Modality-dependent aspects of sign language production: Evidence from slips of the hands and their repairs in German Sign Language

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511486777.006

5 - Modality-dependent aspects of sign language production: Evidence from slips of the hands and their repairs in German Sign Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009

Annette Hohenberger ,

Daniela Happ and

Edited by

Kearsy Cormier and

Annette Hohenberger: Affiliation:
Research assistant University of Frankfurt, Germany
Daniela Happ: Affiliation:
Deaf research assistant University of Frankfurt, Germany
Helen Leuninger: Affiliation:
Professor of Linguistics University of Frankfurt, Germany
Richard P. Meier: Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Kearsy Cormier: Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
David Quinto-Pozos: Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

In the present study, we investigate both slips of the hand and slips of the tongue in order to assess modality-dependent and -independent effects in language production. As a broader framework, we adopt the paradigm of generative grammar, as it has developed over the past 40 years (Chomsky 1965; 1995, and related work of other generativists). Generative Grammar focuses on both universal and language-particular aspects of language. The universal characteristics of language are known as Universal Grammar (henceforth, UG). UG defines the format of possible human languages and delimits the range of possible variation between languages. We assume that languages are represented and processed by one and the same language module (Fodor 1983), no matter what modality they use. UG is neutral with regard to the modality in which a particular language is processed (Crain and Lillo-Martin 1999).

By adopting a psycholinguistic perspective, we ask how a speaker's or signer's knowledge of language is put to use during the production of language. So far, models of language production have mainly been developed on the basis of spoken languages ((Fromkin 1973; Garrett 1975, 1980, Butterworth 1980 Levelt 1989, Levelt, Roelofs and Meyer 1999, Dell 1986, Dell and Reich 1981, MacKay 1987, Stemberger 1985). But, even the set of spoken languages investigated so far is restricted (with a clear focus on English). Thus, Levelt, Roelofs and Meyer (1999: 36) challenge researchers to consider a greater variety of (spoken) languages in order to broaden the empirical basis for valid theoretical inductions.

Type: Chapter
Information: Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages , pp. 112 - 142

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486777.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abd-El-Jawad, , Abu-Salim, Hassan and Issam. 1987. Slips of the tongue in Arabic and their theoretical implications. Language Sciences 9:145–171CrossRef Google Scholar

Baars, Bernard J., ed. 1992. Experimental slips and human error. Exploring the architecture of volition. New York: Plenum Press

Baars, Bernard J. and Michael, T. Motley 1976. Spoonerisms as sequencer conflicts: Evidence from artificially elicited errors. American Journal of Psychology 89:467–484CrossRef Google Scholar

Baars, Bernard J., Motley, Michael T. and MacKay, Donald G.. 1975. Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14:382–391CrossRef Google Scholar

Berg, Thomas. 1988. Die Abbildung des Sprachproduktionsprozesses in einem Aktivationsflussmodell. Untersuchungen an deutschen und englischen Versprechern. Linguistische Arbeiten 206. Tübingen: Niemeyer

Brentari, Diane. 1998. A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Butterworth, Brian. 1980. Some constraints on models of language production. In Language production, Vol. 1: Speech and talk, ed. B. Butterworth, 423–459. London: Academic Press

Caramazza, Alfonso. 1984. The logic of neuropsychological research and the problem of patient classification in aphasia. Brain and Language 21:9–20CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Corina, David. 1998. The processing of sign language. Evidence from aphasia. In Handbook of neurolinguistics, ed. Brigitte Stemmer and Harry A. Whitaker, 313–329. San Diego, CA: Academic Press

Crain, Stephen and Diane Lillo-Martin. 1999. An introduction to linguistic theory and language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell

Cutler, Anne. 1982. Speech errors: A classified bibliography. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club

Dell, Gary S. 1986. A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93:293–321CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dell, Gary S. and O'Seaghdha, Padraigh G.. 1992. Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition 42:287–314CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dell, Gary S. and Peter, A. Reich. 1981. Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20:611–629CrossRef Google Scholar

Del Viso, Susana, Igoa, José M., and García-Albea, José E.. 1991. On the autonomy of phonological encoding: Evidence from slips of the tongue in Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 20:161–185CrossRef Google Scholar

Ferber, Rosa. 1995. Reliability and validity of slip-of-the-tongue corpora: A methodological note. Linguistics 33:1169–1190CrossRef Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry A. 1983. The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Fromkin, Victoria A. 1973. Introduction. In Speech errors as linguistic evidence, ed. Victoria A. Fromkin, 11–45. The Hague: Mouton

Fromkin, Victoria A., ed. 1980. Errors in linguistic performance: slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic Press

Garrett, Merrill F. 1975. The analysis of sentence production. In The psychology of learning and motivation, ed. Gordon H. Bower, Vol. 1, 133–175. New York: Academic Press

Garrett, Merrill F. 1980. Levels of processing in sentence production. In Language production, ed. Brian Butterworth, Vol. 1, 177–210. London: Academic Press

Gee, James and Wendy Goodhart. 1988. American Sign Language and the human biological capacity for language. In Language learning and deafness, ed. Michael Strong.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Jescheniak, Jörg D. 1999. Accessing words in speaking: Models, simulations, and data. In Representations and processes in language production, ed. Ralf Klabunde and Christiane von Stutterheim, 237–257. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts Verlag

Kean, Mary-Louise. 1977. The linguistic interpretation of aphasic syndromes: Agrammatism in Broca's aphasia, an example. Cognition 5:9–46CrossRef Google Scholar

Klima, Edward S. and Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Lentz, Ella Mae, Ken Mikos, and Cheri Smith. 1989. Signing naturally. Teachers curriculum guide level 2. San Diego, CA: DawnSignPress

Leuninger, Helen. 1989. Neurolinguistik. Probleme, Paradigmen, Perspektiven. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag

Leuninger, Helen. 1996. Danke und Tschüβürs Mitnehmen. Zürich: Amman Verlag

Leuninger, Helen, Daniela Happ, and Annette Hohenberger. 2000a. Sprachliche Fehlleistungen und ihre Korrekturen in Deutscher Gebärdensprache (DGS). Modalitätsneutrale und modalitätsabhängige Aspekte der Sprachproduktion. In Sprachproduktion, ed. Christopher Habel and Thomas Pechmann. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts Verlag

Leuninger, Helen, Daniela Happ, and Annette Hohenberger. 2000b. Assessing modality-neutral and modality-dependent aspects of language production: Slips of the tongue and slips of the hand and their repairs in spoken German and German sign language M. Paper presented at the DFG-colloquium at Dagstuhl, 2000, September

Levelt, Willem J. M. 1983. Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition 14:41–104CrossRef Google Scholar

Levelt, Willem J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Levelt, Willem J. M. 1992. Assessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representationsCognition 42:1–22CrossRef Google Scholar

Levelt, Willem J. M. 1999. Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In The neurocognition of language, ed. Colin M. Brown and Peter Hagoort, 83–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Levelt, Willem J. M., Roelofs, Ardi, and Meyer, Antje S.. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22:1–75CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1986. Two kinds of null arguments in American Sign Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4:415–444CrossRef Google Scholar

Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1991. Universal Grammar and American Sign Language: Setting the null argument parameters. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic

Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1999. Modality effects and modularity in language acquisition: The acquisition of American Sign Language. In Handbook of child language acquisition, ed. William C. Ritchie and Tej K. Bhatia, 531–567. San Diego, CA: Academic Press

McCarthy, John J. 1981. A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12:373–418Google Scholar

MacKay, Donald G. 1987. The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer

MacNeilage, Peter F. 1998. The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21:499–511CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Meringer, Rudolf and Karl Mayer. 1895. Versprechen und Verlesen. Eine psychologisch-linguistische Studie. Stuttgart: Goeschen

Meyer, Antje S. 1992. Investigation of phonological encoding through speech error analyses: Achievements, limitations, and alternatives. Cognition 42:181–211CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Motley, Michael T. and Bernard, J. Baars 1976. Semantic bias effects on the outcomes of verbal slips. Cognition 4:177–187CrossRef Google Scholar

Mowry, Richard A. and MacKay, Ian R. A.. 1990. Phonological primitives: Electromyographic speech error evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88:1299–1312CrossRef Google Scholar

Newkirk, Don, Edward S. Klima, Carlene C. Pedersen, and Ursula Bellugi. 1980. Linguistic evidence from slips of the hand. In Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand, ed. Victoria A. Fromkin, 165–197. New York: Academic Press

Odden, David. 1995. Tone: African languages. In The handbook of phonological theory, ed. John A. Goldsmith, 444–475. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell

Perlmutter, David. 1992. Sonority and syllable structure in American Sign LanguageLinguistic Inquiry 23:407–442Google Scholar

Pfau, Roland. 1997. Zur phonologischen Komponente der Deutschen Gebärdensprache: Segmente und Silben. Frankfurter Linguistische Forschungen 20:1–29Google Scholar

Poulisse, Nanda. 1999. Slips of the tongue: Speech errors in first and second language production. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Sandler, Wendy. 1993. Hand in hand: The roles of the nondominant hand in sign language phonology. Linguistic Review 10:337–390CrossRef Google Scholar

Schade, Ulrich. 1992. Konnektionismus: Zur Modellierung der Sprachproduktion. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag

Schade, Ulrich. 1999. Konnektionistische Sprachproduktion. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts Verlag

Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stephanie. 1979. Speech errors as evidence for a serial-ordering mechanism in sentence production. In Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett, eds. W. Cooper and E. Walker, 295–342. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Slobin, Dan I. 1977. Language change in childhood and in history. In Language learning and thought, ed. John MacNamara, 185–214. New York: Academic Press

Smith, Cheri, Ella Mae Lentz, and Ken Mikos. 1988. Signing naturally. Teachers curriculum guide Level 1. San Diego, CA: DawnSignPress

Stemberger, Joseph P. 1984. Structural errors in normal and agrammatic speech. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1:281–313CrossRef Google Scholar

Stemberger, Joseph P. 1985. The lexicon in a model of language production. New York: Garland

Stemberger, Joseph P. 1989. Speech errors in early child production. Journal of Memory and Language 28:164–188CrossRef Google Scholar

Whittemore, Gregory L. 1987. The production of ASL signs. Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin

Wiese, Richard. 1987. Versprecher als Fenster zur Sprachstruktur. Studium Linguistik 21:45–55Google Scholar

Zimmer, June. 1989. Towards a description of register variation in American Sign Language. In The sociolinguistics of the Deaf community, ed. Ceil Lucas, 253–272. San Diego, CA: Academic Press