Albert, M. [2001] Bayesian learning and expectations formation, in Corfield, D. and Williamson, J. (eds.), Foundations of Bayesianism (Boston: Kluwer), 341–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alchian, A. [1950] Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory, Journal of Political Economy, 58, 211–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, W. R. [1977] Economics, economists and economic policy: modern American experiences, History of Political Economy, 9, 48–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

An, S., Chang, Y. and Kim, S.-B. [2009] Can a representative-agent model represent a heterogeneous-agent economy, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 1(2), 29–54.Google Scholar

Angrist, J. and Pischke, J.-S. [2010] The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, J. S. [1978] Forecasting with econometric methods: Folklore versus fact, Journal of Business, 51, 549–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arrow, K. [1959] Toward a theory of price adjustment, in Abramovitz, M. (ed.), Allocation of Economic Resources (Stanford: Stanford University Press), 41–51.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. and Debreu, G. [1954] Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy, Econometrica, 22, 265–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aumann, R. [1985] What is game theory trying to accomplish? in Arrow, K. and Honkapohja, S. (eds.), Frontiers of Economics (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), 28–76.Google Scholar

Aumann, R. [1987] Game theory, in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds.), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. (London: The Macmillan Press), 1, 460–82.Google Scholar

Aumann, R. [1995] Backward induction and common knowledge of rationality, Games and Economic Behavior, 8, 6–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aumann, R. [1996a] Reply to Binmore, Games and Economic Behavior, 17, 138–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aumann, R. [1996b] Reply to Binmore and Samuelson, in Arrow, K., Colombatto, E., Perlman, M. and Schmidt, C. (eds.), The Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior (London: Macmillan), 130–1.Google Scholar

Aumann, R. [1998] On the Centipede Game, Games and Economic Behavior, 23, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banks, J., Olson, M., Porter, D., Rassenti, S. and Smith, V. [2003] Theory, experiment and the federal communications commision spectrum auctions, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51, 303–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barro, R. and Grossman, H. [1971] A general disequilibrium model of income and employment, American Economic Review, 61, 82–93.Google Scholar

Beattie, A. and Politi, J. [2008] ‘I made a mistake,’ admits Greenspan, Financial Times, 23 October.Google Scholar

Becker, G. [1965] A theory of the allocation of time, The Economic Journal, 75, 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, R. [1981] An Empirical Test of some Post-Keynesian Income Distribution Theories, PhD thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B. C.

Bicchieri, C. [1993] Rationality and Coordination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Binmore, K. [1996] A note on backward induction, Games and Economic Behavior, 17, 135–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binmore, K. [1997] Rationality and backward induction, Journal of Economic Methodology, 4, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binmore, K. [2007] Game Theory: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binmore, K. [2011] Interpreting knowledge in the backward induction problem, Episteme, 8, 248–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blanchard, O. [2000] What do we know about macroeconomics that Fisher and Wicksell did not?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 1375–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blaug, M. [1992] The Methodology of Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boland, L. [1971] An institutional theory of economic technology and change, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1, 253–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boland, L. [1977a] Giffen goods, market prices and testability, Australian Economic Papers, 16, 72–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boland, L. [1977b] Testability, time and equilibrium stability, Atlantic Economic Journal, 5, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boland, L. [1978] Time in economics vs. economics in time: the ‘Hayek Problem’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 11, 240–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boland, L. [1979] A critique of Friedman’s critics, Journal of Economic Literature, 17, 503–22.Google Scholar

Boland, L. [1982] The Foundations of Economic Method (London: George Allen & Unwin). Google Scholar

Boland, L. [1986] Methodology for a New Microeconomics (Boston: Allen & Unwin). Google Scholar

Boland, L. [1989] The Methodology of Economic Model Building: Methodology after Samuelson (London: Routledge). Google Scholar

Boland, L. [1992] The Principles of Economics: Some Lies my Teachers Told Me (London: Routledge). Google Scholar

Boland, L. [1997] Critical Economic Methodology: A Personal Odyssey (London: Routledge). Google Scholar

Boland, L. [2003] The Foundations of Economic Method: A Popperian Perspective (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Boland, L. [2008a] On the economist’s view of inductive reasoning, paper presented to the 35th Annual Meeting of the History of Economics Association, York University, 28 June 2008.

Boland, L. [2008b] Stylized facts, Durlauf, S. and Blume, L. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Ed. (London: Palgrave Macmillan) Google Scholar

Boland, L. [2010] Cartwright on ‘Economics’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 40, 530–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boland, L. [2013] Review of Mäki [2012], Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics.

Borrill, P. and Tesfatsion, L. [2011] Agent-based modeling: the right mathematics for the social sciences? in Davis, and Hands, [2011], 228–58.

