Book contents
- A Less Familiar Plato
- Cambridge Studies in Religion and Platonism
- A Less Familiar Plato
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Embodiment and Participation in the Divine
- Part II Introduction to the Republic and Philebus
- Part III Introduction to Love, Myth, Erotikē Technē, and Generative Epistēmē
- Appendix Scientific Perception or Sharp Seeing in the Middle and Late Dialogues
- Primary Texts
- General Bibliography
- Index
- References
General Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 October 2023
Book contents
- A Less Familiar Plato
- Cambridge Studies in Religion and Platonism
- A Less Familiar Plato
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Embodiment and Participation in the Divine
- Part II Introduction to the Republic and Philebus
- Part III Introduction to Love, Myth, Erotikē Technē, and Generative Epistēmē
- Appendix Scientific Perception or Sharp Seeing in the Middle and Late Dialogues
- Primary Texts
- General Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A Less Familiar PlatoFrom Phaedo to Philebus, pp. 309 - 322Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
General Bibliography
Adam, J. 1965. The Republic of Plato, Edited with Critical Notes, Commentary and Appendices, 2nd ed., with an Introduction by D. A. Rees, vols. I–II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, R. E. 1965 (1960). “Participation and Predication in Plato’s Middle Dialogues.” In Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, ed. Allen, R. E.. London; New York: Routledge; Kegan Paul, 43–60.Google Scholar
Allen, R. E. ed. 1965. Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics. London; New York: Routledge; Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 1985. “Self-Knowledge in Early Plato.” In Platonic Investigations, ed. O’Meara, Dominic J.. Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, vol. 13. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 111–138.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 2002. “What Are Plato’s “Middle” Dialogues in the Middle Of.” In New Perspectives on Plato, Ancient and Modern, eds. Annas, J. and Rowe, C.. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press, 1–23 (and comments by D. Frede, 25–36).Google Scholar
Anton, J. P., and Kustas, G. L.. 1971. Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Anton, J. P., and Preus, A.. 1989. Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy 3: Plato. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. 1986. “Psychagogia in Plato’s Phaedrus.” Illinois Classical Studies 11 (1–2), 153–172.Google Scholar
Bailey, J. I. 2018. Logos and Psyche in the Phaedo. Lanham; Boulder; New York; London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Baltès, M. 1994. “Idee (Ideenlehre).” Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum 17, 213–246.Google Scholar
Baltès, M. 1997. “Is the Idea of the Good in Plato’s Republic Beyond Being.” In Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition: Essays Presented to John Whittaker, ed. Joyal, M.. London; New York: Routledge), 3–24 (Reprinted in Baltès, M. 1999. Dianoémata. Kleine Schriften zu Platon und zum Platonismus. Stuttgart; Leipzig: De Gruyter, 351–371.Google Scholar
Baltzly, D., and Share, M.. 2018. Hermias: On Plato Phaedrus 227A–245E. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1993. Porphyry: Introduction, Translated with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, W. 1985. Denken des Einen: Studien zur neoplatonischen Philosophie und ihrer Wirkungsgeschichte. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Benardete, S. 1993. The Tragedy and Comedy of Life: Plato’s Philebus. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Benardete, S. 1994. On Plato’s Symposium (Uber Platons Symposium). Munich: Carl Friedrich von Siemens Stiftung.Google Scholar
Bok, S. 1978 (1989/1991). Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. New York: Vintage, Random House.Google Scholar
Bonitz, H. 1870 (1955). Index Aristotelicus, 2nd ed. Graz: Akademische Druck-U. Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G., El Murr, D., and Gill, C.. 2013. The Platonic Art of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodnár, I. 2020. “The Study of Natural Kinds in the Early Academy.” In Plato’s Academy: Its Workings and Its History, eds. Kalligas, P., Balla, C., Baziotopoulou-Valavani, E., and Karasmanis, V.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 153–166.Google Scholar
