Developing Professional Judgment: Law School Innovations in Response to the Carnegie Foundation’s Critique of American Legal Education’ in Robertson, Michael and others (eds.), The Ethics Project in Legal Education (Routledge 2010)Google Scholar
Czikszentmihalyi, M, ‘Intrinsic Motivation and Effective Teaching: A Flow Analysis’ (1982) 10 New Directions for Teaching and Learning 15Google Scholar
Economidies, K and Rogers, J, ‘Preparatory Ethics Training for Future Solicitors’ (The Law Society 2009)Google Scholar
Freina, L and Ott, M, ‘A Literature Review on Immersive Virtual Reality in Education: State of the Art and Perspectives’, Conference Proceedings of ELearning and Software for Education (Universitatea Nationala de Aparare Carol I 2015)Google Scholar
Gilbert, DT, ‘Thinking Lightly About Others: Automatic Components of the Social Inference Process’ in Uleman, James S and Bargh, John A (eds.), Unintended Thought (Guilford Press 1989)Google Scholar
Goldin, IM, Ashley, KD and Pinkus, RL, ‘Introducing PETE: Computer Support for Teaching Ethics’, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ACM 2001)Google Scholar
Haller, L, ‘Reading Reported Cases through a Legal Ethics Lens’ in Robertson, Michael and others (eds.), The Ethics Project in Legal Education (Routledge 2010)Google Scholar
Klein, G, ‘Naturalistic Decision Making’ (2008) 50(3) Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 456CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovach, KK, ‘Virtual Reality Testing: The Use of Video for Evaluation in Legal Education’ (1996) 46(2) Journal of Legal Education 233Google Scholar
Kruuse, H, ‘A South African Response to Ethics in Legal Education’ in Robertson, Michael and others (eds.), The Ethics Project in Legal Education (Routledge 2010)Google Scholar
Menaker, E and others, ‘Harnessing Experiential Learning Theory to Achieve Warfighting Excellence’, Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC) (National Training and Simulation Association 2006)Google Scholar
Moorhead, R and others, ‘The Ethical Capacities of New Advocates’ (UCL Centre for Law and Ethics 2015) http://ssrn.com/abstract=2849698 accessed 24 September 2018Google Scholar
Pan, X and others, ‘The Responses of Medical General Practitioners to Unreasonable Patient Demand for Antibiotics – A Study of Medical Ethics Using Immersive Virtual Reality’ (2016) 11(2) PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146837 accessed 20 February 2016Google Scholar
Pan, X and others, ‘A Study of Professional Awareness Using Immersive Virtual Reality: The Responses of General Practitioners to Child Safeguarding Concerns’ (2018) 5 Frontiers in Robotics and AI 80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pan, X and Slater, M, ‘Confronting a Moral Dilemma in Virtual Reality: A Pilot Study’, BCS-HCI ’11 Proceedings of the 25th BCS Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (BCS 2011)Google Scholar
Pawar, S and others, ‘Evaluation of Cognitive Load and Emotional States During Multidisciplinary Critical Care Simulation Sessions’ (2018) 4(2) BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning 87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, M, ‘Renewing a Focus on Ethics in Legal Education. Australian Lawyers and Social Change’ (Australian Lawyers and Social Change Conference, Canberra, September 2004) https://law.anu.edu.au/sites/all/files/users/u4081600/Conference_docs/mikerobertson.pdf accessed 24 September 2018Google Scholar
Robertson, M,“‘Introduction’ in Robertson, Michael and others (eds.), The Ethics Project in Legal Education (Routledge 2010)Google Scholar
Rovira, A and others, ‘The Use of Virtual Reality in the Study of People’s Responses to Violent Incidents’ (2009) 3 Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 59Google Scholar
Sharp, C, ‘“Represent a Murderer … I’d Never Do That!” How Students Use Stories to Link Ethical Development and Identity Construction’ in Robertson, Michael and others (eds), The Ethics Project in Legal Education (Routledge 2010)Google Scholar
Slater, M and others, ‘A Virtual Reprise of the Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiments’ (2006) 1(1) PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000039 accessed 19 May 2019Google Scholar
Slater, M and Sanchez-Vives, M V, ‘Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality’ (2016) 3 Frontiers in Robotics and AI 74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuckey, R, ‘Best Practices for Legal Education: A Vision and A Road Map’ (Clinical Legal Education Association 2007) https://clea.wildapricot.org/resources/documents/best_practices-full.pdf accessed 28 September 2018Google Scholar
Task Force on Law Schools and the Profession – American Bar Association, ‘Legal Education and Professional Development – An Educational Continuum. (MacCrate Report)’ (American Bar Association 1992) www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/misc/legal_education/2013_legal_education_and_professional_development_maccrate_report).authcheckdam.pdf accessed 24 September 2018Google Scholar
Tomlin, KA and others, ‘Are Students Blind to Their Ethical Blind Spots? An Exploration of Why Ethics Education Should Focus on Self-Perception Biases’ (2017) 41(4) Journal of Management Education 539Google Scholar
University College London, ‘Immersive Virtual Environments Laboratory’ (2001) www0.cs.ucl.ac.uk/research/vr/projects/cave/ accessed 20 October 2018Google Scholar
Webb, J, ‘Taking Values Seriously: The Democratic Intellect and the Place of Values in the School Curriculum’ in Robertson, Michael and others (eds.), The Ethics Project in Legal Education (Routledge 2010)Google Scholar
Wood, D and Bilsborow, C, ‘Enhancing Creative Problem Solving in the Higher Education Curriculum through the Use of Innovative E-Learning Technologies’, 8th International Conference on E-Learning (ICEL-2013) Proceedings (Academic Conferences Limited 2013)Google Scholar
Zsambok, CE and Klein, G, Naturalistic Decision Making (Taylor and Francis 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by