Boumans, M. [1999] Built in justification, in Morgan, and Morrison, [1999], 66–96.

Boumans, M. [2001] Measure for measure: How economists model the world into numbers, Social Research, 68, 427–53.Google Scholar

Boumans, M. [2005] How Economists Model the World into Numbers (London: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boumans, M. [2012] Mathematics as quasi-matter to build models as instruments, in Dieks, D., Gonzalez, W. J., Hartmann, S., Stöltzner, M. and Weber, M. (eds.), Probabilities, Laws and Structures (New York: Springer) 307–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Box, G. E. P. [1953] Non-normality and tests on variances, Biometrika, 40, 318–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bridel, P. (ed.) [2011] General Equilibrium Analysis: A Century after Walras (New York: Routledge).

Camerer, C. and Loewenstein, G. [2003] Behavioral economics: Past, present, future, in Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G. and Rabin, M. (eds.) Advances in Behavioral Economics (Oxford: Princeton University Press), 3–51.Google Scholar

Carlaw, K. and Lipsey, R. [2012] Does history matter?: Empirical analysis of evolutionary versus stationary equilibrium views of the economy, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 22, 735–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, Y. and Kim, S-B. [2006] From individual to aggregate labor supply: A quantitative analysis based on a heterogeneous agent macroeconomy, International Economic Review, 47, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, Y. and Kim, S-B. [2007] Heterogeneity and aggregation: Implications for labor-market fluctuations, American Economic Review, 97, 1939–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chari, V. and Kehoe, P. [2006] Modern macroeconomics in practice: How theory is shaping policy, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chatfield, C. [1995] Model uncertainty, data mining and statistical inference, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 158, 419–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clements, M. and Hendry, D. [2008] Economic forecasting in a changing world, Capitalism and Society, 3, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clower, R. [1959] Some theory of an ignorant monopolist, The Economic Journal, 69, 705–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clower, R. and Due, J. [1972] Microeconomics (Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.).Google Scholar

Colander, D. [2009] Economists, incentives, judgment and the European CVAR approach to macroeconometrics. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 3, 2009-9. .Google Scholar

Colander, D., Howitt., P., Kirman, A., Leijonhufvud, A. and Mehrling, P. [2008] Beyond DSGE models: Toward an empirically based macroeconomics, The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 98, 236–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowell, F. [2006] Microeconomics: Principles and Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Crawford, V. and Iriberri, N. [2007] Level-k auctions: Can a nonequilibrium model of strategic thinking explain the winner’s curse and overbidding in private-value auctions?Econometrica, 75, 1721–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, V., Costa-Gomes, M. and Iriberri, N. [forthcoming] Structural models of nonequilibrium strategic thinking: Theory, evidence and applications, Journal of Economic Literature.

Darden, S. [1961] Short Talk on the Universe, The sound of my own voice (and other noises) (LP record: Mercury OCS 6202, OCLC No. 12851697).

Davidson, P. [1972] Money and the Real World (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar

Davidson, P. [1977] Money and general equilibrium, Economie Appliquee, 30, 541–62.Google Scholar

Davidson, P. [1991] Is probability theory relevant for uncertainty? a post-Keynesian perspective, Journal of Economic Perspective, 5, 129–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, J. B. and Hands, D. W. (eds.) [2011] The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology (Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar).CrossRef

Dawes, R., Fildes, R., Lawrence, M. and Ord, K. [1994] The past and the future of forecasting research, International Journal of Forecasting, 10, 151–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Debreu, G. [1959] Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar

Debreu, G. [1974] Excess demand functions, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1, 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duarte, P. G. [2011] Recent developments in macroeconomics: the DSGE approach to business cycles in perspective, in Davis, and Hands, [2011], 375–403.

Duffy, J. [forthcoming] Macroeconomics: A survey of laboratory research, in Kagel, J. and Roth, A. E. (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics, Vol. 2 (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

Eddington, A. [1928/58] The Nature of the Physical World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Einstein, A. and Infeld, L. [1938/61] The Evolution of Physics: The Growth of Ideas from Early Concepts to Relativity and Quanta (New York: Simon and Schuster).Google Scholar

Farmer, R. and Guo, J. T. [1994] Real business cycles and animal spirits hypothesis, Journal of Economic Theory, 63, 42–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, C. E. [1969] Microeconomic Theory (Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.).Google Scholar

Fisher, F. [1983] Disequilibrium Foundations of Equilibrium Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, F. [1987] Aggregation problem, in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds.), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics (London: The Macmillan Press), 2, 53–5.Google Scholar

Fisher, I. [1892/1925] Mathematical Investigations in the Theory of Value and Prices (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar

Flores, B. and Pearce, S. [2000] The use of an expert system in the M3 competition, International Journal of Forecasting, 116, 485–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foster, J. [1997] The analytical foundations of evolutionary economics: From biological analogy to economic self-organization, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 8, 427–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franses, P. H., McAleer, M. and Legerstee, R. [2012] Evaluating macroeconomic forecasts: A concise review of some recent developments, University of Canterbury, Working Paper 12/2012, 1–29.Google Scholar

Friedman, B. [1979] Optimal expectations and the extreme information assumptions of ‘Rational Expectations’ macromodels, Journal of Monetary Economics, 5, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, D. [1991] Evolutionary Games in Economics, Econometrica, 59, 637–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, D. [1998] Monty Hall’s Three Doors: Construction and deconstruction of a choice anomaly, American Economic Review, 88, 933–46.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. [1953] Methodology of positive economics, in Essays in Positive Economics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), 3–43.Google Scholar

Frisch, R. [1933a] Propagation problems and impulse problems in dynamic economics, in Economic Essays in Honour of Gustav Cassel (London: George Allen & Unwin), 171–205.Google Scholar

Frisch, R. [1933b] Editor’s Note, Econometrica, 1, 1–2.Google Scholar

Frisch, R. [1936] On the notion of equilibrium and disequilibrium, Review of Economic Studies, 3, 100–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frydman, R. and Phelps, E. (eds.) [1983] Individual Forecasting and Aggregate Outcomes: ‘Rational Expectations’ Examined (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Fudenberg, D. and Levine, D. [1993] Self-confirming equilibrium, Econometrica, 61, 523–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fudenberg, D. and Levine, D. [2009] Self-confirming equilibrium and the Lucas Critique, Journal of Economic Theory, 144, 2354–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Georgescu-Roegen, N. [1971] The Entropy Law and the Economic Process (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbard, A. and Varian, H. [1978] Economic models, Journal of Philosophy, 75, 664–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilboa, I., Postlewaite, A., Samuelson, L. and Schmeidler, D. [2011] Economics models as analogies, Penn Institute for Economic Research, working paper 12-001.

Govindan, S and Wilson, R. [2008] Refinements of Nash Equilibrium, in Durlauf, S. and Blume, L. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Ed. (London: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar

Granger, C. [1999] Empirical Modeling in Economics: Specification and Evaluation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granger, C. [2012] The philosophy of economic forecasting, in Mäki, [2012], 311–27.

Greene, W. [2008] Econometric Analysis, 7th Ed. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar

Grubel, H and Boland, L. [1986] On the efficient use of mathematics in economics: some theory, facts and results of an opinion survey, Kyklos, 39, 419–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guala, F. [2001] Building economic machines: the FCC auctions, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 32, 453–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guala, F. [2012] Experimentation in economics, in Mäki, [2012], 597–640.

Haavelmo, T. [1943] The statistical implication of a system of simultaneous equations, Econometrica, 11, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haavelmo, T. [1944] The probability approach in econometrics, Econometrica, 12 (Supplement), iii–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haavelmo, T. [1958] The role of the econometrician in the advancement of economic theory, Econometrica, 26, 351–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hahn, F. [1965] On some problems of proving the existence of an equilibrium in a monetary economy, in Hahn, F. and Brechling, F. (eds.), Theory of Interest Rates: Proceedings of a Conference Held by the International Economics Association (London: Macmillan), 126–35.Google Scholar

Hahn, F. [1970] Some adjustment problems, Econometrica, 38, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hahn, F. [1973] On the Notion of Equilibrium in Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Hahn, F. and Negishi, T [1962] A theorem on non-tatonnement stability, Econometrica, 30, 463–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hands, D. W. [2001] Reflection without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hargreaves Heap, S. and Varoufakis, Y. [1995] Game Theory: A Critical Introduction (London: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hargreaves Heap, S. and Varoufakis, Y. [2004] Game Theory: A Critical Text, 2nd Ed. (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Harsanyi, J. and Selten, R. [1988] A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games (Cambridge: MIT Press).Google Scholar

Hartley, J. [1996] The origins of the representative agent, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 169–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartley, J. [1997] The Representative Agent in Macroeconomics (London: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hausman, D. [1992] The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, F. [1937] Economics and knowledge, Economica, 4 (NS), 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heckman, J. [2000] Causal parameters and policy analysis in economics: a twentieth century retrospective, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 45–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hendry, D. F. [1980] Econometrics – alchemy or science?Economica, 47 N.S., 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hendry, D. F. [2011] Empirical economic model discovery and theory evaluation, Rationality, Markets and Morals, 2, 115–45.Google Scholar

Hendry, D. F. and Nielsen, B. [2007] Econometric Modeling: A Likelihood Approach (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Herschel, J. [1830] Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy (London: Longman).Google Scholar

Hey, J. [1981] Economics in Disequilibrium (Oxford: Martin Robertson).Google Scholar

Hicks, J. [1939/46] Value and Capital, 2nd Ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Hicks, J. [1956] A Revision of Demand Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Hicks, J. [1976] Some questions of time in economics, in Tang, A., Westfield, F. and Worley, J. (eds.), Evolution, Welfare and Time in Economics (Toronto: Heath) 135–51Google Scholar

Hicks, J. [1979] Causality in Economics (Oxford: Basil Backwell).Google Scholar

Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. [2006] Why we need a generalized Darwinism, and why generalized Darwinism is not enough, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 61, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hollis, M. and Sugden, R. [1993] Rationality in action, Mind, 102, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honkapohja, S. and Mitra, K. [2006] Learning stability in economies with heterogeneous agents, Review of Economic Dynamics, 9, 284–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoover, K. D. [1988] The New Classical Macroeconomics: A Sceptical Inquiry (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Hoover, K. D. [2001] The Methodology of Empirical Macroeconomics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoover, K. D. [2003] A history of postwar monetary economics and macroeconomics, in Biddle, J., Davis, J. and Samuels, W. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to the History of Economic Thought (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Hoover, K. D. [2012] Microfoundational programs, in Duarte, P. G. and Tadeu Lima, G. (eds.) Microfoundations Reconsidered: The Relationship of Micro and Macroeconomics in Historical Perspective (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), 29–61.Google Scholar

Hoover, K. D. and Perez, S. [1999] Data mining reconsidered: encompassing and the general-to-specific approach to specification search, Econometrics Journal, 2, 167–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoover, K. D., Johansen, S. and Juselius, K. [2008] Allowing the data to speak freely: The macroeconometrics of the cointegrated vector autoregression, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 98, 251–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Isaac, M. [1983] Laboratory experimental economics as a tool in public policy analysis, Social Science Journal, 45–58.Google Scholar

Jensen, K., Kamath, S. and Bennett, R. [1987] Money in the production function: An alternative test procedure, Eastern Economic Journal, 13, 259–69.Google Scholar

Judge, G. G., Griffiths, W. E., Hill, R. C., Lutkepohl, H. and Lee, T. C. [1985] The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd. Ed. (New York: John Wiley).Google Scholar

Juselius, K. [2006] Cointegrated VAR Model: Methodology and Applications (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Juselius, K. [2011] On the role of theory and evidence in macroeconomics, in Davis, and Hands, [2011], 404–36.

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. [1979] Prospect theory: an analysis of choice under risk, Econometrica, 47, 263–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaldor, N. [1957] A model of economic growth, The Economic Journal, 67, 594–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, S., Samuels, J. and Cohen, J. [2013] An examination of the effect of CEO social ties and CEO reputation on nonprofessional investors’ Say-on-Pay judgments, presented at the 2013 Ethics Symposium sponsored by the University of Waterloo’s Centre for Accounting Ethics, April 18–20.

Kennedy, P. E. [2008] A Guide to Econometrics, 6th Ed. (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing).Google Scholar

Keynes, J. M. [1936] General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World).Google Scholar

Keynes, J. M. [1937] The general theory of employment, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51, 209–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirman, A. [1992] Whom or what does the representative individual represent?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6, 117–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirman, A. [2006] Forward, in Colander, D. (ed.) Post Walrasian Macroeconomics: Beyond the Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Kirman, A. [2010] Walras’ unfortunate legacy, working paper subsequently published as Kirman [2011].

Kirman, A. [2011] Walras’ unfortunate legacy, in Bridel, [2011], 109–33.

Klein, J. [2001] Reflections from the age of economic measurement, History of Political Economy, 33, 111–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, L. [1957] The scope and limitations of econometrics, Applied Statistics, 6: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, L. [1971] Whither econometrics?Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 415–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kneale, W. and Kneale, M [1962] The Development of Logic (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Knight, F. [1921] Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Knudsen, T. [2004] General selection theory and economic evolution: The Price equation and the replicator/interactor distinction, Journal of Economic Methodology, 11, 147–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kocherlakota, N. [1998] Money is memory, Journal of Economic Theory, 81, 232–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koopmans, T. [1941] The logic of econometric business cycle research, Journal of Political Economy, 49, 157–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koopmans, T. [1947] Measurement without theory, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 29, 161–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koopmans, T. [1957] Three Essays on the State of Economic Science (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar

Kreps, D. [1990] Game Theory and Economic Modelling (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krusell, P. and Smith, A. [1998] Income and wealth heterogeneity in the macroeconomy, Journal of Political Economy, 106, 867–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krusell, P. and Smith, A. [2006] Quantitative macroeconomic models with heterogenous agents, Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress, vol. 1, Econometric Society Monographs No. 41 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 298–340.Google Scholar

Kydland, F. and Prescott, E. [1996] The computational experiment: an econometric tool, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kydland, F. E. and Prescott, E. [1991] Econometrics of the general equilibrium approach to business cycles, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 93, Proceedings of a Conference on New Approaches to Empirical Macroeconomics, 161–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

La Mura, P. [2009] Projective expected utility: a subjective formulation, Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (New York: Association for Computing Machinery), 184–92.Google Scholar

Lagueux, M. [2010] Rationality and Explanation in Economics (London: Routledge)Google Scholar

Lancaster, T. [2004] An Introduction to Modern Bayesian Econometrics (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing).Google Scholar

Lawson, T. [1988] Probability and uncertainty in economic analysis, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 11, 38–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leamer, E. [1983] Let’s take the con out of econometrics, American Economic Review, 73, 31–43.Google Scholar

Leamer, E. [2010] Tantalus on the road to Asymptopia, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ledyard, J., Porter, D. and Rangel, A. [1997] Experiments testing multiobject allocation mechanisms, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 6, 639–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leijonhufvud, A. [1997] Models and theories, Journal of Economic Methodology, 4, 193–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leijonhufvud, A. [2006] The Uses of the Past, Discussion Paper No. 3 (lecture to ESHET meetings, 2006).Google Scholar

Leonhardt, D. [2008] Greenspan’s Mea Culpa, Economix, New York Times, 23 October.Google Scholar

Leontief, W. [1936] Composite commodities and the problem of index numbers, Econometrica, 4, 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leontief, W. [1947] Introduction to a theory of the internal structure of functional relationships, Econometrica, 15, 361–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levin, A. [2010] Nonlinearities, Risks, and the Design of Monetary Policy, paper given November 16, 2010 to the annual meetings of the Argentina Economics Association.

Levine, D. K. [2011] Neuroeconomics?International Review of Economics, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levine, D. K. and Zheng, J. [2010] The Relationship of Economic Theory to Experiments, in Frechette, G. and Schotter, A. (eds.) The Methods of Modern Experimental Economics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Lichtenstein, S. and Slovic, P. [1971] Reversal of preferences between bids and choices in gambling decision, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindley, D. [1987] Thomas Bayes (1702–1761), in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds.), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics (London: The Macmillan Press), 3, 205–6.Google Scholar

Lipsey, R. [2012] Some contentious issues in theory and policy in memory of Mark Blaug, in Boumans, M. and Klaes, M. (eds.) Mark Blaug: Rebel With Many Causes (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar

Lipsey, R. [1963] An Introduction to Positive Economics (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson).Google Scholar

Lloyd, C. [1965] On the falsifiability of traditional demand theory, Metroeconomica, 17, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, C. [1967] Microeconomic Analysis (Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.).Google Scholar

Lloyd, C. [1980] The Northern Stores Project, in Boland, L., Dean, J., Schoner, B. and Tower, E. (eds.) The Collected Works of Cliff L. Lloyd (Burnaby: Simon Fraser University).Google Scholar

Loewenstein, G. [1999] Experimental economics from the vantage-point of behavioural economics, The Economic Journal, 109, F25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lovell, M. [1983] Data mining, Review of Economic and Statistics, 65, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucas, R. [1980] Methods and problems in business cycle theory, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 12, 696–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucas, R. [1986] Adaptive behavior and economic theory, Journal of Business, 59, 401–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucas, R. [1989] Recursive Methods in Economic Dynamics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Lucas, R. and Prescott, E. [1971] Investment under uncertainty, Econometrica, 39, 659–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucas, R. and Sargent, T. [1979] After Keynesian macroeconomics, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review (Spring), 1–16.Google Scholar

Luce, D. and Raiffa, H. [1957] Games and Decisions (New York: John Wiley).Google Scholar

Maddala, G. S. [2001] Introduction to Econometrics, 3rd Ed. (New York: John Wiley & Sons).Google Scholar

Mäki, U. (ed.) [2012] Elsevier Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Volume 13: Philosophy of Economics (Amsterdam: North Holland).

