Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:09:59.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Confabulations

from Part III

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

German E. Berrios
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
John R. Hodges
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Confabulations are inaccurate or false narratives purporting to convey information about world or self. According to the received view, they are utterances intent on ‘covering up’ for a putative memory deficit. Confabulations are said to vary in terms of ‘content’, ‘mode of production’, ‘duration’, ‘aetiology’, ‘form’, and ‘conviction’. According to content, a distinction is often made between prosaic and fantastic confabulations; and according to mode of production two types have been distinguished: ‘volunteered’ and ‘extracted by the clinician’. Although the dearth of published case series might suggest that confabulations are a rare occurrence, this may be the result of underdiagnosis. With regard to aetiological factors, amnesia, embarrassment, ‘frontal lobe’ damage, a particular subtype of ‘personality’, a dream-like event, and a disturbance of the self have been listed.

There has been little work on the linguistic, logical, and epistemological status of confabulations although the way in which they are dealt with in the medical and neuropsychological literature suggests that confabulations are considered by most as a form of propositional attitude (i.e. a belief); if so, the problem of differentiating them from delusions remains (Berrios, 1985). Lastly, on account of the putative heterogeneity of their narratives, personalities and neurobiology, ‘confabulators’ (i.e. the subjects who issue confabulations) constitute a motley group.

Historical analysis shows that ‘confabulation’ entered psychopathology at the turn of the century as a member of a set of concepts (that included delusion, fixed idea, obsessions, overvalued idea, etc.) dedicated to capturing ‘narratives’ of dubious content. This means that confabulation is not an autonomous concept but part of a ‘discourse formation’, i.e. it only has meaning within a given context.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×