Ackerman, J., Nocera, C. and Bargh, J. (2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 328, 1712–1715.Google Scholar

Adolphs, R. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aikhenvald, A. and Storch, A. (2013). Linguistic perception of perception and cognition. In Aikenvald, A. and Storch, A. (eds.) Perception and Cognition in Language and Culture, Leiden: Brill, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar

Akpinar, E. and Berger, J. (2015). Drivers of cultural success: The case of sensory metaphors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109 (1), 20–34.Google Scholar

Alan, K. and Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Alibali, M. W. and DiRusso, A. A. (1999). The function of gesture in learning to count: More than keeping track. Cognitive Development, 14, 37–56.Google Scholar

Alibali, M. W. and Nathan, M. J. (2007). Teachers’ gestures as a means of scaffolding students’ understanding: Evidence from an early algebra lesson. In Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B. and Derry, S. J. (eds.) Video Research in the Learning Sciences, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 349–365.Google Scholar

Alibali, M. W. and Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21 (2), 247–286.Google Scholar

Almohammadi, A. (2017). The development of metaphor comprehension in Arabic-speaking children. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Kings College London.Google Scholar

Anderson, S., Matlock, T. and Spivey, M. J. (2010). On the path to understanding the on-line processing of grammatical aspect. Spatial Cognition, 7, 139–151.Google Scholar

Andreano, J. and Cahill, L. (2009). Sex influences on the neurobiology of learning and memory. Learning and Memory, 16, 248–266.Google Scholar

Andric, M. and Small, S. L. (2012). Gesture’s neural language. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 99.Google Scholar

Antle, A., Corness, G. and Droemeva, M. (2009). What the body knows: Exploring the benefits of embodied metaphors in hybrid physical digital environments. Interacting with Computers, 21, 66–75.Google Scholar

Asperger, H. (1941). Education Issues within Children's Week (Vienna 1st to 7th September 1940). NERVENARZT, 14 (1), 28–31.Google Scholar

Avenanti, A., Candidi, M. and Urgesi, C. (2013). Vicarious motor activation during action perception: Beyond correlational evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 185.Google Scholar

Avanzini, P., Fabbri-Destro, M., Dalla Volta, R., Daprati, E., Rizzolatti, G. and Cantalupo, G. (2012). The dynamics of sensorimotor cortical oscillations during the observation of hand movements: An EEG study. PLoS ONE, 7 (5), e37534.Google Scholar

Aziz-Zadeh, L. and Damasio, A. (2008). Embodied semantics for actions: Findings from functional brain imaging. Journal of Physiology, 102 (1–3), 35–39.Google Scholar

Aziz-Zadeh, L., Wilson, S. M., Rizzolatti, G. and Iacoboni, M. (2006). Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Current Issues in Biology, 16 (8), 1818–1823.Google Scholar

Bakker, S., Antle, A. N. and Van den Hoven, E. (2009). Identifying embodied metaphors in children’s sound-action mappings. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, Como, Italy, 140–149.Google Scholar

Banaji, M. E. and Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7 (3), 186–192.Google Scholar

Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y. and Algom, D. (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 136, 610–622.Google Scholar

Barchard, K. A., Grob, K. and Roe, M. J. (2017). Is sadness blue? The problem of using figurative language for emotions on psychological tests. Behavior Research Methods, 49 (2), 443–456.Google Scholar

Bardolph, M. and Coulson, S. (2014). How vertical hand movements impact brain activity elicited by literally and metaphorically-used words: An ERP study of embodied metaphor. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1031.Google Scholar

Bargh, J., Chen, M. and Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behaviour: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 (2), 230–244.Google Scholar

Barnden, J. A., Glasbey, S. R., Lee, M. G. and Wallington, A. M. (2003). Domain-transcending mappings in a system for metaphorical reasoning. In Conference Companion to the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL’03).Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M. and Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21 (1), 37–46.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwight, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y. and Plumb, I. (2001). The ‘Reading the Mind’ test revised version: A study with normal adults, adults with Asperger Syndrome or high functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42 (2), 241–251.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barsalou, L. W. (2010). Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2 (4), 716–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Becker, G. (1997). Disrupted Lives: How People Create Meaning in a Chaotic World, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benor, S. B. and Levy, R. (2006). The chicken or the egg? A probabilistic analysis of English binomials. Language, 82, 233–278.Google Scholar

Bergen, B. (2012). Louder Than Words, The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bergen, B. and Wheeler, K. (2010). Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain and Language, 112, 150–158.Google Scholar

Bessenoff, G. R. and Sherman, J. W. (2000). Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: Evaluation versus stereotype activation. Social Cognition, 18 (4), 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birdsell, B. (2017). Creative metaphor production in a first and second language and the role of creativity. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar

Blackwell, P. M., Engen, E., Fischgrund, J. E. and Zarcadoolas, C. (1978). Sentences and Other Systems: A Language and Learning Curriculum for Hearing-Impaired Children, Washington, DC: The Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.Google Scholar

Blomberg, J. and Zlatev, J. (2014). Actual and non-actual motion: Why experientialist semantics needs phenomenology (and vice versa). Phenomelogical Cognitive Science, 13 (3), 395–418.Google Scholar

Blomberg, J. and Zlatev, J. (2015). Non-actual motion: Phenomenological analysis and linguistic evidence. Cognitive Process, 16, S153–S157.Google Scholar

Boers, F. (1997a). Health, fitness and mobility in a free-market ideology. In van Noppen, J. P. and Maufort, M. (eds.) Voices of Power: Co-operation and Conflict in English Language and Literatures, Liège University Press, pp. 89–96.Google Scholar

Boers, F. (1997b). No pain, no gain in a free-market rhetoric: A test for cognitive semantics? Metaphor and Symbol, 12, 231–241.Google Scholar

Boers, F. (1999). When a bodily source domain becomes prominent: The joy of counting metaphors in the socio-economic domain. In Gibbs, R. and Steen, G. (eds.) Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 47–56.Google Scholar

Boers, F. and Littlemore, J. (2000). Cognitive style variables in participants’ explanations of conceptual metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 15 (3), 177–187.Google Scholar

Bohrn, I. C., Altman, U. and Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Looking at the brains behind figurative language – a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2669–2683.Google Scholar

Bohrne, I. C., Altann, U., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W. and Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Old proverbs in new skins – an fMRI study on defamialiarization. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 204.Google Scholar

Bonda, E., Petrides, M., Frey, S. and Evans, A. (1994). Frontal cortex involvement in organized sequences of hand movements: Evidence from a positron emission topography study. Society for Neurosciences Abstracts, 20, 353.Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M., Glenberg, A. M. and Kaschal, M. P. (2004). Putting words in perspective. Memory and Cognition, 32, 863–873.Google Scholar

Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1–28.Google Scholar

Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1–22.Google Scholar

Boroditsky, L., Fhurman, O. and McComick, K. (2011). Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? Cognition, 118 (1), 123–129.Google Scholar

Boroditsky, L., Ramscar, M. and Frank, M. C. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13, 185–189.Google Scholar

Bosmans, A. (2006). Scents and sensibility: When do (in) congruent ambient scents influence product evaluations? Journal of Marketing, 70 (3), 32–43.Google Scholar

Bottini, G., Corcoran, R., Sterzi, R. et al. (1994). The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language: A positron emission tomography activation study. Brain, 117 (6), 1241–1253.Google Scholar

Boulenger, V., Hauk, O., and PulverMüller, F. (2009). Grasping ideas with the motor system: Semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1905–1914.Google Scholar

Bowdle, B.F. and Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor, Psychological Review, 112 , 193–216.Google Scholar

Bowes, A. and Katz, A. N. (2015). Metaphor creates intimacy and temporarily enhances theory of mind. Memory and Cognition, 43, 953–963.Google Scholar

Bråten, S. (2007). (Ed.) On Being Moved: From Mirror Neurons to Empathy, Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Brants, T. and Franz, A. (2006). Web 1T 5-gram version 1.Google Scholar

Brdar, M., Strkalj Despot, K., Tonkovic, M., Brdar-Szabo, R. And Tomic, I. (2015). How heavy are things in Croation and elsewhere? A contrastive experimental study. Paper presented at the Biennial Conference of the International Cognitive Linguistics Association, Newcastle, UK.Google Scholar

Bremner, A., Caparos, S., Davidoff, J., de Fockert, J., Linnell, K. and Spence, C. (2013). Bouba and Kiki in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape-sound matches but different shape-taste matches to Westerners. Cognition, 126, 165–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brown, R. (1973). A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. In the CHILDES Corpus: https://talkbank.org/share/.Google Scholar

Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C., Augustyn, J. S. and Taylor, H. (2009). When you and I share perspectives: Pronouns modulate perspective raking during narrative comprehension. Psychological Science, 20 (1), 27–32.Google Scholar

Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. and Taylor, H. (2011). Better you than I: Perspectives and emotion simulation during narrative comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23 (5), 659–666.Google Scholar

Buxbaum, L. and Saffran, E. (2002). Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: Dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects. Brain and Language, 82, 179–199.Google Scholar

Caballero, R. et al. (2013). Sensuous Cognition, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Cacciari, C. and Glucksberg, S. (1994). Understanding Figurative Language. In Gernsbacher, M. A. (ed.) Handbook of Psycholinguistics, San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 447–477.Google Scholar

Cacciari, C., Bolonini, N., Senna, I., Pellicciari, M. C., Miniussi, C. and Papagno, C. (2011). Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study. Brain and Language, 119, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cacioppo, J. and Petty, R. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J, Petty, R., Feinstein, J., Jarvis, W. and Blair, G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in Need for Cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2), 197–253.Google Scholar

Caers, E. (2006). When ministers were digging in for a fight. Metaphors of liberal common sense during the Winter of Discontent, 1978–1979. https://doclib.uhasselt.be/dspace/bitstream/1942/1672/1/whenministers.pdf.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (2008). From left to right … Coverbal gestures and their symbolic use of space. In Cienki, A. and Müller, C., (eds.) Metaphor and Gesture, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 27–53.Google Scholar

Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in Educational Discourse, London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, L. (2007). Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse and Society, 18 (2), 197–222.Google Scholar

Campbell, A., Muncer, S. and Coyle, E. (1992). Social representation of aggression as an explanation of gender differences: A preliminary study. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 95–108.Google Scholar

Cannon, R., Schnall, S. and White, M. (2011). Transgressions and expressions: Affective facial muscle activity predicts moral judgments. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2 (3), 325–331.Google Scholar

Cardillo, E. R., Watson, C. E., Schmidt, G., Kranjec, A. and Chatterjee, A. (2012). From novel to familiar: Tuning the brain for metaphors. Neuroimage, 59, 3212–3221.Google Scholar

Casasanto, D. (2008). Who’s afraid of the Big Bad Whorf? Cross-linguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning, 58 (1), 63–79.Google Scholar

Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138 (3), 351–367.Google Scholar

Casasanto, D. (2011). Different bodies, different minds: The body-specificity of language and thought. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20 (6), 378–383.Google Scholar

Casasanto, D. (2014). Development of metaphorical thinking: The role of language. In Borkent, M., Hinnell, J. and Dancygier, B. (eds.) Language and the Creative Mind, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Casasanto, D. (2016). Linguistic relativity. In Riemer, N. (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Semantics, New York: Routledge, pp. 158–174.Google Scholar

Casasanto, D. (2017). The hierarchical structure of mental metaphors. Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse, 46–61.Google Scholar

Casasanto, D. and Boroditsky, L. (2003). Do we think about time in terms of space? In Alterman, R. and Kirsch, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 216–221.Google Scholar

Casasanto, D. and Bottini, R. (2014). Mirror-reading can reverse the flow of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 473–479.Google Scholar

Casasanto, D. and Chrysikou, E. (2011). When left is ‘right’: motor fluency shapes abstract concepts, Psychological Science, 22 (4), 419–422.Google Scholar

Casasanto, D. and Dijkstra, K. (2010). Motor action and emotional memory. Cognition, 115, 179–185.Google Scholar

Casasanto, D. and Gijssels, T. (2015). What makes a metaphor an embodied metaphor? Linguistics Vanguard, 1 (1), 327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casasanto, D. and Jasmin, K. (2010). Good and bad in the hands of politicians: Spontaneous gestures during positive and negative speech. PLoS ONE, 5 (7), e11805. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011805.Google Scholar

Casasanto, D., Boroditsky, L., Phillips, W., Greene, J., Goswami, S., Bocanegra-Thiel, T. et al., (2004). How deep are effects of language on thought? Time estimation in speakers of English, Indonesian, Greek, and Spanish. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Conference Cognitive Science Society, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar

Chandler, J., Reinhard, D. and Schwarz, N. (2012). To judge a book by its weight you need to know its content: Knowledge moderates the use of embodied cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48 (4), 948–952.Google Scholar

Chang, C. T. and Yen, C. T. (2013). Missing ingredients in metaphor advertising: The right formula of metaphor type, product type, and need for cognition. Journal of Advertising, 42 (1), 80–94.Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, J. (2009). Metaphor and gender in British parliamentary debates. In Ahrens, K. (ed.) Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 139–165.Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, J. (2012). Shattering the Bell jar: Metaphor, gender and depression. Metaphor and Symbol, 27 (3), 199–216.Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, J. (2016). The “dull roar” and the “burning barbed wire pantyhose”: Complex metaphor in accounts of chronic pain. In Gibbs, R. (ed.). Mixing Metaphor, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 155–176.Google Scholar

Chen, J., Kacinik, N. A., Chen, Y. and Wu, N. (2014). Metaphorical color representations of emotional concepts in English and Chinese speakers: Evidence from behavioral data. Poster session presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology conference, Long Beach, CA.Google Scholar

Chiou, W. B. and Cheng, Y. Y. (2013). In broad daylight, we trust in God! Brightness, the salience of morality, and ethical behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 37–42.Google Scholar

Christi, M. and McGrath, M. (1987). Taking up the challenge of grief: Film as therapeutic metaphor and action ritual. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 8 (4), 193–199.Google Scholar

Chu, M. and Kita, S. (2011). The nature of gesture’s beneficial role in spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 706–723.Google Scholar

Cienki, A. (1997). Some properties and groupings of image schemas. In Verspoor, M., Less, K. D. and Sweester, E. (eds.) Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Cienki, A. (2008). Why study metaphor and gesture. In Cienki, A. and Müller, C. (eds.) Metaphor and Gesture, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 5–25.Google Scholar

