Book contents
- Maritime Delimitation as a Judicial Process
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 144
- Maritime Delimitation as a Judicial Process
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Foreword
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- Table of Treaties and Legislation
- Abbreviations
- 1 Maritime Delimitation in the Time of International Tribunals
- 2 Historical and Conceptual Framework
- 3 Relevant Coast and Relevant Area
- 4 Equidistance
- 5 Relevant Circumstances
- 6 Disproportionality
- 7 States, International Tribunals and the Delimitation Process
- Book part
- Bibliography (in alphabetical order by author)
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law
- References
Bibliography (in alphabetical order by author)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 June 2019
Book contents
- Maritime Delimitation as a Judicial Process
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 144
- Maritime Delimitation as a Judicial Process
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Foreword
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- Table of Treaties and Legislation
- Abbreviations
- 1 Maritime Delimitation in the Time of International Tribunals
- 2 Historical and Conceptual Framework
- 3 Relevant Coast and Relevant Area
- 4 Equidistance
- 5 Relevant Circumstances
- 6 Disproportionality
- 7 States, International Tribunals and the Delimitation Process
- Book part
- Bibliography (in alphabetical order by author)
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Maritime Delimitation as a Judicial Process , pp. 357 - 382Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Bibliography (in alphabetical order by author)
Acikgonul, YE, ‘Reflections on the Principle of Non-Cut Off: A Growing Concept in Maritime Boundary Delimitation Law’ (2016) 47 Ocean Development and International Law 52.Google Scholar
Acikgonul, YE, ‘Equitable Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries: The Uncontested Supremacy of Coastal Geography in Case Law’ (2017) 31 Ocean Yearbook 173.Google Scholar
Akehurst, M, ‘The Hierarchy of the Sources of International Law’ (1974–1975) 47 British Yearbook of International Law 273.Google Scholar
Al-Qahtani, M, ‘The Role of the International Court of Justice in the Enforcement of its Judicial Decisions’ (2002) 15 Leiden Journal of International Law 781.Google Scholar
Anderson, D, ‘Negotiating Maritime Boundary Agreements: A Personal Perspective’ in Lagoni, R and Vignes, D (eds.), Maritime Delimitation (Martinus Nijhoff, 2006) 121.Google Scholar
Anderson, D, ‘Grisbådarna Revisited’ in Anderson, D (ed.) Modern Law of the Sea – Selected Essays (Martinus Nijhoff, 2008) 477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D, ‘Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea Case (Romania v. Ukraine)’ (2009) 8 Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D, ‘Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/Myanmar): Case No. 16’ (2012) 106 American Journal of International Law 817.Google Scholar
Aquarone, M-C, ‘The 1985 Guinea/Guinea-Bissau Maritime Boundary Case and its Implications’ (1995) 26 Ocean Development and International Law 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbour, J-M, ‘Le Limites du Plateau Continental et de la Zone Économique Exclusive: les Fondements du Titre de l’Etat sur les Espaces Maritimes et ses Rapports avec l’Opération de Délimitation’ in Pharand, D and Leanza, U (eds.), The Continental Shelf and the Exclusive Economic Zone: Delimitation and Legal Regime (Martinus Nijhoff, 1993) 13.Google Scholar
Arrow, D, ‘Seabed, Sovereignty and Objective Regimes’ (1984) 7 Fordham International Law Journal 169.Google Scholar
Ascensio, H, ‘Les Actes Unilatéraux Etatiques en Droit de la Mer’ in Forteau, M and Thouvenin, J-M (eds.), Traité de Droit International de la Mer (Pédone, 2017) 190.Google Scholar
Attard, D, The Exclusive Economic Zone in International Law (Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Azar, A, L’Exécution des Décisions de la Cour Internationale de Justice (Bruylant, 2003).Google Scholar
Balmond, L, ‘Le Plateau Continental jusqu’à 200 milles marins’ in Le Processus de Délimitation Maritime – Étude d’un Cas Fictif (Pédone, 2004) 98.Google Scholar
Barboza, J, ‘The Beagle Channel Dispute: Reflections of the Agent of Argentina’ (2014) 13 Chinese Journal of International Law 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, R, ‘Objective Regimes Revisited’ (2000) 9 Asian Journal of International Law 97.Google Scholar
Batongbacal, JL, ‘Extended Continental Shelf Claims in the South China Sea: Implications for Future Maritime Boundary Delimitations’ (2015) 29 Ocean Yearbook 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumert, KA, ‘The Outer Limits of the Continental Shelf under Customary International Law’ (2017) 111 American Journal of International Law 827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, M and Rose, C, ‘Investigating the Value of Site Visits in Inter-State Arbitration and Adjudication’ (2017) 8 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 219.Google Scholar
Becker-Weinberg, V, Joint Development of Hydrocarbon Deposits in the Law of the Sea (Springer, 2014).Google Scholar
Beckman, R and Sim, C, ‘Maritime Boundary Disputes and Compulsory Dispute Settlement: Recent Developments and Unresolved Issues’ in Nordquist, MH et al. (eds.), Legal Order of the World’s Oceans – UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (Martinus Nijhoff, 2018) 228.Google Scholar
Beer-Gabel, J, ‘Variations sur la Notion de Frontière Maritime’ in Droit de la Mer – Études dédiées au Doyen Claude-Albert Colliard (Pédone, 1992) 10.Google Scholar
Beer-Gabel, J, ‘Les Accords de Délimitation Maritime, la Pratique des Etats’ in Le Processus de Délimitation Maritime: Étude d’un Cas Fictif (Pédone, 2004) 323.Google Scholar
Bennouna, M, ‘Le Droit International entre la Lettre et l’Esprit’ (2017) 383 Recueil des Cours 9.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, R, ‘Custom and Treaty in the Law of the Sea’ (1987) 205 Recueil des Cours 247.Google Scholar
Besson, S, ‘State Consent and Disagreement in International Law-Making: Dissolving the Paradox’ (2016) 29 Leiden Journal of International Law 289.Google Scholar
Bodansky, D, ‘Non Liquet and the Incompleteness of International Law’ in de Chazournes, L Boisson and Sands, P (eds.), International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge University Press, 1999) 153.Google Scholar
de Chazournes, L Boisson and Angelini, A, ‘Regard sur la Mise en Œuvre des Décisions de la Court internationale de Justice’ (2016) 40 L’Observateur des Nations Unies 63.Google Scholar
Bowett, DW, ‘The Arbitration between the United Kingdom and France concerning the Continental Shelf Boundary in the English Channel and South-Western Approaches’ (1978) 49 British Yearbook of International Law 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowett, DW, ‘Islands, Rocks, Reefs, and Low-Tide Elevations in Maritime Boundary Delimitations’ in Charney, JI and Alexander, LM (eds.), International Maritime Boundaries (Martinus Nijhoff, 1991) vol I, 131.Google Scholar
Bowett, DW, ‘The Dubai/Sharjah Boundary Arbitration of 1981’ (1995) 65 British Yearbook of International Law 103.Google Scholar
Bowett, DW, ‘Res Judicata and the Limits of Rectification of Decisions by International Tribunals’ (1996) 8 African Journal of International and Comparative Law 577.Google Scholar
Boyle, A and Chinkin, C, The Making of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Brown, C, ‘Article 59’ in Zimmermann, A et al. (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice – A Commentary 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2012) 1416.Google Scholar
Brown, ED, ‘The Anglo-French Continental Shelf Case’ (1979) 16 San Diego Law Review 461.Google Scholar
Brownlie, I, ‘International Law at the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations’ (1995) 255 Recueil des Cours 9.Google Scholar
Brownlie, I, ‘The Sources of the Law Governing Maritime Delimitation’ in Rama Montaldo, M (ed.), El Derecho Internacional en un Mundo en Transformación: Liber Amicorum en Homenaje al Profesor Eduardo Jiménez de Aréchaga (FCU, 1995) vol. II, 733.Google Scholar
Bundy, RR, ‘State Practice in Maritime Delimitation’ in Blake, GH (ed.), Maritime Boundaries (Routledge, 1994) 18.Google Scholar
Burke, N, ‘Nicaragua v. Colombia at the ICJ: Better the Devil you Don’t?’ (2012) 2 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 314.Google Scholar
Caflisch, L, ‘Lez Zones Maritimes sous Juridiction Nationale, leurs Limites et leur Délimitation’ in Bardonnet, D and Virally, M (eds.), Le Nouveau Droit International de la Mer (Pédone, 1983) 35.Google Scholar
Caflisch, L, ‘La Délimitation des Espaces entre Etats dont les Côtes se font face ou sont adjacentes’ in Dupuy, R-J and Vignes, D (eds.), Traité du Nouveau Droit de la Mer (Bruylant, 1985) 374.Google Scholar
Cahier, P, ‘Le Problème des Effets des Traités à l’égard des Etats Tiers’ (1974) 143 Recueil des Cours 589.Google Scholar
Cahier, P, ‘Les Sources du Droit relatif à la Délimitation du Plateau Continental’ in Le Droit International au Service de la Paix, de la Justice et du Développement – Mélanges Michel Virally (Pédone, 1991) 175.Google Scholar
Caminos, H, ‘Les Sources du Droit de la Mer’ in Dupuy, R-J and Vignes, D (eds.), Traité du Nouveau Droit de la Mer (Bruylant, 1985) 27.Google Scholar
Caminos, H, ‘The Legal Regime of Straits in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea’ (1987) 205 Recueil des Cours 9.Google Scholar
Carleton, C, ‘Maritime Delimitation in Complex Island Situations: A Case Study on the Caribbean Sea’ in Lagoni, R and Vignes, D (eds.), Maritime Delimitation (Martinus Nijhoff, 2006) 153.Google Scholar
Castellarin, E, ‘La sentence partielle du 30 juin 2016 dans l’affaire du différend territorial et maritime entre la Croatie et la Slovénie’ (2016) 62 Annuaire Français de Droit International 129.Google Scholar
Cataldi, G, ‘L’Italia e la Delimitazione degli Spazi Marini’ (2004) 87 Rivista di Diritto Internazionale 621.Google Scholar
Cataldi, G, ‘La Mise en Œuvre des Décisions des Tribunaux Internationaux dans l’Ordre Interne’ (2016) 386 Recueil des Cours 267.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, H, ‘Law-making and Sources’ in Crawford, J and Koskenniemi, M (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2012) 187.Google Scholar
Charney, JI, ‘Disputes implicating the Institutional Credibility of the Court: Problems of Non-appearance, Non-participation, and Non-performance’ in Damrosch, LF (ed.), The International Court of Justice at a Crossroads (Transnational Publishers, 1987) 289.Google Scholar
Charney, JI, ‘The Delimitation of Ocean Boundaries’ (1987) 18 Ocean Development and International Law 497.Google Scholar
Charney, JI, Alexander, LM, Colson, DA, Smith, RW and Lathrop, C (eds.), International Maritime Boundaries (Martinus Nijhoff 1991) vols. I–VII.Google Scholar
Charney, JI, ‘Progress in International Maritime Boundary Delimitation Law’ (1994) 88 American Journal of International Law 227.Google Scholar
Charney, JI and Danilenko, GM, ‘Consent and the Creation of International Law’ in Fisler Damrosch, L et al. (eds.), Beyond Confrontation – International Law for the Post-Cold War Era (Westview Press, 1995) 23.Google Scholar
Chimni, BS, ‘Customary International Law: A Third World Perspective’ (2018) 112 American Journal of International Law 1.Google Scholar
Churchill, RR, ‘Maritime Delimitation in the Jan Mayen Area’ (1985) 10 Marine Policy 16.Google Scholar
Churchill, RR, ‘Fisheries Issues in Maritime Boundary Delimitation’ (1993) 17 Marine Policy 44.Google Scholar
Churchill, RR, ‘The Greenland-Jan Mayen Case and its Significance for the International Law of Maritime Boundary Delimitation’ (1994) 9 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, RR, ‘Dispute Settlement under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: Survey for 2006’ (2007) 22 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 463.Google Scholar
Churchill, RR, ‘Dispute Settlement under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: Survey for 2007’ (2008) 23 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 601.Google Scholar
Churchill, RR, ‘Dispute Settlement under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: Survey for 2009’ (2010) 25 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 457.Google Scholar
Churchill, RR, ‘The Bangladesh/Myanmar Case: Continuity and Novelty in the Law of Maritime Boundary Delimitation’ (2012) 1 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 137.Google Scholar
Churchill, RR, ‘Dispute Settlement under in the Law of the Sea: Survey for 2012’ (2013) 28 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 564.Google Scholar
Churchill, RR, ‘Dispute Settlement under in the Law of the Sea: Survey for 2014’ (2015) 30 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 585.Google Scholar
Churchill, RR, ‘Dispute Settlement in the Law of the Sea: Survey for 2015, Part II and 2016’ (2017) 32 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 379.Google Scholar
Ciciriello, MC, ‘L’Effetto delle Isole nella Delimitazione degli Spazi Marini’ (1989) 91 Il Diritto Marittimo 675.Google Scholar
Ciciriello, MC, Le Formazioni Insulari e la Delimitazione degli Spazi Marini (Editoriale Scientifica, 1990).Google Scholar
Ciciriello, MC, ‘Le Rapport entre le Plateau Continental et la Zone Économique Exclusive dans la Jurisprudence Internationale la plus récente’ in Pharand, D and Leanza, U (eds.), The Continental Shelf and the Exclusive Economic Zone: Delimitation and Legal Regime (Martinus Nijhoff, 1993) 379.Google Scholar
Cogliati-Bantz, VP, ‘The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of the Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China)’ (2016) 31 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 759.Google Scholar
Colson, D, ‘The Legal Regime of Maritime Boundary Agreements’ in Charney, JI and Alexander, LM (eds.), International Maritime Boundaries (Martinus Nijhoff, 1991) vol. I, 41.Google Scholar
Colson, D, ‘The Delimitation of the Outer Continental Shelf between Neighboring States’ (2003) 97 American Journal of International Law 91.Google Scholar
Condorelli, L, ‘L’Autorité de la Décision des Juridictions Internationales Permanentes’ in La Juridiction Internationale Permanente – Colloque de Lyon (Pédone, 1987) 277.Google Scholar
Conforti, B, ‘L’Arrêt de la Cour Internationale de Justice dans l’Affaire de la Délimitation du Plateau Continental entre la Libye et Malte’ (1986) 90 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 313.Google Scholar
Cooper, J, ‘Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area’ (1986) 16 Ocean Development and International Law 59.Google Scholar
Cot, J-P, ‘The Dual function of Base Points’ in Hestermeyer, H et al. (eds.), Coexistence, Cooperation and Solidarity – Liber Amicorum Rüdiger Wolfrum (Martinus Nijhoff, 2012) 807.Google Scholar
Cottier, T, Equitable Principles of Maritime Boundary Delimitation (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Couvreur, P, The International Court of Justice and the Effectiveness of International Law (Brill, 2017).Google Scholar
Crawford, J and Viles, T, ‘International Law on a Given Day’ in Crawford, J (ed.), International Law as an Open System (Cameron May, 2002) 69.Google Scholar
Crawford, J, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law 8th edn (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Crawford, J and Koskenniemi, M (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Crawford, J, ‘Chance, Order, Change: the Course of International Law’ (2013) 365 Recueil des Cours 9.Google Scholar
Currie, JH, ‘Maritime Boundary Delimitation in a Federal Domestic Setting: The Newfoundland and Labrador v. Nova Scotia Arbitration’ (2004) 17 Leiden Journal of International Law 155.Google Scholar
Dailler, P, ‘Le Processus de Délimitation Maritime: la Convention de Montego Bay’ in Le Processus de Délimitation Maritime: Étude d’un Cas Fictif (Pédone, 2004) 264.Google Scholar
d’Argent, P, ‘Des Frontières et des Peuples: l’Affaire de la Frontière Terrestre et Maritime entre le Cameroun et le Nigéria (Arrêt sur le Fond)’ (2003) 48 Annuaire Français de Droit International 281.Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, J, ‘The Idea of “Rules” in the Sources of International Law’ (2014) 84 British Yearbook of International Law 103.Google Scholar
David, E, ‘La Sentence Arbitrale du 14 Février 1985 sur la Délimitation de la Frontière Maritime Guinée-Guinée Bissau’ (1986) 31 Annuaire Français de Droit International 350.Google Scholar
de Azcárraga, JL, La Plataforma Submarina y el Derecho Internacional – La Zona Nerítica Epijurisdiccional (Instituto Francisco de Vitoria, 1952).Google Scholar
De Brabandere, E, ‘The Use of Precedent and External Case Law by the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea’ (2016) 15 Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 24.Google Scholar
Decaux, E, ‘L’Arrêt de la Cour Internationale de Justice dans l’Affaire du Plateau Continental (Tunisie/Libye): Arrêt du 24 Février 1982’ (1982) 28 Annuaire Français de Droit International 357.Google Scholar
Decaux, E, ‘Arrêt de la Chambre de la Court Internationale de Justice sur l’Affaire de la Délimitation de la Frontière Maritime dans le Golfe du Maine (Canada/Etats-Unis): Arrêt du 12 Octobre 1984’ (1984) 30 Annuaire Français de Droit International 304.Google Scholar
Decaux, E, ‘L’Arrêt de la Cour Internationale de Justice dans l’Affaire du Plateau Continental (Libye/Malte): Arrêt du 3 Juin 1985’ (1985) 31 Annuaire Français de Droit International 294.Google Scholar
