Abramson, Mark. Ethnic Identity in Tang China. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Algazi, Gadi. “Introduction: Doing Things with Gifts.” In Negotiating the Gift: Pre-modern Figurations of Exchange, edited by Algazi, Gadi, Groebner, Valentin, and Jussen, Bernhard. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 2003, pp. 9–28.Google Scholar

Allen, Lindsay. “Lei roi imaginaire: An Audience with the Achaemenid King.” In Imaginary Kings: Royal Images in the Ancient Near East, Greece and Rome, edited by Fowler, Richard and Hekster, Olivier. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2005, pp. 39–62.Google Scholar

Allsen, Thomas. “Guard and Government in the Reign of the Grand Qan Mongke, 1251–59.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 46, no. 2 (1986): 495–521.Google Scholar

Allsen, Thomas “Mongolian Princes and Their Merchant Partners, 1200–1260.” Asia Major, 3rd series 2, no. 2 (1989): 83–126.Google Scholar

Allsen, Thomas “A Note on Mongol Imperial Ideology.” In The Early Mongols: Language, Culture and History: Studies in Honor of Igor de Rachewiltz on the Occasion of his 80th Birthday, edited by Rybatzki, Volker et al. Indiana University Uralic and Altai Studies 173, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2009, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar

Allsen, Thomas “Population Movements in Mongol Eurasia.” In Nomads as Agents of Cultural Change: The Mongols and Their Eurasian Predecessors, edited by Amitai, Reuven and Biran, Michal. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2015, pp. 119–51.Google Scholar

Allsen, Thomas The Royal Hunt in Eurasian History. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Allsen, Thomas “Spiritual Geography and Political Legitimacy in the Eastern Steppe.” In Ideology and the Formation of Early States, edited by Claessen, Heri and Oosten, Jarich. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1996, pp. 116–35.Google Scholar

Yongxiang, An. “Shishu Sali Weiwuer dongqian.” Xibei minzu yanjiu 1 (1988): 139–44.Google Scholar

Anon. Gaochang guan ke. Rpt. in BTGZ, vol. 6.Google Scholar

Anon. Guo chao dian zhang. Rpt. in SKCM, shi 268.Google Scholar

Anon. Jia Long xin li. Rpt. in Zhongguo zhenxi falü dianji jicheng, edited by Hainian, Liu and Yifan, Yang. Beijing: Kexue chubanshe, 1994, vol. 2, part 2.Google Scholar

Anon. Tiao li bei kao. Mid-sixteenth century. Jiajing (1522–66) edition held at Naikaku Bunko Collection, Tokyo, Japan; Hishi copy held at Princeton East Asian Library.Google Scholar

Anon. Zhen fan si zui chong jun wei min li. 1585. Rpt. in Zhongguo zhenxi falü dianji jicheng, edited by Hainian, Liu and Yifan, Yang. Beijing: Kexue chubanshe, 1994, vol. 2, part 2.Google Scholar

Anooshahr, Ali. “Mughals, Mongols, and Mongrels: The Challenge of Aristocracy and the Rise of the Mughal State in the Tarikh-i Rashidi.” Journal of Early Modern History 18 (2014): 559–77.Google Scholar

Anooshahr, Ali Turkestan and the Rise of Eurasian Empires: A Study of Politics and Invented Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Atwood, Christopher. “Buddhists as Natives: Changing Positions in the Religious Ecology of the Mongol Yuan Dynasty.” In The Middle Kingdom and the Dharma Wheel: Aspects of the Relationship between the Buddhist Samgha and the State in Chinese History, edited by Jülch, Thomas. Leiden: Brill, 2016, pp. 278–321.Google Scholar

Atwood, Christopher Encyclopedia of Mongolia and the Mongol Empire. New York: Facts on File, Inc., 2004.Google Scholar

Atwood, Christopher “Ulus Emirs, Keshig Elders, Signatures, and Marriage Partners: The Evolution of a Classic Mongol Institution.” In Imperial Statecraft: Political Forms and Techniques of Governance in Inner Asia, Sixth–Twentieth Centuries, edited by Sneath, David. Bellingham: Western Washington University, 2006, pp. 141–73.Google Scholar

Atwood, Christopher “Worshipping Grace: The Language of Loyalty in Qing Mongolia.” Late Imperial China 21, no. 2 (2000): 86–139.Google Scholar

Cuise, Bai. “Guanyu Yexian de jige wenti.” Xinjiang shifan daxue xuebao (zhexue shehui kexue ban) 1 (1993): 32–40.Google Scholar

Cuise, Bai “Tumu zhi yi yu Jingtai heyi.” In Xi Menggushi yanjiu, edited by Rong, Du and Cuise, Bai. Urumqi: Xinjiang renmin chubanshe, 1986.Google Scholar

Ban, Gu. Han shu. Rpt. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1962.Google Scholar

Ban, Shinichirō. “Amudo-Chibetto bukkyō jiin Atsuan-gonpa (Qutansi) no Chibettobun hibun shokō: Eiraku jūrokunen ‘Kōtei chokuyubi’ no shiryōteiki kachi no kentō o chūshin ni.” Ōtani daigaku daigakuin kenkyū kiyō 22 (2005): 189–219.Google Scholar

Ban, Shinichirō. “Minsho ni okeru tai Mongoru seisaku to Kasai in okeru Sakya-Bandeita no Choruten saiken: Kanbun-Chibetto bun taiyaku, Gentoku 5 nen (1430) ‘jūshū Ryōshū Hakutashi’ no reikishiteki haikei.” Ajia-Afurika gengo bunka kenkyū 84 (2009): 39–65.Google Scholar

Bang, Peter Fibiger. “The King of Kings: Universal Hegemony, Imperial Power, and a New Comparative History of Rome.” In The Roman Empire in Context: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, edited by Arnason, Johann and Raaflaub, Kurt. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, pp. 322–49.Google Scholar

Bang, Peter Fibiger “Lord of All the World: The State, Heterogeneous Power and Hegemony in the Roman and Mughal Empires.” In Tributary Empires in Global History, edited by Fibiger Bang, Peter and Bayly, C.A.. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, pp. 171–92.Google Scholar

Bang, Peter Fibiger and Bayly, C.A.. Tributary Empires in Global History. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar

Bang, Peter Fibiger and Bayly, C.A. “Tributary Empires: Towards a Global and Comparative History.” In Tributary Empires in Global History, edited by Fibiger Bang, Peter and Bayly, C.A.. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar

Bang, Peter Fibiger and Kolodziejczyk, Dariusz. “‘Elephant of India’: Universal Empire through Time and across Cultures.” In Universal Empire: A Comparative Approach to Imperial Culture and Representation in Eurasian History, edited by Fibiger Bang, Peter and Kolodziejczyk, Dariusz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 1–40.Google Scholar

Bang, Peter Fibiger and Kolodziejczyk, Dariusz Universal Empire: A Comparative Approach to Imperial Culture and Representation in Eurasian History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Barfield, Thomas. The Perilous Frontier: Nomadic Empires and China. Cambridge: B. Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar

Barjamovic, Gojko. “Propaganda and Practice in Assyrian and Persian Imperial Culture.” In Universal Empire: A Comparative Approach to Imperial Culture and Representation in Eurasian History, edited by Fibiger Bang, Peter and Kolodziejczyk, Dariusz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 43–59.Google Scholar

Barthold, Vasilĭ. Four Studies on the History of Central Asia. Translated from the Russian by V. and T. Minorsky. Leiden: Brill, 1962.Google Scholar

Bawden, Charles. The Mongol Chronicle Altan Tobči. Wiesbaden: O. Harrassowitz, 1955.Google Scholar

Benard, Elisabeth. “The Qianlong Emperor and Tibetan Buddhism.” In New Qing Imperial History: The Making of Inner Asian Empire at Qing Chengde, edited by Millward, James. London and New York: Routledge, 2004, pp. 123–35.Google Scholar

Berger, Patricia. Empire of Emptiness: Buddhist Art and Political Authority in Qing China. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Berger, Patricia “Miracles in Nanjing: An Imperial Record of the Fifth Karmapa’s Visit to the Chinese Capital.” In Cultural Intersections of Later Chinese Buddhism, edited by Weidner, Marsha. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2001, pp. 145–69.Google Scholar

Aonan, Bi. “Yexian ganshe Mingchao diwei kaoshu.” Menggushi yanjiu 8 (2005): 166–80.Google Scholar

Biedermann, Zoltán, Gerritsen, Anne, and Riello, Giorgi. “Introduction.” In Global Gifts and the Material Culture of Diplomacy in Early Modern Eurasia, edited by Biedermann, Zoltán, Gerritsen, Anne, and Riello, Giorgi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar

Biran, Michal. “Diplomatic and Chancellery Practices in the Chaghataid Khanate: Some Preliminary Remarks.” Oriente Moderno nuova serie 88, no. 2 (2008): 369–93.Google Scholar

Michal, Biran, Cancik-Kirschbaum, Eva, Pines, Yuri, Rüpke, Jörg, editors. Universality and Its Limits: Spatial Dimensions of Eurasian Empires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Birkenholz, Frank. “Merchant-Kings and Lords of the World: Diplomatic Gift-Exchange between the Dutch East India Company and the Safavid and Mughal Empires in the Seventeenth Century.” In Practices of Diplomacy in the Early Modern World c.1410–1800, edited by Sowerby, Tracey A. and Hennings, Jan. London and New York: Routledge, 2017, pp. 219–36.Google Scholar

Blochet, Edgar. Introduction á l’histoire des mongols. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1910.Google Scholar

Bol, Peter. “This Culture of Ours”: Intellectual Transitions in T’ang and Sung China. Stanford: Stanford, 1992.Google Scholar

Brack, Jonathan. “Mediating Sacred Kingship: Conversion and Sovereignty in Mongol Iran.” Ph.D. dissertation. University of Michigan, 2016.Google Scholar

Brandauer, Frederick. “Introduction.” In Imperial Rulership and Cultural Change in Traditional China, edited by Brandauer, Frederick and Huang, Chün-chieh. Seattle: University of Washington, 1994, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar

Bretschneider, Emil. Mediæval Researches from Eastern Asiatic Sources: Fragments towards the Knowledge of the Geography and History of Central and Western Asia from the 13th to the 17th Century, 2 vols. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1967.Google Scholar

Broadbridge, Anne. “Marriage, Family and Politics: The Ilkhanid–Oirat Connection.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 26, nos. 1–2 (2016): 121–35.Google Scholar

Brook, Timothy. “Commerce: The Ming in the World.” In Ming: 50 Years That Changed China, edited by Clunas, Craig and Harrison-Hall, Jessica. London: British Museum Press, 2014, pp. 254–95.Google Scholar

Brook, Timothy Praying for Power: Buddhism and the Formation of Gentry Society in Late-Ming China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard-Yenching Institute, Harvard University, 1993.Google Scholar

Brummett, Palmira. “A Kiss Is Just a Kiss: Rituals of Submission along the East–West Divide.” In Cultural Encounters between East and West, 1453–1699, edited by Birchwood, Matthew and Dimmock, Matthew. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2005, pp. 107–31.Google Scholar

Burke, Peter. The Fabrication of Louis XIV. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Burke, Peter “Presenting and Re-presenting Charles V.” In Charles V 1500–1558 and His Time, edited by Blockmans, Wim, Hugo Soly and Willem Pieter Blockmans. Antwerp: Mercatorfords, 1999, pp. 393–475.Google Scholar

Buyandelger, (Boyindeligen). “15 shiji zhongyeqian de Bei Yuan kehan shixi ji zhengju.” Menggushi yanjiu 6 (2000): 131–55.Google Scholar

Buyanküü, (Boyinhu). “Guanyu Bei Yuan hanxi.” Neimenggu daxue xuebao 3 (1987): 41–51.Google Scholar

Buyanküü, Mingdai Menggu shilu. Taipei: Meng Zang weiyuanhui, 1998.Google Scholar

Buyanküü, “Ping shiwu shiji Yexian dui Menggu tongyi jiqi yu Mingchao de guanxi.” Neimenggu shehui kexue 2 (1985): 34–39.Google Scholar

Meibiao, Cai. “Mingdai Menggu yu Da Yuan guohao.” Nankai xuebao 1 (1992): 43–51.Google Scholar

Cannadine, David. Ornamentalism: How the British Saw Their Empire. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Yongnian, Cao. Mingdai Menggushi congkao. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe, 2012.Google Scholar

Yongnian, Cao “‘Tumu zhi bian’ Ming bingli ji shangwang renshu kao.” Zhonghua wenshi luncong 109 (2013): 251–59.Google Scholar

Yongnian, Cao “Tumu zhi bian yu Yexian cheng han.” Neimenggu shida xuebao (zhexue shehui kexue ban) 1 (1991): 41–49. Rpt. in idem, Mingdai Menggushi congkao. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe, 2012, pp. 67–80.Google Scholar

Yongnian, Cao “Yexian yu ‘Da Yuan’: Yexian wanghao, nianhao he hanhao de kaocha.” Menggushi yanjiu 5 (1997): 169–76. Rpt. in idem, Mingdai Menggushi congkao. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe, 2012, pp. 54–66.Google Scholar

Cass, Victoria. “Female Healers in the Ming and the Lodge of Ritual and Ceremony.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 106, no. 1 (1986): 233–45Google Scholar

Cha, Hyewon. “Was Joseon a Model or an Exception? Reconsidering the Tributary Relations during Ming China.” Korea Journal 51, no. 4 (2011): 33–58.Google Scholar

Chambers, William. “An Account of Embassies and Letters That Passed between the Emperor of China and Sultan Shah Rokh, Son of Amir Timur,” Asiatic Miscellany, i. Calcutta, 1785: 100–26. The Asiatic miscellany, consisting of translations, fugitive pieces, imitations, original productions, and extracts from curious publications. By W. Chambers, Esq. and Sir W. Jones … and other literary gentlemen, now resident in India. [London], 1792. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Gale. Accessed through Colgate University. 1 Jan. 2017.Google Scholar

Chan, Hok-lam (Chen Xuelin). “The Chien-wen, Yung-lo, Hung-hsi, Hsüan-te reigns.” In CHC 7: 182–304.Google Scholar

Chan, Hok-lam “Chinese Official Historiography at the Yüan Court: The Composition of the Liao, Chin, and Sung Histories.” In China under Mongol Rule, edited by Langlois, John. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981, pp. 56–106.Google Scholar

Chan, Hok-lam “Li Xian yu ‘Tumu zhi yi’ shiliao.” In idem, Mingdai renwu yu chuanshuo. Hong Kong: Zhongwen daxue chubanshe, 1997, pp. 243–47.Google Scholar

Jianhua, Chang. “Ming Taizu dui Qing qianqi zhengzhi de yingxiang.” In Ming Taizu de zhiguo linian jiqi shijian, edited by Hung-lam, Chu. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 2010, pp. 313–43.Google Scholar

Zhongchen, Chao. Ming Chengzu zhuan. Beijing: Renmin chubanshe, 1993.Google Scholar

Nan, Chen. “Lun Mingdai liujing Zangseng de shehui gongyong.” Zhongyang minzu daxue xuebao 5 (2008): 19–25.Google Scholar

Renxi, Chen (jinshi 1639). Huang Ming shi fa lu (1630). Rpt. in SKJHB, vol. 14.Google Scholar

Wen, Chen (d. 1468), editor. Jingtai Yunnan tu jing zhi shu jiaozhu. Kunming: Yunnan minzu chubanshe, 2002.Google Scholar

Wutong, Chen. Hongwu dadi Zhu Yuanzhang zhuan. Guiyang: Guizhou renmin chubanshe, 2005.Google Scholar

Wutong, Chen Hongwu huangdi dazhuan. Zhengzhou: Henan renmin chubanshe, 1993.Google Scholar

Wutong, Chen “Lun Mingchao de minzuguan yu minzu zhengce.” Mingshi yanjiu 4 (1994): 104–11.Google Scholar

Xuelin, Chen. See Chan, Hok-lam.Google Scholar

Xun, Chen (1385–1462). Fang zhou shi ji. Rpt. in XXSK, vol. 1327.Google Scholar

Xun, Chen Fang zhou wen ji. Rpt. in XXSK, vol. 1327.Google Scholar

Kun-dga’-bsod-nams-grags-pa-rgyal-mts’an. Sa skya’i gdun rabs. 1629. Translated by Chen Yingqing, Chen Qingying, Gao Hefu, and Zhou Runnian. Sajia shixishi. Xizang renmin chubanshe, 2002.Google Scholar

Chen, Yunü. Mingdai ershisi yamen huanguan yu Beijing fojiao. Taipei: Ruwen chubanshe, 2001.Google Scholar

Zilong, Chen (1608–47). Huang Ming jing shi wen bian. 1638. Rpt. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1962; third printing 1997.Google Scholar

Liying, Cheng. “Mingdai guanxi qiwei neiqian quxiang he neiqian renshutan.” Guizhou minzu yanjiu 4 (2005): 158–61.Google Scholar

Liying, Cheng “Mingdai guanxi qiwei tanyuan.” Neimenggu shehui kexue (Hanwen ban) 4 (2006): 45–49.Google Scholar

Liying, Cheng “Mingdai guanxi qiwei yu xifan zhuwei.” Xizang yanjiu 3 (2005): 15–18.Google Scholar

Nina, Cheng. “Mingdai Wuliangha Menggu sanwei chaogong zhidu.” Shixue jikan 3 (2016): 4–17.Google Scholar

Ching, Dora. “Tibetan Buddhism and the Creation of the Ming Imperial Image.” In Culture, Courtiers, and Competition: The Ming Court (1368–1644), edited by Robinson, David. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2008, pp. 321–64.Google Scholar

Ching, Dora “Visual Images of Hongwu.” In Long Live the Emperor! Uses of the Ming Founder across Six Centuries of East Asian History, edited by Schneewind, Sarah. Minneapolis: Society for Ming Studies, 2008, pp. 171–209.Google Scholar

Chosŏn wangjo sillok. Rpt. Seoul: Kuksa p’yŏnch’an wiwŏnhoe, 1955–58.Google Scholar

Chosŏn Sejong sillok.Google Scholar

Chosŏn T’aejong sillok.Google Scholar

Chosŏn Tanjong sillok.Google Scholar

Hung-lam, Chu. “Intellectual Trends in the Fifteenth Century.” Ming Studies 27 (1989): 1–33.Google Scholar

Hung-lam, Chu “Ming Taizu dui Jingshu de zhengyin jiqi zhengzhi lixiang he zhiguo linian.” In Ming Taizu de zhiguo linian jiqi shijian, edited by Hung-lam, Zhu. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 2010, pp. 19–62Google Scholar

Chua, Amy. Day of Empire: How Hyperpowers Rise to Global Dominance And Why They Fall. New York: Doubleday, 2007.Google Scholar

Cleaves, Francis. “The Lingǰi of Aruγ of 1340.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 25 (1964–65): 31–79.Google Scholar

Cleaves, Francis “The Sino-Mongolian Edict of 1453 in the Topkapi Sarayi Muzesi.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 13, nos. 3–4 (1950): 431–46.Google Scholar

Clunas, Craig. Empire of Great Brightness: Visual and Material Cultures of Ming China, 1368–1644. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Clunas, Craig Screen of Kings: Royal Art and Power in Ming China. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Clunas, Craig and Harrison-Hall, Jessica, editors. Ming: 50 Years That Changed China. London: British Museum, 2014.Google Scholar

Clunas, Craig, Harrison-Hall, Jessica, and Yu-Ping, Luk, editors. Ming China: Courts and Contacts 1400–1450. London: British Museum, 2016.Google Scholar

Confucius. The Analects. Translated by D.C. Lau. Penguin Classics. London: Penguin Books, 1979, rpt. 1988.Google Scholar

Crossley, Pamela. A Translucent Mirror: History and Identity in Qing Imperial Ideology. Berkeley: University of California, 1999.Google Scholar

Hongyi, Dai. “Guanyu Bei Yuanshi de jige wenti.” Neimeng minzu shifan xueyuan xuebao 2 (1987): 67–71, 24.Google Scholar

Dalai Lama, V (1617–82). See Ngag-dbang-blo-bzang-rgya-mtsho.Google Scholar

Hiroshi, Danjō. Eirakutei: Kai chitsujo no kansei. Tokyo: Kōdansha, 2012.Google Scholar

Dardess, John. “Did the Mongols Matter?” In The Sung–Yuan–Ming Transition in Chinese History, edited by Smith, Paul and von Glahn, Richard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2003, pp. 111–34.Google Scholar

Debreczeny, Karl. “The Early Ming Imperial Atelier on the Tibetan Frontier.” In Ming China: Courts and Contacts 1400–1450, edited by Clunas, Craig, Harrison-Hall, Jessica, and Yu-ping, Luk. London: The British Museum, 2016, pp. 152–62.Google Scholar

Qiu, Deng. Huang Ming yonghua leibian. Rpt. Taipei: Guofeng chubanshe, 1965.Google Scholar

de Rachewiltz, Igor. The Secret History of the Mongols: A Mongolian Epic Chronicle of the Thirteenth Century. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar

DeWeese, Devin. Islamization and Native Religion in the Golden Horde: Baba Tükles and Conversion to Islam in Historical and Epic Tradition. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

di Cosmo, Nicola. Ancient China and Its Enemies: The Rise of Nomadic Power in East Asian History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

di Cosmo, Nicola “China–Steppe Relations in Historical Perspective.” In Complexity of Interaction along the Eurasian Steppe Zone in the First Millennium CE, edited by Bemmann, Jan and Schmauder, Michael. Bonn Contributions to Asian Archeology, Vol. 7. Bonn: Vor- und Frühgeschichtliche Archäologie Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 2015, pp. 49–72.Google Scholar

di Cosmo, Nicola “The Extension of Ch’ing Rule over Mongolia, Sinkiang, and Tibet, 1636–1800.” In The Cambridge History of China. Vol. 9 Part 2, The Ch’ing Dynasty to 1800, edited by Peterson, Willard J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 111–45.Google Scholar

di Cosmo, Nicola “Qing Colonial Administration in Inner Asia.” International History Review 20, no. 2 (1998): 287–309.Google Scholar

di Cosmo, Nicola “State Formation and Periodization in Inner Asian History.” Journal of World History 10, no. 1 (1999): 1–40.Google Scholar

di Cosmo, Nicola and Bao, Dalizhibu. Manchu–Mongol Relations on the Eve of the Qing Conquest: A Documentary History. Leiden: Brill, 2003.Google Scholar

Dikötter, Frank. The Discourse of Race in Modern China. London: Hurst & Company, 1992Google Scholar

Dreyer, Edward. Early Ming China: A Political History 1355–1435. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Dreyer, Edward Zheng He: China and the Oceans in the Early Ming Dynasty, 1405–1433. New York: Pearson/Longman, 2007.Google Scholar

Drompp, Michael. “Strategies of Cohesion and Control in the Türk and Uyghur Empires.” In Complexity of Interaction along the Eurasian Steppe Zone in the First Millennium CE, edited by Bemmann, Jan and Schmauder, Michael. Bonn Contributions to Asian Archeology, Vol. 7. Bonn: Vor- und Frühgeschichtliche Archäologie Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 2015, pp. 437–51.Google Scholar

Changshun, Du. “Mingdai liuzhu jingshi de Zangchuan fojiao sengren.” Zhongguo zangxue 2 (2005): 59–66.Google Scholar

Duindam, Jeroen. Dynasties: A Global History of Power 1300–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Duindam, Jeroen Myths of Power: Norbert Elias and the Early Modern European Court. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Ebrey, Patricia. Emperor Huizong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Elias, Norbert. The Court Society. New York: Pantheon Books, 1983.Google Scholar

Elliott, Mark. The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Elman, Benjamin. A Cultural History of Civil Service Examinations in Late Imperial China. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Elverskog, Johan. “China and and New Cosmopolitanism.” Sino-Platonic Papers 233 (2013): 1–30.Google Scholar

Elverskog, Johan Our Great Qing: The Mongols, Buddhism and the State in Late Imperial China. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Elverskog, Johan “Sagang Sechen on the Tumu Incident.” In Why Mongolia Matters: War, Law, and Society, edited by Rossabi, Morris. Leiden: Brill, 2017, pp. 6–18.Google Scholar

Elverskog, Johan “The Story of Zhu and the Mongols of the Seventeenth Century.” Ming Studies 50 (2004): 39–76. Rpt. in Long Live the Emperor, edited by Sarah Schneewind. Minneapolis: Society for Ming Studies, 2008, pp. 211–43.Google Scholar

Elverskog, Johan “The Tumu Incident and the Chinggisid Legacy.” Silk Road 15 (2017): 142–50.Google Scholar

Elverskog, Johan “Wutai Shan, Qing Cosmopolitanism, and the Mongols.” Journal of the International Association of Tibetan Studies 6 (2011): 243–74.Google Scholar

Endicott-West, Elizabeth. “Merchant Associations in Yuan China: The Ortogh.” Asia Major, 3rd series 2 (1989): 127–54.Google Scholar

Fairbank, John, editor. The Chinese World Order. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Fairbank, John. “Tributary Trade and China’s Relations with the West.” Far Eastern Quarterly 1, no. 2 (1942): 129–49.Google Scholar

Baoliang, Fan. “Chahetai houwang yu Wali fengjianzhu ji Mingchao zai silushang de guanxi.” Xibei minzu yanjiu 2 (1992): 117–22, 286.Google Scholar

Shuzhi, Fan. Mingchao darenwu. Shanghai: Fudan daxue chubanshe, 2011.Google Scholar

Gang, Fang, Jun, Yuan, and Hanbing, Zhu. “Ming Libu shangshu Ji Yi shendao beiming jiaodian ji xiangguan kaoshi.” Sichuan wenwu 4 (2009): 78–83.Google Scholar

Farmer, Edward. Early Ming Government: The Evolution of Dual Capitals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Farquhar, David. “The Origins of the Manchus’ Mongolian Policy.” In The Chinese World Order, edited by Fairbank, John K.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968, pp. 198–205.Google Scholar

Farquhar, David “Oirat–Chinese Tribute Relations, 1408–1446.” In Studia Altaica, Festschrift für Nikolaus Poppe zum 60. Geburtstag am 8. August 1957. Ural–altaische Bibliothek, Series No. 5, edited by von Farkas, Julius and Pritsak, Omeljan. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz 1957, pp. 60–68.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Joseph. “China and Central Asia, 1368–1884.” In Chinese World Order: Traditional China’s Foreign Relations, edited by Fairbank, John. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968, pp. 206–24.Google Scholar

Fowler, Richard and Hekster, Olivier. “Imagining Kings: From Persia to Rome.” In Imaginary Kings: Royal Images in the Ancient Near East, Greece and Rome, edited by Fowler, Richard and Hekster, Olivier. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2005, pp. 9–38.Google Scholar

Franke, Wolfgang. “Chinesische Feldzüge durch die Mongolie im frühen 15. Jahrhundert.” Sinologica 3 (1951–53): 81–88.Google Scholar

Franke, Wolfgang “Yunglo’s Mongolei-Feldzüge.” Sinologische Arbeiten 3 (1945): 1–54.Google Scholar

Dai, Gao. “San li lu ting. ” In Hong you lu, juan 8 (in Ji lu hui bian, compiled by Shen Jiefu (1533–1601), juan 74.Google Scholar

Deyang, Gao (1352–1420). Jie an ji. Rpt. in SKCM, ji 29.Google Scholar

Zihou, Gao. “Mingdai de guanxi qiwei jiqi dongqian.” Lanzhou daxue xuebao (shehui kexue ban) 1 (1986): 42–48.Google Scholar

Geevers, Liesbeth and Marini, Mirella. “Introduction: Aristocracy, Dynasty and Identity in Early Modern Europe, 1520–1700. In Dynastic Identity in Early Modern Europe: Rulers, Aristocrats, and the Formation of Identities, edited by Geevers, Liesbeth and Marini, Mirella. London: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2015, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

Geiss, James. “The Leopard Quarter during the Cheng-te reign.” Ming Studies 24 (1987): 1–38.Google Scholar

Geiss, James “Peking under the Ming (1368–1644).” Ph.D. diss., Princeton University, 1979.Google Scholar

Gilbert, Martin. The First World War: A Complete History. New York: H. Holt, 1994.Google Scholar

ʼGos Lo-tsā-ba Gźon-nu-dpal (1392–1481). Deb-ther sṅon-po. Translated into English by George N. Roerich as Blue Annals. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1976 (2007 printing).Google Scholar

Grupper, Samuel. “A Barulas Family Narrative in the Yuan Shih: Some Neglected Prosopographical and Institutional Sources on Timurid Sources.” Archivum Eurasiae medii aevi 8 (1992–94): 11–97.Google Scholar

Grupper, Samuel “Manchu Patronage and Tibetan Buddhism during the First Half of the Ch’ing Dynasty.” Journal of the Tibet Society 4 (1984): 47–75.Google Scholar

Yingtai, Gu. Ming shi ji shi ben mo. 1658. Rpt. Taipei: Sanlian shuju, 1985.Google Scholar

Junpei, Hagiwara. Mindai Mōkoshi kenkyū. Kyoto: Dōhōsha, 1980.Google Scholar

Junpei, Hagiwara “Minsho no hokuhen ni tsuite.” Tōyōshi kenkyū 19, no. 2 (1960): 15–47.Google Scholar

Junpei, Hagiwara “Tomuku no hen zengo: keizai mondai o chūshin toshite mita MinMō kōshō.” Tōyōshi kenkyū 11, no. 3 (1951): 193–212.Google Scholar

Hall, John A. “Imperial Universalism: Further Thoughts.” In Universal Empire: A Comparative Approach to Imperial Culture and Representation in Eurasian History, edited by Peter Fibiger Bang and Dariusz Kolodziejczyk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 304–09.Google Scholar

Hamashima, Atsutoshi. “The City-God Temples of Chiangnan in the Ming and Ch’ing Dynasties.” Memoirs of the Research Department of Tōyō Bunko 50 (1992): 1–28.Google Scholar

Harrison, Henrietta. “The Qianlong Emperor’s Letter to George III and the Early-Twentieth-Century Origins of Ideas about Traditional China’s Foreign Relations.” American Historical Review 122, no. 3 (June 2017): 680–701.Google Scholar

Moriyoshi, Hasumi. “Minchō no sakuhō taisei to sono yōtai: Tomoku no hen o meguru Rishi Chōsen to no kankei.” Shigaku zasshi 104, no. 8 (1995): 37–73.Google Scholar

Haufler, Marsha (Weidner). “Beyond Yongle: Tibeto-Chinese Thangkas for the Mid-Ming Court.” Artibus Asiae 69, no. 1 (2009): 7–37.Google Scholar

Haufler, Marsha “Faces of Transnational Buddhism at the Early Ming Court.” In Ming China: Courts and Contacts 1400–1450, edited by Clunas, Craig, Harrison-Hall, Jessica, and Yu-ping, Luk. London: The British Museum, 2016, pp. 147–50.Google Scholar

Qiaoyuan, He (1558–1631), compiler. Huang Ming wen zheng. Rpt. SKCM, ji 328.Google Scholar

Qiaoyuan, He Mingshan cang. 1640. Rpt. Fuzhou: Fujian renmin chubanshe, 2010.Google Scholar

Xiaorong, He. Mingdai Beijing Fojiao siyuan xiujian yanjiu. Tianjin: Nankai daxue chubanshe, 2007Google Scholar

Xiaorong, He “Mingdai huangdi chongfeng Zangchuan fojiao qianxi.” Zhongguoshi yanjiu 4 (2005): 119–37.Google Scholar

Heal, Felicity. “Presenting Noble Beasts: Gifts of Animals in Tudor and Stuart Diplomacy.” In Practices of Diplomacy in the Early Modern World c.1410–1800, edited by Sowerby, Tracey and Hennings, Jan. London and New York: Routledge, 2017, pp. 187–203.Google Scholar

Heer, Philip de. The Care-Taker Emperor: Aspects of the Imperial Institution in Fifteenth Century China as Reflected in the Political History of the Reign of Chu Ch’i-yü. Leiden: Brill, 1986.Google Scholar

Heijdra, Martin. “The Socio-economic Development of Rural China during the Ming.” In CHC 8: 417–578.Google Scholar

Hekster, Olivier. “Capture in the Gaze of Power: Visibility, Games, and Roman Imperial Representation.” In Imaginary Kings: Royal Images in the Ancient Near East, Greece and Rome, edited by Fowler, Richard and Hekster, Olivier. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2005, pp. 157–76.Google Scholar

Helms, Mary. Ulysses’ Sail: An Ethnographic Odyssey of Power, Knowledge, and Geographical Distance. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Hennings, Jan and Sowerby, Tracey A.. “Introduction: Practices of Diplomacy.” In Practices of Diplomacy in the Early Modern World c.1410–1800. London and New York: Routledge, 2017, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Hevia, James. Cherishing Men from Afar: Qing Guest Ritual and the Macartney Embassy of 1793. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Hevia, James “Tribute, Asymmetry, and Imperial Formations: Rethinking Relations of Power in East Asia.” Journal of American–East Asian Relations 16, nos. 1–2 (2009): 69–83.Google Scholar

Hilsdale, Cecily. Byzantine Art and Diplomacy in an Age of Decline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Höllman, Thomas. “On the Road Again: Diplomacy and Trade from a Chinese Perspective.” In Complexity of Interaction along the Eurasian Steppe Zone in the First Millennium CE, edited by Bemmann, Jan and Schmauder, Michael. Bonn Contributions to Asian Archeology, Vol. 7. Bonn: Vor- und Frühgeschichtliche Archäologie Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 2015, pp. 557–71.Google Scholar

