References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2024
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Magnetic CommunicationsTheory and Techniques, pp. 203 - 213Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Akyildiz, I., Pompili, D., and Melodia, T., “Underwater acoustic sensor networks: Research challenges,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 257–279, 2005.Google Scholar
Lanbo, L., Shengli, Z., and Jun-Hong, C., “Prospects and problems of wireless communication for underwater sensor networks,” Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 977–994, 2010.Google Scholar
Li, L., Vuran, M. C., and Akyildiz, I. F., “Characteristics of underground channel for wireless underground sensor networks,” presented at the Sixth Annual Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking WorkShop, Corfu, Greece, June 12–15, 2007.Google Scholar
Sojdehei, J. J., Wrathall, P. N., and Dinn, D. F., “Magneto-inductive (MI) communications,” in MTS/IEEE OCEANS, 2001. An Ocean Odyssey Conference and Exhibition, vol. 1. pp. 513–519, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhi, S., Pu, W., Vuran, M. C., A. Al-Rodhaan, M., M. Al-Dhelaan, A., and Akyildiz, I., “MISE-PIPE: Magnetic induction-based wireless sensor networks for underground pipeline monitoring,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 218–227, 2011.Google Scholar
Domingo, M. C., “Magnetic induction for underwater wireless communication networks,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 2929–2939, 2012.Google Scholar
Gulbahar, B. and Akan, O. B., “A communication theoretical modeling and analysis of underwater magneto-inductive wireless channels,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 3326–3334, 2012.Google Scholar
Parameswaran, V., Zhou, H., and Zhang, Z., “Irrigation control using wireless underground sensor networks,” in Sixth International Conference on Sensing Technology, Kolkata, pp. 653–659, 2012.Google Scholar
Meybodi, S. A., Dohler, M., Askarpour, A. N., Bendtsen, J., and Nielsen, J. D., “The feasibility of communication among pumps in a district heating system,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 118–134, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markham, A. and Trigoni, N., “Magneto-inductive networked rescue system (MINERS): Taking sensor networks underground,” in 2012 ACM/IEEE Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, Beijing, April 16–20, pp. 317–328, 2012.Google Scholar
Abrudan, T., Kypris, O., Trigoni, N., and Markham, A., Magneto-Inductive Underground Tracking: Principles and Systems, ch. 8.2. Elsevier, 2016.Google Scholar
Abrudan, T. E., Xiao, Z., Markham, A., and Trigoni, N., “Distortion rejecting magnetoinductive three-dimensional localization (MagLoc),” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 2404–2417, 2015.Google Scholar
Halliday, D., Resnick, R., and Walker, J., Fundamentals of Physics, Extended, 3rd ed. Wiley, 1988.Google Scholar
Sun, F., Ge, X., and He, S., “Can Maxwell’s fish eye lens really give perfect imaging? Part II. The case with passive drains,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research, vol. 110, pp. 313–328, 2010.Google Scholar
Sun, Z., Akyildiz, I., Kisseleff, S., and Gerstacker, W., “Increasing the capacity of magnetic induction communications in RF-challenged environments,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 3943–3952, 2013.Google Scholar
Kisseleff, S., Gerstacker, W., Schober, R., Sun, Z., and Akyildiz, I. F., “Channel capacity of magnetic induction based wireless underground sensor networks under practical constraints,” in 2013 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Shanghai, China, pp. 2603–2608, 2013.Google Scholar
Gabillard, R., Degauque, P., and Wait, J. R., “Subsurface electromagnetic telecommunication: A review,” IEEE Transactions on Communication Technology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1217–1228, 1971.Google Scholar
Guo, H., Sun, Z., and Wang, P., “Channel modeling of MI underwater communication using tri-directional coil antenna,” in GLOBECOM: IEEE Global Communications Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 1–6, 2015.Google Scholar
Sun, Z. and Akyildiz, I. F., “Magnetic induction communications for wireless underground sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 2426–2435, 2010.Google Scholar
Masihpour, M. and Agbinya, J. I., “Cooperative relay in near field magnetic induction: A new technology for embedded medical communication systems,” in 2010 Fifth International Conference on Broadband and Biomedical Communications, Malaga, Spain, December 15–17, 2010.Google Scholar
Kisseleff, S., Sackenreuter, B., Akyildiz, I. F., and Gerstacker, W., “On capacity of active relaying in magnetic induction based wireless underground sensor networks,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), London, UK, June 8–12, pp. 6541–6546, 2015.Google Scholar
Ma, H., Liu, E., Wang, R., and Qu, X., “Effect of antenna deployment on achievable rate in cooperative magnetic induction communication,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1748–1752, 2019.Google Scholar
Ma, H., Liu, E., Wang, R., Yin, X., Xu, Z., Qu, X., and Li, B., “Antenna optimization for decode-and-forward relay in magnetic induction communications,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 3449–3453, 2020.Google Scholar
Gibson, A. D. W., “Channel characterisation and system design for sub-surface communications,” PhD Thesis, University of Leeds, 2004.Google Scholar
Sun, Z., Akyildiz, I. F., Kisseleff, S., and Gerstacker, W., “Increasing the capacity of magnetic induction communications in RF-challenged environments,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 3943–3952, 2013.Google Scholar
Friis, H., “Noise figures of radio receivers,” Proceedings of the IRE, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 419–422, 1944.Google Scholar
Tan, X. and Sun, Z., “Environment-aware indoor localization using magnetic induction,” in GLOBECOM: 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, December 6–10, pp. 1–6, 2015.Google Scholar
Sun, Z. and Akyildiz, I. F., “Magnetic induction communications for wireless underground sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Antenna and Propagation, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 2426–2435, 2010.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Liu, E., Qu, X., Wang, R., Ma, H., and Sun, Z., “Connectivity of magnetic induction-based ad hoc networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 4181–4191, 2017.Google Scholar
Ma, H., Liu, E., Wang, R., and Qu, X., “Channel characteristics for vehicle magnetic induction communication with road disturbance,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1363–1367, 2020.Google Scholar
Karlsson, A., “Physical limitations of antennas in a lossy medium,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 2027–2033, 2004.Google Scholar
Rahmat-Samii, Y., Williams, L. I., and Yaccarino, R. G., “The UCLA bi-polar planar-near-field antenna-measurement and diagnostics range,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 16–35, 1995.Google Scholar
Azad, U. and Wang, Y. E., “Direct antenna modulation (DAM) for enhanced capacity performance of near-field communication (NFC) link,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 902–910, 2014.Google Scholar
Kisseleff, S., Akyildiz, I. F., and Gerstacker, W. H., “Digital signal transmission in magnetic induction based wireless underground sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 2300–2311, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, H., Sun, Z., and Wang, P., “Multiple frequency band channel modeling and analysis for magnetic induction communication in practical underwater environments,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 6619–6632, 2017.Google Scholar
Guo, H. and Sun, Z., “Channel and energy modeling for self-contained wireless sensor networks in oil reservoirs,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 2258–2269, 2014.Google Scholar
Jadidian, J. and Katabi, D., “Magnetic MIMO: How to charge your phone in your pocket,” in Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 495–506, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, G., R. V. Moghadam, M., and Zhang, R., “Magnetic MIMO signal processing and optimization for wireless power transfer,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 2860–2874, 2017.Google Scholar
Lang, H.-D., Ludwig, A., and Sarris, C. D., “Convex optimization of wireless power transfer systems with multiple transmitters,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 4623–4636, 2014.Google Scholar
Grover, P. and Sahai, A., “Shannon meets Tesla: Wireless information and power transfer,” in 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings (ISIT), pp. 2363–2367, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, H. and Sun, Z., “Increasing the capacity of magnetic induction communication using MIMO coil-array,” in 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 1–6, 2016.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, R. W. and Erentok, A., “Metamaterial-based efficient electrically small antennas,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 2113–2130, 2006.Google Scholar
Smith, D. R., Pendry, J. B., and Wiltshire, M. C., “Metamaterials and negative refractive index,” Science, vol. 305, no. 5685, pp. 788–792, 2004.Google Scholar
Shamonina, E., Kalinin, V., Ringhofer, K., and Solymar, L., “Magnetoinductive waves in one, two, and three dimensions,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 6252– 6261, 2002.Google Scholar
Guo, H., Sun, Z., Sun, J., and Litchinitser, N. M., “M2I: Channel modeling for metamaterial-enhanced magnetic induction communications,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 5072–5087, 2015.Google Scholar
Veselago, V. G., “The electrodynamics of substances with simultaneously negative values of and μ,” Soviet Physics Uspekhi, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 509, 1968.Google Scholar
Pendry, J. B., “Negative refraction makes a perfect lens,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, no. 18, p. 3966, 2000.Google Scholar
Urzhumov, Y. and Smith, D. R., “Metamaterial-enhanced coupling between magnetic dipoles for efficient wireless power transfer,” Physical Review B, vol. 83, no. 20, p. 205114, 2011.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, R. W. and Kipple, A. D., “Application of double negative materials to increase the power radiated by electrically small antennas,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 2626–2640, 2003.Google Scholar
Arslanagic, S., Ziolkowski, R. W., and Breinbjerg, O., “Analytical and numerical investigation of the radiation from concentric metamaterial spheres excited by an electric Hertzian dipole,” Radio Science, vol. 42, no. 06, pp. 1–20, 2007.Google Scholar
Engheta, N. and Ziolkowski, R. W., Metamaterials: Physics and Engineering Explorations. Wiley, 2006.Google Scholar
Guo, H., Sun, Z., and Zhou, C., “Practical design and implementation of metamaterialenhanced magnetic induction communication,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 17213–17229, 2017.Google Scholar
Choy, T. C., Effective Medium Theory: Principles and Applications, vol. 165. Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Pendry, J. B., Holden, A. J., Robbins, D., and Stewart, W., “Magnetism from conductors and enhanced nonlinear phenomena,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 2075–2084, 1999.Google Scholar
Scarborough, C., Jiang, Z., Werner, D., Rivero-Baleine, C., and Drake, C., “Experimental demonstration of an isotropic metamaterial super lens with negative unity permeability at 8.5 MHz,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 101, no. 1, p. 014101, 2012.Google Scholar
Lipworth, G., Ensworth, J., Seetharam, K., Huang, D., S. Lee, J., Schmalenberg, P., Nomura, T., Reynolds, M. S., R. Smith, D., and Urzhumov, Y., “Magnetic metamaterial superlens for increased range wireless power transfer,” Scientific Reports, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2014.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, R. W. and Kipple, A. D., “Application of double negative materials to increase the power radiated by electrically small antennas,” IEEE Transactions on Antenna and Propagation, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 2626–2640, 2003.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, R. W. and Erentok, A., “At and below the chu limit: Passive and active broad bandwidth metamaterial-based electrically small antennas,” IET Microwave, Antennas and Propagation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 116–128, 2007.Google Scholar
Rubinov, M. and Sporns, O., “Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations,” NeuroImage, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1059–1069, 2010, Computational Models of the Brain. [Online]. Available: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105381190901074XGoogle Scholar
M. Araújo and H. J. Herrmann, N. A., “Explosive percolation via control of the largest cluster,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 105, p. 035701, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.035701Google Scholar
Urban, D. and Keitt, T., “Landscape connectivity: A graph-theoretic perspective,” Ecology, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 1205–1218, 2001. [Online]. Available: https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1890/0012-9658%282001%29082%5B1205%3ALCAGTP%5D2.0.CO%3B2Google Scholar
Shang, Y., Ruml, W., Zhang, Y., and Fromherz, M., “Localization from connectivity in sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 961–974, 2004.Google Scholar
Gupta, P. and Kumar, P. R., “Critical power for asymptotic connectivity,” in Proceedings of the IEEE CDC, Tampa, USA, December 1998.Google Scholar
Bettstetter, C., “On the minimum node degree and connectivity of a wireless multihop network,” in Proceedings of the ACM MOBIHOC ’02, Lausanne, Switzerland, June 2002.Google Scholar
Wattenhofer, R., Li, L., Bahl, P., and Y.-Wang, M., “Distributed topology control for power efficient operation in multihop wireless ad hoc networks,” in IEEE INFOCOM, vol. 3, Anchorage, AK, pp. 1388–1397, 2001.Google Scholar
Wang, X., Lin, X., Wang, Q., and Luan, W., “Mobility increases the connectivity of wireless networks,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 440–454, 2013.Google Scholar
Bettstetter, C., Hartmann, C., and Moser, C., “How does randomized beamforming improve the connectivity of ad hoc networks?” in 2005 IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2005. ICC 2005, vol. 5. pp. 3380–3385, 2005.Google Scholar
Zhou, X., Durrani, S., and Jones, H. M., “Connectivity of ad hoc networks: Is fading good or bad?” in 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems, Gold Coast, pp. 1–5, 2008.Google Scholar
Wang, L., Wan, P.-J., and Washington, W., “Connectivity of multihop wireless networks with log-normal shadowing,” Wireless Networks, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 2279–2292, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettstetter, C., Hartmann, C., and Moser, C., “How does randomized beamforming improve the connectivity of ad hoc networks?” in IEEE ICC, vol. 5, Corunna, Spain, pp. 3380– 3385, 2005.Google Scholar
Dung, L. T. and An, B., “A modeling framework for supporting and evaluating connectivity in cognitive radio ad hoc networks with beamforming,” Wireless Networks, vol. 23, pp. 1743–1755, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrathall, P. N. and Sojdehei, J. J., “Magneto-inductive communications,” in AeroSense, pp. 229–236, 1999.Google Scholar
Rožanskij, V. and Rojansky, V. B., Electromagnetic Fields and Waves. Dover Publications, 1971.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Liu, E., Qu, X., Liu, D., Wang, R., and Liu, F., “Effective coverage for the connectivity of magnetic induction-based ad hoc networks,” in IEEE GLOBECOM, San Diego, pp. 1–6, 2015.Google Scholar
Sun, Z. and Akyildiz, I. F., “Wireless underground networks,” Foundations and Trends in Networking, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 138–283, 2012.Google Scholar
Kisseleff, S., Gerstacker, W., Sun, Z., and Akyildiz, I., “On the throughput of wireless underground sensor networks using magneto-inductive waveguides,” in 2013 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 322–328, December 2013.Google Scholar
Bettstetter, C., “On the connectivity of ad hoc networks,” The Computer Journal, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 432–447, 2004.Google Scholar
Bettstetter, C., “On the minimum node degree and connectivity of a wireless multihop network,” in ACM MOBIHOC, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 80–91, 2002.Google Scholar
Barry, D., Parlange, J.-Y., Li, L., Prommer, H., Cunningham, C., and Stagnitti, F., “Analytical approximations for real values of the Lambert W-function,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 95–103, 2000.Google Scholar
Kisseleff, S., Sackenreuter, B., Akyildiz, I. F., and Gerstacker, W., “On capacity of active relaying in magnetic induction based wireless underground sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications, London, UK, pp. 6541–6546, June 2015.Google Scholar
Akyildiz, I. F., Sun, Z., and Vuran, M. C., “Signal propagation techniques for wireless underground communication networks,” Physical Communication, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 167– 183, 2009. [Online]. Available: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874490709000408Google Scholar
Sun, Z., Wang, P., Vuran, M. C., A. Al-Rodhaan, M., M. Al-Dhelaan, A., and Akyildiz, I. F., “BorderSense: Border patrol through advanced wireless sensor networks,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 468–477, 2011. [Online]. Available: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570870510001484Google Scholar
Zhi, S. and Akyildiz, I. F., “Magnetic induction communications for wireless underground sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas & Propagation, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 2426–2435, 2010.Google Scholar
Sun, Z. and Akyildiz, I. F., “Underground wireless communication using magnetic induction,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2009.Google Scholar
Sun, Z. and Akyildiz, I. F., “Optimal deployment for magnetic induction-based wireless networks in challenged environments,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 996–1005, 2013.Google Scholar
Schwarzkopf, O., “Computational geometry: Algorithms and applications,” Library Philosophy & Practice, vol. 2011, no. 1, pp. 333–334, 2000.Google Scholar
Bansal, R., “Near-field magnetic communication,” IEEE Antennas & Propagation Magazine, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 114–115, 2004.Google Scholar
Syms, R. R. A., Young, I. R., and Solymar, L., “Low-loss magneto-inductive waveguides,” Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, vol. 39, no. 18, pp. 3945–3951, 2006.Google Scholar
Shamonina, E., Kalinin, V. A., Ringhofer, K. H., and Solymar, L., “Magnetoinductive waves in one, two, and three dimensions,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 92, no. 10, p. 6252, 2002.Google Scholar
Sydoruk, O., Zhuromskyy, O., and Shamonina, E., “Dispersion characteristics of magnetoinductive waves made up by doubly periodic elements,” in Conference on Metamaterials; 20050830-31; Warsaw, PL, 2005.Google Scholar
Ramanathan, R. and Rosales-Hain, R., “Topology control of multiple wireless networks using transmit power adjustment,” in IEEE Proceedings. INFOCOM 2000. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, 2000.Google Scholar
Burkhart, M., Von Rickenbach, P., Wattenhofer, R., and Zollinger, A., “Does topology control reduce interference?” Department of Computer Science ETH Zurich 8092 Zurich, Switzerland, 2004.Google Scholar
Pan, J., Hou, Y. T., Cai, L., Shi, Y., and Shen, S. X., “Topology control for wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, ser. MobiCom ’03. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 286–299, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/938985.939015Google Scholar
Wang, Y., “Topology control for wireless sensor networks,” in Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications. Signals and Communication Technology. Springer, 2008.Google Scholar
Khan, A., “Sensor deployment and target localization based on virtual forces,” in IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-Second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, 2014.Google Scholar
Wang, G., Cao, G., and T. La Porta, “Movement-assisted sensor deployment,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 640–652, 2006.Google Scholar
Sun, Z. and Akyildiz, I. F., “On capacity of magnetic induction-based wireless underground sensor networks,” in 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, pp. 370–378, 2012.Google Scholar
Dettmann, C. P. and Georgiou, O., “Product of n independent uniform random variables,” Statistics & Probability Letters, vol. 79, no. 24, pp. 2501–2503, 2009.Google Scholar
Wu, B. Y. and Chao, K. M., Spanning Trees and Optimization Problems. Spanning Trees and Optimization Problems, 2004.Google Scholar
Mark, D. B., Computational Geometry: Algorithms and Applications, 3rd ed. Springer, 2013.Google Scholar
Akyildiz, I. F. and Stuntebeck, E. P., “Wireless underground sensor networks: Research challenges,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 669–686, 2006.Google Scholar
Vuran, S., “Signal propagation techniques for wireless underground communication networks,” Physical Communication, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 167–183 2009.Google Scholar
Karalis, A., Joannopoulos, J. D., and M. Soljačić, “Efficient wireless non-radiative midrange energy transfer,” Annals of Physics, vol. 323, no. 1, pp. 34–48, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Z. and Akyildiz, I. F., “On capacity of magnetic induction-based wireless underground sensor networks,” in 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, pp. 370–378, 2012.Google Scholar
Silva, A. R. and Vuran, M. C., “Development of a testbed for wireless underground sensor networks,” EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, vol. 2010, pp. 1–14, 2010.Google Scholar
Zhi, S. and Akyildiz, I. F., “Connectivity in wireless underground sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the Seventh Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, SECON 2010, Boston, MA, USA, June 21–25, 2010.Google Scholar
Wiltshire, M., Shamonina, E., Young, I. R., and Solymar, L., “Dispersion characteristics of magneto-inductive waves: Comparison between theory and experiment,” Electronics Letters, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 215–217, 2003.Google Scholar
Zhi, S. and Akyildiz, I. F., “Deployment algorithms for wireless underground sensor networks using magnetic induction,” in Global Telecommunications Conference, 2010.Google Scholar
Gupta, P. and Kumar, P. R., “The capacity of wireless networks,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 388–404, 2000.Google Scholar
Wang, C. X., Hong, X., Chen, H. H., and Thompson, J., “On capacity of cognitive radio networks with average interference power constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1620–1625, 2009.Google Scholar
Bhandari, V. and Vaidya, N. H., “Capacity of multi-channel wireless networks with random (c,f) assignment,” Technical Report, 2007.Google Scholar
Jiang, C., Shi, Y., Hou, Y. T., and Kompella, S., “On the asymptotic capacity of multihop MIMO ad hoc networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1032–1037, 2011.Google Scholar
Spyropoulos, A. and Raghavendra, C. S., “Capacity bounds for ad-hoc networks using directional antennas,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2003.Google Scholar
Yemini, Y., “The OSI network management model,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 20–29, 1993.Google Scholar
Nunes, B. A. A., Mendonca, M., Nguyen, X.-N., Obraczka, K., and Turletti, T., “A survey of software-defined networking: Past, present, and future of programmable networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1617–1634, 2014.Google Scholar
Tang, F., Fadlullah, Z. M., Mao, B., and Kato, N., “An intelligent traffic load predictionbased adaptive channel assignment algorithm in SDN-IoT: A deep learning approach,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 5141–5154, 2018.Google Scholar
Qin, Z., Denker, G., Giannelli, C., Bellavista, P., and Venkatasubramanian, N., “A software defined networking architecture for the internet-of-things,” in 2014 IEEE network operations and management symposium (NOMS), pp. 1–9, 2014.Google Scholar
Guo, H. and Sun, Z., “Demo abstract: Prototyping M2I communication system for underground and underwater networks,” in 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), pp. 962–963, 2017.Google Scholar
Vyas, R. and Tye, B., “A sequential RFID system for robust communication with underground carbon steel pipes in oil and gas applications,” Electronics, vol. 8, no. 12, p. 1374, 2019.Google Scholar
Klair, D. K., Chin, K.-W., and Raad, R., “A survey and tutorial of RFID anti-collision protocols,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 400–421, 2010.Google Scholar
Delen, D., Sharda, R., and Hardgrave, B. C., “The promise of RFID-based sensors in the perishables supply chain,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 82–88, 2011.Google Scholar
Liu, H., Bolic, M., Nayak, A., and Stojmenovi, I., “Integration of RFID and wireless sensor networks,” in Encyclopedia on Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing: Theory and Design of Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor, and Mesh Networks. World Scientific, pp. 319–347, 2010.Google Scholar
Nosratinia, A., Hunter, T. E., and Hedayat, A., “Cooperative communication in wireless networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 74–80, 2004.Google Scholar
Riihonen, T., Werner, S., and Wichman, R., “Mitigation of loopback self-interference in full-duplex MIMO relays,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 5983–5993, 2011.Google Scholar
Krikidis, I., Suraweera, H. A., Smith, P. J., and Yuen, C., “Full-duplex relay selection for amplify-and-forward cooperative networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 4381–4393, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamonina, E., Kalinin, V., Ringhofer, K., and Solymar, L., “Magneto-inductive waveguide,” Electronics Letters, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 371–373, 2002.Google Scholar
Guo, H. and Sun, Z., “Full-duplex metamaterial-enabled magnetic induction networks in extreme environments,” in IEEE INFOCOM 2018-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 558–566, 2018.Google Scholar
Neely, M. J. and Modiano, E., “Capacity and delay tradeoffs for ad hoc mobile networks,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1917–1937, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, K. and Pal, A., “Internet of perishable logistics,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 22–31, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, P. and Kumar, P. R., “The capacity of wireless networks,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 388–404, 2000.Google Scholar
Franceschetti, M., Dousse, O., David, N., and Thiran, P., “Closing the gap in the capacity of wireless networks via percolation theory,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 1009–1018, 2007.Google Scholar
Toumpis, S. and Goldsmith, A. J., “Large wireless networks under fading, mobility, and delay constraints,” in INFOCOM 2004. Twenty-third Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, vol. 1, 2004.Google Scholar
Raab, F. H., Blood, E. B., Steiner, T. O., and Jones, H. R., “Magnetic position and orientation tracking system,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. AES-15, no. 5, pp. 709–718, 1979.Google Scholar
Paperno, E., Sasada, I., and Leonovich, E., “A new method for magnetic position and orientation tracking,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1938–1940, 2001.Google Scholar
Paperno, E. and Keisar, P., “Three-dimensional magnetic tracking of biaxial sensors,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 1530–1536, 2004.Google Scholar
Sheinker, A., Ginzburg, B., Salomonski, N., Frumkis, L., and Kaplan, B., “Localization in 2D using beacons of low frequency magnetic field,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1020–1030, 2013.Google Scholar
Sheinker, A., Ginzburg, B., Salomonski, N., Frumkis, L., and Kaplan, B., “Localization in 3D using beacons of low frequency magnetic field,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 3194–3201, 2013.Google Scholar
Markham, A., Trigoni, N., Macdonald, D. W., and Ellwood, S. A., “Underground localization in 3-D using magneto-inductive tracking,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1809–1816, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meng, M. Q.-H., Mei, T., Pu, J., Hu, C., Wang, X., and Chan, Y., “Wireless robotic capsule endoscopy: State-of-the-art and challenges,” in Proceedings of the Fifth World Congress Intelligent Control and Automation (IEEE Cat. No.04EX788), vol. 6, pp. 5561–555a, 2004.Google Scholar
Hu, C., M. Q.-Meng, H., Mandal, M., and Wang, X., “3-Axis magnetic sensor array system for tracking magnet’s position and orientation,” in Proceedings of the 6th World Congress Intelligent Control and Automation, vol. 2, pp. 5304–5308, 2006.Google Scholar
Li, M., Hu, C., Song, S., Dai, H., and M. Q.-Meng, H., “Detection of weak magnetic signal for magnetic localization and orientation in capsule endoscope,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, pp. 900–905, 2009.Google Scholar
Yabukami, S., Kikuchi, H., Yamaguchi, M., Arai, K. I., Takahashi, K., Itagaki, A., and Wako, N., “Motion capture system of magnetic markers using three-axial magnetic field sensor,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 3646–3648, 2000.Google Scholar
Tan, X., Sun, Z., and Wang, P., “On localization for magnetic induction-based wireless sensor networks in pipeline environments,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 2780–2785, 2015.Google Scholar
Kisseleff, S., Akyildiz, I. F., and Gerstacker, W. H., “Survey on advances in magnetic induction-based wireless underground sensor networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 4843–4856, 2018.Google Scholar
Li, Y., Wang, S., Jin, C., Zhang, Y., and Jiang, T., “A survey of underwater magnetic induction communications: Fundamental issues, recent advances, and challenges,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 2466–2487, 2019.Google Scholar
Saeed, N., Alouini, M.-S., and Al-Naffouri, T. Y., “Toward the internet of underground things: A systematic survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 3443–3466, 2019.Google Scholar
Khalil, R. A., Saeed, N., Babar, M. I., and Jan, T., “Toward the internet of underwater things: Recent developments and future challenges,” IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 32–37, 2020.Google Scholar
Akyildiz, I. F. and Stuntebeck, E. P., “Akyildiz wireless underground sensor networks: Research challenges,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 669–686, 2006.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Liu, E., Zheng, X., Jian, Y., Wang, D., and Liu, D., “Cooperative magnetic induction based through-the-earth communication,” in IEEE/CIC ICCC, pp. 653–657, 2014.Google Scholar
Sun, Z., Akyildiz, I. F., and Wang, P., “Realizing underwater communication through magnetic induction,” IEEE Communications Magazine: Articles, News, and Events of Interest to Communications Engineers, 2015.Google Scholar
Khalil, R. A. and Saeed, N., “Optimal relay placement in magnetic induction-based internet of underwater things,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 821–828, 2020.Google Scholar
Wei, D., Yan, L., Huang, C., Wang, J., Chen, J., Pan, M., and Fang, Y., “Dynamic magnetic induction wireless communications for autonomous-underwater-vehicle-assisted underwater IoT,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 9834–9845, 2020.Google Scholar
AL-Kadi, T., AL-Tuwaijri, Z., and AL-Omran, A., “Wireless sensor networks for leakage detection in underground pipelines: A survey paper,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 21, pp. 491–498, 2013.Google Scholar
Sun, Z., Wang, P., Vuran, M. C., A. Al-Rodhaan, M., M. Al–Dhelaan, A., and Akyildiz, I. F., “Mise-pipe: Magnetic induction-based wireless sensor networks for underground pipeline monitoring,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 218–227, 2011.Google Scholar
Markham, A. and Trigoni, N., “Proceedings of the 11th international conference on information processing in sensor networks: 11th international conference on information processing in sensor networks,” in Magneto-Inductive NEtworked Rescue System (MINERS): Taking Sensor Networks Underground, Beijing, China, April 2012.Google Scholar
Gutierrez-Estevez, M. A., Krüger, U., Krueger, K. A., Manolakis, K., Jungnickel, V., Jaksch, K., Krueger, K., S. Mikulla, R. Giese, M. Sohmer et al., “Acoustic broadband communications over deep drill strings using adaptive OFDM,” in 2013 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pp. 4089–4094, 2013.Google Scholar
Martins, C. H., Alshehri, A. A., and Akyildiz, I. F., “Novel mi-based (FracBot) sensor hardware design for monitoring hydraulic fractures and oil reservoirs,” in 2017 IEEE 8th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON), pp. 434–441, 2017.Google Scholar
Al-Shehri, A. A., Akyildiz, I. F., Servin, J. M., and Schmidt, H. K., “Fracbot technology for mapping hydraulic fractures,” in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, OnePetro, 2017.Google Scholar
Lee, T. H., The Design of CMOS Radio-Frequency Integrated Circuits. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Zargham, M. and Gulak, P. G., “Maximum achievable efficiency in near-field coupled power-transfer systems,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 228–245, 2012.Google Scholar
Lang, H.-D. and Sarris, C. D., “Optimization of wireless power transfer systems enhanced by passive elements and metasurfaces,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 5462–5474, 2017.Google Scholar
Li, Z. and Sun, Z., “Enabling magnetic beamforming in MIMO wireless power transfer using reconfigurable metasurface,” in GLOBECOM 2020–2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference, pp. 1–6, 2020.Google Scholar
Li, Z. and Sun, Z., “Antenna system optimization for active metamaterial-enhanced magnetic induction communications,” in 2019 13th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), pp. 1–5, 2019.Google Scholar
Gao, F., Zhang, F., Huang, M., and Sievenpiper, D. F., “Programmable screen for patterning magnetic fields,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 481–490, 2014.Google Scholar
Li, Z. and Sun, Z., “Antenna system optimization for active metamaterial-enhanced magnetic induction communications,” in 2019 13th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), pp. 1–5, 2019.Google Scholar
Haenggi, M., Andrews, J. G., Baccelli, F., Dousse and M. Franceschetti, O., “Stochastic geometry and random graphs for the analysis and design of wireless networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1029–1046, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2009.090902Google Scholar
Li, L., Vuran, M., and Akyildiz, I., “Characteristics of Underground Channel for Wireless Underground Sensor Networks,” 2012.Google Scholar