Decaux, E, ‘Affaire de la Délimitation Maritime dans la Région située entre le Groenland et Jan Mayen (Danemark c. Norvège)’ (1993) 39 Annuaire Français de Droit International 495.Google Scholar
Decaux, E, ‘Affaire de la Délimitation Maritime et des Questions Territoriales entre Qatar et Bahreïn (Fond) Arrêt du 16 Mars 2001’ (2001) 47 Annuaire Français de Droit International 177.Google Scholar
Degan, V-D, ‘Consolidation of Legal Principles on Maritime Delimitation: Implications for the Dispute between Slovenia and Croatia in the North Adriatic’ (2007) 6 Chinese Journal of International Law 601.Google Scholar
Delabie, L, ‘Le fragile Équilibre entre Prévisibilité Juridique et Opportunité Judiciaire en Matière de Délimitation Maritime: l’Arrêt de la Cour Internationale de Justice dans l’Affaire du Différend Territorial et Maritime (Nicaragua c. Colombie)’ (2012) 58 Annuaire Français de Droit International 223.Google Scholar
Devine, DJ, ‘Base Points, Baselines in Median-line Delimitation’ (2002) 27 South African Yearbook of International Law 223.Google Scholar
Diaité, I, ‘Le Règlement du Contentieux entre la Guinée-Bissau et le Sénégal relatif à la Délimitation de leur Frontière Maritime’ (1996) 41 Annuaire Français de Droit International 700.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y, ‘The Interaction between Customary International Law and Treaties’ (2007) 322 Recueil des Cours 243.Google Scholar
Dipla, H, ‘Arrêt de la Cour Internationale de Justice en l’Affaire de la Délimitation Maritime dans la Région située entre le Groenland et Jan Mayen’ (1994) 98 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 899.Google Scholar
Doussis, E, ‘Îles, Îlots, Rochers et Hauts-Fonds Découvrants’ in Le Processus de Délimitation Maritime – Étude d’un Cas Fictif (Pédone, 2004) 134.Google Scholar
Dupont, P-E and Solomou, A, ‘Provisional Measures in Maritime Delimitation Cases’ in Crawford, J et al. (eds.), The International Legal Order: Current Needs and Possible Responses – Essays in Honour of Djamchid Momtaz (Brill, 2017) 312.Google Scholar
Dupuy, R-J, ‘La Mer sous Compétence Nationale’ in Dupuy, R-J and Vignes, D (eds.), Traité du Nouveau Droit de la Mer (Bruylant, 1985) 219.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R, ‘On Gaps in the Law’ in Amselek, P and MacCormick, N (eds.), Controversies about Law’s Ontology (Edinburgh University Press, 1991) 84.Google Scholar
Elias, TO, ‘The Doctrine of Intertemporal Law’ (1980) 74 American Journal of International Law 285.Google Scholar
Evans, MD, Relevant Circumstances and Maritime Delimitation (Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Evans, MD, ‘Maritime Delimitation and Expanding Categories of Relevant Circumstances’ (1991) 40 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1.Google Scholar
Evans, MD, ‘Delimitation and the Common Maritime Boundary’ (1993) 64 British Yearbook of International Law 283.Google Scholar
Evans, MD, ‘Less Than an Ocean Apart: The St. Pierre et Miquelon and Jan Mayen Islands and the Delimitation of Maritime Zones’ (1994) 43 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 678.Google Scholar
Evans, MD, ‘Intervention, the International Court of Justice and the Law of the Sea’ (1995) 48 Revue Hellénique de Droit International 73.Google Scholar
Evans, MD, ‘Maritime Delimitation after Denmark v. Norway: Back to the Future?’ in Goodwin-Gill, GS and Talmon, S (eds.), The Reality of International Law – Essays in Honour of Ian Brownlie (Oxford University Press, 1999) 153.Google Scholar
Evans, MD, ‘The Maritime Delimitation between Eritrea and Yemen’ (2001) 14 Leiden Journal of International Law 141.Google Scholar
Evans, MD, ‘Case concerning Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain (Qatar v Bahrain)’ (2002) 51 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 709.Google Scholar
Evans, MD, ‘Maritime Boundary Delimitation: Where Do We Go From Here?’ in Freestone, D et al. (eds.), Law of the Sea – Progress and Prospects (Oxford University Press, 2006) 137.Google Scholar
Evans, MD, ‘The Law of the Sea’ in Evans, MD, International Law (Oxford University Press, 2014) 651.Google Scholar
Evans, MD, ‘Maritime Boundary Delimitation’ in Rothwell, DR et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea (Oxford University Press, 2015) 254.Google Scholar
Evans, MD, ‘Maritime Boundary Delimitation: Whatever Next?’ in Barrett, J and Barnes, R (eds.), Law of the Sea – UNCLOS as a Living Treaty (BIICL, 2016) 41.Google Scholar
Evans, MD, ‘Relevant Circumstances’ in Oude Elferink, A et al. (eds.), Maritime Boundary Delimitation – The Case Law: Is It Consistent and Predictable? (Cambridge University Press, 2018) 222.Google Scholar
Evensen, J, ‘Working Methods and Procedures in the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea’ (1986) 199 Recueil des Cours 415.Google Scholar
Feldman, MB, ‘The Tunisia-Libya Continental Shelf Case: Geographic Justice or Judicial Compromise?’ (1983) 77 American Journal of International Law 219.Google Scholar
Fietta, S and Cleverly, R, A Practitioner’s Guide to Maritime Boundary Delimitation (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Fife, RE, ‘La Négociation de l’Accord de Délimitation Maritime: une Perspective Norvégienne’ in Le Processus de Délimitation Maritime: Étude d’un Cas Fictif (Pédone, 2004) 336.Google Scholar
Fife, RE, ‘Le Traité du 15 Septembre 2010 entre la Norvège et la Russie relatif à la Délimitation et à la Coopération Maritime en Mer de Barents et dans l’Océan Arctique’ (2010) 56 Annuaire Français de Droit International 399.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘Some Problems Regarding the Formal Sources of International Law’ in Symbolae Verzijl (Martinus Nijhoff, 1958) 153.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘The Problem of Non Liquet: Prolegomena to a Restatement’ in Mélanges Offerts à Charles Rousseau – La Communauté Internationale (Pédone, 1974) 89.Google Scholar
Forlati, S, ‘“Interesse di Natura Giuridica” ed Effetti per gli Stati Terzi delle Sentenze della Corte Internazionale di Giustizia’ (2002) 85 Rivista di Diritto Internazionale 99.Google Scholar
Francalanci, G, ‘La Ligne d’Équidistance’ in Pharand, D and Leanza, U (eds.), The Continental Shelf and the Exclusive Economic Zone: Delimitation and Legal Regime (Martinus Nijhoff, 1993) 57.Google Scholar
Friedmann, W, ‘The North Sea Continental Shelf Cases: A Critique’ (1970) 64 American Journal of International Law 229.Google Scholar
Gardner, J, ‘Concerning Permissive Sources and Gaps’ (1988) 8 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 457.Google Scholar
Gautier, P, ‘Le Plateau Continental de la Belgique et sa Délimitation: quelques Réflexions sur la Notion d’Accord implicite’ (1995) 28 Revue Belge de Droit International 108.Google Scholar
Gautier, P, ‘Conduite, Accord Tacite et Délimitation Maritime’ in Droit des Frontières Internationales – The Law of International Borders (Pédone, 2016) 145.Google Scholar
Giraudeau, G, ‘La remarquable Entrée en Scène du TIDM dans le Contentieux de la Délimitation Maritime: l’Arrêt du 14 Mars 2012 relatif au Différend entre le Bangladesh et le Myanmar dans le Golfe du Bengale’ (2012) 17 Annuaire du Droit de la Mer 93.Google Scholar
Gray, C, ‘The 2014 Judicial Activity of the International Court of Justice’ (2015) 109 American Journal of International Law 583.Google Scholar
Gray, C, ‘The 2016 Judicial Activity of the International Court of Justice’ (2017) 111 American Journal of International Law 415.Google Scholar
Gray, D, ‘Seaward Limits of the Continental Shelf and EEZ: Technical Concerns’ in Pharand, D and Leanza, U (eds.), The Continental Shelf and the Exclusive Economic Zone: Delimitation and Legal Regime (Martinus Nijhoff, 1993) 19.Google Scholar
Grieg, DW, ‘Third Party Rights and Intervention before the International Court’ (1991–1992) 32 Virginia Journal of International Law 285.Google Scholar
Grotius, H, De Jure Belli ac Pacis Whewell, W (ed.) (Cambridge University Press, 1853).Google Scholar
Guillaume, G, ‘De l’exécution des Décisions de la Cour internationale de Justice’ (1997) 7 Swiss Review of International and European Law 431.Google Scholar
Guillaume, G, ‘Les Hauts-Fonds Découvrants en Droit International’ in La Mer et Son Droit – Mélanges Offerts à Laurent Lucchini et Jean-Pierre Quéneudec (Pédone, 2003) 287.Google Scholar
Harrison, J, Making the Law of the Sea – A Study in the Development of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Heller, KJ, ‘Specially-Affected States and the Formation of Custom’ (2018) 112 American Journal of International Law 191.Google Scholar
Henriksen, T and Ulfstein, G, ‘Maritime Delimitation in the Arctic: The Barents Sea Today’ (2011) 42 Ocean Development and International Law 1.Google Scholar
Herman, LL, ‘The Court Giveth and the Court Taketh Away: An Analysis of the Tunisia-Libya Continental Shelf Case’ (1984) 33 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 825.Google Scholar
Hernández, GI, The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Function (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Higgins, R, ‘Some Observations on the Inter-Temporal Rule in International Law’ in Makarczyk, J (ed.), Theory of International Law at the Threshold of the 21st Century – Essays in Honour of Krzysztof Skubiszewski (Kluwer, 1996) 173.Google Scholar
Huang, L and Liao, X, ‘Natural Prolongation and Delimitation of the Continental Shelf Beyond 200 nm: Implications of the Bangladesh/Myanmar Case’ (2014) 4 Asian Journal of International Law 281.Google Scholar
Ida, R, ‘The Role of Proportionality in Maritime Delimitation Revisited: The Origin and Meaning of the Principle from the Early Decisions of the Court’ in Ando, N et al. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda (Martinus Nijhoff, 2002) vol. II, 1037.Google Scholar
Infante-Caffi, MT, ‘Peru v. Chile: The International Court of Justice Decides on the Status of the Maritime Boundary’ (2014) 13 Chinese Journal of International Law 741.Google Scholar
Jaenicke, G, ‘The Role of Proportionality in the Delimitation of Maritime Zones’ in Bos, A and Siblesz, H (eds.), Realism in Law-Making – Essays on International Law in Honour of Willem Riphagen (Martinus Nijhoff, 1986) 51.Google Scholar
Jennings, RY, ‘General Course on Principles of International Law’ (1967) 121 Recueil des Cours 323.Google Scholar
Jennings, RY, ‘The Limits of Continental Shelf Jurisdiction: Some Possible Implications of the North Sea Case Judgment’ (1969) 18 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 819.Google Scholar
Jennings, RY, The Acquisition of Territory in International Law (Manchester University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Jensen, Ø, The Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf – Law and Legitimacy (Martinus Nijhoff, 2014).Google Scholar
Jensen, Ø, ‘Maritime Boundary Delimitation Beyond 200 Nautical Miles: The International Judiciary and the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf’ (2015) 84 Nordic Journal of International Law 580.Google Scholar
Jessup, PC, ‘Intervention in the International Court’ (1981) 75 American Journal of International Law 903.Google Scholar
Jia, BB, ‘International Case Law in the Development of International Law’ (2015) 382 Recueil des Cours 175.Google Scholar
Jouannet, E, ‘L’impossible Protection des Droits des Tiers par la Cour Internationale de Justice dans les Affaires de Délimitation Maritime’ in La Mer et son Droit – Mélanges offerts à Laurent Lucchini et Jean-Pierre Quéneudec (Pédone, 2003) 315.Google Scholar
Kaldunski, M, ‘A Commentary on Maritime Boundary Arbitration between Bangladesh and India concerning the Bay of Bengal’ (2015) 28 Leiden Journal of International Law 799.Google Scholar
Kaldunski, M and Wasiliewski, T, ‘The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea on Maritime Delimitation: The Bangladesh v. Myanmar Case’ (2014) 45 Ocean Development and International Law 123.Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J, ‘Uncertainty in the Formal Sources of International Law: Customary International Law and Some of its Problems’ (2004) 15 European Journal of International Law 523.Google Scholar
Kamto, M, ‘Le Contentieux de la Frontière Maritime entre la Guinée-Bissau et le Sénégal’ (1997) 101 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 695.Google Scholar
Kamto, M, ‘Considérations actuelles sur l’inexécution des Décisions de la Cour internationale de Justice’ in Ndiaye, TM and Wolfrum, R (eds.), Law of the Sea, Environmental Law and Settlement of Disputes – Liber Amicorum Judge Thomas A. Mensah (Martinus Nijhoff, 2007) 215.Google Scholar
Kamto, M, ‘Sur Quelques Questions Techniques liées à la Détermination du Tracé d’une Frontière Maritime Délimitée’ in Casado-Raigón, R and Cataldi, G (eds.), L’Evolution et l’Etat actuel du droit international de la mer – Mélanges offerts à Daniel Vignes (Bruylant, 2009) 481.Google Scholar
Kamto, M, ‘Considérations actuelles sur la méthode de délimitation maritime devant la Cour internationale de Justice. De Charybde en Scylla?’ in Crawford, J et al. (eds.), The International Legal Order: Current Needs and Possible Responses – Essays in Honour of Djamchid Momtaz (Brill, 2017) 383.Google Scholar
Kaye, S, ‘The Use of Multiple Boundaries in Maritime Boundary Delimitation: Law and Practice’ (1998) 19 Australian Yearbook of International Law 49.Google Scholar
Kaye, S, ‘Lessons Learned from the Gulf of Maine Case: The Development of Maritime Boundary Delimitation Jurisprudence since UNCLOS III’ (2008) 14 Ocean and Coastal Law Journal 73.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D, ‘The Nuclear Weapons Case’ in de Chazournes, L Boisson and Sands, P (eds.), International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge University Press, 1999) 462.Google Scholar
Kim, HJ, ‘La Délimitation de la Frontière Maritime dans le Golfe du Bengale: Courir deux Lièvres à la Fois avec Succès dans le Règlement de la Délimitation Maritime’ (2012) 58 Annuaire Français de Droit International 443.Google Scholar
Kirgis, F, ‘Custom on a Sliding Scale’ (1987) 81 American Journal of International Law 146.Google Scholar
Klein, N, Dispute Settlement in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Klein, N, ‘Provisional Measures and Provisional Arrangements in Maritime Boundary Disputes’ (2006) 21 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 489.Google Scholar
Kohen, M, ‘La Relation Titre/Effectivités dans le Contentieux Territorial à la Lumière de la Jurisprudence Récente’ (2004) 108 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 561.Google Scholar
Kolb, R, Case Law on Equitable Maritime Delimitation: Digest and Commentaries (Martinus Nijhoff, 2003).Google Scholar
Krisch, N, ‘The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Public Goods’ (2014) 108 American Journal of International Law 1.Google Scholar
Kulick, A, ‘From Problem to Opportunity?: An Analytical Framework for Vagueness and Ambiguity in International Law’ (2016) 59 German Yearbook of International Law 257.Google Scholar
Kunoy, B, ‘A Geometric Variable Scope of Delimitations: The Impact of a Geological and Geomorphological Title to the Outer Continental Shelf’ (2006) 11 Austrian Review of International and European Law 49.Google Scholar
Kunoy, B, ‘The Admissibility of a Plea to an International Adjudicative Forum to Delimit the Outer Continental Shelf Prior to the Adoption of Final Recommendations by the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf’ (2010) 25 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 237.Google Scholar
Kunoy, B, ‘Establishment of the Outer Limits of the Continental Shelf: Is Crossing Boundaries Trespassing?’ (2011) 26 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 313.Google Scholar
Kunoy, B, ‘The Delimitation of an Indicative Area of Overlapping Entitlement to the Outer Continental Shelf’ (2012) 83 British Yearbook of International Law 61.Google Scholar
Kwiatkowska, B, ‘Equitable Maritime Boundary Delimitation: A Legal Perspective’ (1988) 3 International Journal of Estuarine and Coastal Law 287.Google Scholar
Kwiatkowska, B, ‘Equitable Maritime Boundary Delimitation, as exemplified in the Work of the International Court of Justice during the Presidency of Sir Robert Yewdall Jennings and Beyond’ (1997) 28 Ocean Development and International Law 91.Google Scholar
Kwiatkowska, B, ‘The Eritrea/Yemen Arbitration: Landmark Progress in the Acquisition of Territorial Sovereignty and Equitable Maritime Boundary Delimitation’ (2001) 32 Ocean Development and International Law 1.Google Scholar
Kwiatkowska, B, ‘The Qatar v Bahrain Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions Case’ (2002) 33 Ocean Development and International Law 227.Google Scholar
Kwiatkowska, B, ‘The Contribution of the 2002 (Cameroon v. Nigeria; Equatorial Guinea intervening) Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria Judgment of the International Court of Justice to Equitable Maritime Boundary Delimitation’ (2005) 17 Hague Yearbook of International Law 95.Google Scholar
Kwiatkowska, B, ‘The 2006 UNCLOS Annex VII Barbados/Trinidad and Tobago Award: Landmark Progress in Compulsory Jurisdiction and Equitable Maritime Boundary Delimitation’ (2007) 19 Hague Yearbook of International Law 33.Google Scholar
Lalonde, S, ‘The Role of the “Uti Possidetis” Principle in the Resolution of Maritime Boundary Disputes’ in Baetens, F and Chinkin, C (eds.), Sovereignty, Statehood and State Responsibility – Essays in Honour of James Crawford (Cambridge University Press, 2015) 248.Google Scholar
Lando, M, ‘Compliance with Provisional Measures Indicated by the International Court of Justice’ (2017) 8 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 22.Google Scholar
Lando, M ‘Delimiting the Continental Shelf Beyond 200 Nautical Miles at the International Court of Justice: The Nicaragua v Colombia Cases’ (2017) 16 Chinese Journal of International Law 137.Google Scholar
Lando, M ‘Judicial Uncertainties concerning Territorial Sea Delimitation under Article 15 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea’ (2017) 66 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 589.Google Scholar
Lando, M ‘The Croatia/Slovenia Arbitral Award of 29 June 2017: Is there a Common Method for Delimiting All Maritime Zones under International Law?’ (2017) 100 Rivista di Diritto Internazionale 1184.Google Scholar
Lathrop, C, ‘Newfoundland and Labrador-Nova Scotia: The latest “International” Maritime Boundary’ (2003) 34 Ocean Development and International Law 83.Google Scholar
Lathrop, C, ‘Why Litigate a Maritime Boundary? Some Contributing Factors’ in Klein, N (ed.), Litigating International Law Disputes: Weighing the Options (Cambridge University Press, 2014) 230.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, E, Aspects of the Administration of International Justice (Cambridge University Press, 1991) 125.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, ‘Sovereignty over Submarine Areas’ (1950) 27 British Yearbook of International Law 376.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, ‘Some Observations on the Prohibition of “Non Liquet” and the Completeness of the Law’ in Symbolae Verzijl (Martinus Nijhoff, 1958) 196.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, The Development of International Law by the International Court (Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Lavalle, R, ‘Not Quite a Sure Thing: The Maritime Areas of Rocks and Low-Tide Elevations Under the UN Law of the Sea Convention’ (2004) 19 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 43.Google Scholar
Lavalle, R, ‘The Rights of States over Low-Tide Elevations: A Legal Analysis’ (2014) 29 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 457.Google Scholar
Le Bœuf, R, ‘Différend en Mer de Chine Méridionale (Philippines c. Chine) – Sentence arbitrale du 12 juillet 2016’ (2016) 62 Annuaire Français de Droit International 159.Google Scholar
Legault, LH and Hankey, B, ‘From Sea to Seabed: The Single Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Case’ (1985) 79 American Journal of International Law 961.Google Scholar
Lévy, J-P, La Conférence des Nations Unies sur le Droit de la Mer – Histoire d’une Négociation Singulière (Pédone, 1983).Google Scholar
Liao, X, ‘Evaluation of Scientific Evidence by International Courts and Tribunals in the Continental Shelf Delimitation Cases’ (2017) 48 Ocean Development and International Law 136.Google Scholar
Liao, X, ‘Is There a Hierarchical Relationship between Natural Prolongation and Distance in the Continental Shelf Delimitation?’ (2018) 33 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 79.Google Scholar
Lowe, V, ‘Uniform Interpretation of the Rules of International Law Governing Innocent Passage’ (1991) 6 International Journal of Estuarine and Coastal Law 73.Google Scholar
Lucchini, L, ‘Le Juge et l’Équidistance: Sense or Sensibility?’ in Alabrune, F et al. (eds.), L’Etat Souverain dans le Monde d’Aujourd’hui – Mélanges en l’Honneur de Jean-Pierre Puissochet (Pédone, 2008) 175.Google Scholar
Lucchini, L, ‘Plaidoyer pour une ligne unique de délimitation’ in Casado-Raigón, R and Cataldi, G (eds.), L’Evolution et l’Etat actuel du droit international de la mer – Mélanges offerts à Daniel Vignes (Bruylant, 2009) 561.Google Scholar
Magnússon, BM, ‘Judgment in the Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal (14 March 2012)’ (2012) 27 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 623.Google Scholar
Magnússon, BM, ‘Is there a Temporal Relationship between the Delineation and the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf beyond 200 Nautical Miles?’ (2013) 28 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 465.Google Scholar
Magnússon, BM, ‘The Rejection of the Theoretical Beauty: The Foot of the Continental Slope in Maritime Boundary Delimitations Beyond 200 Nautical Miles’ (2014) 45 Ocean Development and International Law 41.Google Scholar
Magnússon, BM, The Continental Shelf Beyond 200 Nautical Miles – Delineation, Delimitation and Dispute Settlement (Martinus Nijhoff, 2015).Google Scholar
Mahinga, J-G, ‘La Délimitation de la Frontière Maritime entre la Roumanie et l’Ukraine dans la Mer Noire’ (2010) 137 Journal du Droit International 1157.Google Scholar
Mahinga, J-G, Le Tribunal International du Droit de la Mer – Organisation, Compétence et Procédure (Larcier, 2013).Google Scholar
Marotta Rangel, V, ‘Le Plateau Continental dans la Convention de 1982 sur le Droit de la Mer’ (1985) 194 Recueil des Cours 269.Google Scholar
Marques Antunes, NS, ‘The 1999 Eritrea-Yemen Maritime Delimitation Award and the Development of International Law’ (2001) 50 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 299.Google Scholar
Marques Antunes, NS, Towards a Conceptualisation of Maritime Delimitation: Legal and Technical Aspects of a Political Process (Martinus Nijhoff, 2003).Google Scholar
Marques Antunes, N, ‘Entitlement to Maritime Zones and their Delimitation – In the Doldrums of Uncertainty and Unpredictability’ in Oude Elferink, A et al. (eds.), Maritime Boundary Delimitation – The Case Law: Is It Consistent and Predictable? (Cambridge University Press, 2018) 62.Google Scholar
Marston, G, ‘Low-Tide Elevations and Straight Baselines’ (1972–73) 46 British Yearbook of International Law 405.Google Scholar
Marston, G, ‘Delimitation of Maritime Zones: Recent Commonwealth Decisions’ (1980) 51 British Yearbook of International Law 263.Google Scholar
Marston, G, ‘St. Pierre–Miquelon Arbitration: Canada–France Maritime Delimitation Award’ (1993) 17 Marine Policy 155.Google Scholar
Matine-Daftary, A, ‘Cours Abrégé sur la Contribution des Conférences de Genève au Développement Progressif du Droit International de la Mer’ (1961) 102 Recueil des Cours 635.Google Scholar
McDorman, T et al., ‘The Gulf of Maine Boundary: Dropping Anchor or Setting a Course?’ (1985) 9 Marine Policy 90.Google Scholar
McDorman, T, ‘The Continental Shelf’ in Rothwell, DR et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea (Oxford University Press, 2015) 181.Google Scholar
McRae, D, ‘Adjudication of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine’ (1979) 17 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 292.Google Scholar
McRae, D, ‘The Single Maritime Boundary: Problems in Theory and Practice’ in Brown, ED and Churchill, RR (eds.), The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: Impact and Implementation (Law of the Sea Institute, 1987) 225.Google Scholar
Mendelson, M, ‘The Formation of Customary International Law’ (1998) 272 Recueil des Cours 155.Google Scholar
Mendelson, M, ‘On the Quasi-normative Effect of Maritime Boundary Agreements’ in Ando, N et al. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Shigeru Oda (Martinus Nijhoff, 2002) vol. II, 1069.Google Scholar
Merrills, JG, ‘Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria; Equatorial Guinea intervening), Merits, Judgment of 10 October 2002’ (2003) 52 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 788.Google Scholar
Miller, H, ‘The Hague Codification Conference’ (1930) 24 American Journal of International Law 674.Google Scholar
Mishra, R, ‘The “Grey Area” in the Northern Bay of Bengal: A Note on a Functional Cooperative Solution’ (2016) 47 Ocean Development and International Law 29.Google Scholar
Miyoshi, M, ‘Considerations of Equity in Maritime Boundary Cases before the International Court of Justice’ in Ando, N et al. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Shigeru Oda (Martinus Nijhoff, 2002) vol. II, 1087.Google Scholar
Morelli, G, ‘La Théorie Générale du Procès International’ (1937) 61 Recueil des Cours 257.Google Scholar
Müller, D, ‘Les Limites Extérieures des Espaces Marins’ in Forteau, M and Thouvenin, J-M (eds.), Traité de Droit International de la Mer (Pédone, 2017) 529.Google Scholar
Ndiaye, TM, ‘Le Juge et la Délimitation Maritime: Modes d’Emploi’ in Van Dyke, JN et al. (eds.), Governing Ocean Resources: New Challenges and Emerging Regimes – A Tribute to Judge Choon-Ho Park (Martinus Nijhoff, 2013) 139.Google Scholar
Ndiaye, TM, ‘The Judge, Maritime Delimitation and the Grey Areas’ (2015) 56 Indian Journal of International Law 493.Google Scholar
Nelson, LMD, ‘Equity and the Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries’ (1978) 11–12 Revue Iranienne de Relations Internationales 197.Google Scholar
Neri, K, ‘L’Arrêt de la Cour Internationale de Justice du 27 Janvier 2014 dans l’Affaire du Différend Maritime (Perou c. Chili)’ (2014) 60 Annuaire Français de Droit International 91.Google Scholar