Brandwood, L. 1990. The Chronology of Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brann, E. 2004. The Music of Plato’s Republic: Socrates’ Conversations and Plato’s Writings. Philadelphia: Paul Dry Books.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. 1983. The Early Greek Concept of the Soul. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. 1992. “Nous Poietikos: Survey of Earlier Interpretations.” In Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, eds. Nussbaum, M. C., and Rorty, A. O.. Oxford: Clarendon, 313–342.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 2001. “Comment render compte de la participation du sensible à l’intelligible chez Platon.” In Platon: Les formes intelligibles, ed. Pradeau, J.-F.. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 55–86.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 2002. “L’approche traditionnelle de Platon par H. F. Cherniss.” In New Images of Plato: Dialogues on the Idea of the Good, eds. Reale, G. and Scolnicov, S.. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 85–97.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 2004. How Philosophers Saved Myths: Allegorical Interpretation and Classical Mythology. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadie, S. 2021. Plato’s Sun-Like Good: Dialectic in the Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunschwig, J. 1996. “La deconstruction du ‘connais-toi toi-même’ dans l’Alcibiade Majeur.” Recherches sur la Philosophie et le Langage 18, ed. Desclos, M.-L., 61–84.Google Scholar
Burger, R. 1980. Plato’s Phaedrus: A Defense of the Philosophic Art of Writing. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1985. Greek Religion: Archaic and Classical. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1976. “Plato on the Grammar of Perceiving.” Classical Quarterly, New Series 26, 29–51.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M., and Frede, M.. 2015. The Pseudo-Platonic Seventh Letter, ed. Scott, D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bury, J. B. 1886. “Questions Connected with Plato’s Phaidros.” Journal of Philology 15, 80–85.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. 1896. “On the Place of the Parmenides in the Chronological Order of the Platonic Dialogues.” Classical Review 10, 129–136.Google Scholar
Capra, A. 2014. Plato’s Four Muses: The Phaedrus and the Poetics of Philosophy. Hellenic Studies Series. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Catana, L. 2019. Late Ancient Platonism in Eighteenth-Century German Thought. International Archives of the History of Ideas (Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idées). London: Springer Nature Switzerland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavarero, A. 1995. In Spite of Plato: A Feminist Rewriting of Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. 1965 (1957). “The Relation of the Timaeus to Plato’s Later Dialogues.” In Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, ed. Allen, R. E.. London; New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 339–378Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. 2001. “L’économie philosophique de la théorie des idées.” In Platon: les formes intelligibles, ed. Pradeau, J.-F.. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 155–176.Google Scholar
Chittick, W. C. 1983. The Sufi Path of Love: The Spiritual Teachings of Rumi. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Chittick, W. C. 1989. The Sufi Path of Knowledge: Ibn Al-Arabi’s Metaphysics of Imagination, New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, L. 1948. PLATO Phaedrus, Ion, Gorgias, and Symposium, with Passages from the Republic and Laws, translated into English with an introduction and prefatory notes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Corbin, H. 1976. L’imagination creatrice dans le soufisme d’Ibn’ Arabi. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Cornelli, G., Robinson, T. M., and Bravo, F., eds. 2018. Plato’s Phaedo: Selected Papers from the Eleventh Symposium Platonicum. St. Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. 1975. The Republic of Plato, Oxford: Oxford University Press (first published 1941).Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. 1986. “Plotinus, ‘Enneads’ 5, 4 [7], 2 and Related Passages.” Hermes 114 (2), 195–203.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. 1996a. “‘Solitary’ Mysticism in Plotinus, Proclus, Gregory of Nyssa, and Pseudo-Dionysius.” Journal of Religion 76, 28–42.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. 1996b. “Essence and Existence in the Enneads.” In The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, ed. Gerson, L. P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 105–129.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. 2010. “Plotinus and the Hypotheses of the Second Part of Plato’s Parmenides.” In Plato’s Parmenides and Its Heritage: Volume II: Reception in Patristic, Gnostic, and Christian Neoplatonic Texts, eds. Corrigan, K. and Turner, J. D.. Atlanta: SBL Press.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. 2018. Love, Friendship, Beauty, and the Good: Plato, Aristotle, and the Later Tradition, Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock; Cascade Books.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. (forthcoming). “Plotinus’ Interpretation of Plato’s Phaedrus.” Kronos, Poland.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K., and Glazov-Corrigan, E.. 2004. Plato’s Dialectic at Play: Argument, Structure and Myth in the Symposium. University Park: The Pennsylvania University State Press.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K., and Turner, J. D., eds. 2010. Plato’s Parmenides and Its Heritage: Volume II: Reception in Patristic, Gnostic, and Christian Neoplatonic Texts. Atlanta: SBL Press.Google Scholar
Couvreur, P., ed. 1901. Hermiae Alexandrini in Platonis Phaedrum Scholia. Paris: E. Bouillon.Google Scholar
Curran, J. V. 1986. “The Rhetorical Technique of Plato’s Phaedrus.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 19 (1), 66–67.Google Scholar
De Vries, G. J. 1969. A Commentary on the Phaedrus of Plato. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert.Google Scholar
Delcomminette, S. 2006. Le Philèbe de Platon: Introduction À l’agathologie Platonicienne. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Delcomminette, S., D’Hoine, P., Gavray, M.-A.. 2015. Ancient Readings of Plato’s Phaedo (Philosophia Antiqua 140). Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Denyer, N. 2001. Plato: Alcibiades. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diehl, E. 1903–1906. Procli in Platonis Timaeum Commentaria, 3 vols. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 1993. Alcinous. The Handbook of Platonism [Didaskalikos]. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 1994. “A Platonist Ars Amatoria.” Classical Quarterly, New Series 44 (2), 387–392.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 2003. The Heirs of Plato: A Study of the Old Academy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 2012. “Plato and Rawls on the Parameters of a Just Society.” Etudes platoniciennes 9, 105–113.Google Scholar
Dillon, J., and Brisson, L., eds. 2010. Plato’s Philebus: Selected Papers from the Eighth Symposium Platonicum. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Dittenberger, W. 1881. “Sprachliche Kriterien für die Chronologieder Platonischen Dialoge.” Hermes 16, 321–345Google Scholar
Dixsaut, M. 1998. Le naturel philosophe: Essai sur les dialogues de Platon. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Dixsaut, M. 2000. “Ousia, eidos et idea dans le Phédon.” In Platon et la question de la penséé. Études platoniciennes. Paris: Vrin, 71–91.Google Scholar
Dixsaut, M. 2018. “La mort, estimons-nous que c’est quelque chose?” In Plato’s Phaedo: Selected Papers from the Eleventh Symposium Platonicum, eds. Cornelli, G., Robinson, T. M., and Bravo, F.. St. Augustin: Academia Verlag, 177.Google Scholar
Dombrovski, D. 1977. “Plato’s Noble Lie.” History of Political Thought XVIII (4), 576–578.Google Scholar
Dorter, K. 1969. “The Significance of the Speeches in Plato’s Symposium.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 2, 215–234.Google Scholar
Dorter, K. 1982. Plato’s Phaedo: An Interpretation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Dorter, K. 1992. “A Dual Dialectic in the Symposium.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 25 (3), 253–270.Google Scholar
Dorter, K. 1996. “Three Disappearing Ladders in Plato.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 29, 279–299.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1974. Greek Popular Morality in the Time of Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elias, J. A. 1984. Plato’s Defense of Poetry. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Else, G. F. 1986. Plato and Aristotle on Poetry. Chapel Hill; London: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, R. W. 1944 “Plato.” In The Essays of Ralph Waldo Emerson. New York: Literary Classics.Google Scholar
Fattal, M., ed. 2003. Logos et Langage chez Plotin et avant Plotin. Paris : L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Ferber, R., and Damschen, G., 2015. “Is the Idea of the Good beyond Being? Plato’s ‘epekeina tes ousias’ Revisited.” In Second Sailing: Alternative Perspectives on Plato, ed. Nails, Debra et al. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. 1987. Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato’s Phaedrus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. 1992. “Platonic Love.” In The Cambridge Companion to Plato, ed. Kraut, R., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 248–276.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. ed. 2007. The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. N. 1974. Plato: The Written and Unwritten Doctrines. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Fine, G., 1978. “Knowledge and Belief in Republic V.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 60, 121–139.Google Scholar
Fine, G., 1990. “Knowledge and Belief in Republic V–VII.” In Epistemology, ed. Everson, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 85–115.Google Scholar
Fine, G., 2017. “Plato on the Grades of Perception: Theaetetus 184–186 and the Phaedo.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 53, 65–109.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, J. T., ed. 1997. Greco-Roman Perspectives on Friendship. Atlanta: SBL Press.Google Scholar