Guang, Hu. Hu wen mu gong wen ji. Rpt. in SKCM, ji 28, 29.Google Scholar

Xiaopeng, Hu. “Chahetaixi Menggu zhuwang jituan yu Mingchu guanxi zhuwei de chengli.” Lanzhou daxue xuebao 5 (2005): 85–91.Google Scholar

Yan, Hu (1361–1443). Hu Ji jiu ji. Rpt. in BTGZ, vol. 102.Google Scholar

Zhenhua, Hu and Runhua, Huang, editors. Mingdai wenxian Gaochang guanke. Urumqi: Xinjiang renmin chubanshe, 1981.Google Scholar

Zhongda, Hu. “Ming yu Bei Yuan: Menggu guanxi zhi tantao.” Neimenggu shehui kexue 5 (1984): 44–55.Google Scholar

Huai, Huang. Huang wen jian gong jie an ji. Rpt. in SKCM, ji 26.Google Scholar

Jingfang, Huang. Guo shi wei yi. 1644. Rpt. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe, 2002.Google Scholar

Huang, Ray. 1587, A Year of No Significance: The Ming Dynasty in Decline. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Huang, Yu. Shuang huai sui chao. 1495. Rpt. Beijing: Zhongguo shuju, 1999, second printing, 2006.Google Scholar

Huo, Yi, editor. Jun zheng tiao li lei kao. Rpt. Beijing: Beijing tushuguan chubanshe, 1997.Google Scholar

Yonghan, Im. “Oirat ǔi wihyǒp kwa Chosǒn ǔi pang’ǒ chǒllyak.” Yǒksa kwa silhak 46 (2011): 42–70.Google Scholar

Yumiko, Ishihama. Chibetto Bukkyō sekai no rekishiteki kenkyū. Tokyo: Tōhō shoten, 2001.Google Scholar

Jackson, Peter. Mongols and the Islamic World: From Conquest to Conversion. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Jagchid, Sechin and Symons, Van Jay. Peace, War, and Trade along the Great Wall: Nomadic–Chinese Interaction through Two Millennia. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Jang, Scarlett. “The Eunuch Agency Silijian and the Imperial Publishing Enterprise in Ming China.” In Culture, Courtiers, and Competition: The Ming Court (1368–1644), edited by Robinson, David. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2008, pp. 116–85.Google Scholar

Shan, Jin. See Jin Youzi.Google Scholar

Shi, Jin (1371–1439). Jue fei zhai wen ji. Rpt. in XXSK, vol. 1327.Google Scholar

Xiao, Jin. “Tuotuo buhua shifou kuilei bian.” Neimenggu shehui kexue (Hanwen ban) 28, no. 4 (2007): 53–6.Google Scholar

Youzi, Jin (1368–1431). Bei zheng lu (1). Rpt. in GCDG, vol. 1.Google Scholar

Youzi, Jin Jin wen jing gong ji. Rpt. Taipei: Wenhai chubanshe, 1970.Google Scholar

Johnston, Alastair. Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Kang, David. East Asia before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012Google Scholar

Kasakevich, V.M. “Sources to the History of the Chinese Military Expeditions into Mongolia.” Translated from the Russian by Rudolf Löwenthal. Monumenta Serica 8 (1943): 328–35.Google Scholar

Yoshihiro, Kawachi. Mindai Nyoshinshi no kenkyū. Kyoto: Dōhōsha, 1992.Google Scholar

Yasuhiro, Kawagoe. “Futatabi no ‘bing ge qiang rang’ ni Kotsuryōgō seitōgun to Tomoku no hen (2).” Chūō daigaku Ajiashi kenkyū 39 (2015): 45–71.Google Scholar

Yasuhiro, Kawagoe “Keinan no eki ni okeru En-ō kika no eijyokan ni tsuite.” Chūō daigaku bungakubu kiyō 7 (1990): 85–136.Google Scholar

Yasuhiro, Kawagoe “Keinan no ekigo ni okeru En-ō kika no eijyokan ni tsuite.” In Yamane Yukio Kyōju taikyū kinen Mindai shi ronsō, edited by kenkyūkai, Mindaishi Mindaishi ronsō henshū iinkai. Tokyo: Kyūko shoin, 1990, pp. 91–109.Google Scholar

Yasuhiro, Kawagoe “Kotsuryōgō seitōgun to Tomoku no hen” (Chūō daigaku jinbun kagaku kenkyūjo). Jinbunken kiyō 79 (2014): 139–64.Google Scholar

Yasuhiro, Kawagoe Mindai chōjō no gunzō. Tokyo: Kyūko shoin, 2003.Google Scholar

Yasuhiro, Kawagoe Mindai Chūgoku no gigoku jiken: Ran Gyoku no goku to renza no hitobito. Tokyo: Fūkyōsha, 2002.Google Scholar

Yasuhiro, Kawagoe Mindai ikoku jōhō no kenkyū. Tokyo: Kyūko shoten, 1999.Google Scholar

Yasuhiro, Kawagoe Mongoru ni rachi sareta Chūgoku kōtei: Min Eishū no sūki naru unmei. Tokyo: Kenbun shuppan, 2003.Google Scholar

Yasuhiro, Kawagoe “Tenjun gonen no shuto sōran.” Chūō daigaku bungakubu kiyō (shika) 55 (2009): 79–163.Google Scholar

Yasuhiro, Kawagoe “Tomoku no hen to shinseigun.” Tōyōshi kenkyū 52, no. 1 (1993): 24–55.Google Scholar

Khodarkovsky, Michael. Russia’s Steppe Frontier: The Making of a Colonial Empire, 1500–1800. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Hodong, Kim. “The Early History of the Moghul Nomads: The Legacy of the Chaghatai Khanate.” In The Mongol Empire and Its Legacy, edited by Amitai-Preiss, Reuven and Morgan, David. Leiden, Boston, and Cologne: Brill, 1999, pp. 290–318.Google Scholar

Hodong, Kim “Isŭrram seryok ŭi Tongjin kwa Hami wangguk ŭi morrak.” Chindan hakpo 76 (1993): 107–42.Google Scholar

Hodong, Kim “Mong’gol che’guk kwa Tae Wŏn.” Yŏksa hakpo 192 (2006): 221–53.Google Scholar

Hodong, Kim “The Unity of the Mongol Empire and Continental Exchanges over Eurasia.” Journal of Central Asian Studies 1 (2009): 15–42.Google Scholar

Hodong, Kim “Was ‘Da Yuan’ a Chinese Dynasty?” Journal of Song–Yuan Studies 45 (2015): 279–306.Google Scholar

Manji, Kitajima. “Eirakutei ki ni okeru Chōsen Ōkoku no sakuhō to kōeki.” In Zenkindai no Nihon to Higashi Ajia, edited by Takeo, Tanaka. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 1995, vol. 7, pp. 197–215.Google Scholar

Koch, Ebba. “How the Mughal Pādshāhs Referenced Iran in Their Visual Construction of Universal Rule.” In Universal Empire: A Comparative Approach to Imperial Culture and Representation in Eurasian History, edited by Fibiger Bang, Peter and Kolodziejczyk, Dariusz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 194–209.Google Scholar

Kutcher, Norman. Eunuch and Emperor in the Great Age of Qing Rule. Oakland: University of California Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Jiadu, Lai. “Mingdai chuqi Xibei qiwei de shezhi.” Lishi jiaoxue (1957): 30–32.Google Scholar

Lane, George. “Arghun Aqa: Mongol Bureaucrat.” Iranian Studies 32, no. 4 (1999): 459–82.Google Scholar

Langlois, John. “The Hung-wu reign, 1368–1398,” In CHC 7: 107–81.Google Scholar

Legge, James. The Chinese Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1893–95. Rpt., Taipei: Southern Materials Centers, 1983, 4 vols.Google Scholar

Legge, James The Ch’un Ts’ew. In The Chinese Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1893–95. Rpt., Taipei: Southern Materials Center, 1983. 4 vols.Google Scholar

Legge, James The Li Kî. In The Sacred Books of China. The Texts of Confucianism. Part IV. Part of The Sacred Books of the East series edited by F. Max Müller, vol. 28. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1885.Google Scholar

Legge, James Shoo King, in James Legge, The Chinese Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1893–95. Rpt. Taipei: Southern Materials Center, 1983. 4 vols.Google Scholar

Lewis, Mark. China’s Cosmopolitan Empire: The Tang Dynasty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Lewis, Mark “Gift Circulation and Charity in the Han and Roman Empires.” In Rome and China: Comparative Perspectives on Ancient World Empires, edited by Scheidel, Walter. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 121–36.Google Scholar

Guangtao, Li, compiler. Ming Qing dang’an cunzhen xuanji chuji. Taipei: Zhongyang yuanjiuyuan lishi yuyan yanjiusuo, 1959.Google Scholar

Jia, Li. “Zhongjun yu zhongsheji guanxibian.” Qiu shi xue kan 39, no. 4 (2012): 154–60.Google Scholar

Shi, Li. Li shi lang shi bei lu. Rpt. in GCDG, vol. 1.Google Scholar

Shi, Li Li Shi ti ben. N.p., c. 1450. Ming manuscript edition. National Beiping Library, Rare Book Collection. Microfilm held at Princeton University.Google Scholar

Shi, Li Xu an Li gong feng shi lu. Rpt. in XXSK, vol. 444.Google Scholar

Xian, Li (1408–67). Gu rang ji. WYSK, vol. 1244.Google Scholar

Xinfeng, Li. “Lun Yuan Ming zhijian de biange.” Gudai wenming 4, no. 4 (2010): 83–102.Google Scholar

Xinfeng, Li “Tumu zhi zhan zhi yi.” Mingshi yanjiu 6 (1999): 109–15.Google Scholar

Yanjie, Li. “Mingdai Tainingwei de jingji shenghuo jiyu Mingchao de guanxi.” Neimenggu shifan daxue xuebao (zhexue shehui kexue ban) 4 (2007): 130–33.Google Scholar

Yongqiang, Li and Fengliang, Liu. “Xinhuo Mingdai Huairou bo Shi Ju, Shi Jian muzhi.” Wenwu chunqiu 1 (2008): 60–5.Google Scholar

Zhian, Li. “Yuandai ji Mingdai chuqi shehui biandong chutan.” Zhongguoshi yanjiu (zengkan) (2005): 83–98.Google Scholar

Huan, Lin. “Ming Yingzong beifu jiqi zai Mengdi jiya qijian de huodong.” Zhongguo bianjiang minzu yanjiu 5 (2011): 87–98.Google Scholar

Dingzhi, Liu (1409–69). Pi tai lu. Rpt. in GCDG, vol. 1.Google Scholar

Guofang, Liu. “Mingchao de beibian zhengce yu Hamiwei de shezhi.” Xiyu yanjiu 4 (1998): 14–20.Google Scholar

Hainian, Liu and Yifan, Yang, editors. Zhongguo zhenxi falü dianji jicheng. Beijing: Kexue chubanshe, 1994.Google Scholar

Liu, Xu. Tang shu. 945. Rpt. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1975.Google Scholar

Zhengyin, Liu. “Mingdai Wala yu Dong Chahetai hanguo de guanxi.” Menggushi yanjiu 4 (1993): 69–76.Google Scholar

Lo, Jung-pang. “Intervention in Annam: A Case Study of the Foreign Policy of the Early Ming Government.” Tsinghua Journal of Chinese Studies 8, nos. 1–2 (1970): 154–82.Google Scholar

Loewe, Michael. “The Former Han Dynasty.” In CHC 1: 103–222.Google Scholar

Lorge, Peter. The Reunification of China: Peace through War under the Song Dynasty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Rong, Lu (1436–94). Shu yuan za ji. 1494. Rpt. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1985.Google Scholar

Hengxin, Luo. Jue fei ji. Rpt. in BTGZ, vol. 103.Google Scholar

Jianchun, Ma.“Liangzhou lishishang de liangwei xiyuren: Xiningwang Xindu, Fuqianghou Mao Zhong.” Xiyu yanjiu 2 (1998): 85–88.Google Scholar

Jianchun, Ma “Mingdai Xiyu Huihuiren Ma Keshun shiji kao.” Huihui yanjiu 2 (2008): 58–61.Google Scholar

Jianchun, Ma “‘Tumu zhi bian’ yu Huihuiren.” Xibei minzu yanjiu 2 (1995): 153–65.Google Scholar

McMahon, Keith. Celestial Women: Imperial Wives and Concubines in China from Song to Qing. Lanham, Boulder, and New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2016.Google Scholar

McMahon, Keith Women Shall Not Rule: Imperial Wives and Concubines in China from Han to Liao. Lanham, Boulder, and New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2013.Google Scholar

Bowen, Mao. Dong tang ji. Rpt. in BTGZ, vol. 107.Google Scholar

Peiqi, Mao. “Yingzong, Wang Zhen, Tumu zhi bian.” Mingshi yanjiu luncong 7 (2007): 110–22.Google Scholar

Peiqi, Mao Yongle huangdi dazhuan. Shenyang: Liaoning jiaoyu chubanshe, 1994.Google Scholar

Martin, Janet. “The Novokshcheny of Novgorod: Assimilation in the 16th Century.” Central Asian Survey 9, no. 2 (1990): 13–38.Google Scholar

Martin, Janet “Tatar Pomeshchiki in Muscovy (1560s–1570s).” In The Place of Russia in Eurasia, edited by Szvák, Gyula. Budapest: Magyar Ruszisztikai Intézet, 2001, pp. 114–20.Google Scholar

Martin, Janet “Tatars in the Muscovite Army during the Livonian War.” In The Military and Society in Russia 1450–1917, edited by Lohr, Eric and Poe, Marshall. Leiden, Boston, and Cologne: Brill, 2002, pp. 365–87.Google Scholar

Jun, Matsumura. “Mindai Hami ōke no kigen.” Tōyō gakuhō 39, no. 4 (1957): 40–7.Google Scholar

Guido van, Meersbergen (2017). “The Dutch Merchant–Diplomat in Comparative Perspective: Embassies to the Court of Aurangzeb, 1660–1666.” In Practices of Diplomacy in the Early Modern World c.1410–1800, edited by Tracey Sowerby and Jan Hennings. London and New York: Routledge, 2017, pp. 147–65.Google Scholar

Melo, João. “In Search of a Shared Language: The Goan Diplomatic Protocol.” Journal of Early Modern History 20, no. 4 (2016): 390–407.Google Scholar

Fanren, Meng. Mingdai gongting jianzhushi. Beijing: Zijincheng chubanshe, 2010.Google Scholar

Sen, Meng. Mingdaishi. Rpt. Taipei: Huaxiangyuan chubanshe, 1993.Google Scholar

Xiu, Meng. “Ming Meng chaogong tizhi yu Tumu zhi bian.” Dalian daxue xuebao 4 (2010): 38–42.Google Scholar

Xiu, Meng “Tumu zhi bian xinlun.” Heilongjiang jiaoyu daxue xuebao 28, no. 7 (2009): 88–89.Google Scholar

Millward, James, Dunnell, Ruth, Elliott, Mark, and Forêt, Philippe, editors. New Qing Imperial History: The Making of Inner Asian Empire at Qing Chengde. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004, pp. 91–105.Google Scholar

Millward, James, Dunnell, Ruth, Elliott, Mark, and Forêt, Philippe Ming shilu. 1418–mid-17th century. Rpt. Taipei: Zhongyang yanjiuyuan li yuyan yanjiusuo, 1961–66, 133 vols.Google Scholar

Junko, Miyawaki. “Mongoru–Oiratto kankeishi: jūsan seiki kara jūshichi seiki made.” Ajia Afulika gengo bunka kenkyū 25 (1983): 150–92.Google Scholar

Miyazaki, Ichisada. “Kōbu kara Eiraku e: shoki Minchō seiken no seikaku.” Tōyōshi kenkyū 27, no. 4 (1969): 1–23.Google Scholar

Masahiko, Morihira. “Genchō keshike seido to Kōrai ōke: Kōrai-Genchō kankei ni okeru turghagh no igi ni kanren shite.” Shigaku zasshi 110, no. 2 (2001): 60–89. Rpt. in idem, Mongoru hakenka no Kōrai: Teikoku chitsujo to ōkoku no taiō. Nagoya: Nagoya daigaku shuppankai, 2013, pp. 147–201.Google Scholar

Mosca, Matthew. “The Expansion of the Qing Empire before 1800.” In Universality and Its limits: Spatial Dimensions of Eurasian Empires, edited by Biran, Michal, Cancik-Kirschbaum, Eva, Yuri Pines, and Jörg Rüpke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Mosca, Matthew “The Qing Empire in the Fabric of Global History.” In The Prospect of Global History, edited by Belich, James, James Belich, John Darwin, Margret Frenz, and Chris Wickham. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 108–23.Google Scholar

Mostaert, Antoine. Le matériel mongol du Houa i i iu de Houng-ou (1389). Mélanges chinois et bouddhiques 18, edited by de Rachewiltz, Igor and Schönbaum, Anthony. 2 vols. Brussels: Institut belge des hautes études chinoises, 1977.Google Scholar

Mostaert, Antoine and Cleaves, Francis. Les lettres de 1289 et 1305 des Ilkhan Aryun et Öljeitü à Philippe le Bel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Mote, Frederick. “The Growth of Chinese Despotism: A Critique of Wittfogel’s Theory of Oriental Despotism as Applied to China.” Oriens Extremus 8 (1961): 1–41.Google Scholar

Mote, Frederick Imperial China, 900–1800. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Mote, Frederick The Poet Kao Ch’i. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Mote, Frederick “The T’u-mu Incident of 1449.” In Chinese Ways in Warfare, edited by Kierman, Frank and Fairbank, John. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974, pp. 243–72.Google Scholar

Mote, Frederick W. and Twitchett, Denis. Cambridge History of China, vol. 7, The Ming Dynasty, 1368–1644, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Dūghlāt, Muḥammad Ḥaydar (Mirza Muhammand Haidar), History of the Mughals of Central Asia being the Tarikh-i-rashidi, translated by E. Denison Ross and edited by Elias, N.. 2nd edition, London, 1898. Rpt. New York, Washington, and London: Praeger Publishers, 1970.Google Scholar

Dūghlāt, Muḥammad Ḥaydar Tarikh-i-Rashid: A History of the Khans of Moghulistan, English translation and annotation by W.M. Thackston. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Munkh-Erdene, Lhamsuren. “Where Did the Mongol Empire Come From? Medieval Mongol Ideas of People, State, and Empire.” Inner Asia 13 (2011): 211–37.Google Scholar

Hisanori, Nagamoto. “Minsho no Hami ōke ni tsuite: Seiso no Komuru keiei. Tōyōshi kenkyū 22, no. 1 (1963): 1–38.Google Scholar

Nanjingshi bowuguan, compiler. Zheng He shidai tebiezhan tulu. Nanjing: Nanjing bowuguan, 2012.Google Scholar

Naqqash, Ghiyathuddin. “Report to Mirza Baysunghur on the Timurid Legation to the Ming Court at Peking.” In A Century of Princes, translated and edited by W.M. Thackston. Cambridge: The Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture, 1989.Google Scholar

Naquin, Susan. Peking: Temples and City Life, 1400–1900. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Newby, Laura. The Empire and the Khanate: A Political History of Qing Relations with Khoqand, c.1760–1860. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar

Ngag-dbang-blo-bzang-rgya-mtsho (Fifth Dalai Lama 1617–82). Bod kyi deb ther dpyid kyi rgyal moi glu dbyans. Translated into Chinese by Guo Heqing as Xizang wangchenji. Beijing: Minzu chubanshe, 1983.Google Scholar

Okada, Hidehiro. “China as a Successor State to the Mongols.” In The Mongol Empire and Its Legacy, edited by Amitai-Preiss, Reuven and Morgan, David. Leiden: Brill, 1999, pp. 260–72.Google Scholar

Norio, Okuyama. “Tomokuhō no hen.” Shihō 1 (1974): 8–15.Google Scholar

Matsuo, Otagi and Takanobu, Terada. Mongoru to Dai Min teikoku. Tokyo: Kōdansha gakujutsu bunko, 1998.Google Scholar

Tomoko, Otosaka. “Min chokken Kōkaji kō: aru Seikai Gerukepa jiin no isō.” Shihō 6 (1991): 31–63.Google Scholar

Tomoko, Otosaka “A Study of Hong-hua-si Temple Regarding the Relationship between the dGe-Lugs-Pa and the Ming Dynasty.” Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko 52 (1994): 69–101.Google Scholar

Oyunbilig, and Cairangjia, Daowei. “‘Chijiao fawang yuling’ kaoshi.” In Man Meng dang’an yu Menggushi yanjiu, edited by Oyunbilig, . Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe, 2014, pp. 59–70.Google Scholar

Pak, Wŏn-ho. “‘Jingnnan zhi yi.’” Mingshi yanjiu 1 (1991): 227–47.Google Scholar

Pak, Wŏn-ho Myŏng-ch’o Chosŏn kwan’gyesa yŏn’gu. Seoul: Iljogak, 2002.Google Scholar

Yihong, Pan. “Early Chinese Settlement Policies towards the Nomads.” Asia Major 5, no. 2 (1994): 41–77.Google Scholar

Yihong, Pan “Integration of the Northern Ethnic Frontiers in Tang China.” Chinese Historical Review 19, no. 1 (2012): 3–26.Google Scholar

Yihong, Pan “Marriage Alliances and Chinese Princesses in International Politics from Han through T’ang.” Asia Major, 3rd series 10, nos. 1–2 (1997): 95–131.Google Scholar

Yihong, Pan Son of Heaven and Heavenly Qaghan: Sui–Tang China and Its Neighbors. Studies on East Asia, vol. 20. Bellingham: Western Washington University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Patterson, Angus. “Arms and Armour.” In Treasures of the Royal Courts: Tudors, Stuarts and the Russian Tsars, edited by Dmitrieva, Olga and Murdoch, Tessa. London: V&A Publishing, 2013, pp. 107–25.Google Scholar

Perdue, Peter. China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Perdue, Peter “The Tenacious Tributary System.” Journal of Contemporary China 24, no. 96 (2015): 1–13.Google Scholar

Wenying, Qi. “Beiming suojian Mingdai daguan hunyin guanxi.” Zhongguoshi yanjiu 3 (2011): 167–81.Google Scholar