Cienki, A. and Müller, C. (eds.) Metaphor and Gesture, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Cienki, A. and Müller, C. (2008a). Introduction. In Cienki, A. and Müller, C. (eds.) Metaphor and Gesture, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar

Cienki, A. and Müller, C. (2008b). Metaphor, gesture and thought. In Gibbs, R. W. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 483–501.Google Scholar

Cienki, A., Becker, R., Boutet, D., Morgenstern, A. and Iriskhanova1, O. (2016). Grammatical aspect, gesture, and mental simulation in Russian and French International Conference of the Cognitive Linguistics Association.Google Scholar

Citron, F. M. and Goldberg, A. E. (2014a). Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their literal counterparts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 1–11.Google Scholar

Citron, F. M. and Goldberg, A. E. (2014b). Social context modulates the effect of hot temperature on perceived interpersonal warmth: A study of embodied metaphors. Language and Cognition, 6, 1–11.Google Scholar

Citron, F. M., Cacciari, C., Kucharski, M., Beck, L., Conrad, M. and Jacobs, A. (2015). When emotions are expressed figuratively: Psycholinguistic and affective norms of 619 idioms for German (PANIG). Behavioural Research Methods, 1–21.Google Scholar

Clark, K. B. and Clark, M. P. (1940). Skin color as a factor in racial identification of Negro preschool children. Journal of Social Psychology, S.P.SS.SI. Bulletin, II, 159–169.Google Scholar

Classen, C. (1990) Sweet colors, fragrant songs: Sensory models of the Andes and the Amazon. American Ethnologist, 17 (4), 722–735.Google Scholar

Coker, E. M. (2004). “Traveling pains”: Embodied metaphors of suffering among southern Sudanese refugees in Cairo. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 28 (1), 15–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cogan, J. C., Bhalla, S. K., Sefa-Dedeh, A. and Rothyblum, E. D. (1996). A comparative study of United States and African Students on Perceptions of Obesity and Thinness. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 27 (1), 98–113.Google Scholar

Cohen Kadosh, R. and Gertner, L. (2011). Synaesthesia: Gluing together time, number and space. In Dehaene, S. and Brannon, E (eds.) Space, Time and Number in the Brain, Searching for the Foundations of Mathematics Thought, Cambridge, MA: Elsevier, pp. 123–132.Google Scholar

Cohen Kadosh, R., Henik, A. and Walsh, V. (2007). Small is bright and big is dark in synaesthesia. Current Biology, 17, 834–835.Google Scholar

Connell, L. and Lynott, D. (2010). Look but don’t touch: Tactile disadvantage in processing modality-specific word. Cognition, 115, 1–9.Google Scholar

Cook, K. and Alfonso, R. (2015). Erotic metaphors jazz musicians play by, Paper presented at the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Newcastle, UK.Google Scholar

Cornejo, C., Simonetti, F., Ibáñez, A., Aldunate, N., Ceric, F., López, V. and Núñez, R. E. (2009). Gesture and metaphor comprehension: Electrophysiological evidence of cross-modal coordination by audiovisual stimulation. Brain and Cognition, 70 (1), 42–52. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.12.005.Google Scholar

Corts, D. P. and Pollio, H. R. (1999). Spontaneous production of figurative language and gesture in college lectures. Metaphor and Symbol, 14 (2), 81–100.Google Scholar

Corts, D. P. and Meyers, K. (2002). Conceptual clusters in figurative language production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31 (4), 391–408.Google Scholar

Coslett, H. B. (1998). Evidence for disturbance of the body schema in neglect. Brain and Cognition, 37, 529–544.Google Scholar

Coslett, H. B., Saffran, E. M. and Schwoebel, J. (2002). Knowledge of the human body: A distinct semantic domain. Neurology, 59, 357–363.Google Scholar

Costa, A., Foucart, A., Hayakawa, S., Aparici, M., Apesteguia, J., Heafner, J. et al. (2014). Your morals depend on language. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e94842. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094842.Google Scholar

Crawford, E. L. (2009). Conceptual metaphors of affect. Emotion Review, 1, 129–139.Google Scholar

Crawford, E. L., Margolies, S., Drake, J. and Murphy, M. (2006). Affect biases memory of location: Evidence for the spatial representation of affect. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 1153–1169.Google Scholar

Cuccio, V. (2017). Body-schema and body-image: What are they and what is their role in embodied metaphor processing? In Hampe, B. and Steen, G. (eds.) Metaphor: From Embodied Cognition to Discourse, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 82–98.Google Scholar

Cytowic, R. E. (1989). Synaesthesia: A Union of the Senses, New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Cytowic, R. E. (1994). The Man Who Tasted Shapes, London: Abacus.Google Scholar

Dailey, A., Martindale, C. and Borkum, J. (2010). Creativity, synesthesia, and physiognomic Perception. Creativity Research Journal, 10 (1), 1–8.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. (2006). Descartes’ Error, New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar

Daniel, A. C. (2010). Immorality-blackness associations and the moral-purity metaphor in African Americans, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Tennessee State University.Google Scholar

Davidson, L., Sells, D., Sangster, S. and O’Connell, M. (2004). Qualitative studies of recovery: What can we learn from the person? In Ralph, R. O. and Corrigan, P. W. (eds.) Recovery in Mental Illness: Broadening our Understanding of Wellness, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 147–170.Google Scholar

Deamer, F. (2013). An investigation into the processes and mechanisms underlying the comprehension of metaphor and hyperbole, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar

De Beauvoir, Simone (1949). The Second Sex, trans. (2009), Borde, Constance and Malovany-Chevallier, Sheila. Random House: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

De Grauwe, S., Willemsa, R. M., Rueschemeyera, S. A., Lemhöfera, K. and Schriefersa, H. (2014). Embodied language in first- and second-language speakers: Neural correlates of processing motor verbs. Neuropsychologia, 56 , 334–349.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S. and Brannon, E. (eds.) (2011). Space, Time and Number in the Brain: Searching for the Foundations of Mathematical Thought, Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S., Bossini, S. and Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396.Google Scholar

Deignan, A., Littlemore, J. and Semino, E. (2013). Figurative Language, Genre and Register, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Deroy, O., Crisnel, A-S. and Spence, C. (2013). Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: Odors, musical notes and geometrical shapes. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 20, 878–896.Google Scholar

Desai, R., Binder, J., Conant, L., Mano, Q. and Seidenberg, M. (2011). The neural career of sensory-motor metaphors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2376–2386.Google Scholar

De Sousa, H. (2012). Generational differences in the orientation of time in Cantonese speakers as a function of changes in the direction of Chinese writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–8.Google Scholar

Despot, K. (2017). The production of metaphor by patients with Schizophrenia, Paper presented at the RaAM specialised Seminar, Odense, Denmark.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, K., Kaschak, M. and Zwaan, R. (2007). Body posture facilitates retrieval of autobiographical memories. Cognition, 102, 139–149.Google Scholar

Di Paulo, E. (2009). Editorial: The social and enactive mind. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8 (4), 409–415.Google Scholar