Fotinis, V. 2004. Paul Natorp. Plato’s Theory of Ideas. An Introduction to Idealism. Sankt Augustin: Academia.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 2001. L’herméneutique du sujet: Cours au Collège de France (1981–2), eds. Ewald, F., Fontana, A., and Gros, F.. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Fowler, H. N. 1925. Plato in Twelve Volumes, vol. 9, trans. H. N. Fowler. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Frede, D. 1992. “Disintegration and Restoration: Pleasure and pain in Plato’s Philebus.” In The Cambridge Companion to Plato, ed. Kraut, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 425–463.Google Scholar
Frede, D. 1993. Philebus. Translated with Introduction and Notes. Indianapolis; Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
Frede, D. 1999. Platons “Phaidon”: Der Traum Von Der Unsterblichkeit Der Seele. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Friedländer, P. 1923. Der Grosse Alkibiades: Kritische Erorterungen. s.l.: Kritische Erorterungen.Google Scholar
Friedländer, P. 1958/1964/1970. Plato, trans. H. Meyerhoff, 3 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fronterotta, F. 2001. Methexis. La Teoria platonica delle Idee e la particepazione delle cose empiriche dai dialoghi giovanili al Parmenide. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.Google Scholar
Fronterotta, F. 2007. “The Development of Plato’s Theory of Ideas and the ‘Socratic Question.’” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32, 37–62.Google Scholar
Fronterotta, F. 2018. “Eudoxe et Speusippe sur le plaisir (selon Aristote): Un Débat dans l’ Ancienne Académie.” Revue de philosophie ancienne, Issue 1, 39–72.Google Scholar
Fujisawa, N., 1974. “῎Εχειν, Μετέχειν, and Idioms of ‘Paradeigmatism’ in Plato’s Theory of Forms.” Phronesis 19 (1), 30–58.Google Scholar
Furley, D. 1989. “Truth as What Survives Elenchos.” Cosmic Problems: Essays on Greek and Roman Philosophy of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 38–46.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. 1980. Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermeneutical Studies on Plato, trans. P. C. Smith. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. 1986. The Idea of the Good in Platonic-Aristotelian Philosophy, trans. and with introduction and annotation by P. C. Smith, New Haven; London: Yale University Press (Die Idee des Guten zwischen Platon und Aristoteles).Google Scholar
Gaiser, K. 2012. “Plato’s Synopsis of the Mathematical Sciences.” In The Other Plato. The Tübingen Interpretation of Plato’s Inner-Academic Teachings, ed. Nikulin, D.. New York: State University of New York Press, 83–120.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Q., and Baltzly, D., 2019. “Hermias on the Unity of the Phaedrus.” In Studies in Platonism, Neoplatonism, and the Platonic Tradition, vol. 24, eds. Finamore, J. F., Manolia, C. P., Klitenic-Wear, S.. Leiden: Brill, 68–83.Google Scholar
Geach, P. T. 1975 (1956). “The Third Man Again.” In Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, ed. Allen, R. E.. London; New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 265–278.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. 2018. “Socrates’ Autobiography: An Epitome of Platonism.” In Plato’s Phaedo: Selected Papers from the Eleventh Symposium Platonicum, eds. Cornelli, G., Robinson, T. M., and Bravo, F.. St. Augustin: Academia Verlag, 323–327.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. 2020. Platonism and Naturalism: The Possibility of Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 1990. “Platonic Love and Individuality.” In Polis and Politics: Essays in Greek Moral and Political Philosophy, eds. Loizou, A. and Lesser, H.. Brookfield, VT: Avebury, 69–88.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 1990. The Person and the Human Mind: Issues in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gill, C. 1995. Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy, and Philosophy. New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 2007. “Self-Knowledge in Plato’s Alcibiades.” In Reading Ancient Texts, vol.1, eds. Stern-Gillet, S. and Corrigan, K.. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 97–112.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. 2012. Philosophos: Plato’s Missing Dialogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gomperz, T. 1964. Greek Thinkers: A History of Ancient Philosophy, 4 vols. (1901–1912), repr., London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, F. J. 1996, “Propositions or Objects: A Critique of Gail Fine on Knowledge and Belief in Republic V.” Phronesis 41 (3), 245–275.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, F. J. 1998. Dialectic and Dialogue: Plato’s Practice of Philosophical Inquiry. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, T. 1963. Platonic Love. New York: Free Press of Glencoe; Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Griswold, C. 1996. Self-Knowledge in Plato’s Phaedrus. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A. 1935. Plato’s Thought. Toronto: Entretiens 3, Vandoeuvres-Genève: Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C., 1957. Plato’s Views on the Nature of the Soul. Recherches sur la tradition platonicienne. Toronto : Fondation Hardt, Entretiens 3. Vandoeuvres-Genève.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C., 1962–1981. A History of Greek Philosophy III–VI. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C., 1975. A History of Greek Philosophy. Vol. 4, Plato: The Man and His Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halfwassen, J. 2000. “Der Demiurg: seine Stellung in der Philosophie Platons und seine Deutung im antiken Platonismus.” In Le Timée de Platon. Contributions à l’histoire de sa réception. Platos Timaios. Beiträge zu seiner Rezeptionsgeschichte, ed. Neschke-Hentschke, A.. Louvain; Paris: Peeters, 39–42.Google Scholar
Halfwassen, J. 2020. “Monism and Dualism in Plato’s Doctrine of Principles.” In The Other Plato. The Tübingen Interpretation of Plato’s Inner-Academic Teachings, ed. Nikulin, D.. New York: State University of New York Press, 143–160.Google Scholar
Halper, E. C. 2018. “The Currency of Virtue: Phaedo 68c–69d.” In Plato’s Phaedo: Selected Papers from the Eleventh Symposium Platonicum, ed. Cornelli, G., Robinson, T. M., and Bravo, F.. Sankt Augustin: Akadamie Verlag, 124–132.Google Scholar
Harte, V. 2002. Plato on Parts and Wholes: The Metaphysics of Structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Helmbold, W. C., and Holther, W. B. 1952. The Unity of the “Phaedrus.” Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hermann, F.-G. 2003. “Metechein, metalambamein and the Problem of Participation in Plato’s Ontology.” Philosophical Inquiry 25, 3–56.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. 1995. Philosophy as a Way of Life, ed. Davidson, A. I., trans. M. Chase from Exercices spirituelles et philosophie antique. Paris, 1987. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Halperin, D. M. 1985. “Platonic Eros and What Men Call Love.” Ancient Philosophy 5, 161–204.Google Scholar
Halperin, D. M. 1986. “Plato and Erotic Reciprocity.” Classical Antiquity 5, 60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halperin, D. M. 1990. “Why Is Diotima a Woman?” In One Hundred Years of Homosexuality and Other Essays on Greek Love, ed. Halperin, David M.. New York: Routledge, 113–151, 190–211.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 1993 Philolaus of Croton: Pythagorean and Presocratic: A Commentary on the Fragments and Testimonia with Interpretive Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, L. 1994. “Sorcerer Love: A Reading of Plato’s Symposium, Diotima’s Speech,” trans. E. H. Kuykendall. In Feminist Interpretations of Plato, ed. Tuana, N., 181–196. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1977. Plato’ s Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. 1944. Paideia, trans. Gilbert Highet, vol. 3. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Joachim, H. H. 1966. Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1976. “Plato on the Unity of Virtues.” In Facets of Plato’s Philosophy, ed. Werkmeister, W. H.. Assen: Van Gorcum, 21–39.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1996. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 2002. “On Platonic Chronology.” In New Perspectives on Plato, Ancient and Modern, eds. Annas, J. and Rowe, C.. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press, 93–127 (and comments by Griswold, 129–144).Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 2013. Plato and the Post-Socratic Dialogue: The Return to the Philosophy of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kalligas, P., Balla, C., Baziotopoulou-Valavani, E., and Karasmanis, V.. 2020. Plato’s Academy: Its Workings and Its History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G. E., 2006. Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Konstan, D., and Young-Bruehl, E.. 1982. “Eryximachus’ Speech in the Symposium.” Apeiron 16, 40–46.Google Scholar
Kosman, L. A. 1976. “Platonic Love.” In Facets of Plato’s Philosophy, ed. Werkmeister, W. H.. Assen: Van Gorcum, 53–69.Google Scholar
Kosman, L. A. 1992. “What Does the Maker Mind Make.” In Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, eds. Nussbaum, M. C., and Rorty, A. O.. Oxford: Clarendon, 343–358.Google Scholar
Krämer, H. J. 1964 (1967). Der Ursprung der Geistmetaphysik: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Platonismus zwischen Platon und Plotin, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner.Google Scholar
Krämer, H. J. 1990. Plato and the Foundations of Metaphysics. A Work on the Theory of the Principles and Unwritten Doctrines of Plato with a Collection of the Fundamental Documents, ed. and trans. Catan, J. R.. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Krämer, H. J. 2012. “Epekeina tes ousias: On Plato, Republic 509B.” In The Other Plato: The Tübingen Interpretation of Plato’s Inner-Academic Teachings, ed. Nikulin, D.. New York: State University of New York Press, 39–64.Google Scholar
Krämer, H. J. 2014. “Platons Definition des Guten.” In H. Krämer, Gesammelte Aufsätze zu Platon, ed. Mirbach, Dagmar. Berlin: De Gruyter, 236–240.Google Scholar
Kraut, R., ed. 1992. The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kroll, Wilhelm,ed. 1899–1901. Procli Diadochi in Platonis Rem publicam commentarii, 2 vols., Leipzig, repr. Amsterdam 1965.Google Scholar