Wenying, Qi “Ming Hongwu shiqi neiqian Mengguren bianxi.” Zhongguo bianjiang shidi yanjiu 14, no. 2 (2004): 59–65.Google Scholar

Wenying, Qi Mingdai weisuo guifuren yanjiu. Beijing: Zhongyang minzu daxue chubanshe, 2011.Google Scholar

Jun, Qiu. Qiu wen zhuang wen ji san. Rpt. in HMJS, juan 73.Google Scholar

Zhonglin, Qiu. “Mingdai de Wuliangha sanwei fushang jiqi jingfei zhi choucuo.” Mingdai yanjiu 27 (2016): 1–69.Google Scholar

Rawski, Evelyn. “Ch’ing Imperial Marriage and the Problems of Rulership.” In Marriage and Inequality in Chinese Society, edited by Watson, Rubie and Ebrey, Patricia. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991, pp. 170–203.Google Scholar

Rawski, EvelynThe Last Emperors: A Social History of Qing Imperial Institutions. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Rawski, Evelyn “Presidential Address: Reenvisioning the Qing.” Journal of Asian Studies 55, no. 4 (1996): 829–50.Google Scholar

Robinson, David. Bandits, Eunuchs, and the Son of Heaven: Rebellion and the Economy of Violence in Ming China. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Robinson, David “Celebrating War with the Mongols.” In Why Mongolia Matters: War, Law, and Society, edited by Rossabi, Morris. Leiden: Brill, 2017, pp. 105–28.Google Scholar

Robinson, Davideditor. Culture, Courtiers, and Competition: The Ming Court (1368–1644). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2008.Google Scholar

Robinson, David “Disturbing Images: Rebellion, Usurpation, Rulership: Korean Writings on Emperor Wuzong (r. 1506–21).” Journal of Korean Studies 9, no. 1 (Fall 2004): 97–127.Google Scholar

Robinson, David Empire’s Twilight: Northeast Asia under the Mongols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2009.Google Scholar

Robinson, David “Images of Subject Mongols under the Ming Dynasty.” Late Imperial China 25, no. 1 (2004): 59–123.Google Scholar

Robinson, David In the Shadow of the Mongol Empire: The Ming Court in Eurasia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Robinson, David “Justifying Ming Rulership on a Eurasian Stage.” In Ming China: Courts and Contacts, 1400–1450, edited by Clunas, Craig, Harrison-Hall, Jessica, and Yu-ping, Luk. London: British Museum Press, 2016, pp. 8–14.Google Scholar

Robinson, David Martial Spectacles of the Ming Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2013.Google Scholar

Robinson, David “Military Labor in China, circa 1500.” In Fighting for a Living: A Comparative History of Military Labour 1500–2000, edited by Erik-Jan Zürcher. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2014, pp. 43–80.Google Scholar

Robinson, David “The Ming Court.” In Culture, Courtiers, and Competition, edited by David Robinson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2008, pp. 21–60.Google Scholar

Robinson, David “The Ming Court and the Legacy of the Yuan Mongols.” In Culture, Courtiers, and Competition, edited by Robinson, David. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2008, pp. 365–421.Google Scholar

Robinson, David “Politics, Force, and Ethnicity.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 59, no. 1 (June 1999): 79–123.Google Scholar

Robinson, David “Rethinking the Late Koryŏ in an International Context.” Korean Studies 41 (2017): 75–98.Google Scholar

Robinson, David “Why Military Institutions Matter for Ming History.” Journal of Chinese History 2 (2017): 297–327.Google Scholar

Roerich, George. The Blue Annals. See ʼGos Lo-tsā-ba Gźon-nu-dpal (1392–1481).Google Scholar

Rogers, Daniel, Ulambayar, Erdenebat, and Mathew, Gallon. “Urban Centres and the Emergence of Empires in Eastern Inner Asia.” Antiquity 79 (2005): 801–18.Google Scholar

Rossabi, Morris. “The Ming and Inner Asia.” In CHC 8: 222–71.Google Scholar

Rossabi, Morris “Ming China and Turfan, 1406–1517.” Central Asiatic Journal 16, no. 3 (1972): 206–25.Google Scholar

Rossabi, Morris “Ming Foreign Policy: The Case of Hami.” In idem, From Yuan to Modern China and Mongolia: The Writings of Morris Rossabi. Leiden: Brill, 2014, pp. 17–37.Google Scholar

Rossabi, Morris “Ming Officials and Northwest China.” In Officials on the Chinese Borders, edited by Jagou, F.. Taipei: Academia Sinica, 2006. Rpt. in idem, From Yuan to Modern China and Mongolia: The Writings of Morris Rossabi. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2014, pp. 89–107.Google Scholar

Rossabi, Morris “Notes on Esen’s Pride and Ming China’s Prejudice.” Mongolia Society Bulletin 9, no. 2 (1970): 31–9.Google Scholar

Rossabi, Morris “The Tea and Horse Trade with Inner Asia during the Ming.” Journal of Asian History 4, no. 2 (1970): 136–68.Google Scholar

Sechen, Sagang. The Bejewelled Summary of the Origin of the Khans (Qad-un ündüsün-ü Erdeni-yin Tobči). Translated by John Krueger. The Mongolia Society Occasional Papers. Bloomington: The Mongolia Society, 1967.Google Scholar

Saguchi, Tōru. “Sarigū uikuru shuzokushi kō.” Yamamoto Hakushi kanreki kinen Tōyōshi ronsō, edited by Hakushi, Yamamoto kanreki kinen Tōyō shi ronsō hensan Iinkai. Tokyo: Yamakawa Shuppansha, 1972, pp. 191–202.Google Scholar

Schneewind, Sarah. “Introduction.” In Long Live the Emperor! Uses of the Ming Founder across Six Centuries of East Asian History, edited by Schneewind, Sarah. Minneapolis: Society for Ming Studies, 2008, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar

Schneewind, Saraheditor. Long Live the Emperor! Uses of the Ming Founder across Six Centuries of East Asian History. Minneapolis: Society for Ming Studies, 2008.Google Scholar

Schwieger, Peter. Dalai Lama and the Emperor of China: A Political History of the Tibetan Institution of Reincarnation. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Schwieger, Peter “A Document of Chinese Diplomatic Relations with East Tibet during the Ming Dynasty.” In Tibetstudien: Festschrift für Dieter Schuh zum 65. Geburtstag, edited by Maurer, Petra and Schwieger, Peter. Bonn: Bier’sche Verlagsanstalt, 2007, pp. 209–26.Google Scholar

Scott, Hamish. “Conclusion.” In Dynastic Identity in Early Modern Europe: Rulers, Aristocrats, and the Formation of Identities, edited by Geevers, Liesbeth and Marini, Mirella. London: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2015, pp. 194–214.Google Scholar

Scott, James. Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Scott, James The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Scott, James Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Scott, James Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Tansen, Sen. “Changing Regimes: Two Episodes of Chinese Military Interventions in Medieval South Asia.” In Asian Encounters: Networks of Cultural Interactions, edited by Singh, Upinder and Parul, P. Dhar, . New Delhi, 2014, pp. 62–85.Google Scholar

Tansen, Sen “Diplomacy, Trade and the Quest for the Buddha’s Tooth: The Yongle Emperor and Ming China’s South Asian Frontier.” In Ming China: Courts and Contacts 1400–1450, edited by Clunas, Craig, Harrison-Hall, Jessica, and Yu-ping, Luk. London: The British Museum, 2016, pp. 26–36.Google Scholar

Tansen, Sen “Formation of Chinese Maritime Networks to Southern Asia, 1200–1450.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 49, no. 4 (2006): 421–53.Google Scholar

Tansen, Sen “The Impact of Zheng He’s Expeditions on Indian Ocean Interactions.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 79, no. 3 (2016): 609–36.Google Scholar

Serruys, Henry. “The Dates of the Mongolian Documents in the Hua-i i-yu.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 17, nos. 3–4 (1954): 419–27.Google Scholar

Serruys, Henry “The Location of T’a-t’an, ‘Plain of the Tower’.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 19, nos. 1–2 (1956): 52–66.Google Scholar

Serruys, Henry “A Manuscript Version of the Legend of the Mongol Ancestry of the Yung-lo Emperor.” In Analecta Mongolica: Dedicated to the Seventieth Birthday of Professor Owen Lattimore, edited by Hangin, John and Onon, Urgunge. Bloomington: Indiana University, 1972, pp. 19–61.Google Scholar

Serruys, Henry “Mongols Ennobled during the Early Ming.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 22 (1959): 209–60.Google Scholar

Serruys, Henry The Mongols in China during the Hung-wu Period. Bruxelles: Institut belge des hautes études chinoises, 1959.Google Scholar

Serruys, Henry The Mongols of Kansu during the Ming. Bruxelles: Institut belge des hautes études chinoises, 1955.Google Scholar

Serruys, Henry “Notes on a Chinese Inscription of 1606 in a Lamaist Temple in Mai-ta-chao, Suiyüan.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 78, no. 2 (1958): 101–13Google Scholar

Serruys, Henry “The Office of Tayisi in Mongolia in the Fifteenth Century.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 37, no. 2 (1977): 353–80.Google Scholar

Serruys, Henry Sino-Mongol Relations during the Ming, II: The Tribute System and Diplomatic Missions. Bruxelles: Institut belge des hautes études chinoises, 1966–67.Google Scholar

Serruys, Henry Sino-Mongol Relations during the Ming, III: Trade Relations: The Horse Fairs (1400–1600). Bruxelles: Institut belge des hautes études chinoises, 1975.Google Scholar

Serruys, Henry “Sino-Mongol Trade during the Ming.” Journal of Asian History 9, no. 1 (1975): 34–56.Google Scholar

Chuan, Shang. Yongle huangdi. Beijing: Beijing chubanshe, 1989.Google Scholar

Xunzheng, Shao. “You Mingchuye yu Tiemuer diguo zhi guanxi.” [Qinghua daxue] Shehui kexue 2, no. 1 (1936). Rpt. in Shao Xunzheng lishi lunwenji. Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe, 1985, pp. 86–98.Google Scholar

Shea, Eiren. “The Mongol Cultural Legacy in East and Central Asia: The Early Ming and Timurid Courts.” Ming Studies 78 (2018): 32–56.Google Scholar

Sheffield, Gary. The Somme. London: Cassell, 2007.Google Scholar

Jiefu, Shen (1533–1601). Ji lu hui bian. 1617. Rpt. Taipei: Taiwan shangwu yinshuguan, 1969.Google Scholar

Jian, Shi (1434–96). Xi Cun ji. WYSK, vol. 1259.Google Scholar

Xinrong, Shi. “Mingdai Hami yu Zhongyuan diqu de jingji laiwang.” Xiyu yanjiu 1 (2007): 18–27.Google Scholar

Silver, Larry. Marketing Maximilian: The Visual Ideology of a Holy Roman Emperor. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Skaff, Jonathan. Sui–Tang China and Its Turko-Mongol Neighbors: Culture, Power, and Connections, 580–800. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Smith, Paul and von Glahn, Richard, editors. The Sung–Yuan–Ming Transition in Chinese History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2003.Google Scholar

Sneath, David. The Headless State: Aristocratic Orders, Kinship Society, and Misrepresentations of Nomadic Inner Asia. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Sŏ, In-bǒm. “Tomoku no hen to kenōhei: Giyū to minsō o chūshin toshite.” Tōyō gakuhō 82, no. 1 (2000): 1–28.Google Scholar

