We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 April 2024
CASE
In a particular period of time, a disease, query fever, spread through the population. Query fever is known to spread from goats to humans by direct contact, or by contact with contaminated dust in the air. Farmers were under a statutory duty to vaccine their goats, but some of them did not. Many people fell ill, and a large group (> 1,000) developed chronic query fever and lost the capacity to work full time and therefore suffered loss of income. It is uncertain whether the government is liable because although ample evidence exists that it did not take preventive measures by adequate vaccine enforcement, it is uncertain whether those measures would have prevented the epidemic.
A group of plaintiffs suffering from chronic query fever demand compensation from both the government and the goat farmers. Will they receive compensation and, if so, for what losses? And is it possible to start a collective proceeding? If so, please indicate the most important bottlenecks in this particular case.
Please also indicate briefly in the ‘meta-legal formants’ if one or more compensation schemes have been developed that fully or partly compensate the victims of COVID-19.
DISCUSSIONS
AUSTRIA
Matthias Dangl and Georg E Kodek
Operative Rules
It would be possible to bring an action against the government based on the Public Liability Act (Amtshaftungsgesetz) as well as against the farmers based on general tort law (§ § 1293 ff Austrian Civil Code (ACC)). It would also be possible to start a collective proceeding, such as the ‘Austrian model of group litigation’ (as described in the Austrian section in the procedural rules chapter).
However, the case poses two difficulties from a substantive law perspective. The first difficulty for claimants is to prove causation. It is not clear whether a particular farmer’s failure to have his goats vaccinated caused a particular plaintiff to contract the disease, nor is it clear that stricter vaccine enforcement had prevented the epidemic. The second difficulty for plaintiffs, both for their case against the government and against the farmers, is the purpose of the statute requiring all goats to be vaccinated.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