Makridakis, S. [1986] The art and science of forecasting: an assessment and future directions, International Journal of Forecasting, 2, 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makridakis, S. [1991] Forecasting in the 21st century, International Journal of Forecasting, 7, 123–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makridakis, S., Andersen, A., Carbone, R., Fildes, R., Hibon, M., Lewandovvski, R., Newton, J., Parzen, E. and Winkler, R. [1982]. The accuracy of extrapolation (time series) methods: results of a forecasting competition. Journal of Forecasting, 1, 111–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makridakis, S. and Wheelwright, S. [1989] Forecasting Methods for Management (New York: John Wiley & Sons).Google Scholar

Makridakis, S., Chatfield, C., Hibon, M., Lawrence, M., Mills, T., Ord, K. and Simmons, L. F. [1993] The M-2 Competition: a real-time judgmentally based forecasting study, International Journal of Forecasting, 9, 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makridakis, S. and Hibon, M. [1979] Accuracy of Forecasting: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 142, 97–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makridakis, S. and Hibon, M. [2000] The M3-Competition: results, conclusions and implications, International Journal of Forecasting, 116, 451–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mankiw, N. G. [2006] The macroeconomist as scientist and engineer, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mann, H. and Wald, A. [1943] On the statistical treatment of linear stochastic difference equations, Econometrica, 11, 173–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantel, R. [1974] On the characterization of aggregate excess demand, Journal of Economic Theory, 7, 348–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marschak, J. [1953] Economic measurements for policy and prediction, in Hood, W. C. and Koopmans, T. (eds.) Studies in Econometric Method (New York: John Wiley & Sons), 1–26.Google Scholar

Marshall, A. [1890] Principles of Economics (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar

Marshall, A. [1920] Principles of Economics, 8th Ed. (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar

Mas-Colell, A., Winston, M. and Green, J. [1995] Microeconomic Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Maxwell, J. [1958] Some Marshallian concepts, especially the representative firm, The Economic Journal, 68, 691–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McAleer, M. [2011] Are forecast updates progressive?Kyoto Institute of Economic Research, Discussion Paper No. 762, 1–24.Google Scholar

McCloskey, D. N. [1994] Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, L. H. [2004] A Term at the Fed: An Insider’s View (New York: HarperCollins).Google Scholar

Miller, P. [1978] Forecasting with econometric methods: a comment, Journal of Business, 51, 579–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mittelhammer, R. C., Judge, G. G. and Miller, D. J. [2000] Econometric Foundations (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Morgan, M. [1990] The History of Econometric Ideas (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, M. [1998] Model, in Davis, J., Hands, D. W. and Maki, U. (eds.), The Handbook of Economic Methodology (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), 316–21.Google Scholar

Morgan, M. [2001] Making measuring instruments, History of Political Economy, 33, Annual Supplement, 235–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, M. [2008] Models, in Durlauf, S. and Blume, L. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Ed. (London: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar

Morgan, M. [2012] The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, M. and Knuuttila, T. [2012] Models and modelling in economics, in Mäki, [2012], 49–87.

Morgan, M. and Morrison, M. [1999] Models as mediating instruments, in Morgan, and Morrison, [1999], 10–37.

Morgan, M. and Morrison, M. (eds.) [1999] Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRef

Moore, D., McCabe, G. and Craig, B. [2012] The Introduction to the Practice of Statistics, 7th Ed. (New York: W. H. Freeman).Google Scholar

Muth, J. [1961] Rational expectations and the theory of price movements, Econometrica, 29, 315–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nash, J. F. [1951] Noncooperative games, Annals of Mathematics, 54, 286–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, R. and Winter, S. [1974] Neoclassical vs. evolutionary theories of economic growth: critique and prospectus, The Economic Journal, 84, 886–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, R. and Winter, S. [1982] An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Nelson, R. and Winter, S. [2002] Evolutionary theorizing in economics, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neumann, J. [1937/45] A model of general equilibrium, Review of Economic Studies, 13, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. [1953] Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 3rd Ed. (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Nikaido, H. [1960/70] Introduction to Sets and Mappings in Modern Economics (Amsterdam: North Holland).Google Scholar

Nik-Khan, E. [2008] A tale of two auction, Journal of Institutional Economics, 4, 73–97.Google Scholar

Patinkin, D. [1956] Money, Interest and Prices (Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Company).Google Scholar

Patinkin, D. [1987] Keynes, John Maynard (1883–1946), in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds.) The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics (London: The Macmillan Press), 3, 19–41.Google Scholar

Pesaran, H and Dupleich Ulloa, M. R. [2008] Nonnested Hypotheses, in Durlauf, S. and Blume, L. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Ed. (London: Palgrave Macmillan). Google Scholar

Pesaran, M. and Deaton, A. [1978] Testing non-nested nonlinear regression models, Econometrica, 46, 677–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plott, C. [1997] Laboratory experimental testbeds: application to the PCS auction, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 6, 605–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pope, D. and Schweitzer, M. [2011] Is Tiger Woods loss averse? Persistent bias in the face of experience, competition and high stakes, American Economic Review, 101, 129–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popper, K. [1963] Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Popper, K. [1965] Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, 2nd Ed. (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar

Price, G. R. [1972] Extension of covariance selection mathematics, Annals of Human Genetics, 35: 485–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Price, G. R. [1995] The nature of selection, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 175: 389–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rabin, M. [1993] Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics, American Economic Review, 83, 1281–1302.Google Scholar

Ramsey, F. [1926/31] Truth and probability, in Braithwaite, R. B. (ed.), Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul), 156–98.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank P. [1927] A contribution to the theory of taxation, The Economic Journal, 37, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richardson, G. [1959] Equilibrium, expectations and information, The Economic Journal, 69, 225–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robbins, L. [1928] The Representative Firm, The Economic Journal, 38, 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robson, A. [2002] Evolution and human nature, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romer, R. [1986] Increasing returns and long-run growth, Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, A. [1978] The puzzle of economic modeling, Journal of Philosophy, 75, 679–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubinstein, A. [1991] Comments on the interpretation of game theory, Econometrica, 59, 909–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubinstein, A. [2006] Discussion of ‘Behavioral Economics’, in Blundell, R., Newey, W. and Persson, T. (eds.) Advances in Economics and Econometrics, Ninth World Congress (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 246–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubinstein, A. [2008] Comments on neuroeconomics, Economics and Philosophy, 24, 485–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, B. [1945] A History of Western Philosophy (New York: Simon and Schuster).Google Scholar

Samuelson, L. [2002] Evolution and game theory, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuelson, L. [2005] Economic theory and experimental economics, Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 65–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuelson, L. and Robson, A. [2010] The evolutionary optimality of decisions and experienced utility, presented at the SFU workshop on the biological basis of behavioural economics, 14 May.

Samuelson, P. [1947/65] Foundations of Economic Analysis (New York: Atheneum).Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. [1948b] Consumption theory in terms of revealed preference, Economica, 15 (NS), 243–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuelson, P. [1948a] Economics (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. [1953] Consumption theorems in terms of overcompensation rather than indifference comparisons, Economica, 20 (NS), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Santos, A. C. [2011] Experimental economics, in Davis, and Hands, [2011], 39–60.

Sargent, T and Wallace, N. [1976] Rational expectations and the theory of economic policy, Journal of Monetary Economics, 2, 169–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sargent, T. [1979] Macroeconomic Theory (New York: Academic Press).Google Scholar

Sargent, T. [1984] Autoregressions, expectations and advice, American Economic Review, 74, Papers and Proceedings, 408–15.Google Scholar

Sargent, T. [1993] Bounded Rationality in Macroeconomics: The Arne Ryde Memorial Lectures (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Sargent, T. [2004] Recursive Macroeconomic Theory (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).Google Scholar

Sargent, T. [2008] Evolution and intelligent design, American Economic Review, 98, Papers and Proceedings, 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saul, J. R. [1995] The Unconscious Civilization (Toronto: House of Anansi Press).Google Scholar

Savage, L. [1954] The Foundations of Statistics (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J. [1933] The common sense of econometrics, Econometrica, 1, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selten, R. [1975] The Chain-Store Paradox, Theory and Decision, 9, 127–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sent, E.-M. [1997] Sargent versus Simon: bounded rationality unbound, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21, 323–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sent, E.-M. [2004] Behavioral economics: How psychology made its (limited) way back to economics, History of Political Economy, 36, 735–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shackle, G. [1967] The Years of High Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Shackle, G. [1972] Epistemics and Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Shubik, M. [1959] Strategy and Market Structure (New York: John Wiley).Google Scholar

Shubik, M. [2012] What is a solution to a matrix game, Cowles Foundations Discussion Paper No. 1866.

Simon, H. [1947] Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (NewYork: Macmillan).Google Scholar

Simon, H. [1955] A behavioral model of rational choice, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sims, C. [1980] Macroeconomics and reality, Econometrica, 48, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sims, C. [1996] Macroeconomics and methodology, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 105–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sims, C. [2010] But economics is not an experimental science, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, V. K. [1969] The identification problem and the validity of economic models: a comment, South African Journal of Economics, 37, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, V. L. [1962] An experimental study of competitive market behavior, Journal of Political Economy, 70, 111–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, V. L. [1976] Experimental economics: Induced value theory, American Economic Review, 66, 274–9.Google Scholar

Smith, V. L. [1982] Experimental economics: Induced value theory, American Economic Review, 66, 923–55.Google Scholar

Smith, V. L. [1992] Game theory and experimental economics: Beginnings and early influences, History of Political Economics, 24, Supplement, 241–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, V. L. [2002] Method in experiment: Rhetoric and reality, Experimental Economics, 5, 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, V. L. [2008] Rationality in Economics: Constructivist and Ecological Forms (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Solow, R. [1956] A contribution to the theory of economic growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solow, R. [2008] The state of macroeconomics, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 243–9.Google Scholar

Solow, R. [2011] Macroeconomics and the uses of general equilibrium, in Bridel, [2011], 98–101.

Sonnenschein, H. [1972] Market excess demand functions, Econometrica, 40, 549–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spanos, A. [2008] Statistics and economics, in Durlauf, S. and Blume, L. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Ed. (London: Palgrave Macmillan) 1129–62. Google Scholar

Spanos, A. [1995a] On theory testing in econometrics: modeling with nonexperimental data, Journal of Econometrics, 67, 189–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spanos, A. [1995b] On normality and the linear regression model, Econometric Reviews, 14, 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spanos, A. [1999] Probability Theory and Statistical Inference: econometric modeling with observational data (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spanos, A. [2009] The pre-eminence of theory versus the European CVAR perspective in macroeconometric modeling. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 3, 2009–10. Google Scholar

Spanos, A. [2010a] Theory testing in economics and the error-statistical perspective, in Mayo, D. and Spanos, A. (eds.) [2010] Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 202–46.Google Scholar

Spanos, A. [2010b] Statistical adequacy and the trustworthiness of empirical evidence: Statistical vs. substantive information, Economic Modelling, 27, 1436–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spanos, A. [2011] Revisiting Haavelmo’s structural econometrics: Bridging the gap between theory and data, paper presented at the Trygve Haavelmo Centennial Symposium, December 13, 2011, in ‘Gamle festsal’, Domus Academica, Oslo.

Spanos, A. [2012] Philosophy of econometrics, in Mäki, [2012], 329–93.

Starmer, C. [1999] Experiments in economics: should we trust the dismal scientists in white coats?Journal of Economic Methodology, 6, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stigler, G. [1954] The early history of empirical studies of consumer behavior, Journal of Political Economy, 62, 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sugden, R. [1998] The role of inductive reasoning in the evolution of conventions, Law and Philosophy, 377–410.Google Scholar

Sugden, R. [2008] The changing relationship between theory and experiment in economics, Philosophy of Science, 75, 621–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sugden, R. [2013] Review of Morgan [2012], Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 6, 108–14.Google Scholar

Summers, L. [1991] Scientific illusion in empirical macroeconomics, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 93, 129–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swamy, P. A. V. B. [1970] Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model, Econometrica, 38, 311–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swamy, P. A. V. B., Conway, R. and von zur Muehlen, P. [1985] The foundations of econometrics – are there any?Econometric Reviews, 4, 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vajda, S. [1956] The Theory of Games and Linear Programming (London: Methuen & Co.).Google Scholar

Valavanis, S. [1959] Econometrics: An Introduction to Maximum Likelihood Method, edited from manuscript by Conrad, A. (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar

Varian, H. [1992]. Microeconomic Analysis, 3rd Ed. (New York: Norton).Google Scholar

Varian, H. [2006]. Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach, 7th Ed. (New York: Norton).Google Scholar

Vromen, J. [2004] Conjectural revisionary economic ontology: Outline of an ambitious research agenda for evolutionary economics, Journal of Economic Methodology, 11, 213–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vromen, J. [2006] Routines, genes and program-based behavior, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16, 543–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vromen, J. [2012] Ontological issues in evolutionary economics: The debate between Generalized Darwinism and the Continuity Hypothesis, in Mäki, [2012], 737–63.

Wald, A. [1936/51] On some systems of equations of mathematical economics, Econometrica, 19, 368–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, D. A. [1996] Walras’s Market Models (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weintraub, E. R. [1979] Microfoundations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winter, S. [1971] Satisficing, selection, and the innovating remnant, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85, 237–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witt, U. [2012] Evolutionary economics and psychology, Lewis, A. (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behavior (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 493–511.Google Scholar

Wolfe, J. [1954] The representative firm, The Economic Journal, 64, 337–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woodford, M. [1999] Revolution and Evolution in Twentieth Century Macroeconomics, presented at the conference Frontier of the Mind in the Twenty-First Century, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.

Wray, R. [2011] The dismal state of macroeconomics and the opportunity for a new beginning, in Davis, and Hands, [2011], 452–69.

Zaman, A. [1996] Statistical Foundations for Econometric Techniques (San Diego: Academic Press).Google Scholar

Zarnowitz, V. [1967] An Appraisal of Short-term Economic Forecasts (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar

Zellner, A. [1978] Folklore versus facts in forecasting with econometric methods, Journal of Business, 51, 587–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar