Allsopp, M., Page, R., Johnston, P. & Santillo, D. (2009). State of the World’s Oceans. London: Springer.Google Scholar

Amemiya, C.T., Alföldi, J., Lee, A.P., et al. (2013). The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution. Nature, 496, 311–16.Google Scholar

Anderson, E.D. (1990). Fishery models as applied to elasmobranch fisheries. In Elasmobranchs as Living Resources: Advances in the Biology, Ecology, Systematics, and the Status of the Fisheries, ed. Pratt, H.L. Jr, Gruber, S.H. & Taniuchi, T., NOAA Technical Report, 90, 473–84.Google Scholar

Andrews, A.H., Tracey, D.M. & Dunn, M.R. (2009). Lead-radium dating of orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus): validation of a centenarian life span. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 66, 1130–40.Google Scholar

Balon, E.K., Bruton, M.N. & Fricke, H. (1988). A fiftieth anniversary reflection on the living coelacanth, Latimeria chalumnae: some new interpretations of its natural history and conservation status. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 23, 241–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barker, M.J. & Schluessel, V. (2005). Managing global shark fisheries: suggestions for prioritizing management strategies. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 15, 325–47.Google Scholar

Beverton, R.J.H., Cooke, J.G., Csirke, J.B., et al. (1984). Dynamics of single species. In Exploitation of Marine Communities, ed. May, R.M., pp. 13–58. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Billard, R. & Lecointre, G. (2001). Biology and conservation of sturgeon and paddlefish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 10, 355–92.Google Scholar

Bonfil, R. (1994). Overview of world elasmobranch fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 341, 119 pp.Google Scholar

Bonfil, R. (2005). Fishery stock assessment models and their application to sharks. In Management Techniques for Elasmobranch Fisheries, ed. Musick, J.A. & Bonfil, R.. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 474, 154–81.Google Scholar

Bronzi, P., Rosenthal, H. & Gessner, J. (2011). Global sturgeon aquaculture production: an overview. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 27, 169–75.Google Scholar

Bruton, M.N. (1995). Threatened fishes of the world: Latimeria chalumnae Smith, 1939 (Latimeriidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes, 43, 104.Google Scholar

Bruton, M.N. & Stobbs, R.E. (1991). The ecology and conservation of the coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 32, 313–39.Google Scholar

Burgess, G.H. (2011). The International Shark Attack File. Available at www.flmnh.ufl.edu/fish/sharks/ISAF.htm.Google Scholar

Camhi, M., Fowler, S., Musick, J., Bräutigam, A. & Fordham, S. (1998). Sharks and their relatives: ecology and conservation. Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 20, 39 pp. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar

Cheung, W.W.L., Watson, R., Morato, T., Pitcher, T.J. & Pauly, D. (2007). Intrinsic vulnerability in the global fish catch. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 333, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cisneros-Montemayor, A.M., Barnes-Mauthe, M., Al-Abdulrazzak, D., Navarro-Holm, E. & Sumaila, U.R. (2013). Global economic value of shark ecotourism: implications for conservation. Oryx, 47, 381–8.Google Scholar

Clark, M. (2001). Are deepwater fisheries sustainable? – the example of orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) in New Zealand. Fisheries Research, 51, 123–35.Google Scholar

Clark, M.R. (2009). Deep-sea seamount fisheries: a review of global status and future prospects. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research, 37, 501–12.Google Scholar

Clark, M.R., Fincham, D.J. & Tracey, D.M. (1994). Fecundity of orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) in New Zealand waters. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 28, 193–200.Google Scholar

Clark, M.R. & Tracey, D.M. (1994). Changes in a population of orange roughy, Hoplostethus atlanticus, with commercial exploitation on the Challenger Plateau, New Zealand. Fishery Bulletin, 92, 236–53.Google Scholar

Clarke, J., Milligan, R.J., Bailey, D.M. & Neat, F.C. (2015). A scientific basis for regulating deep-sea fishing by depth. Current Biology, 25, 2425–9.Google Scholar

Clarke, S.C., Magnussen, J.E., Abercrombie, D.L., McAllister, M.K. & Shivji, M.S. (2006a). Identification of shark species composition and proportion in the Hong Kong shark fin market based on molecular genetics and trade records. Conservation Biology, 20, 201–11.Google Scholar