Nilufer, O, ‘International Court of Justice: Case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine) – Judgment of 3 February 2009’ (2010) 25 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 63.Google Scholar
Nguyen, LN, ‘UNCLOS Tribunals and the Development of the Outer Continental Shelf Regime’ (2018) 67 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 425.Google Scholar
Nordquist, MH (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 – A Commentary (Martinus Nijhoff, 1993).Google Scholar
Oda, S, ‘The International Court of Justice Viewed from the Bench’ (1993) 244 Recueil des Cours 9.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, R, ‘Palm-Fringed Benefits: Island Dependencies in the New Law of the Sea’ (1996) 45 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 408.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, R, ‘Legal Title versus Effectivités: Prescription and the Promise and Problem of Private Law Analogies’ (2011) 13 International Community Law Review 147.Google Scholar
Olorundami, F, ‘The ICJ and its Lip-service to the Non-priority Status of the Equidistance Method of Delimitation’ (2015) 4 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 53.Google Scholar
Olorundami, F, ‘Revisiting the Libya/Malta Decision and Assessing its Relevance (or otherwise) to the East China Sea Dispute’ (2016) 15 Chinese Journal of International Law 717.Google Scholar
Olorundami, F, ‘Objectivity versus Subjectivity in Maritime Boundary Delimitation’ (2017) 32 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 36.Google Scholar
Orrego-Vicuña, F, ‘La Zone Économique Exclusive: Regime et Nature Juridique dans le Droit International’ (1986) 199 Recueil des Cours 9.Google Scholar
Orrego-Vicuña, F, ‘The Contribution of the Exclusive Economic Zone to the Law of Maritime Delimitation’ (1989) 31 German Yearbook of International Law 120.Google Scholar
Orrego-Vicuña, F, The Exclusive Economic Zone: Regime and Legal Nature under International Law (Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Orrego-Vicuña, F, ‘La Limite Intérieure de la Limite Extérieure : le Chevauchement de Revendications et la Délimitation du Plateau Continental Étendu’ in Casado-Raigón, R and Cataldi, G (eds.), L’Evolution et l’Etat actuel du Droit International de la Mer – Mélanges offerts à Daniel Vignes (Bruylant, 2009) 691.Google Scholar
Orrego-Vicuña, F, ‘Le Rôle de la Jurisprudence Internationale’ in Forteau, M and Thouvenin, J-M (eds.), Traité de Droit International de la Mer (Pédone, 2017) 77.Google Scholar
Oude Elferink, A, ‘Does Undisputed Title to a Maritime Zone Always Exclude its Delimitation: The Grey Area Issue’ (1998) 13 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 143.Google Scholar
Oude Elferink, A, ‘Maritime Delimitation between the United Kingdom and Denmark/Faroe Island’ (1999) 14 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 541.Google Scholar
Oude Elferink, A, ‘The Impact of the Law of the Sea Convention on the Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries’ in Vidas, D and Østreng, W (eds.), Order of the Oceans at the Turn of the Century (Martinus Nijhoff, 1999) 457.Google Scholar
Oude Elferink, A, ‘International Law and Negotiated and Adjudicated Maritime Boundaries: A Complex Relationship’ (2015) 58 German Yearbook of International Law 231.Google Scholar
Oude Elferink, A, ‘ITLOS’s Approach to the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf beyond 200 Nautical Miles in the Bangladesh/Myanmar Case: Theoretical and Practical Difficulties’ in Wolfrum, R et al. (eds.), Contemporary Developments in International Law – Essays in Honour of Budislav Vukas (Martinus Nijhoff, 2016) 231.Google Scholar
Oude Elferink, A, ‘Relevant Coast and Relevant Area’ in Oude Elferink, A et al. (eds.), Maritime Boundary Delimitation – The Case Law: Is It Consistent and Predictable? (Cambridge University Press, 2018) 173.Google Scholar
Oxman, BH, ‘La Troisième Conférence des Nations Unies sur le Droit de la Mer’ in Dupuy, R-J and Vignes, D (eds.), Traité du Nouveau Droit de la Mer (Bruylant, 1985) 143.Google Scholar
Oxman, BH, ‘On Rocks and Maritime Delimitation’ in Arsanjani, MH et al. (eds.), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honour of W. Michael Reisman (Martinus Nijhoff, 2010) 893.Google Scholar
Paik, J-H, ‘The Role of Proportionality in Maritime Delimitation: State of the Jurisprudence’ in Hestermeyer, HP et al. (eds.), Coexistence, Cooperation and Solidarity – Liber Amicorum Rüdiger Wolfrum (Martinus Nijhoff, 2012) 199.Google Scholar
Palchetti, P, ‘Opening the International Court of Justice to Third States: Intervention and Beyond’ (2002) 6 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 139.Google Scholar
Palchetti, P, ‘La Protection des Intérêts d’Etats Tiers par la Cour Internationale de Justice: l’Affaire de la Frontière Terrestre et Maritime entre le Cameroun et le Nigéria’ (2003) 107 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 865.Google Scholar
Papanicolopulu, I, ‘Some Thoughts on the Extension of Existing Boundaries for the Delimitation of New Maritime Zones’ in Lagoni, R and Vignes, D (eds.), Maritime Delimitation (Martinus Nijhoff, 2006) 143.Google Scholar
Papanicolopulu, I, ‘A Note on Maritime Delimitation in a Multizonal Context: The Case of the Mediterranean’ (2007) 38 Ocean Development and International Law 381.Google Scholar
Parry, C, The Sources and Evidences of International Law (Manchester University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Paulson, C, ‘Compliance with Final Judgments of the International Court of Justice since 1987’ (2004) 98 American Journal of International Law 434.Google Scholar
Pawlak, S, ‘Some Reflections on Factors exerting Influence on Maritime Boundary Delimitation’ in Hestermeyer, H et al. (eds.), Coexistence, Cooperation and Solidarity – Liber Amicorum Rüdiger Wolfrum (Martinus Nijhoff, 2012) 223.Google Scholar
Peiris, N, ‘Ghana v. Ivory Coast. Case No. 23’ (2018) 112 American Journal of International Law 88.Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘The Normative Dilemma: Will and Consent in International Law-making’ (1988–1989) 12 Australian Yearbook of International Law 22.Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘Article 38’ in Zimmermann, A et al. (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice – A Commentary 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2012) 731.Google Scholar
Pellet, A and Samson, B, ‘La Délimitation des Espaces Marins’ in Forteau, M and Thouvenin, J-M (eds.), Traité de Droit International de la Mer (Pédone, 2017) 565.Google Scholar
Petersen, N, ‘The Role of Consent and Uncertainty in the Formation of Customary International Law’ in Lepard, BD (ed.), Reexamining Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2017) 111.Google Scholar
Phan, HD and Nguyen, LN, ‘The South China Sea Arbitration: Bindingness, Finality, and Compliance with UNCLOS Dispute Settlement Decisions’ (2017) 7 Asian Journal of International Law 36.Google Scholar
Pinto, MCW, ‘Maritime Boundary Issues and their Resolution’ in Ando, N et al. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Shigeru Oda (Martinus Nijhoff, 2002) vol. II, 1115.Google Scholar
Pinto, MCW, ‘Article 76 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Bay of Bengal Exception’ (2013) 3 Asian Journal of International Law 215.Google Scholar
Pistorelli, R, ‘La Piattaforma Continentale: un Istituto ancora vitale?’ (1978) 60 Rivista di Diritto Internazionale 496.Google Scholar
Platzöder, R, Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea: Documents (Oceana, 1986).Google Scholar
Politakis, GP, ‘The 1993 Jan Mayen Judgment: The End of Illusions?’ (1994) 41 Netherlands International Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Ponroy, J-S, ‘Le Plateau Continental au-delà des 200 milles marins’ in Le Processus de Délimitation Maritime – Étude d’un Cas Fictif (Pédone, 2004) 108.Google Scholar
Pratt, M, ‘The Role of the Technical Expert in Maritime Delimitation Cases’ in Lagoni, R and Vignes, D (eds.), Maritime Delimitation (Martinus Nijhoff, 2006) 79.Google Scholar
Pulvenis, J-F, ‘Zone Économique et Plateau Continental: Unité ou Dualité ?’ (1978) 11–12 Revue Iranienne des Relations Internationales 103.Google Scholar
Pulvenis, J-F, ‘Le Plateau Continental, Définition et Regime’ in Dupuy, R-J and Vignes, D (eds.), Traité du Nouveau Droit de la Mer (Bruylant, 1985) 275.Google Scholar
Quéneudec, J-P, ‘L’Arbitrage relatif à la Détermination de la Frontière Maritime entre la Guinée-Bissau et le Sénégal’ (1990) 35 Annuaire Français de Droit International 325.Google Scholar
Quéneudec, J-P, ‘Les Principes dégagés par le Juge et le Rôle des Circonstances Pertinentes en Matière de Délimitation Maritime’ in Le Processus de Délimitation Maritime: Étude d’un Cas Fictif (Pédone, 2004) 279.Google Scholar
