Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T15:13:19.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Clinical efficacy of CT in acute cerebral ischemia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2009

Stephen Davis
Affiliation:
Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne
Marc Fisher
Affiliation:
National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Steven Warach
Affiliation:
National Institutes of Health, Baltimore
Get access

Summary

Patients with acute cerebral ischemia represent with hemiparesis, hemianopia, speech disturbance, or impairment of consciousness. The differential diagnosis is intracranial hemorrhage, cerebral venous thrombosis, focal encephalitis, demyelination disorder or tumour. Brain imaging is necessary to assess the exact diagnosis and the acute pathophysiological state of the brain. Both pieces of information will guide treatment and will finally determine the clinical outcome of the patient.

Kent and Larson proposed five levels of clinical efficacy for assessing diagnostic technology: (i) technical capacity; (ii) diagnostic accuracy; (iii) diagnostic impact; (iv) therapeutic impact; and (v) patient outcome. In this chapter, I will study the question what unenhanced CT is able to assess in patients with acute stroke; how accurate this information is; and whether imaging with CT has any impact on stroke diagnosis, stroke treatment and, finally, on the clinical outcome of patients.

Level 1 of clinical efficacy: technical capacity of CT in acute cerebral ischemia

Technical capacity is the capability of CT to reproducibly display recognizable images that demonstrate pathology with good intra- and interobserver reliability. Based on changes in X-ray attenuation, CT is capable of detecting intracranial hemorrhage, thrombo-embolic occlusion of major brain arteries, brain tissue swelling without edema, and ischemic brain edema. Intra- and interobserver reliability was not studied for all of these findings. Generally, it seems as if hyperattenuating lesions are easier to detect than hypoattenuating lesions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×