Kung, J., 1988, “Why the Receptacle Is Not a Mirror?” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 70, 167–178 (l’Université de Liège, Louvain-la-Neuve, Éditions Peeters).Google Scholar
Lear, J., 1988. Aristotle: The Desire to Understand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H., and Nails, D., Sheffield, F. C. C., 2006. Plato’s Symposium: Issues in Interpretation and Reception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, D. 1979. “The Definition of Love in Plato’s Symposium.” Journal of the History of Ideas 40, 285–291.Google Scholar
Leyh, A. 2020. “Three Models of Political Friendship in Plato.” PhD dissertation at Emory University.Google Scholar
Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., and Jones, H. D.. 1940. A Greek-English Lexicon, 9th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Loriaux, R. 1969. Le Phédon de Platon, 2 vols. Namur: Presses Universitaires de Namur.Google Scholar
Markus, R. A. 1955. “The Dialectic of Eros in Plato’s Symposium.” Downside Review 73, 219–230. Reprinted in Vlastos, G., ed. 1971. Plato: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City: Anchor Books, 2: 132–143.Google Scholar
Merlan, P. 1969. Monopsychism, Mysticism, Metaconsciousness: Problems of the Soul in the Neoaristotelian and Neoplatonic Tradition (Archives Internationales D’Histoire Des Idées). The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. 1990. “Plato’s Third Man Argument in the Parmenides.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 72, 143–181.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, J. M. E. 1971. “Reason and Eros in the ‘Ascent’ Passage of the Symposium.”in Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, eds. Anton, J. P. and Kuscas, G. L.. Albany: Stace University of New York Press, 285–302.Google Scholar
Moore, John D. 1973. “The Relation between Plato’s Symposium and Phaedrus.” in Patterns in Plato’s Thought, ed. Moravcsik, J. M. E.. Reidel: Dordrecht; Boston: Reidel, 52–71 (with comments by J, Dillon, 72–77).Google Scholar
Motte, A., Rutten, C., and Somville, P., eds. (with L. Bauloye, A. Lefka, and A. Stevens). 2003. Philosophie de la Forme: eidos, idea, morphè dans la philosophie grecque des origines à Aristote, travaux du Centre d’études aristotéliciennes de l’Université de Liège. Louvain-la-Neuve: Éditions Peeters.Google Scholar
Narbonne, J.-M. 2002. “The Origin, Significance, and Meaning of the Epekeina Motif in Plotinus and the Neoplatonic Tradition.” In Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, vol. 17, ed. Cleary, J. J. and Gurtler, G. M.. Brill: Leiden, 185–206.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 1995. Plato’s “Phaedrus”, trans. with intro. and notes, with Paul Woodruff. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Neumann, H. 1965. “Diotima’s Concept of Love.” American Journal of Philology 86, 33–59.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. 1995. Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nikulin, D. 2012. The Other Plato. The Tübingen Interpretation of Plato’s Inner-Academic Teachings. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1978. Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium, Text, Translation, Commentary and Interpretive Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1990. Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2003. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C., and Rorty, A. O., eds. 1992. Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Nye, Andrea. 1994. “Irigaray and Diotima at Plato’s Symposium.” In Feminist Interpretations of Plato, ed. Tuana, Nancy. University Park: Penn State University Press, 197–216.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. 1967–1968. “The Last Argument of Plato’s Phaedo.” Classical Quarterly, New Series 17 (2), 198–231; 18 (1), 95–106.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. J. 1989. Pythagoras Revived: Mathematics and Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. J. ed. 1985. Platonic Investigations. Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, vol. 13. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1956 (1975). “The Place of the Timaeus in Plato’s Dialogues.” In Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, ed. Allen, R. E., London; New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 313–338.Google Scholar
Patterson, R. 2018. “Malaria, Causality and Plato’s Explanatory Framework.” In Plato’s Phaedo: Selected Papers from the Eleventh Symposium Platonicum, eds. Cornelli, G., Robinson, T. M., and Bravo, F.. St. Augustin: Academia Verlag, 177.Google Scholar
Patterson, R. 1982. “The Platonic Art of Comedy and Tragedy.” Philosophy and Literature 6, 76–92.Google Scholar
Patterson, R. 1991. “The Ascent in Plato’s Symposium.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 7, 193–214.Google Scholar
Pender, E. E. 1992. “Spiritual Pregnancy in Plato’s Symposium.” Classical Quarterly 42, 72–86.Google Scholar