Dehui, Song. “Mingchao Tainingwei kaoshu.” Bowuguan yanjiu 3 (2010): 57–63.Google Scholar

Duanyi, Song. Li zhai wen lu. Rpt. in GCDG, vol. 2.Google Scholar

Lian, Song (1310–81). Song Lian quan ji. Hangzhou: Zhejiang guji chubanshe, 1999.Google Scholar

Lian, Song et al., editors. Yuan shi. 1360–70. Rpt. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1976.Google Scholar

Soulliere, Ellen. “The Imperial Marriages of the Ming Dynasty.” Papers on Far Eastern History 37 (March 1988): 15–42.Google Scholar

Soulliere, Ellen “Palace Women in the Ming Dynasty.” Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University, 1987.Google Scholar

Sowerby, Tracey. “‘A Memorial and a Pledge of Faith’: Portraiture and Early Modern Diplomatic Culture.” English Historical Review 129, no. 537 (2014): 296–331.Google Scholar

Sperling, Elliot. “Early Ming Policy toward Tibet: An Examination of the Proposition that the Early Ming Emperors Adopted a Divide and Rule Policy toward Tibet.” Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, 1983.Google Scholar

Sperling, Elliot “Notes on the Early History of Gro-tshang Rdo-rje-’chang and Its Relations with the Ming Court.” Lungta 14 (2001): 77–87.Google Scholar

Sperling, Elliot “Tibetan Buddhism, Perceived and Imagined along the Ming-Era Sino-Tibetan Frontier.” In Buddhism between Tibet and China, edited by Kapstein, Matthew. Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications, 2009, pp. 155–80.Google Scholar

Zhigao, Su (jin shi 1532). Yi yu. Rpt. in MMHJ, vol. 1, pp. 216–37.Google Scholar

Subrahmanyam, Sanjay. “Connected Histories: Notes towards a Reconfiguration of Early Modern Eurasia.” Modern Asian Studies 31, no. 3 (1997): 735–62.Google Scholar

Subrahmanyam, Sanjay Courtly Encounters: Translating Courtliness and Violence in Early Modern Eurasia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Subrahmanyam, Sanjay “One Asia, or Many? Reflections from Connected History.” Modern Asian Studies 50, no. 1 (2016): 5–43.Google Scholar

Laichen, Sun. “Chinese Gunpowder Technology and Dai Viet: c.1390–1497.” In Viet Nam: Borderless History, edited by Tuyet, Nhung Tran and Reid, Anthony. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2006, 72–120.Google Scholar

Laichen, Sun “Chinese-Style Gunpowder Weapons in Southeast Asia.” In New Perspectives on the History and Historiography of Southeast Asia, edited by Aung-Thwin, Michael and Hall, Kenneth. London and New York: Routledge, 2011, pp. 75–100.Google Scholar

Laichen, Sun “Military Technology Transfers from Ming China and the Emergence of Northern Mainland Southeast Asia (c.1390–1527).” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 34, no. 3 (2003): 495–517.Google Scholar

Swope, Kenneth. “Bestowing the Double-Edged Sword: Wanli as Supreme Military Commander.” In Culture, Courtiers, and Competition: The Ming Court (1368–1644), edited by Robinson, David. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2008, pp. 61–115.Google Scholar

Swope, Kenneth “Causes and Consequences of the Ming Intervention in Vietnam in the Early Fifteenth Century.” In Ming China: Courts and Contacts 1400–1450, edited by Clunas, Craig, Harrison-Hall, Jessica, and Yu-ping, Luk. London: The British Museum, 2016, pp. 37–45.Google Scholar

Swope, Kenneth A Dragon’s Head and a Serpent’s Tail: Ming China and the First Great East Asian War, 1592–1598. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Szonyi, Michael. The Art of Being Governed: Everyday Politics in Late Imperial China. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Szonyi, Michael Practising Kinship: Lineage and Descent in Late Imperial China. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Tackett, Nicolas. The Origins of the Chinese Nation: Song China and the Forging of an East Asian World Order. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Xisi, Tan. Ming da zheng zuan yao. 1619. Rpt. Taipei: Wenhai chubanshe, 1988.Google Scholar

Bin, Tang (1627–87). Tang Bin ji, compiled by Fan Zhiheng. Zhengzhou: Zhongzhou guji chubanshe, 2003.Google Scholar

Jingshen, Tang. “Mingdai Handongwei diwang xiaokao.” Qinghai shehui kexue 2 (1985): 94–97.Google Scholar

Jing-shen, Tao. Two Sons of Heaven: Studies in Sung–Liao Relations. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Taylor, Romeyn. “Ming T’ai-tsu and the Nobility of Merit.” Ming Studies 2 (1976): 57–69.Google Scholar

Taylor, Romeyn “Yuan Origins of the Wei-so System.” In Chinese Government in Ming Times: Seven Studies, edited by Hucker, Charles. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969, pp. 23–40.Google Scholar

Temul, . “Silüsi shenfu lunzhu mulu.” Leuven Chinese Studies 36 (2017): 285–309.Google Scholar

Thackston, W.M., trans. and ed., A Century of Princes. Cambridge: The Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture, 1989.Google Scholar

Twitchett, Denis and Grimm, Tilemann. “The Cheng-t’ung, Ching-t’ai, and T’ien-shun reigns, 1436–1464.” In CHC 7: 305–42.Google Scholar

Tao, Tian. “Mingdai Hami weiji shulun.” Zhongguo bianjiang shidi yanjiu 4 (2002): 14–22.Google Scholar

Weijiang, Tian. “Lun Mingdai Hamiwei de shezhi jiqi yiyi.” Xibei minzu xueyuan xuebao (zhexue shehui kexue ban) 1 (1988): 83–91.Google Scholar

Toby, Ronald. State and Diplomacy in Early Modern Japan: Asia in the Development of Tokugawa Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Tsai, Shih-shan Henry. The Eunuchs in the Ming Dynasty. New York: State University of New York, 1996.Google Scholar

Tsai, Shih-shan Henry. Perpetual Happiness: The Ming Emperor Yongle. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Sei, Wada. “Minsho no Mōko keiryaku.” Rpt. in idem, Tōashi kenkyū (Mōkohen), pp. 1–106.Google Scholar

Sei, Wada Tōashi kenkyū (Mōkohen). Tokyo: Tōyō bunko, 1959.Google Scholar

Sei, Wada “Uryoha san’ei ni kansuru kenkyū (ichi).” Mansen chiri rekishi kenkyū hōkoku 12 (1930). Rpt. in idem, Tōashi kenkyū (Mōkohen). Tokyo: Tōyō bunko, 1959, pp. 151–265.Google Scholar

Sei, Wada “Uryoha san’ei ni kansuru kenkyū (ni).” Mansen chiri rekishi kenkyū hōkoku 13 (1932): 261–498. Rpt. in idem, Tōashi kenkyū (Mōkohen). Tokyo: Tōyō bunko, 1959, pp. 267–423.Google Scholar

Wade, Geoff. “Domination in Four Keys: Ming China and Its Southern Neighbors 1400–1450.” In Ming China: Courts and Contacts 1400–1450, edited by Clunas, Craig, Harrison-Hall, Jessica, and Yu-ping, Luk. London: The British Museum, 2016, pp. 15–25.Google Scholar

Wade, Geoff “Engaging the South: Ming China and Southeast Asia in the Fifteenth Century.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 51, 4 (2008): 578–638.Google Scholar

Wade, Geoff “The Zheng He Voyages: A Reassessment.” Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 78, part one, no. 228 (2005): 37–58.Google Scholar

Waldron, Arthur. The Great Wall of China: From History to Myth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Walthall, Anne. “Introducing Palace Women.” In Servants of the Dynasty: Palace Women in World History, edited by Walthall, Anne. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Wan, Maggie. “Building an Immortal Land: The Ming Jiajing Emperor’s West Park.” Asia Major, 3rd series 22.2 (2009): 65–99.Google Scholar

Dafang, Wang and Wenfang, Zhang. Caoyuan jinshi lu. Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe, 2013.Google Scholar

Wang, Fu. You shi xian sheng shi ji. Rpt. in BTGZ, vol. 100.Google Scholar

Gungwu, Wang. “Early Ming Relations with Southeast Asia: A Background Essay.” In The Chinese World Order: Traditional China’s Foreign Relations, edited by Fairbank, John. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968, pp. 34–62.Google Scholar

Gungwu, Wang “The Rhetoric of a Lesser Empire: Early Sung Relations with Its Neighbors.” In China among Equals: The Middle Kingdom and Its Neighbors, 10th–14th Centuries, edited by Rossabi, Morris. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983, pp. 47–65.Google Scholar

Jinping, Wang. “The Great Ming and East Asia: The World Order of a Han-Centric Chinese Empire, 1368–1644.” In Empire in Asia: A New Global History, vol. 1, edited by Farrell, Brian. London and New York: Bloomsbury, 2018, pp. 43–76.Google Scholar

Wang, Qi. Xu Wenxian tongkao. 1586.Google Scholar

Wang, Qi (1433–99). Yu pu za ji. 1500 preface. Rpt. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1984.Google Scholar

Shizhen, Wang. Fengzhou za bian. In Ji lu hui bian, compiled by Shen Jiefu (1533–1601), juan 154.Google Scholar

Shizhen, WangYanzhou shi liao qian ji . Rpt. in SKCM, ji 112.Google Scholar

Shuo, Wang. “Qing Imperial Women: Empresses, Concubines, and Aisin Gioro Daughters.” In Servants of the Dynasty: Palace Women in World History, edited by Walthall, Anne. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008, pp. 137–58.Google Scholar

Tianyou, Wang. “Shilu bu shi de yige lizheng.” Beijing daxue xuebao (zhexue shehui kexueban) 1 (1980): 94–95, 84.Google Scholar

Xijue, Wang. Huang Ming guan ke jing shi hong ci xu ji. Rpt. in SKJH, ji 92.Google Scholar

Xijue, WangZeng ding guo chao guan ke jing shi hong ci. Rpt. in SKJH, ji 92.Google Scholar

Xiuli, Wang. “Xu Zi zhi tong jian.” Shixueshi yanjiu 2 (2004): 46–49.Google Scholar

Xun, Wang and Hu Ruli, compilers. Ningxia xinzhi. Rpt. in Tianyige cang Mingdai fangzhi xuankan xubian. Shanghai: Shanghai shudian, 1990, vol. 72.Google Scholar

Ying, Wang (1376–1450). Wang Wen An gong shi wen ji. Rpt. in XXSK, vol. 1327.Google Scholar

Yuan-kang, Wang. “Explaining the Tribute System: Power, Confucianism, and War in Medieval East Asia.” Journal of East Asian Studies 13, no. 2 (2013): 207–32.Google Scholar

Yuan-kang, Wang Harmony and War: Confucian Culture and Chinese Power Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Zhaoning, Wang. “Tumu zhi bian qianhou de shidaifu.” Hubei dier shifan xueyuan xuebao 30, no. 1 (2013): 59–62.Google Scholar

Zhenping, Wang. Ambassadors from the Islands of Immortals : China–Japan Relations in the Han–Tang Period. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Zhenping, Wang. Tang China in Multi-polar Asia: A History of Diplomacy and War. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Watson, Burton. Complete Works of Zhuangzi. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Watt, C.Y. and Leidy, Denise Patry, editors. Defining Yongle: Imperial Art in Early Fifteenth-Century China. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2005.Google Scholar

