Book contents
- Leniency in Asian Competition Law
- Leniency in Asian Competition Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables and Boxes
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Leniency in Historical, International and Theoretical Context
- Part III Leniency Programmes in Selected Asian Jurisdictions
- 5 The Original Leniency Programme of Japan
- 6 Negotiated Leniency in Japan Embedded in Ever-Increasing Sanctions
- 7 The Law and Policy on Cartels and Leniency in Korea
- 8 The Leniency Programme in Taiwan
- 9 The State Administration for Market Regulation and Its Leniency Programme
- 10 Leniency Policy in Singapore
- 11 The Leniency Programme in Malaysia’s Competition Regime
- 12 Hong Kong’s Revised Leniency Policy and Its Potential to Deter Cartels
- 13 The Leniency Programme under the Indian Competition Law
- 14 Cartel Defection in the Philippines through Leniency
- 15 The Absence of a Leniency Programme in Thai Competition Law
- Part IV Concluding Remarks
- Appendix Schematic Overview of the Leniency Programmes from Korea, Japan, Singapore, China, India, Taiwan, Malaysia, Hong Kong and the Philippines
- Bibliography
- Index
15 - The Absence of a Leniency Programme in Thai Competition Law
from Part III - Leniency Programmes in Selected Asian Jurisdictions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 September 2022
- Leniency in Asian Competition Law
- Leniency in Asian Competition Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables and Boxes
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Leniency in Historical, International and Theoretical Context
- Part III Leniency Programmes in Selected Asian Jurisdictions
- 5 The Original Leniency Programme of Japan
- 6 Negotiated Leniency in Japan Embedded in Ever-Increasing Sanctions
- 7 The Law and Policy on Cartels and Leniency in Korea
- 8 The Leniency Programme in Taiwan
- 9 The State Administration for Market Regulation and Its Leniency Programme
- 10 Leniency Policy in Singapore
- 11 The Leniency Programme in Malaysia’s Competition Regime
- 12 Hong Kong’s Revised Leniency Policy and Its Potential to Deter Cartels
- 13 The Leniency Programme under the Indian Competition Law
- 14 Cartel Defection in the Philippines through Leniency
- 15 The Absence of a Leniency Programme in Thai Competition Law
- Part IV Concluding Remarks
- Appendix Schematic Overview of the Leniency Programmes from Korea, Japan, Singapore, China, India, Taiwan, Malaysia, Hong Kong and the Philippines
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
The chapter describes how the legislator discussed whether to incorporate a leniency programme in the Trade Competition Act of 2017 (2017 Act). It is argued that there was an initial desire to introduce a leniency programme. The leniency programme would be applied to the criminal sanctions that the bill prescribed for hard-core cartels, such as those involved in price fixing or bid rigging. However, the Office of the Attorney General objected with reasons that giving immunity from a sanction is the constitutional prerogative of the court. In order not to jeopardise the creation of a leniency programme, the drafting committee was willing to limit the lenient treatment to just a reduction in the sanction or to the cartels for which only an administrative sanction would apply. But these initiatives were not incorporated into the 2017 Act. Instead, the 2017 Act gave tremendous flexibility to the enforcement agency by only prescribing maximum sanctions. This might allow a similar result to a leniency programme to be achieved, albeit without a well-defined formal framework.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Leniency in Asian Competition Law , pp. 371 - 392Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022