Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:40:11.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Primary goods, capabilities, and children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Colin M. MacLeod
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Law and Philosophy at the University of Victoria
Harry Brighouse
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Ingrid Robeyns
Affiliation:
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Get access

Summary

The debate between advocates of a primary-goods focused approach to justice and advocates of a capabilities focused approach has been conducted without much explicit attention to how the perspective of children should be represented and interpreted. The objective of this paper is to make some modest progress toward remedying this neglect. The principal conclusion I reach is that neither the Rawlsian primary goods approach nor the capabilities approach provides a fully satisfactory theoretical framework for addressing the full range of children's interests with which justice should be concerned. Moreover, the shortcomings of both approaches are located, I suggest, in a common implicit assumption, namely that the human beings with whom justice is concerned are to be conceived primarily as either mature agents capable of assuming responsibility for the ends they adopt and pursue or as potential mature agents. I will argue that children do not comfortably fit the paradigm of agency that plays an animating role in both theories. Although my main aim is to provide a diagnosis of the theoretical limitations of both approaches, I will offer some tentative remarks about what fuller sensitivity to all the relevant interests of children might involve.

The analysis I develop highlights limitations that I believe can be detected in both views but I do not want the critical focus of the paper to be interpreted as entailing a wholesale rejection of either Rawlsian theory or the capabilities approach.

Type
Chapter
Information
Measuring Justice
Primary Goods and Capabilities
, pp. 174 - 192
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arneson, R. 1989. “Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare,” Philosophical Studies 56: 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggeri, M., Libanora, R., Marian, S., and Menchini, L. 2006. “Children Conceptualizing their Capabilities: Results of a Survey Conducted during the First Children's World Congress on Child Labour,” Journal of Human Development 7, 1: 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bojer, H. 2005. “Social Justice and the Rights of Children,” in Qvortrup, J. (ed.), Studies in Modern Childhood. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 221–30.Google Scholar
Brennan, S. and Noggle, R. 1998. “Rawls's Neglected Childhood: Reflections on the Original Position, Stability and the Child's Sense of Justice”, in Matthews, G. and Turner, S. (eds.), The Philosopher's Child. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Brighouse, H. 2000. School Choice and Social Justice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 2000. Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. 1986. Wellbeing. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, A. 1980. “Children, Paternalism, and Education: A Liberal Argument,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 9, 4: 338–58.Google Scholar
Macleod, C. 1997. “Conceptions of Parental Autonomy,” Politics and Society 25, 1: 117–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noggle, R. 2002. “Special Agents: Children's Autonomy and Parental Authority,” in Archard, D. and Macleod, C. (eds.), The Moral and Political Status of Children. Oxford University Press, pp. 97–117.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. 2005. “The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey,” Journal of Human Development 6, 1: 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, Ingrid 2006. “The Capability Approach in Practice,” Journal of Political Philosophy 14, 3: 351–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. S. 2007. “Children and Dangerous Sport and Recreation,” Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 34: 176–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, M. 2003. “Amartya Sen's Capability Approach to Education: A Critical Exploration,” Journal of Philosophy of Education 37, 1: 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schapiro, T. 1999. “What is a Child?Ethics 109: 715–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Tan, Kok-Chor 2004. Justice Without Borders. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallentyne, P. 2005. “Debate: Capabilities versus Opportunities for Well-being,” Journal of Political Philosophy 13, 3: 359–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×