Dolcos, F., LaBar, K. S. and Cabeza, R. (2005). Remembering one year later: Role of the amygdala and the medial temporal lobe memory system in retrieving emotional memories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 2626–2631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dolscheid, S., Hunnius, D., Casasanto, D. and Majid, A. (2012). The sound of thickness: Prelinguistic infants’ associations of space and pitch. Cognitive Science, 2012: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, N. Miyake, D. Peeples and R. P. Cooper (eds.) Austin, Tx: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 306–311.Google Scholar

Dolscheid, S., Shayan, S., Majid, A. and Casasanto, D. (2013). The thickness of musical pitch: Psychophysical evidence for linguistic relativity. Psychological Science, 24 (5), 613–621.Google Scholar

Domes, G., Heintrichs, M., Michel, A., Berger, C. and Herpertz, S. (2007). Oxytocin improves ‘mind reading’ in humans. Biological Psychiatry, 61, 731–733.Google Scholar

Droit-Volet, S., Brunot, S. and Niedenthal, P. (2004). Perception of the duration of emotional events. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 849–858.Google Scholar

Dryll, E. (2009). Changes in metaphor comprehension in children. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 40, 204–212.Google Scholar

Dudschig, C., de la Vega, I. and Kaup, B. (2014). Embodiment and second-language: Automatic activation of motor responses during processing spatially associated L2 words and emotion L2 words in a vertical Stroop paradigm. Brain and Language, 132, 14–21.Google Scholar

Duffy, S. E. (2014). The role of cultural artefacts in the interpretation of metaphorical expressions about time. Metaphor and Symbol, 29 (2), 94–112.Google Scholar

Duffy, S. E. and Feist, M. I. (2014). Individual differences in the interpretation of ambiguous statements about time. Cognitive Linguistics, 25 (1), 29–54.Google Scholar

Duffy, S. E., Feist, M. I. and McCarthy, S. (2014). Moving through time: The role of personality in three real life contexts. Cognitive Science, 1662–1674.Google Scholar

Duffy, S., Littlemore, J., Heritage, F. and Winter, B. (in prep.). Gender and the social hierarchy.Google Scholar

Dunn, R. and Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching Secondary Students through Their Learning Styles, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H., Wood, W. and Diekman, A. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similaritries: A current appraisal. In Eckes, T. and Trautner, M. (eds.) The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 123–173.Google Scholar

Earp, B., Everett, J., Madva, E. and Hamlin, J. (2014). Out, damned spot: Can the ‘Macbeth effect’ be replicated? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36 (1), 91.Google Scholar

Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). On Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology, New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6 (3/4), 169–200.Google Scholar

Ekman, P., Sorenson, E. and Friesen, W. V. (1969). Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotion. Science, 164, 86–88.Google Scholar

El Refaie, E. (2009). Metaphor in political cartoons, exploring audience responses. In Forceville, C. (ed.) Multimodal Metaphor, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 173–196.Google Scholar

El Refaie, E. (2014). Appearances and dis/dys-appearances: A dynamic view of embodiment in Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Metaphor and the Social World, 4 (1), 109–125.Google Scholar

Enkell, H. (2002). Metaphor and the psychodynamic functions of the mind, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Kuopio, Finland, Kuopion Yliopisto.Google Scholar

Epstein, E. L. and Gamlin, P. J. ((1994). Young children’s comprehension of simple and complex metaphors presented in pictures and words. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9, 179–191.Google Scholar

Fainsilber, L. and Ortony, A. (1987). Metaphorical uses of language in the experience of emotions. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 2, 239–250.Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (2008). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Faust, M. and Kenett, Y. N. (2014). Rigidity, chaos and integration: Hemispheric interaction and individuals differences in metaphor comprehension. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 511.Google Scholar

Fedden, S. and Boroditsky, L. (2012). Spatialization of time in Mian. Frontiers of Psychology, 3 (485), 1–10.Google Scholar

Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456.Google Scholar

Feist, M. and Duffy, S. (2015). Moving beyond ‘Next Wednesday’: The interplay of lexical semantics and constructional meaning in an ambiguous metaphoric statement. Cognitive Linguistics, 26 (4), 633–656.Google Scholar

Feldman, J. and Narayanan, S. (2004). Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language, 89, 385–392.Google Scholar

Fetterman, A., Robinson, M. and Meier, B. (2012). Anger as “seeing red”: Evidence for a perceptual association. Cognition & Emotion, 26 (8), 1445–1458.Google Scholar

Figueras Bates, C. (2015). I am a waste of breath, of space, of time: Metaphors of self in a pro-anorexia group. Qualitative Health Research, 25 (2), 189–204.Google Scholar

Foolen, A., Ludtke, U., Racine, T. P. and Zlatev, J. (eds.) (2012). Moving Ourselves and Moving Others: Motion and Emotion in Intersubjectivity, Consciousness and Language, Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Forceville, C. and Urios-Aparisi, E. (eds.) (2009). Multimodal metaphor, Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Foroni, F. (2015). Do we embody second language? Evidence for ‘partial’ simulation during processing of a second language. Brain and Cognition, 99, 8–16.Google Scholar

Foroni, F. and Semin, G. R. (2013). Comprehension of action negation involves inhibitory simulation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frank, M. C., Everett, D. L., Fedorenko, E. and Gibson, E. (2008). Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language and cognition. Cognition, 108 (3), 819–824.Google Scholar

Frieze, I. H., Olson, J. E. and Good, D. C. (1990). Perceived and actual discrimination in the salaries of male and female managers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 46–67.Google Scholar

Fuhrman, O. and Boroditsky, L. (2010). Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of time: Evidence from a non-linguistic task. Cognitive Science, 34, 1430–1451.Google Scholar

Fuhrman, O., McCormick, K., Chen, E., Jiang, H., Shu, D., Mao, S. and Boroditsky, L. (2011). How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cognitive Science, 35, 1305–1328.Google Scholar

Fuller, D., Littlemore, J., McGuinness, S., Turner, S., Kuberska, K., and Burgess, M. (2016–2018). ‘Death before Birth: Understanding, informing and supporting choices made by people who have experienced miscarriage, termination and stillbirth’ ESRC-funded project: ES/N008359/1, https://deathbeforebirthproject.org/.Google Scholar

Fussell, S. R. and Moss, M. M. (1998). Figurative language in emotional communication. Human Computer Interaction Institute, 82, 113–141.Google Scholar

Gallagher, H. L., Happe, F., Brunswick, N., Fletcher, P. C., Frith, U. and Frith, P. C. D. (2000). Reading the mind in cartons and stories: An fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38 (1), 11–21.Google Scholar

Gallagher, S. (2008). Understanding others: Embodied social cognition. In Calvo, P. and Gomila, A. (eds.) Handbook of Cognitive Science: An Embodied Approach, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 439–452.Google Scholar

Gallese, V. (2001). The shard manifold hypothesis: From mirror neurons to empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 33–50.Google Scholar

Gallese, V. (2006). Intentional attunement: A neurophysiological perspective on social cognition and its disruption in autism. Brain Research, 1079, 15–24.Google Scholar

Gallese, V. and Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2, 439–450.Google Scholar

Gallese, V. and Lakoff, G. (2005). The Brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22 (3), 455–479.Google Scholar

Gamez, E., Diaz, J. and Marrero, H. (2011). The uncertain universality of the Macbeth effect with a Spanish sample. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14 (1), 156–162.Google Scholar

Gamez-Djokic, V., Narayanan, S., Wehlong, E., Sheng, T., Bergen, B., Davis, J. and Aziz-Zadeh, L. (under review). Morally queasy: metaphors implying moral disgust activate specific subregions of the insula and basal ganglia.Google Scholar

Gardner, H., Kircher, M., Winner, E. and Perkins, D. (1975). Children’s metaphoric productions and preferences, Journal of Child Language, 2 (1), 125–141.Google Scholar

Gentilucci, M. and Volta, R. D. (2008). Spoken language and arm gestures are controlled by the same motor control system. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61 (6), 944–957.Google Scholar

Gentner, D. (1988). Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift. Child Development, 59, 47–59.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (1999). Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series 4, 145–166.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (2001). Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language understanding. Metaphor and Symbol, 16 (3 & 4), 317–333.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (2002). Embodied metaphor in women’s narratives about their experiences with cancer. Health Communication, 14 (2), 139–165.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (2005). The psychological status of image schemas. In Hampe, B. (ed.) From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 113–136.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (2006a). Embodiment and Cognitive Science, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (2006b). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind & Language, 21, 434–458.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (2008). Metaphor and thought: The state-of-the-art. In Gibbs, R. (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48 (8), 529–562.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (2012). Walking the walk while thinking about the talk: Embodied interpretation of metaphorical narratives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42 (4), 363–378.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (2013). Why do some people dislike conceptual metaphor theory? Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 5 (102), 14–36.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (2015). Embodied metaphor. In Littlemore, J. and Taylor, J. (eds.) The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, London: Bloomsbury, 167–184.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (2017). Metaphor Wars, Conceptual Metaphors in Human Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. and Colston, H. (2012). Interpreting Figurative Meaning, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. and Franks, H. (2002). Embodied metaphors in womens’ narratives about their experiences with cancer. Health Communication, 14, 139–165.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. and Perlman, M. (2010). Language understanding is grounded in experiential simulations: A reply to Weiskopf. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 41, 305–308.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W, Costa Lima, P. and Francozo, E. (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1189–1210.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W, Gould, J. and Andric, M. (2006). Imagining metaphorical actions: Embodied simulations make the impossible plausible. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 25, 221–238.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., Bogdanovich, J. M., Sykes, J. R. and Barr, D. J. (1997). Metaphor in idiom comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 141–154.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1977). The Theory of Affordances. In Shaw, R. E. and Bransford, J. (eds.) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Giessner, S. and Schubert, T. (2007). High in the hierarchy: How vertical location and judgments of leaders’ power are interrelated. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 104, 30–44.Google Scholar

Gil, S., Niedenthal, P. M. and Droit-Volet, S. (2007). Anger and time perception in children. Emotion, 7, 219–225.Google Scholar

Gillberg, C. (2002). A guide to Asperger syndrome, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Giora, R., Fein, O., Kronrod, A., Elnatan, I., Shuval, N. and Zur, A. (2004). Weapons of mass distraction: Optimal innovation and pleasure ratings. Metaphor and Symbol, 19, 115–141.Google Scholar

Gkiouzepas, L. (2013). Is your ad headline high enough? The influence of orientational metaphors on affect and comprehension for print advertisements. The 12th International Conference on Research in Advertising (ICORIA), Zagreb, Croatia: European Academy of Advertising.Google Scholar

Gkiouzepas, L. (2015). Metaphor-ad layout consistency effects: The moderating role of personality traits. In Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. V), Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. (1999). Why mental models must be embodied. In Advances in Psychology (Vol. 128) North-Holland, pp. 77–90.Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M. and Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 9, 558–565.Google Scholar

Gold, R. and Faust, M. (2010). Right hemisphere dysfunction and metaphor comprehension in young adults with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autistic Developmental Disorders, 40, 800–811.Google Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.Google Scholar

Goldberg, R. F., Perfetti, C. A. and Schneider, W. (2006). Perceptual knowledge retrieval activates sensory brain regions. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 4917–4921.Google Scholar

Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing Gesture: How our Hands Help us Think, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Goldin-Meadow, S. and Wagner, S. M. (2005). How our hands help us learn. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 234–241.Google Scholar

Goldinger, S., Papesh, M., Barnhart, A., Hansen, W. and Hout, M. (2016). The poverty of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23 (4), 959–978.Google Scholar

González, J., Barros-Loscertales, A., Pulvermueller, F., Meseguer, V., Sanjuan, A., Belloch, V. et al. (2006). Reading cinnamon activates olfactory brain regions. Neuroimage, 32, 906–912.Google Scholar

González-Cutre, D., Sicilia, Á., Sierra, A. C., Ferriz, R. and Haggerd, M. S. (2016). Understanding the need for novelty from the perspective of self-determination theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 159–169.Google Scholar

Gori, M. (2015). Multisensory integration and calibration in children and adults with and without sensory and motor disabilities. Multisensory Research, 28, 71–99.Google Scholar

Goschler, J. (2005). Embodiment and Body Metaphors. Metaphorik, 9, 33–52.Google Scholar

Grady, J. E. (1997a). Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary stress, PhD Dissertation, University of Berkeley. Available at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3g9427m2#page-1.Google Scholar

Grady, J. E. (1997b). Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8 (4), 267–290.Google Scholar

Grady, J. E. (2007). Metaphor. In Geeraerts, D. and Cuyckens, H. (eds.) Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Oxford University Press, pp. 188–213.Google Scholar

Greenwald, A., McGhee, D. and Schwartz, J. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.Google Scholar

Gullberg, M. (1998). Gesture as a Communication Strategy in Second Language Discourse: A Study of Learners of French and Swedish, Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.Google Scholar

Gullberg, M. (1999). Communication strategies, gesture and grammar. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère, 2, 61–71.Google Scholar

Gullberg, M. (2006). Handling discourse: Gestures, reference tracking, and communication strategies in early L2. Language Learning, 56, 155–196.Google Scholar

Gullberg, M. and McCafferty, S. (2008). Introduction to gesture and SLA: Toward an integrated approach. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 133–146.Google Scholar

Haddon, M. (2004). The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time, Vintage Press.Google Scholar

Hains, A. (2014). Metaphor comprehension in the treatment of people with schizophrenia, Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Wollongong.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A., Hasan, R. and Hasan, R. (1985). Language, Text and Context. Victoria: Derkin University.Google Scholar

Happé, F. (1991). The autobiographical writings of three Asperger syndrome adults: Problems of interpretation and implications for theory. In Frith, U. (ed.) Autism and Asperger syndrome, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 207–242.Google Scholar

Happé, F. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101–119.Google Scholar

Happé, F. (1995). Understanding minds and metaphors: Insight from the study of figurative language in autism. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 275–295.Google Scholar

Happé, F. and Frith, U. (2009). The beautiful otherness of the autistic mind. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rstb.2009.0009.Google Scholar

Happé, F. and Vital, P. (2009). What aspects of autism predispose to talent? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364 (1522), 1369–1375.Google Scholar

Hardin, C. L. and Maffi, L. (1997). Color Categories in Thought and Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hare, R. D. (1996). Psychopathy: A clinical construct whose time has come. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 25–54.Google Scholar

Hartman, J. and Paradis, C. (2018). Emotive and sensory simulation through comparative construal. Metaphor and Symbol, 33 (2), 1–21.Google Scholar

Hartmann, M., Martarelli, C., Mast, F. and Stocker, K. (2014). Eye movements during mental time travel follow a diagonal line. Consciousness and Cognition, 30, 201–209.Google Scholar

Hasson, U. and Glucksberg, S. (2004). Does understanding negation entail affirmation? An examination of negated metaphors. University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I. and PulverMüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307.Google Scholar

Havas, D., Glenberg, A. and Rinck, M. (2007). Emotion simulation during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin, and Review, 14 (3), 191–201.Google Scholar

Hellmann, J. H., Thoben, D. F. and Echterhoff, G. (2013). The sweet taste of revenge: Gustatory experience induces metaphor-consistent judgments of a harmful act. Social Cognition, 31 (5), 531–542.Google Scholar

Hensley, W. E. and Angoli, M., (1980). Message, valence, familiarity, sex and personality effects on the perceptual distortion of height. Journal of Psychology, 104, 149–156.Google Scholar

Herz, R. S. (2004). A naturalistic analysis of autobiographical memories triggered by olfactory visual and auditory stimuli. Chemical Senses, 29 (3), 217–224.Google Scholar

Hodder, A. and Houghton, D. (2014). Linguistic markers of Tweets: Giving unions a voice, Seminar presented at the University of Birmingham English Language Research Seminar Series, October, 2014.Google Scholar

Holle, H., Obleser, J., Rueschemeyer, S. A. and Gunter, T. C. (2010). Integration of iconic gestures and speech in left superior temporal areas boosts speech comprehension under adverse listening conditions. Neuroimage, 49, 875–884.Google Scholar

Holle, H., Gunter, T. C., Rüschemeyer, S. A., Hennenlotter, A. and Iacoboni, M. (2008). Neural correlates of the processing of co-speech gestures. Neuroimage, 39, 2010–2024.Google Scholar

Holyoak, K. J., Junn, E. N. and Billman, D. (1984). Development of analogical problem-solving skill. Child Development, 55, 2042–2055.Google Scholar

Horstmann, G. and Ansorge, U. (2011). Compatibility between tones, head movements, and facial expressions. Emotion, 11, 975–980.Google Scholar

Horton, W. S. (2007). Metaphor and readers’ attributions of intimacy. Memory and Cognition, 35 (1), 87–94.Google Scholar

Horton, W. S. (2013). Character intimacy influences the processing of metaphoric utterances during narrative comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 28, 148–166.Google Scholar

Hostetter, A. B. (2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137 (2), 297–315.Google Scholar

Hostetter, A. B. and Alibali, M. (2007). Raise your hand if you’re spatial: Relations between verbal and spatial skills and gesture production. Gesture, 7 (1), 73–95.Google Scholar

Hostetter, A. B. and Alibali, M. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15 (3), 495–514.Google Scholar

Hostetter, A. B. and Alibali, M. (2010). Language, gesture, action! A test of the Gesture as Simulated Action framework. Journal of Memory and Language, 63 (2), 245–257.Google Scholar

Houghton, D. and Littlemore, J. (in prep.). The role played by figurative messaging and emotion in viral videos.Google Scholar

Howe, J. (2007). Argument is argument: An essay on conceptual metaphor and verbal dispute. Metaphor and Symbol, 23 (1), 1–23.Google Scholar

Howes, D. and Classen, C. (1991). Sounding sensory profiles. In Howes, D. (ed.) The Varieties of Sensory Experience: A Sourcebook in the Anthropology of the Senses, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 257–288.Google Scholar

Huette, S., Winter, B., Matlock, T., Ardell, D. H. and Spivey, M. (2014). Eye movements during listening reveal spontaneous grammatical processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–7.Google Scholar

Hupka, R., Zalaski, Z., Otto, J., Reidl, L. and Tarabrina, N. (1997). The colors of anger, envy, fear and jealousy, a cross-cultural study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28 (2), 156–171.Google Scholar

Hutchins, E. (1995) Cognition in the Wild, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1555–1577.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, S. and Louwerse, M. (2013). Language statistics and individual differences in processing primary metaphors. Cognitive Linguistics, 24 (4), 667–687.Google Scholar

Hurtienne, J. (2011). Image Schemas and Design for Intuitive Use. Exploring New Guidance for User Interface Design. PhD Dissertation; http://opus.kobv.de/tuberlin/volltexte/2011/2970/pdf/hurtienne_joern.pdf.Google Scholar

Hurtienne, J. (2014). Non-linguistic applications of cognitive linguistics: On the usefulness of image-schematic metaphors in user interface design. In Littlemore, J. and Taylor, J. (eds.) The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, London: Bloomsbury, pp. 301–324.Google Scholar

Hurtienne, J., Stößel, C., Sturm, C., Maus, A., Rötting, M., Longdin, P. and Clarkson, J. (2010). Physical gestures for abstract concepts: Inclusive design with primary metaphors. Interacting with Computers, 22 (6), 475–484.Google Scholar

Hussey, K. and Katz, A. N. (2006). Metaphor production in online conversation: Gender and friendship status. Discourse Processes, 42 (1), 75–98.Google Scholar

Hussey, K. and Katz, A. N. (2009). Perception of the use of metaphor by an interlocutor in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 24, 203–236.Google Scholar

Ibáñez, A., Manes, F., Escobar, J., Trujillo, N., Andreucci, P. and Hurtado, E. (2010). Gesture influences the processing of figurative language in non-native speakers: ERP evidence. Neuroscience Letters, 471 (1), 48–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.01.009.Google Scholar

Ibáñez, A., Toro, P., Cornejo, C., Urquina, H., Manes, F., Weisbrod, M. and Schroder, J. (2011). High contextual sensitivity of metaphorical expressions and gesture blending: A video event-related potential design. Psychiatry Research, 191 (1), 68–75. doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.008.Google Scholar

Ibarretze-Antuñano, I. (2008). Guts, heart and liver: The conceptualization of internal organs in Basque. In Sharifian, F., Dirven, R., Ning, Y. and Niemeier, S. (eds.) Culture, Body, and Language: Conceptualizations of Internal Body Organs across Cultures and Languages, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 103–128.Google Scholar

Inagi, K. and Hatano, G. (1987). Young children’s spontaneous personification as analogy. Child Development, 58, 1013–1020.Google Scholar

Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., and Bloom, P. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 714–725.Google Scholar

Ishihara, M., Keller, P., Rossetti, Y. and Prinz, W. (2008). Horizontal spatial representations of time: Evidence for the STEARC effect. Cortex, 44 (4), 454–461.Google Scholar

Iverson, J. M. and Goldin-Meadow, S. (2001). The resilience of gesture in talk: Gesture in blind speakers and listeners. Developmental Science, 4, 416–422.Google Scholar

Jacobs, A., Võ, M., Briesemeister, B., Conrad, M., Hofmann, M., Kuchinke, L., Lüdtke, J. and Braun, M. (2015). 10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: What are the echoes? Frontiers in Psychology, 1 (8).Google Scholar

Jamalian, A. and Tversky, B. (2012). Gestures alter thinking about time. In Miyake, N., Peebles, D. and Cooper, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 503–508.Google Scholar

Jarvis, S. (2003). Probing the effects of the L2 on the L1: A case study. In Cook, V. J. (ed.) Second Language Acquisition, 3: Effects of the Second Language on the First, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Limited.Google Scholar

Jensen, T. (2013). New perspectives on language, cognition and values. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 9 (1), 71–78.Google Scholar

Jensen, T. (2014). Emotion in languaging: An ecological approach to the intertwined nature of language and emotion. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 720.Google Scholar

Jensen, T. and Cuffari, E. (2014). Doubleness in experience: Toward a distributed enactive approach to metaphoricity. Metaphor and Symbol, 29, 278–297.Google Scholar

Johansson-Falck, M. (2010). Review of Müller (2008) Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking (University of Chicago Press). Metaphor and Symbol, 25, 114–121.Google Scholar

Johansson-Falck, M. and Gibbs, R. (2012). Embodied motivations for metaphorical meanings. Cognitive Linguistics, 23 (2), 251–272.Google Scholar

John, O. P. and Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2 (1999), 102–138.Google Scholar

Johnson, C. 1997. Metaphor vs. Conflation in the Acquisition of Polysemy: The Case of See. In Hiraga, M. K., Sinha, C. and Wilcox, S. (eds.) Cultural, Typological and Psychological Perspectives in Cognitive Linguistics, Albuquerque, NM: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. (2007). The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding, Chicago, IL, and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. and Larson, S. (2003). “Something in the way she moves” – Metaphors of musical motion. Metaphor and Symbol, 18 (2), 63–84.Google Scholar

Jostmann, N. B., Lakens, D. and Schubert, T. W. (2009). Weight as embodiment of importance. Psychological Science, 20 (9), 1169–1174.Google Scholar

Judge, T. A. and Cable, D. M. (2004). The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary test of a theoretical model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (3), 428–441.Google Scholar

Jung-Beeman, M. (2005). Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9 (11), 512–518.Google Scholar

Jütte, R. (2005). A History of the Senses: From Antiquity to Cyberspace, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1), 193.Google Scholar

Kaneko, M. and Sutton-Spence, R. (2016). In Semino, E. and Demjen, Z. (eds.) Metaphor in Sign Language, The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language, London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 263–279.Google Scholar

Kanner, L. (1946). Irrelevant and metaphorical language in early infantile autism. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 103 (2): 242–246.Google Scholar

Karns, C. M. and Knight, R. T. (2009). Intermodal auditory, visual, and tactile attention modulates early stages of neural processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 6690–6683.Google Scholar

Kasirer, A. and Mashal, N. (2014). Verbal creativity in autism: Comprehension and generation of metaphoric language in high-functioning autism spectrum disorder and typical development. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 615.Google Scholar

Katz, A. N. (1983). What does it mean to be a high imager? In Yuille, J. C. (ed.) Imagery, Memory and Cognition, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 39–63.Google Scholar

Katz, A. N. and Bowes, A. (2015). Embodiment in metaphor and (not?) in bilingual language. In Heredia, R. R. and Cieślicka, A. B. (eds.) Bilingual Figurative Language Processing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kaup, B. (2001). Negation and its impact on the accessibility of text information. Memory and Cognition, 29, 860–967.Google Scholar

Kaup, B. and Zwaan, R. A. (2003). Effects of negation and situational presence on the accessibility of text information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 439–446.Google Scholar

Kaup, B., Yaxley, R. H., Madden, C. J., Zwaan, R. A. and Lüdtke, J. (2007). Experiential simulations of negated text information. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60 (7), 976–990.Google Scholar

Kay, A. C., Wheeler, S. C., Bargh, J. A. and Ross, L. (2004). Material priming: The influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive behavioural choice. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 95, 83–96.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kensinger, E. and Corkin, S. (2003). Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Memory and Cognition, 31, 1169–1180.Google Scholar

Kirby, J. R. (1988). Style, strategy and skill in reading. In Schmeck, R. (ed.) Learning Strategies and Learning Styles, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 230–274.Google Scholar

Kircher, T., Straube, B., Leube, D. et al. (2009). Neural interaction of speech and gesture: Differential activations of metaphoric co-verbal gestures. Neuropsychologia, 47, 169–179.Google Scholar

Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In McNeill, D.. (ed.) Language and Gesture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 162–185.Google Scholar

Kita, S., Alibali, M. W. and Chu, M. (2017). How do gestures influence thinking and speaking? The gesture-for-conceptualization hypothesis. Psychological Review, 124 (3), 245–266.Google Scholar

Kitayana, O. (1987). Metaphorization – Making terms. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 68 (4), 499–509.Google Scholar

Kleege, G. (1999). Sight Unseen, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Knapton, O. (2013). Pro-anorexia: Extensions of ingrained concepts. Discourse & Society, 24 (4), 461–477.Google Scholar

Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt Psychology, New York: Liveright.Google Scholar

Kogan, N., Connor, K., Gross, A. and Fava, D. (1980). Understanding visual metaphor: Developmental and individual differences. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1–78.Google Scholar

Kok, K. and Cienki, A. (2014). Taking simulation semantics out of the laboratory: Towards an interactive and multimodal reappraisal of embodied language comprehension. Language and Cognition, 25, 1–22.Google Scholar

Koller, V. and Semino, E. (2009). Metaphor, politics and gender: A case study from Germany. In Ahrens, K. (ed.) Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 9–35.Google Scholar

Körner, H., Newman, C. and Mao, L. (2011). ‘The black dog just came and sat on my face and built a kennel’: Gay men making sense of ‘depression’. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 15 (4), 417–436.Google Scholar

Kouchaki, M., Gino, F. and Jami, A. (2014). The Burden of Guilt: Heavy Backpacks, Light Snacks, and Enhanced Morality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143 (1), 414–420.Google Scholar

Kousta, S.T., Vinson, D. and Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112, 473–481.Google Scholar

Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M. and Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140 (1), 14–34.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z. (2006). Language, Mind and Culture, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z. (2019). Metaphorical creativity – The case of emotion. Paper presented at The Creative Power of Metaphor Conference, Worcester College, University of Oxford, 30–31 March 2019.Google Scholar

Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgement and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 332–351.Google Scholar

Lacey, S., Stilla, R. and Sathian, K. (2012). Metaphorically feeling: Comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex. Brain and Language, 120, 416–421.Google Scholar

Lakens, D., Semin, G. and Foroni, F. (2011). Why your highness needs the people: Comparing the absolute and relative representation of power in vertical space. Social Psychology, 42 (3), 205–213.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1996). Sorry, I’m not myself today: The metaphor system for conceptualising the self. In Fauconnier, G. and Sweetser, E. (eds.) Spaces, Worlds and Grammar, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 91–123.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (2008). The neural theory of metaphor. In Gibbs, R. W. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–38.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (2012). Explaining embodied cognition results. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 773–785.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (2002). Why cognitive linguistics requires embodied realism. Cognitive Linguistics, 13 (3), 245–263.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Núñez, R. (2000). Where Mathematics Comes From: The Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Landau, M. J., Robinson, M. and Meier, B. (Eds.) (2015). The Power of Metaphor: Examining the Influence on Social Life, Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar

Landau, M. J., Sullivan, D. and Greenberg, J. (2009). Evidence that self-relevant motives and metaphoric framing interact to influence political and social attitudes. Psychological Science, 20 (11), 1421–1427.Google Scholar

Langdon, R., Coltheart, M., Ward, P. B. and Catts, S. V. (2002). Disturbed communication in schizophrenia: The role of poor pragmatics and poor theory-of-mind. Psychological Medicine, 32 (7), 1273–1284.Google Scholar

Langston, W. (2002). Violating orientational metaphors slows reading. Discourse Processes, 34, 281–310.Google Scholar

Larson, S. (2012). Musical Forces: Motion, Metaphor and Meaning in Music, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Leder, D. (1990). The Absent Body, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lee, E. H. and Schnall, S. (2014). The influence of social power on weight perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1719–1725.Google Scholar

Lee, W. S. and Schwarz, N. (2010). Washing away post-decisional dissonance. Science, 329, 709.Google Scholar

Lee, W. S. and Schwarz, N. (2012a). Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103 (5), 737–749.Google Scholar

Lee, W. S. and Schwarz, N. (2012b). Metaphor in judgement and decision making. In Landau, M. J., Robinson, M. D. and Meier, B. P. (eds.) Metaphorical Thought in Social Life, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Leijssen, M. (2006) Verification of the body in psychotherapy. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 46 (2), 126–146.Google Scholar

Lempert, H. and Kinsbourne, M. (1982). Effect of laterality of orientation on verbal memory. Neurophysiologia, 20, 211–214.Google Scholar

Leung, A. et al. (2012). Embodied metaphor and creative acts. Psychological Science, 23, 502–509.Google Scholar

Levenson, M., Kiehl, K. and Fitzpatrick, C. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a non-institutionalised population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151–158.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. and Majid, A. (2014). Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind and Language, 29, 407–427.Google Scholar

Lewkowicz, D. J. and Turkewitz, G. (1980). Cross-modal equivalence in early infancy: Auditory-visual intensity matching. Developmental Psychology, 16, 597–607.Google Scholar

Lewkowicz, D. J. and Turkewitz, G. (1981). Intersensory interaction in newborns: Modification of visual preferences following exposure to sound. Child Development, 52, 827–832.Google Scholar

Li, H. and Cao, Y. (2016). Who’s holding the moral high ground: Religiosity and the vertical conception of morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 178–182.Google Scholar

Li, X. (2010). Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Teaching of English and Chinese Idioms. Journal of Language Teaching And Research, 1 (3), 206–210.Google Scholar

Liljenquist, K., Zhong, C-B. and Galinsky, A. (2010). The smell of virtue: Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychological Science, 21, 381–383.Google Scholar

Lindsay, S., Scheepers, C. and Kamide, Y. (2013). Ro dash or dawdle: Verb-associated speed of motion influences eye movements during spoken sentence comprehension. PLoS ONE, 8 (6), e67187.Google Scholar

Linell, P. (1998). Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogic al Perspectives, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Lipowski, Z. J. (1988). Somatization: The concept and its clinical application. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145 (11), 1358–1368.Google Scholar

Littlemore, J. (2001). Metaphoric competence: A possible language learning strength of students with a holistic cognitive style? TESOL Quarterly, 35 (3), 459–491.Google Scholar

Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Littlemore, J. (2017). On the role of embodied cognition in the understanding and use of metonymy. In Hampe, B. (ed.) Metaphor, Embodied Cognition and Discourse, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Littlemore, J. and Kwong, R. (forthcoming). The use of metaphoric gestures by speakers of English as a first or second language: a comparative case study, In C. Lee (ed.) Language Choice, Use, and Pedagogies in the Bilingual Context, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Littlemore, J. and Turner, (in prep.). A comparison of metaphor use by synaesthetes and non-synaesthetes.Google Scholar

Littlemore, J., Turner, S. and Alexander, H. (in prep.). Investigating the Relationship between Metaphor, Gender and Social Distance.Google Scholar

Littlemore, J., Pérez-Sobrino, P., Leung, D. and Julich, N. (forthcoming). What happens to word-colour associations when we speak a foreign language? In A. Piquer-Piriz and R. Alejo-Gonzalez (eds.) Metaphor in Foreign Language Instruction, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Littlemore, J., Turner, S., Tuck, P. and Cassell, C. (in prep.). Soapy conveyor belts and wet sponges: The role of metaphor in evaluative conversations about the workplace.Google Scholar

Littlemore, J. and Turner, S. (in press). Metaphors in communication about pregnancy loss, Metaphor and the Social World.Google Scholar

Littlemore, J., Duffy, S., Turner, S., Pérez-Sobrino, P., Woodin, G. and Winter, B. (in prep.) Maths, music and metaphor: Conceptual developments in 5–8-year-old children.Google Scholar

Liu, M.-J., Shih, W.-L. and Ma, L.-Y. (2011). Are children with Asperger syndrome creative in divergent thinking and feeling? A brief report. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 5, 294–298. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2010.04.011.Google Scholar

Lossifova, R. and Marmolejo-Ramos, F. (2012). Spatial and temporal deixis: The role of age and vision in the ontogeny of a child’s spatial and temporal cognition. Journal of Speech and Language Pathology, 2 (2), 75–98.Google Scholar

Lourenco, S. F. and Longo, M. R. (2010). General magnitude system in young infants. Psychological Science, 21, 873–881.Google Scholar

Lourenco, S. F. and Longo, M. R. (2011). Origins and the development of generalized magnitude representation. In Dehaene, S. and Brannon, E. (eds.) Space, Time and Number in the Brain: Searching for the Foundations of Mathematical Thought, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 225–244.Google Scholar

Louwerse, M. (2008). Embodied relations are encoded in language. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 838–844.Google Scholar

Low, G., Littlemore, J. and Koester, A. (2008). The use of metaphor in three university lectures. Applied Linguistics, 29 (3), 428–455.Google Scholar

Low, S. M. (1994). Embodied Metaphors: Nerves as lived experience. In Csordas, T. J. (ed.) Embodiment and Experience: The Existential Ground of Culture and Self (Cambridge Studies in Medical Anthropology), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–162.Google Scholar

Lowe, M. (2017). Sounds Big: The Effects of Acoustic Pitch on Product Perceptions. Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (2), 331–347.Google Scholar

Lynott, D. and Connell, L. (2010). Embodied conceptual combination. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 1–14.Google Scholar

Lynott, D., Corker, K. S., Wortman, J., Connell, L., Donnellan, M. B., Lucas, R. E. and O’Brien, K. (2014). Replication of “Experiencing Physical Warmth Promotes Interpersonal Warmth”. Social Psychology, 45, 216–222.Google Scholar

Maalej, Z. (2004) Figurative language in anger expressions in Tunisian Arabic: An extended view of embodiment. Metaphor and Symbol, 19 (1), 51–76.Google Scholar

Maalej, Z. A. and Yu, N. (eds.) (2011). Embodiment Via Body Parts: Studies from Various Languages and Cultures, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

MacCormac, E. R. (1986). Creative metaphors. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 1 , 171–184.Google Scholar

Macedonia, M. (2014). Bringing back the body into the mind: Gestures enhance word learning in foreign language. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–7.Google Scholar