Politis, V. 2021. Plato’s Essentialism: Reinterpreting the Theory of Ideas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. 1966 (c. 1945). The Open Society and Its Enemies, Vol. 1: The Spell of Plato. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pradeau, J.-F., 2001. Platon: les formes intelligibles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Pradeau, J.-F., 2001. “Introduction”/“Les formes et les réalités intelligibles. L’usage platonicien du terme eidos.” In Platon: les formes intelligibles, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Pradeau, J.-F., and Fronterotta, F.. 2005. Hippias majeur et Hippias mineur, présentations et traductions. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Price, A. W. 1989. Love and Friendship in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Price, A. W. 1990. Love and Friendship in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. 1927. “Facts and Propositions.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary 7, 153–170. Reprinted in Ramsey, F. P., Philosophical Papers, ed. Mellor, D. H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, 34–51.Google Scholar
Rappe-Ahbel, S. 2000. Reading Neoplatonism: Non-discursive Thinking in the Texts of Plotinus, Proclus, and Damascius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rappe-Ahbel, S. 2010. “Damascius’ Exegesis of Philebus 27, on the Nature of the Mixed.” In Plato’s Philebus: Selected Papers from the Eighth Symposium Platonicum, eds. Dillon, J. and Brisson, L.. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 376–331.Google Scholar
Rappe-Ahbel, S. 2019. Socratic Ignorance and Platonic Knowledge in the Dialogues of Plato. SUNY series in Western Esoteric Traditions. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Rickless, S. C. 1998. “How Parmenides Saved the Theory of Forms.” Philosophical Review 107, 501–554.Google Scholar
Rickless, S. C. 2007. Plato’s Forms in Transition: A Reading of the Parmenides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rickless, S. C. 2015. “Plato’s Parmenides.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-parmenides/.Google Scholar
Ritter, C. 1910. “Eidos, idea und verwandte Wörter in den Schriften Platons.” In Neue Untersuchungen über Platon. Munich: Beck, 228–326.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 1964. Eros and Psyche: Study in Plato, Plotinus, and Origen. Phoenix, Supplement 6. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Robin, L. 1908. La théorie platonicienne de l’amour. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. M. 1992. “The Relative Dating of the Timaeus and Phaedrus.” In Understanding the Phaedrus, ed. Rosetti, L.. Sankt Augustin: Akademia Verlag, 23–30Google Scholar
Rosen, S. 1993. The Quarrel between Philosophy and Poetry. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rosetti, L., ed. 1992. Understanding the Phaedrus. Proceedings of the II Symposium Platonicum. Sankt Augustin: Akademia Verlag.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1990. “Philosophy, Love and Madness.” In The Person and the Human Mind: Issues in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Gill, C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 241–246.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1992. “La data relativa de Fedro.” In Understanding the Phaedrus. Proceedings of the II Symposium Platonicum, ed. Rosetti, L.. Sankt Augustin: Akademia Verlag, 31–46.Google Scholar
Russon, J. 2000 Retracing the Platonic Text. Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Russon, J. 2000b. “We Sense That They Strive: How to Read (the Theory of the Forms).” In Retracing the Platonic Text, ed. Russon, J. and Sallis, J.. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, G., 1965 (1939) “Plato’s Parmenides.” In Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, ed. Allen, R. E.. London; New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 97–148.Google Scholar
Sallis, J. 1996. Being and Logos: Reading the Platonic Dialogues, 3rd ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Santa Cruz, Maria Isabel. 1992. “Division et Dialectique dans le Phèdre.” In Understanding the Phaedrus. Proceedings of the II Symposium Platonicum, ed. Rosetti, L.. Sankt Augustin: Akademia Verlag, 253–256.Google Scholar
Schanz, M. 1890. Symposion, Phaedrus: Ad codices denuo collatos (edidit Martinus Schanz). Tauchnitz: Lipsae: B. Tauchnitz.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. von, 1966. Philosophie der Mythologie, 2 vols. Originally published in Saemmtliche Werke, Augsburg, 1856 (vol. 11) and Darmstadt, 1857 (vol. 12).Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, F. 1836. Introductions to the Dialogues of Plato, trans W. Dobson. Cambridge; London: British Library, Historical Print Editions, repr. New York: Arno Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Schroeder, F. M. 1997. “Friendship in Aristotle and some Peripatetic Philosophers.” In Greco-Roman Perspectives on Friendship, ed. Fitzgerald, J. T.. Atlanta: SBL Press, 35–58.Google Scholar
Scolnicov, S. 2003. Plato’s Parmenides. Berkeley; San Francisco: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Segonds, A. 1985. Proclus: sur le premier Alcibiade de Platon, 2 vols. Paris: Les Belles Lettres,Google Scholar
