Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:38:34.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

37 - Multi-centre research in the NHS – the process of ethical review when there is no local researcher

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Sue Eckstein
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

1.1 Many research projects undertaken in the NHS take place across numerous sites, sometimes clustered together, but often spread widely throughout the country. It is a requirement that all such multi-centre research has an a med “principalinvestigator”, who has the prime ethical responsibility for the project and its implementation throughout the UK. This is the individual who applies to a Research Ethics Committee (REC) for ethical approval of the protocol, which includes the patient information sheet and the proposed arrangements for taking consent.

1.2 For much multi-centre research, especially where a modification of the standard patient treatment is involved (e.g. therapeutic research, clinical trials), there is a clear role for a “local researcher” at each research site. This person takes local responsibility for the research project, and there is thus a need for local scrutiny of the suitability of this individual and the local research facilities.

1.3 This is in direct contrast to some types of non the rapeutic research, where there is no need for a local individual to be formally part of the research team. In some of these cases there is no need for any direct contact with the patient or research subject. In others, further patient contact needs to be made only by the principal investigator or members of the specialist research team, once patient consent is obtained. This is particularly, but not exclusively, the case for much epidemiological and health services research. [Conversely some projects in these disciplines still retain a distinct need for a named local researcher, just as in the case of ther apeutic research, and therefore each project needs to be considered individually].

Type
Chapter
Information
Manual for Research Ethics Committees
Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, King's College London
, pp. 237 - 240
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×