Wechsler, Howard. “T’ai-tsung (Reign 626–49) the Consolidator.” In CHC 3: 188–241.Google Scholar

Wei, Ji (1374–71). Nan zhai xian sheng Wei wen jing gong zhai gao. Rpt. in SKCM, ji 30.Google Scholar

Weidner, Marsha (Haufler). “Imperial Engagement with Buddhist Art and Architecture.” In Cultural Intersections in Later Chinese Buddhism, edited by Weidner, Marsha. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2001, pp. 117–44.Google Scholar

Whitmore, John. Vietnam, Ho Quý Ly, and the Ming (1371–1421). New Haven: Yale Center for International and Regional Studies, 1985.Google Scholar

Wilson, Thomas. “Sacrifice and the Imperial Cult of Confucius.” History of Religions 41, no. 3 (2002): 251–87.Google Scholar

Wink, André. “Post-nomadic Empires: From the Mongols to the Mughals.” In Tributary Empires in Global History, edited by Fibiger Bang, Peter and Bayly, C.A.. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, pp. 120–31.Google Scholar

Wright, David. From War to Diplomatic Parity in Eleventh-Century China: Sung’s Foreign Relations with Kitan Liao. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar

Wright, David “The Screed of a Humbled Empire: The Xin Tangshu’s Prolegomena on the Turks.” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 55, no. 4 (2002): 379–89.Google Scholar

Han, Wu. Zhu Yuanzhang zhuan. 1948. Rpt. Hong Kong: Xianggang zhuanji wenxueshe, n.d.; Shanghai: Sanlian shudian, 1949.Google Scholar

Yunting, Wu. “Tumu zhi bian qianhou de Menggu xiangren.” Hebei xuekan 3 (1989): 106–11.Google Scholar

Zhihe, Wu. “Mingdai Zhengtong guobian yu Jingtai xingfu.” Shixue huikan 8 (1977). Revised version rpt. in Mingshi yanjiu luncong, edited by Zhihe, Wu. Taipei: Dali chubanshe, 1982, vol. 1, pp. 159–241.Google Scholar

Zhihe, Wu “‘Tumu zhi bian’ hou Mingchao yu Wala zhi jiaoshe.” Mingshi yanjiu zhuankan 3 (1980): 75–99.Google Scholar

Han, Xia. “Ming Huairou bo Shi Ju fufu, Shi Jian muzhi kaoshi.” Zhongguo lishi wenwu 2 (2009): 80–8.Google Scholar

Yikui, Xie (1425–87). Xie wen zhuang gong ji. Rpt. Taipei: Wenhai chubanshe, 1970, vol. 8.Google Scholar

Yuanji, Xia (1366–1430). Zhong jing ji. WYSK, vol. 1240.Google Scholar

Yuanji, XiaZhong jing gong ji. Rpt. in BTGZ, vol. 100.Google Scholar

dang’anguan, Xizang zizhiqu, editor. Xizang lishi dang’an huicui/A Collection of Historical Archives of Tibet. Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe, 1995.Google Scholar

Qianxue, Xu (1631–94). Ming shi lie zhuan. Rpt. Taipei: Xuesheng shuju, 1970.Google Scholar

Xueju, Xu (jinshi 1583). Guo chao dian hui. 1625. Rpt. Beijing: Shumu wenxian chubanshe, 1996.Google Scholar

Zhenxing, Xu (Hui Chun Hing). “Lun Ming Taizu dui Menggu minzu de zhengce.” Dongfang wenhua 24, no. 2 (1988): 224–40.Google Scholar

Zhenxing, Xu “Lun Wang Zhen de ‘jia di qin zheng’.” Shenzhen daxue xuebao (renwen shehui kexue ban) 3 (1987): 99–103.Google Scholar

Zhenxing, Xu “Lun Wang Zhen yu ‘Tumu zhi bian’ de guanxi.” Ming Qingshi jikan 2 (1986–88): 45–57.Google Scholar

Yingqi, Xue (1499–1574). Xian zhang lu jiao zhu. Nanjing: Fenghuang chubanshe, 2014.Google Scholar

Yang, Lien-sheng. “Historical Notes of the Chinese World Order.” In The Chinese World Order, edited by K. Fairbank, John. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968, pp. 20–33.Google Scholar

Ming, Yang. Zhengtong lin rong lu. Rpt. in GCDG, vol. 1.Google Scholar

Yang, Pu (1372–1446). Yang Wen ding gong shi ji. Rpt. in XXSK, vol. 1326.Google Scholar

Rong, Yang (1371–1440). Bei zheng ji. Rpt. in MMHJ, vol. 1.Google Scholar

Rong, Yang Yang wen min gong ji. Rpt. Taipei: Wenhai chubanshe, 1970.Google Scholar

Shiqi, Yang (1365–1444). Dong li wen ji. Rpt. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1998.Google Scholar

Yang Shouli, compiler. Ningxia xinzhi. Rpt. in Tianyige cang Mingdai fangzhi xuankan. Shanghai: Shanghai guji shudian, 1963, rpt. 1981, vol. 68.Google Scholar

Kui, Yao (1414–73). Yao Wen min gong yi gao. Rpt. in SKCM, ji 34.Google Scholar

Sheng, Ye (1420–74). Ye Wen zhuang gong zou yi. Rpt. in XXSK, shi 475.Google Scholar

Xianggao, Ye (1559–1627). “Bei lu kao er. ” Rpt. in MMHJ, vol. 2.Google Scholar

Xuanbo, Yi. “Shilun Jingtaidi Zhu Qiyu.” Mingshi yanjiu 3 (1993): 123–34.Google Scholar

Jideng, Yu (1544–1600). (Huang Ming) Dian gu ji wen. 1601. Rpt. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1981, second printing, 1997.Google Scholar

Moying, Yu. “Mingdai Hami Menggu de fenggong wenti.” Neimenggu daxue xuebao (renwen shehui kexue ban) 32, no. 5 (2000): 10–11.Google Scholar

Moying, Yu and Boyinhu. “Ming Yongle shiqi sanwang ji Hening wang de cefeng.” Neimenggu shehui kexue (Hanwenban) 22, no. 3 (2001): 42–46.Google Scholar

Qian, Yu (1398–1457). Shao bao Yu gong zou yi. Rpt. Beijing: Quanguo tushuguan wenxian suowei fuzhi zhongxin, 2011.Google Scholar

Qian, Yu Yu Qian ji. Rpt. Beijing: Zhongguo wenshi chubanshe, 2000.Google Scholar

Ying-shih, Yü. Trade and Expansion in Han China: A Study in the Structure of Sino-barbarian Economic Relations. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Bin, Yuan. Bei zheng shi ji. As told to Yin Zhi. In Yin Zhi, Jian zhai suo chuo lu. Rpt. in Mindai shiji huikan, edited by Wanli, Qu. Taipei: Guoli zhongyang tushuguan, 1969, vol. 3.Google Scholar

Zhi, Yuan (1502–47). Heng fan chong ke Xutai xian sheng ji. Rpt. in BTGZ, vol. 104.Google Scholar

Yun, Ǔnsuk. “14 segimal Manju ǔi yǒksasang: Otch’igin wangga wa Manju.” Nong’ǒpsa yǒn’gu 11, no. 1 (2012): 47–69.Google Scholar

Yun, Ǔnsuk. “14–15 segi Uryangkkai sam’ui hwa Monggor-Myŏng kwan’gye.” Myŏng Ch’ŏngsa yŏn’gu 43 (2015): 1–29.Google Scholar

Zarrow, Peter. “The Imperial Word in Stone: Stele Inscriptions at Chengde.” In New Qing Imperial History: The Making of Inner Asian Empire at Qing Chengde, edited by Millward, James, Dunnell, Ruth, Elliott, Mark, and Forêt, Philippe. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004, pp. 147–63.Google Scholar

Zeng, Qi (1372–1432). Chao jie ji. Rpt. in BTGZ, vol. 105.Google Scholar

Zeng, QiKe Zeng xi shu xian sheng ji. Rpt. in SKCM, ji 30.Google Scholar

Chang, Zhang (1376–1437). Ming Yongle jia shen hui kui li bu zuo shi lang hui ji Zhi an zhang gong shi wen ji. Rpt. in SKCM, ji 30.Google Scholar

Dexin, Zhang. “Mingdai zhuwang fenfeng zhidu shulun.” Rpt. in idem, Mingshi yanjiu lungao. Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe, 2011, pp. 74–91.Google Scholar

Dexin, Zhang “Mingdai zhuwang yu Mingdai junshi.” Rpt. in idem, Mingshi yanjiu lungao. Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe, 2011, pp. 92–102.Google Scholar

Feng, Zhang. Chinese Hegemony: Grand Strategy and International Institutions in East Asian History. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Jinkui, Zhang. Mingdai weisuo junhu yanjiu. Beijing: Xianzhuang shuju, 2007.Google Scholar

Lei, Zhang and Changshun, Du. “Mingdai Hexi zoulang diqu daguan jiazu de lishi guiji.” Neimenggu shehui kexue (Hanwenban) 4 (2017): 88–95.Google Scholar

Shu, Zhang (1776–1847). Liangzhou fuzhi bei kao. Rpt. Xi’an: Sanqin chubanshe, 1988.Google Scholar

Tianzhou, Zhang. “Jingtai yuannian Meng Han heyi qianlun.” Liaoning shifan daxue xuebao (shehui kexue ban) 6 (1982): 63–68.Google Scholar

Tingyu, Zhang et al., editors. Ming shi. 1736. Rpt. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1974.Google Scholar

Gaiping, Zhao and Huiming, Hou. “Lun Zangchuan fojiao zai Mingdai zhengzhizhong de zuoyong he yingxiang.” Neimenggu shehui kexue (Hanwenban) 26, no. 6 (2006): pp. 53–54.Google Scholar

Xianhai, Zhao. Mingdai jiubian Changcheng junzhenshi: Zhongguo bianjiang jiashuo shiyexia de Changcheng zhidushi. Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe, 2012.Google Scholar

Zhongnan, Zhao. “The Gradual Termination of the Early Ming Voyages to the ‘Western Oceans” and Its Causes.” In Ming China: Courts and Contacts 1400–1450, edited by Clunas, Craig, Harrison-Hall, Jessica, and Yu-ping, Luk. London: The British Museum, 2016, pp. 106–12.Google Scholar

Zhongnan, Zhao Mingdai gongting dianzhishi. Beijing: Zijincheng chubanshe, 2010.Google Scholar

compiler, Zheng Rubi. Huang Ming gong chen feng jue kao. Rpt. in SKCM, shi 258.Google Scholar

Xiao, Zheng. Jin yan. 1566. Rpt. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1984, second printing 1997.Google Scholar

Xiao, ZhengWu xue bian. Rpt. in XXSK, shi 424–25.Google Scholar

Han, Zhong. “Jianxi Ming diguo de Neiyaxing: yi yu Qingchao de leibi wei zhongxin.” Zhongguoshi yanjiu dongtai 5 (2016): 36–42.Google Scholar

wenwu yanjiusuo, Zhongguo and shike yishu bowuguan, Beijing, editors. Xinzhongguo chutu muzhi Beijing. Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe, 2003, vol. 1, section 2.Google Scholar