Clarke, S.C., McAllister, M.K., Milner-Gulland, E.J., et al. (2006b). Global estimates of shark catches using trade records from commercial markets. Ecology Letters, 9, 1115–26.Google Scholar

Clarke, S., Milner-Gulland, E.J. & Bjørndal, T. (2007). Social, economic, and regulatory drivers of the shark fin trade. Marine Resource Economics, 22, 305–27.Google Scholar

Cliff, G. & Dudley, S.F.J. (2011). Reducing the environmental impact of shark-control programs: a case study from KwaZulu-Natal. Marine and Freshwater Research 62, 700–9.Google Scholar

Compagno, L.J.V. (1991). Government protection for the great white shark (Carcharadon carcharias) in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 87, 284–5.Google Scholar

Costello, M.J. (2009). How sea lice from salmon farms may cause wild salmonid declines in Europe and North America and be a threat to fishes elsewhere. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 276, 3385–94.Google ScholarPubMed

Cullis-Suzuki, S. & Pauly, D. (2010). Failing the high seas: a global evaluation of regional fisheries management organizations. Marine Policy, 34, 1036–42.Google Scholar

Dell’Apa, A., Smith, M.C. & Kaneshiro-Pineiro, M.Y. (2014). The influence of culture on the international management of shark finning. Environmental Management, 54, 151–61.Google Scholar

Devine, J.A., Baker, K.D & Haedrich, R.L. (2006). Deep-sea fishes qualify as endangered. Nature, 439, 29.Google Scholar

Dodson, J.J., Gibson, R.J., Cunjak, R.A., et al. (1998). Elements in the development of conservation plans for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 55 (Suppl. 1), 312–23.Google Scholar

Drazen, J.C. & Haedrich, R.L. (2012). A continuum of life histories in deep-sea demersal fishes. Deep-Sea Research I, 61, 34–42.Google Scholar

Dulvy, N.K., Baum, J.K., Clarke, S., et al. (2008). You can swim but you can’t hide: the global status and conservation of oceanic pelagic sharks and rays. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 18, 459–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dulvy, N.K., Fowler, S.L., Musick, J.A., et al. (2014). Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays. eLife, 00590.Google Scholar

Dulvy, N.K. & Reynolds, J.D. (2002). Predicting extinction vulnerability in skates. Conservation Biology, 16, 440–50.Google Scholar

Dulvy, N.K., Sadovy, Y. & Reynolds, J.D. (2003). Extinction vulnerability in marine populations. Fish and Fisheries, 4, 25–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erdmann, M. (2006). Lessons learned from the conservation campaign for the Indonesian coelacanth, Latimeria menadoensis. South African Journal of Science, 102, 501–4.Google Scholar

Eschmeyer, W.N., Fricke, R., Fong, J.D. & Polack, D.A. (2010) Marine fish diversity: history of knowledge and discovery (Pisces). Zootaxa, 2525, 19–50.Google Scholar

FAO (2009). Aquaculture production: quantities 1950–2005. FISHSTAT Plus – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Universal software for fishery statistical time series (online or CDROM; accessed February 2010).Google Scholar

FAO (2014). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture: Opportunities and Challenges. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar

Ferretti, F., Worm, B., Britten, G.L., Heithaus, M.R. & Lotze, H.K. (2010). Patterns and ecosystem consequences of shark declines in the ocean. Ecology Letters, 13, 1055–71.Google Scholar

Field, I.C., Meekan, M.G., Buckworth, R.C. & Bradshaw, C.J.A. (2009). Susceptibility of sharks, rays and chimaeras to global extinction. Advances in Marine Biology, 56, 275–363.Google Scholar

Ford, J.S. & Myers, R.A. (2008). A global assessment of salmon aquaculture impacts on wild salmonids. PLoS Biology, 6, e33.Google Scholar

Foster, S.J. & Vincent, A.C.J. (2004). Life history and ecology of seahorses: implications for conservation and management. Journal of Fish Biology, 65, 1–61.Google Scholar

Foster, S., Wiswedel, S. & Vincent, A. (2016). Opportunities and challenges for analysis of wildlife trade using CITES data – seahorses as a case study. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 26, 154–72.Google Scholar

Fowler, S. (1999). The role of non-governmental organisations in the international conservation of elasmobranchs. In Case Studies of the Management of Elasmobranch Fisheries, ed. Shotton, R., FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 378 (2), 880–903.Google Scholar

Fowler, S.L., Cavanagh, R.D., Camhi, M., et al. (comp. and ed.). (2005). Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras: the Status of the Chondrichthyan Fishes. Status Survey. IUCN/SSC Shark Specialist Group. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. 461 pp.Google Scholar

Francis, M.P. (2013). Temporal and spatial patterns of habitat use by juveniles of a small coastal shark (Mustelus lenticulatus) in an estuarine nursery. PLoS ONE, 8, e57021.Google Scholar

Francis, M.P., Campana, S.E. & Jones, C.M. (2007). Age under-estimation in New Zealand porbeagle sharks (Lamna nasus): is there an upper limit to ages that can be determined from shark vertebrae? Marine and Freshwater Research, 58, 10–23.Google Scholar

Fricke, H. (1997). Living coelacanths: values, eco-ethics and human responsibility. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 161, 1–15.Google Scholar

Fricke, H. (2001). Coelacanths: a human responsibility. Journal of Fish Biology, 59 (Supplement A), 332–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fricke, H., Hissmann, K., Froese, R., et al. (2011). The population biology of the living coelacanth studied over 21 years. Marine Biology, 158, 1511–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gault, A., Meinard, Y. & Courchamp, F. (2008). Consumers’ taste for rarity drives sturgeons to extinction. Conservation Letters, 1, 199–207.Google Scholar

Gilman, E.L. (2011). Bycatch governance and best practice mitigation technology in global tuna fisheries. Marine Policy, 35, 590–609.Google Scholar

Goldman, K.J., Cailliet, G.M., Andrews, A.H. & Natanson, L.J. (2012). Assessing the age and growth of chondrichthyan fishes. In Biology of Sharks and their Relatives, 2nd edn, ed. Carrier, J.C., Musick, J.A. & Heithaus, M.R., pp. 423–51. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Gruber, S.H. & Fowler, S. (1991). Elasmobranch conservation: the establishment of the IUCN Shark Specialist Group. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 1, 193–4.Google Scholar

Hamady, L.L., Natanson, L.J., Skomal, G.B. & Thorrold, S.R. (2014). Vertebral bomb radiocarbon suggests extreme longevity in white sharks. PLoS ONE, 9, e84006.Google Scholar

Helfman, G.S (2007). Fish Conservation: a Guide to Understanding and Restoring Global Aquatic Biodiversity and Fishery Resources. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

Herndon, A., Gallucci, V.F., DeMaster, D., et al. (2010). The case for an international commission for the conservation and management of sharks (ICCMS). Marine Policy, 34, 1239–48.Google Scholar

Hissmann, K., Fricke, H. & Schauer, J. (1998). Population monitoring of the coelacanth (Latimeria chalumnae). Conservation Biology 12, 759–65.Google Scholar

Hoenig, J.M. & Gruber, S.H. (1990). Life-history patterns in the elasmobranchs: implications for fisheries management. In Elasmobranchs as Living Resources: Advances in the Biology, Ecology, Systematics, and the Status of the Fisheries, ed. Pratt, H.L. Jr, Gruber, S.H. & Taniuchi, T., NOAA Technical Report, 90, 1–16.Google Scholar

Hutchings, J.A. (2001). Conservation biology of marine fishes: perceptions and caveats regarding assignment of extinction risk. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58, 108–21.Google Scholar

ICCAT (2011). Report of the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics (SCRS) (Madrid, Spain, October 3–7, 2011). Madrid, Spain: International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas.Google Scholar

Iglésias, S.P., Toulhoat, L. & Sellos, D.Y. (2010). Taxonomic confusion and market mislabelling of threatened skates: important consequences for their conservation status. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 20, 319–33.Google Scholar

ISSF (2011). Status of the world fisheries for tuna: stock status ratings – 2011. ISSF Technical Report 2011-04. McLean, VA: International Seafood Sustainability Foundation.Google Scholar

Kinney, M.J. & Simpfendorfer, C.A. (2009). Reassessing the value of nursery areas to shark conservation and management. Conservation Letters, 2, 53–60.Google Scholar

Koldewey, H.J. & Martin-Smith, K.M. (2010). A global review of seahorse aquaculture. Aquaculture, 302, 131–52.Google Scholar

