Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:18:01.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Nine - Exploring Public Attitudes to Sentencing Factors in England and Wales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2011

Julian V. Roberts
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Our volume now moves away from the theory and practice of mitigation and aggravation at sentencing to consider the views of the community. The next chapter, by Austin Lovegrove, reports findings from a project involving members of the public and judges in Australia. In this chapter we draw on a number of large-scale quantitative surveys to explore public attitudes to the factors that aggravate or mitigate sentence. The purpose of this essay is to describe recent research findings which illuminate public attitudes to a number of common sentencing factors. These results challenge the view that the public are inflexible, punitive sentencers with little interest in mitigation, and shed light on the model of sentencing to which many people subscribe.

CHAPTER OVERVIEW

The chapter begins by discussing some recent survey trends with respect to public attitudes to sentencing. We then discuss some reasons why we might want to know about attitudes to mitigation and aggravation. Some methodological caveats are issued; different approaches to measuring public attitudes will yield very different responses. This discussion is followed by a presentation of some specific research findings from a study involving a large, representative sample of the public in England and Wales. Finally, we draw some conclusions for the sentencing process.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashworth, A. 2010 Sentencing and Criminal JusticeCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beetham, D. 1991 The Legitimation of PowerBasingstokePalgrave MacmillanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Crime Survey 2009
Clarke, A.Moran-Ellis, J.Sleney, J. 2002 Attitudes to Date Rape and Relationship Rape: A Qualitative StudyLondonSentencing Advisory PanelGoogle Scholar
Darley, J.Carlsmith, K.Robinson, P. 2000 Incapacitation and Just Deserts as Motives for PunishmentLaw and Human Behavior 24 659CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Home Office 2001 Making Punishments WorkLondonHome OfficeGoogle Scholar
Hough, M.Roberts, J. V. 1998 Attitudes to Punishment: Findings from the British Crime SurveyLondonHome OfficeGoogle Scholar
Hough, M.Roberts, J. V. 2004 Youth Crime and Youth Justice: Public Opinion in England and WalesBristolThe Policy PressGoogle Scholar
Hough, M.Jackson, J.Bradford, B.Myhill, A.Quinton, P. 2010 Procedural Justice, Trust, and Institutional LegitimacyPolicing 4 203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, M.Roberts, J. V.Jacobson, J.Steele, N.Moon, N. 2009 www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk
Jacobson, J.Hough, M. 2007 Mitigation: The Role of Personal Factors at SentencingLondonPrison Reform TrustGoogle Scholar
Maslen, H. 2011
Roberts, J. V. 1988 Public Opinion and SentencingOttawaDepartment of Justice CanadaGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J. V. 2003 Public Opinion and Mandatory Sentences of Imprisonment: A Review of International FindingsCriminal Justice and Behavior 20 1Google Scholar
Roberts, J. V. 2008 Aggravating and Mitigating Factors at Sentencing: Towards Greater Consistency of ApplicationCriminal Law Review264Google Scholar
Roberts, J. V. 2008 Punishing Persistence: Explaining the Enduring Appeal of the Recidivist Sentencing PremiumBritish Journal of Criminology 48 468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J. V. 2009 Explaining the Enduring Appeal of the Recidivist Sentencing Premium: The Role of Blameworthinessvon Hirsch, A.Ashworth, A.Roberts, J. V.Principled SentencingOxfordHart PublishingGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J. V. 2011 Community Views of Sentencing: Intuitive and Principled Responses to OffendingTonry, M.Punishment FuturesOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J. V.Gebotys, R. 1989 The Purposes of Sentencing: Public Support for Competing AimsBehavioural Sciences and the Law 7 387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J. V.Hough, M. 2005 Understanding Public Attitudes to Criminal JusticeMaidenheadOpen University PressGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. 2009 Empirical DesertRobinson, P.Garvey, S.Ferzan, K.Criminal Law ConversationsOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D. T.Smith-Lovin, L.Tsoudis, O. 1994 Heinous Crime or Unfortunate Accident? The Effects of Remorse on Responses to Mock Criminal ConfessionsSocial Forces 73 175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, N.Morgan, R. 2001 Sentencing of Domestic BurglaryLondonSentencing Councilwww.sentencingcouncil.org.ukGoogle Scholar
Sentencing Council 2010 www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk
Sentencing Guidelines Council 2008 http://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/guidelines/guidelines-to-download.htm
Silvey, J. 1961 The Criminal Law and Public OpinionCriminal Law Review349Google Scholar
Tudor, S. 2008 Why Should Remorse Be a Mitigating Factor in Sentencing?Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R. 2007 Legitimacy and Criminal JusticeNew YorkRussell Sage FoundationGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R.Huo, Y. J. 2002 Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and CourtsNew YorkRussell Sage FoundationGoogle Scholar
von Hirsch, A. 2010 Proportionality and Progressive Loss of Mitigation: Further ReflectionsRoberts, J. V.von Hirsch, A.The Role of Previous Convictions at Sentencing: Theoretical and Applied PerspectivesOxfordHart PublishingGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×