Quintana, JJ, ‘The International Court of Justice and the Formulation of International Law: The Law of Maritime Delimitation as an Example’ in Muller, AS and Rai, D (eds.), The International Court of Justice: Its Future Role after Fifty Years (Martinus Nijhoff, 1997) 367.Google Scholar
Rajkovic, NM, ‘The Visual Conquest of International Law: Brute Boundaries, the Map, and the Legacy of Cartogenesis’ (2018) 31 Leiden Journal of International Law 267.Google Scholar
Ranjeva, R, ‘Le Règlement des Différends’ in Dupuy, R-J and Vignes, D (eds.), Traité du Nouveau Droit de la Mer (Bruylant, 1985) 1105.Google Scholar
Rao, PS, ‘The Nature and Function of International Law: An Evolving International Rule of Law’ (2015) 55 Indian Journal of International Law 459.Google Scholar
Raz, J, ‘Legal Reason, Sources and Gaps’ in Raz, J (ed.), The Authority of Law (Oxford University Press, 1979) 53.Google Scholar
Reuter, P, ‘Une Ligne Unique de Délimitation des Espaces Maritimes’ in Mélanges Georges Perrin (Diffusion Payot, 1984) 251.Google Scholar
Rhee, S-M, ‘Equitable Solutions to the Maritime Boundary Dispute between the United States and Canada in the Gulf of Maine’ (1981) 75 American Journal of International Law 590.Google Scholar
Ridi, N, ‘Precarious Finality? Reflections on Res Judicata and the Question of the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf Case’ (2018) 31 Leiden Journal of International Law 383.Google Scholar
Riesman, WM and Westerman, GS, Straight Baselines in Maritime Boundary Delimitation (St. Martin’s Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Riesman, WM and Arsanjani, MH, ‘Some Reflections on the Effect of Artisanal Fishing on Maritime Boundary Delimitation’ in Ndiaye, TM et al. (eds.), Law of the Sea, Environmental Law and Settlement of Disputes – Liber Amicorum Judge Thomas A. Mensah (Martinus Nijhoff, 2007) 629.Google Scholar
Rigaldies, F, ‘La Délimitation du Plateau Continental entre Etats voisins’ (1976) 14 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 116.Google Scholar
Rigaldies, F, ‘La Zone Économique Exclusive dans la Pratique des Etats’ (1998) 35 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 3.Google Scholar
Roach, JA, ‘Base Points and Baselines in Maritime Boundary Delimitation’ in Nordquist, MH and Moore, JN (eds.), Maritime Border Diplomacy (Martinus Nijhoff, 2012) 269.Google Scholar
Roberts, A, ‘Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation’ (2001) 95 American Journal of International Law 757.Google Scholar
Ronzitti, N, ‘Le Droit Humanitaire applicable aux Conflits Armés en Mer’ (1993) 242 Recueil des Cours 9.Google Scholar
Ros, N, ‘Au-delà de la Borne 602: la Frontière Maritime entre l’Espagne et la France en Mer Méditerranée’ (2014) 141 Journal du Droit International 1099.Google Scholar
Rosenne, S, League of Nations Conference for the Codification of International Law (Oceana, 1975).Google Scholar
Rosenne, S, ‘Article 59 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice Revisited’ in Liber Amicorum Eduardo Jiménez de Aréchaga (FCU, 1994) 1129.Google Scholar
Rosenne, S, ‘The Perplexities of Modern International Law’ (2001) 291 Recueil des Cours 9.Google Scholar
Salerno, F, ‘Treaties establishing Objective Regimes’ in Cannizzaro, E (ed.), The Law of Treaties beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford University Press, 2011) 225.Google Scholar
Salmon, J and Sinclair, I, ‘Special Features of the Qatar v. Bahrain Case before the ICJ – Affaire de la Délimitation Maritime et de Questions Territoriales entre Qatar et Bahreïn: Arrêt de la CIJ du 16 Mars 2001’ in Studi di Diritto Internazionale in Onore di Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz (Editoriale Scientifica, 2004) vol. II, 1167.Google Scholar
Sanchez Rodriguez, LI, ‘L’Uti Possidetis: Application à la Délimitation Maritime’ in Le Processus de Délimitation Maritime: Étude d’un Cas Fictif (Pédone, 2004) 303.Google Scholar
Schachter, O, ‘Linking Equity and Law in Maritime Delimitation’ in Ando, N et al. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Shigeru Oda (Martinus Nijhoff, 2002) vol. II, 1163.Google Scholar
Schulte, C, Compliance with Decisions of the International Court of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Schwebel, SM, Justice in International Law – Further Selected Writings of Stephen M. Schwebel (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Scobbie, I, ‘Res Judicata, Precedent and the International Court: A Preliminary Sketch’ (1999) 20 Australian Yearbook of International Law 299.Google Scholar
Scovazzi, T, ‘The Evolution of the International Law of the Sea: New Issues, New Challenges’ (2000) 286 Recueil des Cours 39.Google Scholar
Scovazzi, T, ‘Recent Developments as regards Maritime Delimitation in the Adriatic Sea’ in Lagoni, R and Vignes, D (eds.), Maritime Delimitation (Martinus Nijhoff, 2006) 189.Google Scholar
Scovazzi, T, ‘Baselines’ in Wolfrum, R (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012) vol. I, 852.Google Scholar
Sharma, SP, ‘The Single Maritime Boundary Regime and the Relationship between the Continental Shelf and the Exclusive Economic Zone’ (1987) 2 International Journal of Estuarine and Coastal Law 203.Google Scholar
Shaw, M, Rosenne’s Law and Practice of the International Court 1920–2015 5th edn (Martinus Nijhoff, 2015).Google Scholar
Silvestre, D, ‘Le Processus de Délimitation Maritime: les Intérêts en Matière de Pêche et d’Environnement’ in Le Processus de Délimitation Maritime: Étude d’un Cas Fictif (Pédone, 2004) 186.Google Scholar
Simma, B, ‘The Antarctic Treaty as a Treaty Providing for an “Objective Regime”’ (1986) 19 Cornell International Law Journal 189.Google Scholar
Stone, J, ‘Non Liquet and the Function of Law in the International Community’ (1959) 35 British Yearbook of International Law 124.Google Scholar
Suarez, S, The Outer Limits of the Continental Shelf – Legal Aspects of their Establishment (Springer, 2008).Google Scholar
Subedi, S, ‘The Doctrine of Objective Regimes in International Law and the Competence of the United Nations to Impose Territorial or Peace Settlements on States’ (1994) 37 German Yearbook of International Law 162.Google Scholar
Sun, C, ‘Comments on the Three-stage Approach of Maritime Delimitation’ in Nordquist, MH et al. (eds.), Challenges of the Changing Arctic – Continental Shelf, Navigation, and Fisheries (Martinus Nijhoff, 2016) 613.Google Scholar
Symmons, CR, ‘Article 15’ in Proelss, A (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea – A Commentary (Hart, 2017) 149.Google Scholar
Symonides, J, ‘Delimitation of Maritime Areas between the States with Opposite or Adjacent Coast’ (1984) Polish Yearbook of International Law 19.Google Scholar
Talmon, S, ‘Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ’s Methodology between Induction, Deduction and Assertion’ (2015) 26 European Journal of International Law 417.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y, ‘Reflections on the Concept of Proportionality in the Law of Maritime Delimitation’ (2001) 16 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 433.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y, ‘Reflections on Maritime Delimitation in the Cameroon/Nigeria Case’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 369.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y, ‘Quelques Observations sur deux Approches Jurisprudentielles en Droit de la Délimitation Maritime: l’Affrontement entre Prévisibilité et Flexibilité’ (2004) 37 Revue Belge de Droit International 419.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y, ‘Low-Tide Elevations in International Law of the Sea: Selected Issues’ (2006) 20 Ocean Yearbook 189.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y, Predictability and Flexibility in the Law of Maritime Delimitation (Hart, 2006).Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y, ‘Case concerning the Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (8 October 2007)’ (2008) 23 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 327.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y, ‘Reflections on Maritime Delimitation in the Nicaragua-Honduras Case’ (2008) 68 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 903.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y, ‘Reflections on Maritime Delimitation in the Romania/Ukraine Case before the International Court of Justice’ (2009) 56 Netherlands International Law Review 397.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y, The International Law of the Sea 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y, ‘Article 74’ in Proelss, A (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea – A Commentary (Hart, 2017) 563.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y, ‘Article 83’ in Proelss, A (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea – A Commentary (Hart, 2017) 651.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y, ‘Reflections on the Interpretation and Application of Article 121(3) in the South China Sea Arbitration (Merits)’ (2017) 48 Ocean Development and International Law 365.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y, The Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y, ‘The Disproportionality Test in the Law of Maritime Delimitation’ in Oude Elferink, A et al. (eds.), Maritime Boundary Delimitation – The Case Law: is it Consistent and Predictable? (Cambridge University Press, 2018) 291.Google Scholar
Tanja, GJ, The Legal Determination of International Maritime Boundaries: the Progressive Development of Continental Shelf, EFZ and EEZ Law (Kluwer, 1990).Google Scholar
Tasioulas, J, ‘In Defence of Relative Normativity: Communitarian Values and the Nicaragua Case’ (1996) 16 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 85.Google Scholar
Tassin, VJM, ‘L’Exploration et l’Exploitation des Ressources Naturelles du Plateau Continental à l’Heure de l’Extension au-delà des 200 milles marins’ (2010) 15 Annuaire du Droit de la Mer 87.Google Scholar
Tavernier, P, ‘Observations sur le Droit Intertemporel dans l’Affaire de l’Île de Kasikili/Sedudu (Botswana/Namibie) Cour internationale de Justice: Arrêt du 13 décembre 1999’ (2000) 104 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 429.Google Scholar
They, M, ‘Les suites du différend maritime opposant le Nicaragua et la Colombie: les arrêts rendus par la Cour internationale de Justice le 17 mars 2016 (exceptions préliminaires)’ (2016) 62 Annuaire Français de Droit International 1.Google Scholar
Thirlway, H, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960–1989 – Part Six’ (1994) 65 British Yearbook of International Law 1.Google Scholar
Thirlway, H, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960–1989 – Supplement, 2007: Parts Four, Five and Six’ (2007) 78 British Yearbook of International Law 17.Google Scholar
Thirlway, H, ‘Territorial Disputes and Their Resolution in the Recent Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice’ (2018) 31 Leiden Journal of International Law 117.Google Scholar
Torres Bernárdez, S, ‘Provisional Measures and Interventions in Maritime Delimitation Disputes’ in Lagoni, R and Vignes, D (eds.), Maritime Delimitation (Martinus Nijhoff, 2006) 33.Google Scholar
Touzé, S, ‘Affaire relative à la Délimitation Maritime en Mer Noire (Roumanie c. Ukraine): Une Clarification Didactique de la Règle de l’Équidistance-Circonstances Pertinentes’ (2009) 55 Annuaire Français de Droit International 221.Google Scholar
Treves, T, ‘La Limite Extérieure du Plateau Continental: Evolution Récente de la Pratique’ (1989) 35 Annuaire Français de Droit International 724.Google Scholar
Treves, T, ‘Codification du Droit International et Pratique des Etats dans le Droit de la Mer’ (1990) 223 Recueil des Cours 9.Google Scholar
Treves, T, ‘What Have the United Nations Convention and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea to Offer As Regards Maritime Delimitation Disputes?’ in Lagoni, R and Vignes, D (eds.), Maritime Delimitation (Martinus Nijhoff, 2006) 63.Google Scholar
Treves, T, ‘La Communauté Internationale et la Délimitation du Plateau Continental au-delà des 200 milles marins’ in Alabrune, F et al. (eds.), L’Etat Souverain dans le Monde d’Aujourd’hui – Mélanges en l’Honneur de Jean-Pierre Puissochet (Pédone, 2008) 311.Google Scholar
Treves, T, ‘Maritime Delimitation and Offshore Features’ in Jayakumar, S et al. (eds.), The South China Sea Disputes and the Law of the Sea (Edward Elgar, 2014) 121.Google Scholar
Vallat, FA, ‘The Continental Shelf’ (1946) 23 British Yearbook of International Law 333.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, JM, ‘Judge Shigeru Oda and Maritime Boundary Delimitation’ in Ando, N et al. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Shigeru Oda (Martinus Nijhoff, 2002) vol. II, 1197.Google Scholar
Vega-Barbosa, G, ‘The Admissibility of Outer Continental Shelf Delimitation Claims Before the ICJ Absent a Recommendation by the CLCS’ (2018) 49 Ocean Development and International Law 103.Google Scholar
Veierud Busch, S, ‘The Delimitation of the Continental Shelf beyond 200 nm: Procedural Issues’ in Oude Elferink, A et al. (eds.), Maritime Boundary Delimitation – The Case Law: Is It Consistent and Predictable? (Cambridge University Press, 2018) 319.Google Scholar
Vidas, D, ‘Consolidation or Deviation? On Trends and Challenges in the Settlement of Maritime Delimitation Disputes by International Courts and Tribunals’ in Boschiero, N et al. (eds.), International Courts and the Development of International Law – Essays in Honour of Tullio Treves (Asser Press, 2013) 325.Google Scholar
Vidas, D, ‘The Delimitation of the Territorial Sea, the Continental Shelf, and the EEZ: A Comparative Perspective’ in Oude Elferink, A et al. (eds.), Maritime Boundary Delimitation – The Case Law: Is It Consistent and Predictable? (Cambridge University Press, 2018) 33.Google Scholar
Virally, M, ‘Panorama du Droit International Contemporain’ (1983) 183 Recueil des Cours 9.Google Scholar
Von Mühlendhal, P, ‘L’Arrêt de la Cour Internationale de Justice dans l’Affaire de la Délimitation Maritime en Mer Noire (Roumanie c. Ukraine): l’Aboutissement d’un Processus vieux de Quarante Ans?’ (2009) 22 Revue Québécoise de Droit International 1.Google Scholar
Von Mühlendhal, P, ‘Tiny Land Features in Recent Maritime Delimitation Case Law’ (2016) 31 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 1.Google Scholar
Von Mühlendahl, P, L’Équidistance dans la Délimitation des Frontières Maritimes (Pédone, 2016).Google Scholar
Vukas, B, ‘Maritime Delimitation in a Semi-enclosed Sea: The Case of the Adriatic Sea’ in Lagoni, R and Vignes, D (eds.), Maritime Delimitation (Martinus Nijhoff, 2006) 205.Google Scholar
Waldock, H, ‘The Legal Basis of Claims to the Continental Shelf’ (1951) 36 Transactions of the Grotius Society 115.Google Scholar
Warioba, JS, ‘Monitoring Compliance with and Enforcement of Binding Decisions of International Courts’ (2001) 5 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 41.Google Scholar
Weil, P, ‘Vers une Normativité Relative en Droit International?’ (1982) 86 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 5.Google Scholar
Weil, P, ‘Délimitation Maritime et Délimitation Terrestre’ in Dinstein, Y (ed.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity – Essays in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne (Martinus Nijhoff, 1989) 1021.Google Scholar
Weil, P, ‘Des Espaces Maritimes aux Territoires Maritimes: Vers un Conception Territorialiste de la Délimitation Maritime’ in Le Droit International au Service de la Paix, de la Justice et du Développement – Mélanges Michel Virally (Pédone, 1991) 501.Google Scholar
Weil, P, ‘A propos la Double Fonction des Lignes et Points de Base dans le Droit de la Mer’ in Bello, EG and Ajibola, BA (eds.), Essays in Honour of Judge Taslim Olawale Elias (Martinus Nijhoff, 1992) 145.Google Scholar
Weil, P, ‘Le Droit International en Quête de son Identité’ (1992) 237 Recueil des Cours 9.Google Scholar
Weil, P, ‘“The Court cannot Conclude Definitively … ” Non Liquet Revisited’ (1998) 36 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 109.Google Scholar
Weil, P, ‘Les Hauts-Fonds Découvrants dans la Délimitation Maritime’ in Ando, N et al. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Shigeru Oda (Martinus Nijhoff, 2002) vol. I, 307.Google Scholar
Xiouri, M, ‘Towards the Acceptance of the Equidistance Rule in the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf and the Exclusive Economic Zone’ in Pazartzis, P et al. (eds.), Reconceptualising the Rule of Law in Global Governance, Resources, Investment and Trade (Hart, 2016) 243.Google Scholar
Yallourides, C, ‘Calming the Waters in the West African Region: The Case of Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire’ (2018) 26 African Journal of International and Comparative Law 507.Google Scholar
Yanai, S, ‘International Law concerning Maritime Boundary Delimitation’ in Fitzmaurice, M and Martínez Gutiérrez, NA (eds.), The IMLI Manual on International Maritime Law – Volume I: The Law of the Sea (Oxford University Press, 2014) 304.Google Scholar
Zoller, E, ‘L’Affaire de la Délimitation du Plateau Continental entre la République Française et le Royaume-Uni de Grande Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord (Décision du 30 Juin 1977)’ (1977) 23 Annuaire Français de Droit International 359.Google Scholar
Zoller, E, ‘Recherche sur les Méthodes de Délimitation du Plateau Continental: à Propos de l’Affaire Tunisie-Libye (Arrêt du 24 Février 1982)’ (1982) 86 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 645.Google Scholar