Krogh, M. & Reid, D. (1996). Bycatch in the protective shark meshing programme off south-eastern New South Wales, Australia. Biological Conservation, 77, 219–26.Google Scholar

Krkošek, M. (2010). Sea lice and salmon in Pacific Canada: ecology and policy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8, 201–9.Google Scholar

Lack, M. (2014). Challenges for international governance. In Sharks: Conservation, Governance and Management, ed. Techera, E.J. & Klein, N., pp. 46–65. Oxford, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lack, M. & Sant, G. (2009). Trends in Global Shark Catch and Recent Developments in Management. Cambridge, UK: TRAFFIC International.Google Scholar

Leidy, R.A. & Moyle, P.B. (1998). Conservation status of the world’s fish fauna: an overview. In Conservation Biology: for the Coming Decade, 2nd edn, ed. Fiedler, P.L. & Kareiva, P.M., pp. 187–227. New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Lynch, A-M.J., Sutton, S.G. & Simpfendorfer, C.A. (2010). Implications of recreational fishing for elasmobranch conservation in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 20, 312–18.Google Scholar

Mace, G.M. & Hudson, E.J. (1999). Attitudes toward sustainability and extinction. Conservation Biology, 13, 242–6.Google Scholar

Magnuson, J. (1987). The significance of sharks in human psychology. In Sharks: an Enquiry into Biology, Behavior, Fisheries, and Use, ed. Cook, S., pp. 85–94. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Extension Service.Google Scholar

McDowall, R.M. (1999). Different kinds of diadromy: different kinds of conservation problems. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 56, 410–13.Google Scholar

McGinnity, P., Prodöhl, P., Ferguson, A., et al. (2003). Fitness reduction and potential extinction of wild populations of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, as a result of interactions with escaped farm salmon. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 270, 2443–50.Google Scholar

Merrett, N.R. & Haedrich, R.L. (1997). Deep-Sea Demersal Fish and Fisheries. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Moore, J.A. (1999). Deep-sea finfish fisheries: lessons from history. Fisheries, 24 (7), 16–21.Google Scholar

Moore, J.A. & Mace, P.M. (1999). Challenges and prospects for deep-sea finfish fisheries. Fisheries, 24 (7), 22–3.Google Scholar

Myers, R.A.; Baum, J.K.; Shepherd, T.D., Powers, S.P. & Peterson, C.H. (2007). Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean. Science, 315, 1846–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Naish, K.A., Taylor, J.E.; Levin, P.S., et al. (2008). An evaluation of the effects of conservation and fishery enhancement hatcheries on wild populations of salmon. Advances in Marine Biology, 53, 61–194.Google Scholar

Naylor, R. & Burke, M. (2005). Aquaculture and ocean resources: raising tigers of the sea. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 185–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Naylor, R., Hindar, K., Fleming, I.A., et al. (2005). Fugitive salmon: assessing the risks of escaped fish from net-pen aquaculture. BioScience, 55, 427–37.Google Scholar

Nelson, J.S. (2006). Fishes of the World, 4th edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar

Nikaido, M., Takeshi, S., Emerson, J.J., et al. (2011). Genetically distinct coelacanth population off the northern Tanzanian coast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 18009–13.Google Scholar

Norse, E.A., Brooke, S., Cheung, W.W.L., et al. (2012). Sustainability of deep-sea fisheries. Marine Policy, 36, 307–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliver, S., Braccini, M., Newman, S.J. & Harvey, E.S. (2015). Global patterns in the bycatch of sharks and rays. Marine Policy, 54, 86–97.Google Scholar

Paterson, R. (1979). Shark meshing takes a heavy toll of harmless marine animals. Australian Fisheries, 6 (10), 17–23.Google Scholar

Pauly, D. (1988). Fisheries research and the demersal fisheries of Southeast Asia. In Fish Population Dynamics: the Implications for Management, 2nd edn, ed. Gulland, J.A., pp. 329–48. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar

Perry, A.L., Lunn, K.E. & Vincent, A.C.J. (2010). Fisheries, large-scale trade, and conservation of seahorses in Malaysia and Thailand. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 20, 464–75.Google Scholar

Pierce, S.J., Méndez-Jiménez, A., Collins, K., Rosero-Caicedo, M. & Monadjem, A. (2010). Developing a Code of Conduct for whale shark interactions in Mozambique. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 20, 782–8.Google Scholar

Pikitch, E.K., Doukakis, P., Lauck, L., Chakrabarty, P. & Erickson, D.L. (2005). Status, trends and management of sturgeon and paddlefish fisheries. Fish and Fisheries, 6, 233–65.Google Scholar

Pourkazemi, M. (2006). Caspian Sea sturgeon conservation and fisheries: past present and future. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22 (Suppl. 1), 12–16.Google Scholar

Press, K.M., Mandelman, J., Burgess, E., et al. (2016). Catching sharks: recreational saltwater angler behaviours and attitudes regarding shark encounters and conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 26, 689–702.Google Scholar

Raymakers, C. (2006). CITES, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora: its role in the conservation of Acipenseriformes. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22 (Suppl. 1), 53–65.Google Scholar

Reid, D.D., Robbins, W.D. & Peddemors, V.M. (2011). Decadal trends in shark catches and effort from the New South Wales, Australia, Shark Meshing Program 1950–2010. Marine and Freshwater Research, 62, 676–93.Google Scholar

Reynolds, J.D., Dulvy, N.K., Goodwin, N.B. & Hutchings, J.A. (2005). Biology of extinction risk in marine fishes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 2337–44.Google Scholar

Rigby, C. & Simpfendorfer, C.A. (2015). Patterns in life history traits of deep-water chondrichthyans. Deep-Sea Research II, 115, 30–40.Google Scholar

Roberts, C.M. (2002). Deep impact: the rising toll of fishing in the deep sea. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 242–5.Google Scholar

Rogan, E. & Mackey, M. (2007). Megafauna bycatch in drift nets for albacore tuna (Thunnus alalunga) in the NE Atlantic. Fisheries Research, 86, 6–14.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, H., Pourkazemi, M. & participants of the 5th International Symposium on Sturgeons (2006). Ramsar Declaration on Global Sturgeon Conservation. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22 (Suppl. 1), 5–11.Google Scholar

Safina, C. (2001). Tuna conservation. In Tuna: Physiology, Ecology, and Evolution, ed. Block, B.A. & Stevens, E.D., pp. 413–59. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Safina, C. & Klinger, D.H. (2008). Collapse of bluefin tuna in the western Atlantic. Conservation Biology, 22, 243–6.Google Scholar

Schaefer, K.M. (2001). Reproductive biology of tunas. In Tuna: Physiology, Ecology, and Evolution, ed. Block, B.A. & Stevens, E.D., pp. 225–70. San Diego, CA: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Stevens, J.D., Bonfil, R., Dulvy, N.K. & Walker, P.A. (2000). The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57, 476–94.Google Scholar

Vianna, G.M.S., Meekan, M.G., Pannell, D.J., Marsh, S.P. & Meeuwig, J.J. (2012). Socio-economic value and community benefits from shark-diving tourism in Palau: a sustainable use of reef shark populations. Biological Conservation, 145, 267–77.Google Scholar

Vincent, A.C.J., Foster, S.J. & Koldewey, H.J. (2011). Conservation and management of seahorses and other Syngnathidae. Journal of Fish Biology, 78, 1681–724.Google Scholar

Vincent, A.C.J., Sadovy de Mitcheson, Y.J., Fowler, S.L. & Lieberman, S. (2014). The role of CITES in the conservation of marine fishes subject to international trade. Fish and Fisheries, 15, 563–92.Google Scholar

Wainwright, T.C. & Kope, R.G. (1999). Methods of extinction risk assessment developed for US West Coast salmon. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 56, 444–8.Google Scholar

Waples, R.S. (1991). Pacific salmon, Oncorhynchus spp., and the definition of ‘species’ under the Endangered Species Act. Marine Fisheries Review, 53 (3), 11–22.Google Scholar

Williams, R.N., Bisson, P.A., Bottom, D.L., et al. (1999). Scientific issues in the restoration of salmonid fishes in the Columbia River. Fisheries, 24 (3), 10–19.Google Scholar

Worm, B., Davis, B., Kettemer, L., et al. (2013). Global catches, exploitation rates, and rebuilding options for sharks. Marine Policy, 40, 194–204.Google Scholar