Sheffield, F. 2006. Plato’s Symposium: The Ethics of Desire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sina, I. 1945. “A Treatise on Love (Risãla fi ‘l-‘ishq),” trans. E. Fackenheim. Medieval Studies 7, 208–228.Google Scholar
Stemmer, P. 1992. Platons Dialektik: die frühen und mittleren Dialoge. Quellen und Studien zur Philosophie, 31. Berlin; New York: Walter De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stern-Gillet, S. 1995. Aristotle’s Philosophy of Friendship. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Stern-Gillet, S., and Corrigan, K., eds. Reading Ancient Texts. Volume I: Presocratics and Plato. Essays in Honour of Denis O’Brien. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Stokes, M. C. 1986. Plato’s Socratic Conversations: Drama and Dialectic in Three Dialogues. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. 1972. “Plato.” In History of Political Philosophy, ed. Strauss, L.. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Striker, G. 1970. Peras Und Apeiron Das Problem der Formen in Platons Philebos. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Szlezák, T. A. 1985. Platon und die Schriftlichkeit der Philosophie. New York: G. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Szlezák, T. A. 1999. Reading Plato. London; New York:Routledge (translation of Platon lesen. Stuttgart: Verlag Frommann-Holzboog, 1993).Google Scholar
Szlezák, T. A. 2012. “The Idea of the Good as Arkhē in Plato’s Republic.” In The Other Plato. The Tübingen Interpretation of Plato’s Inner-Academic Teachings, ed. Nikulin, D.. New York: State University of New York Press, 121–142.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. 2007. “Olympiodorus and Proclus on the Climax of the Alcibiades.” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition I, 3–29.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. 2011. From the Old Academy to Later Neo-Platonism Studies in the History of Platonic Thought. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. 2015. The Platonic Alcibiades I: The Dialogue and Its Ancient Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H., and Johnson, M., eds. 2007. Alcibiades and the Socratic Lover-Educator. London: Bristol Classics Press.Google Scholar
Thesleff, H. 1982. Studies in Platonic Chronology. Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 70. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. H. 1868. The Phaedrus of Plato, with English Notes and Dissertations. London.Google Scholar
Tolan, D. 2021. “The Flight of the All-One to the All-One: The φυγὴ μόνου πρὸς μόνον as the Basis of Plotinian Altruism.” The Harvard Theological Review 114 (4), 469–490.Google Scholar
Tuana, N., ed. 1994. Feminist Interpretations of Plato. University Park: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Van Riel, G. 2013. Plato’s Gods. Quebec: Les Presses de l’ Universite Laval; Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. 1954. “Platons Gottesbegriff.” In La notion du divin depuis Homère jusqu’à Platon, Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique, vol. 1. Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 241–293.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1965. “Degrees of Reality in Plato.” In New Essays on Plato and Aristotle, ed. Bambrough, J. R.. London; New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1–19.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1975 (1956). “The Third Man Argument in the Parmenides.” In Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, ed. Allen, R. E., London; New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 231–264.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1975 (1956). “Postscript to the Third Man: A Reply to Mr. Geach.” In Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, ed. Allen, R. E., London; New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 279–292.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1981 “The Individual as an Object of Love in Plato.” In Platonic Studies, 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1–34Google Scholar
de Vries, G. J. 1969. A Commentary on the Phaedrus of Plato. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert.Google Scholar
Werner, D. 2012. Myth and Philosophy in Plato’s Phaedrus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, D. A. 1989. Myth and Metaphysics in Plato’s “Phaedo.” Cranbury: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
Wilson Nightingdale, A. 1995. Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winnington-Ingram, R. P. 1994. “‘The Unity of the Phaedrus,’ Inaugural Lecture at King’s College, University of London, 1953.” Dialogos (Hellenic Studies Review) 1, 6–20.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. 1982 Plato. Hippias Major, trans. with commentary and essay. Indianapolis; Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
Wurm, A. 2008. Platonicus amor. Lesarten der Liebe bei Platon, Plotin und Ficino. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zeitlen, F. I., Winkler, J. J., and Halperin, D. M., eds. 1990. Before Sexuality: The Constructions of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar