References

John T. Jensen

doi:10.1017/9781108889131.010

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 June 2022

John T. Jensen

Show author details

John T. Jensen: Affiliation:
University of Ottawa

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Lexical and Metrical Phonology of English
The Legacy of the Sound Pattern of English
, pp. 366 - 374

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108889131.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (1969). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. (1992). A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Andronov, A. V. (2002). Materiali dlja Latyšsko-Russkogo Slovarja. Sankt-Peterburg.Google Scholar

Archangeli, Diana (1984). Underspecification in Yawelmani Phonology and Morphology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Archangeli, Diana & Suzuki, Keiichiro (1997). The Yokuts Challenge. In Derivations and Constraints in Phonology, ed. Roca, Iggy, 197–226. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark (1976). Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bailey, Charles-James N. (1973). The patterning of language variation. In Varieties of Present-Day English, ed. Bailey, Richard W. & Robinson, Jay L.. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bailey, Don C. (1962). Glossary of Japanese Neologisms. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar

Benua, Laura (1995). Identity effects in morphological truncation. In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, ed. Beckman, Jill N., Dickey, Laura Walsh, & Urbanczyk, Suzanne, 77–136. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. (2012). The architecture of grammar and the division of labor in exponence. In The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence, ed. Trommer, Jochen, 8–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bing, Janet (1979). Aspects of English Prosody. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1980).Google Scholar

Blevins, Juliette (1995). The syllable in phonological theory. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed. Goldsmith, John A., 206–244. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Blevins, Juliette (1997). Rules in optimality theory: two case studies. In Derivations and Constraints in Phonology, ed. Roca, Iggy, 227–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard (1939). Menomini morphophonemics. Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague 8, 105–115. Reprinted in Makkai (1972), 58–64.Google Scholar

Borowsky, Toni Jean (1986). Topics in the Lexical Phonology of English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar

Borowsky, Toni Jean (1989). Structure preservation and the syllable coda in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7: 145–166.Google Scholar

Brame, Michael (1974). The cycle in phonology: Stress in Palestinian, Maltese, and Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 5: 39–60.Google Scholar

Brooks, Marie Zagorska (1965). On Polish affricates. Word 29: 207–210.Google Scholar

Burzio, Luigi (1994). Principles of English Stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chambers, Jack (1973). Canadian raising. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 18: 113–135.Google Scholar

Chao, Yuan Ren (1920). A system of tone letters. Le Maître Phonétique 45: 24–47.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam (1951). Morphophonemics of Modern Hebrew. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam (1964). Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Clements, George N. (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2: 225–252.Google Scholar

Clements, George N. & Hume, Elizabeth V. (1995). The internal organization of speech sounds. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed. Goldsmith, John A., 245–306. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Clements, George N. & Keyser, Samuel Jay (1983). CV Phonology: a Generative Theory of the Syllable. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Collins Dictionary of the English Languge (1979). London: Collins.Google Scholar

Cowan, Nelson, Braine, Martin D. S., & Leavitt, Lewis A. (1985). The phonological and metaphonological representation of speech: evidence from fluent backward talkers. Journal of Memory and Language 24: 679–698.Google Scholar

Downing, Bruce Theodore (1970). Syntactic and Phonological Phrasing in English. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar

Dresher, B. Elan (2016). Covert representations, contrast, and the acquisition of lexical accent. In Dimensions of Phonological Stress, ed. Heinz, Jeffrey, Goedemans, Rob, & van der Hulst, Harry, 231–262. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Durand, Jacques (1990). Generative and Nonlinear Phonology. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Emonds, Joseph E. (1976). A Transformational Approach to English Syntax: Root, Structure Preserving, and Local Transformations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Fabb, Nigel (1988). English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 527–539.Google Scholar

Fidelholtz, James L. (1967). English vowel reduction. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Fidelholtz, James L. & Wayles Browne, E. (1971). Oy, oy, oy. In Towards Tomorrow’s Linguistics, ed. Shuy, Roger W. & Bailey, Charles-James N. 159–184. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Fudge, Eric C. (1967). The nature of phonological primes. Journal of Linguistics 3: 1–36. Reprinted in Makkai (1972), 500–521.Google Scholar

Furby, Christine E. (1974). Garawa Phonology. Pacific Linguistics, series A, No. 37, 1–11, Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Giegerich, Heinz J. (1992). English Phonology: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Giegerich, Heinz J. (1999). Lexical Strata in English: Morphological Causes, Phonological Effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goad, Heather (2012). sC clusters are (almost always) coda-initial. The Linguistic Review 29: 335–373.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, John A. (1976). Autosegmental Phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, John A. (1990). Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Green, Anthony D. (2004). Opacity in Tiberian Hebrew: Morphology not phonology. In Papers in Phonetics and Phonology, ZAS Papers in Linguistics 37, ed. Fuchs, S. & Hamann, S., 37–70. ROA 703-0105.Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos & Jacobs, Heike (1998). Understanding Phonology. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Hale, Mark & Reiss, Charles (2000). Phonology as cognition. In Phonological Knowledge: Conceptual and Empirical Issues, ed. Burton-Roberts, Noel, Carr, Philip, & Docherty, Gerard 161–184. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Halle, Morris (1959). The Sound Pattern of Russian. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Halle, Morris (1977). Tenseness, vowel shift, and the phonology of the back vowels in modern English. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 611–625.Google Scholar

Halle, Morris (1997). On stress and accent in Indo-European. Language 73: 275–313.Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Idsardi, William J. (1997). R, hypercorrection, and the Elsewhere Condition. In Derivations and Constraints in Phonology, ed. Roca, Iggy, 331–348.Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Mohanan, Karuvannur Puthanveetti (1985). Segmental phonology of modern English. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 57–116.Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Stevens, Kenneth N. (1971). A note on laryngeal features. Quarterly Progress Reports 101: 198–213. Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT.Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger (1987). An Essay on Stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hammond, Michael (1984). Constraining Metrical Theory: A Modular Theory of Rhythm and Destressing. PhD dissertation, UCLA. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

Hammond, Michael (1999). The Phonology of English: A Prosodic Optimality-Theoretic Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Harris, James W. (1969). Spanish Phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Harris, James W. (1983). Syllable Structure and Stress in Spanish: A Nonlinear Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Harris, John (1994). English Sound Structure. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Haugen, Einar (1956). The syllable in linguistic description. In For Roman Jakobson, ed. Halle, Morris, Lunt, Horace G., McLean, Hugh, & van Schooneveld, Cornelius H., 213–221. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce (1980). A Metrical Theory of Stress Rules. PhD dissertation, MIT. (Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1981).Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce (1982). Extrametricality and English stress. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 227–276.Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce (1986). Inalterability in CV phonology. Language 62: 321–351.Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce (1989a). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 253–306.Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce (1989b). The prosodic hierarchy in meter. In Phonetics and Phonology, Volume 1, Rhythm and Meter, ed. Kiparsky, Paul & Youmans, Gilbert, 201–260. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce (1995). Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce (2004). Phonological acquisition in optimality theory: the early stages. In Constraints in Phonological Acquisition, ed. Kager, René, Pater, Joe, & Zonneveld, Wim, 158–203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hoard, James E. (1971). Aspiration, tenseness, and syllabication in English. Language 47: 133–140.Google Scholar

Hoard, James E. (1972). Naturalness conditions in phonology, with particular reference to English vowels. In Contributions to Generative Phonology, ed. Brame, Michael K., 123–154. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles F. (1942). A system of descriptive phonology. Language 18: 3–21. Reprinted in Makkai (1972), 99–112.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hooper, Joan B. (1972). The syllable in phonological theory. Language 48: 525–540.Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry (1985). A Theory of Phonological Weight. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Idsardi, William James (1992). The Computation of Prosody. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Idsardi, William James (2009). Calculating metrical structure. In Contemporary Views on Architecture and Representations in Phonology, ed. Raimy, Eric & Cairns, Charles E., 191–211. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ingria, Robert (1980). Compensatory lengthening as a metrical phenomenon. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 465–495.Google Scholar

Itô, Junko (1986). Syllable Theory in Prosodic Phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar

Itô, Junko (1989). A prosodic theory of epenthesis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7: 217–259.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman & Halle, Morris (1956). Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Jensen, John T. (1990). Morphology: Word Structure in Generative Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Jensen, John T. (1993). English Phonology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jensen, John T. (2000). Against ambisyllabicity. Phonology 17: 187–235.Google Scholar

Jones, Daniel (1966). The Pronunciation of English (fourth edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kager, René (1989). A Metrical Theory of Stress and Destressing in English and Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Kager, René (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.Google Scholar

Kahn, Daniel (1976). Syllable-based Generalizations in English Phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

Kahn, Daniel (1980). Syllable-structure specifications in phonological rules. In Juncture, ed. Aronoff, Mark & Kean, Mary-Louise. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.Google Scholar

Kenstowicz, Michael (1994). Evidence for metrical constitency. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. Hale, Kenneth & Jay Keyser, Samuel, 257–273. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kenstowicz, Michael & Kisseberth, Charles W. (1977). Topics in Phonological Theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Kenstowicz, Michael & Kisseberth, Charles W. (1979). Generative Phonology: Description and Theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul (1966). Über den deutschen Akzent. Studia Grammatica 7: 69–98.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul (1968). How abstract is phonology? In Explanation in Phonology, ed. Kiparsky, Paul (1971), 119–163. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul (1973). Abstractness, opacity, and global rules. In Three Dimensions of Linguistic Theory, ed. Fujimura, O., 57–86. Tokyo: TEC. Also in The Application and Ordering of Grammatical Rules, ed. Andreas Koutsoudas, 160–186. The Hague: Mouton,Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul (1979). Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 421–441.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. Yang, I. S., 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul (1983). Word formation and the lexicon. In Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference, ed. Ingeman, Frances A.. University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul (1985). Some consequences of lexical phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2, 85–138.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul (1988). Phonological change. In Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Volume 1, Linguistic Theory: Foundations, ed. Newmeyer, Fritz, 363–415. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul (1993). Blocking in nonderived environments. In Phonetics and Phonology, Volume 4, Studies in Lexical Phonology, ed. Hargus, Sharon and Kaisse, Ellen, 217–313. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul (1995). The phonological basis of sound change. In Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed. Goldsmith, John A., 640–670. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul (2000). Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review 17: 351–365.Google Scholar

Kirchner, Robert (1996). Synchronic chain shifts in optimality theory. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 341–350.Google Scholar

Kisseberth, Charles W. (1970). On the functional unity of phonological rules. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 291–306.Google Scholar

Klavans, Judith L. (1982). Some Problems in a Theory of Clitics. PhD dissertation, University College, London. IULC.Google Scholar

Klavans, Judith L. (1985). The independence of syntax and phonology in cliticization. Language 61: 95–120.Google Scholar

Lazdiņa, Terēza Budiņa (1966). Teach Yourself Latvian. London: English Universities Press.Google Scholar

Leben, William (1973). Suprasegmental Phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Levin, Juliette (1985). A Metrical Theory of syllabicity. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Liberman, Mark & Prince, Alan S. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 249–336.Google Scholar

Łubowicz, Anna (2002). Derived environment effects in Optimality Theory. Lingua 112: 243–280.Google Scholar

Makkai, Valerie Becker (ed.) (1972). Phonological Theory: Evolution and Current Practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar

Malécot, André (1960). Vowel nasality as a distinctive feature in American English. Language 36: 222–229.Google Scholar

Marchand, Hans (1969). The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation: A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach (second edition). München: C.H. Bech’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar

Mascaró, Joan (1967). Catalan Phonology and the Phonological Cycle. PhD dissertation, MIT. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. (1981). A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 373–418.Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. (1991). Synchronic rule inversion. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. Sutton, Laurel A., Johnson, Christopher & Shields, Ruth, 192–207. Berkleley, California: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. (1993). A case of surface constraint violation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 38: 169–195.CrossRef Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. (1994). Remarks on phonological opacity in optimality theory. In Proceedings of the Second Colloquium on Afro-Asiatic Linguistics (1996), ed. Jacqueline Lecarme, Jean Lowenstamm, & Ur Shlonsky 215–243. The Hague: Academic Graphics. ROA-79.Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. (1999). Sympathy and phonological opacity. Phonology 16: 331–399.Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. (2007). Hidden Generalizations: Phonological opacity in Optimality Theory. London: Equinox.Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan S. (1986). Prosodic Morphology. MS, University of Massachusetts, Amherst & Brandeis University. Published as Prosodic Morphology 1986, Technical Report #32, Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, 1996.Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan S. (1990). Foot and word in prosodic morphology: the Arabic broken plural. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 208–283.Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan S. (1993). Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction. RuCCS-TR-3.Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan S. (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, ed. Beckman, Jill N., Dickey, Laura Walsh, & Urbanczyk, Suzanne, 249–384. Amherst, MA: GLSA. ROA 60.Google Scholar

McCawley, James D. (1968). The Phonological Component of a Grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

McMahon, April (2000). Lexical Phonology and the History of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mielke, Jeff (2005). Ambivalence and ambiguity in laterals and nasals. Phonology 22: 169–203.CrossRef Google Scholar

Minkova, Donka (2014). A Historical Phonology of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Miyamori, Asatarō (1932). An Anthology of Haiku, Ancient and Modern. Tokyo: Maruzen. Reprinted (1970), Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar

Mohanan, Karuvannur Puthanveetti (1986). The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Mohanan, Karuvannur Puthanveetti & Mohanan, Tara (1984). Lexical phonology of the consonant system in Malayalam. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 575–602.Google Scholar

Myers, Scott (1987). Vowel shortening in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 485–518.Google Scholar

Nanni, Debbie L. (1977). Stressing words in -Ative. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 752–763.Google Scholar

Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene (1986). Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Newton, Brian (1972). The Generative Interpretation of Dialect: A Study of Modern Greek Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Odden, David (2008). Ordering. In Rules, Constraints, and Phonological Phenomena, ed. Vaux, Bert & Nevins, Andrew, 61–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Orkin, Mark M. (1997). Canajan, Eh? Toronto: Stoddart.Google Scholar

Osborn, Henry A. Jr (1966). Warao I: phonology and morphophonemics. International Journal of American Linguistics 32: 108–23.Google Scholar

Pater, Joe (1994). Against the underlying specification of an ‘exceptional’ English stress pattern. Toronto Woking Papers in Linguistics 13(1): 95–121.Google Scholar

Pater, Joe (2000). Nonuniformity in English secondary stress: the role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology 17: 237–274.Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L. (1947). Grammatical prerequisites to phonemic analysis. Word 3: 155–172. Reprinted in Makkai (1972), 153–165.Google Scholar

Postal, Paul M. (1968). Aspects of Phonological Theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Prince, Alan S. (1980). A metrical theory for Estonian quantity. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 511–562.Google Scholar

Prince, Alan S. (1983). Relating to the grid. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 19–100.Google Scholar

Prince, Alan S. & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Technical Report 2. Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science.Google Scholar

Pulgram, Ernst (1970). Syllable, Word, Nexus, Cursus. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Pulleyblank, Douglas (1986). Tone in Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Pullum, Geoffrey K. (1976). The Duke of York gambit. Journal of Linguistics 12: 83–102.Google Scholar

Rialland, Annie & Badjimé, Mamadon (1989). Réanalyse des tons du Bambara: Des tons du nom à l’organisation générale du système. Studies in African Linguistics 20: 1–28.Google Scholar

Ross, John Robert (1972). A reanalysis of English word stress (part I). In Contributions to Generative Phonology, ed. Brame, Michael, 229–323. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Rubach, Jerzy (1984). Segmental rules of English and cyclic phonology. Language 60: 21–54.Google Scholar

Rubach, Jerzy (1996). Shortening and ambisyllabicity in English. Phonology 13: 197–237.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rubach, Jerzy (2003). Duke-of-York derivations in Polish. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 601–629.Google Scholar

Rydzewski, Paweł (2018). Canadian Raising and Flapping in Derivational Optimality Theory. In Phonology, Fieldwork and Generalisations, ed. Czaplicki, Bartłomiej, Łukaszewicz, Beata, & Opalińska, Monika, 47–64. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Sagey, Elizabeth Caroline (1986). The Representation of Features and Relations in Non-linear Phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Sainz, Susana (1988). A noncyclic analysis of English word stress. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 3: 1–82.Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1978). On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. In Nordic Prosody II, ed. Fretheim, T., 111–140 (1981). Trondheim: TAPIR.Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1980a). Prosodic domains in phonology: Sanskrit revisited. In Juncture, ed. Aronoff, Mark & Kean, Mary-Louise, 107–129. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1980b). The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 563–605.Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1982a). The Syntax of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1982b). The syllable. In The Structure of Phonological Representations (Part II), ed. van der Hulst, Harry & Smith, Norval, 337–383. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1984a). Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1984b). On the major class features and syllable theory. In Language Sound Structure, ed. Aronoff, Mark & Oehrle, Richard T., 107–136. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Siegel, Dorothy C. (1974). Topics in English Morphology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Stanley, Richard (1967). Redundancy rules in phonology. Language 43: 393–436.Google Scholar

Szpyra, Jolanta (1989). The Morphology-Phonology Interface: Cycles, Levels, and Words. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Tauber, Abraham (1963). George Bernard Shaw on Language. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar

Trager, George L. & Smith, Henry Lee, Jr (1951). An Outline of English Structure. American Council of Learned Societies, Washington, DC. Reprinted by Johnson Reprint Corporation, New York.Google Scholar

Tryon, Darrell T. (1970). An Introduction to Maranungku, Northern Australia (Pacific Linguistics Monographs, Series B, No. 15), Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Vaux, Bert (2008). Why the phonological component must be serial and rule-based. In Rules, Constraints, and Phonological Phenomena, ed. Vaux, Bert & Nevins, Andrew, 20–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Walker, John (1936). The Rhyming Dictionary, revised and enlarged by Lawrence H. Dawson. New York: R.P. Dutton.Google Scholar

Wang, William S.-Y. (1967). Phonological features of tone. International Journal of American Linguistics 33: 93–105.Google Scholar

Wells, J.C. (1982). Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Withgott, Mary Margaret (1982). Segmental Evidence for Phonological Constituents. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar

Zec, Draga (1988). Sonority Constraints on Prosodic Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive