Book contents
- The Legitimacy of Investment Arbitration
- Studies on International Courts and Tribunals
- The Legitimacy of Investment Arbitration
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: The Legitimacy Crisis and the Empirical Turn
- 2 The International Investment Regime and Its Discontents
- Part I Process Legitimacy
- Part II Process Legitimacy
- Part III Output Legitimacy
- 10 The West and the Rest: Geographic Diversity and the Role of Arbitrator Nationality in Investment Arbitration
- 11 Mixing Methodologies in Empirically Investigating Investment Arbitration and Inbound Foreign Investment
- 12 Double Jeopardy? The Use of Investment Arbitration in Times of Crisis
- 13 Who Has Benefited Financially from Investment Treaty Arbitration? An Evaluation of the Size and Wealth of Claimants
- 14 Explaining China’s Relative Absence from Investment Treaty Arbitration
- 14.1 Introduction
- 14.2 Chinese Participation in the International Investment Regime
- 14.3 Patterns of Chinese Inward FDI from 2007: Further Adding to the Puzzle?
- 14.4 Understanding China’s Relative Absence from ITA
- 14.5 Concluding Remarks
- Annex 1 Chinese BITs with No ISDS Provisions
- Annex 2 Chinese BITs with Narrow ISDS Provisions
- Annex 3 Chinese TIPs with ISDS Provisions
- Annex 4 Chinese IIAs Signed but Not in Force/Terminated
- Annex 5 Chinese IIAs Containing Broad ISDS Provisions
- Part IV Legitimation Strategies
- Index
Annex 3 - Chinese TIPs with ISDS Provisions
from 14 - Explaining China’s Relative Absence from Investment Treaty Arbitration
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 January 2022
Book contents
- The Legitimacy of Investment Arbitration
- Studies on International Courts and Tribunals
- The Legitimacy of Investment Arbitration
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: The Legitimacy Crisis and the Empirical Turn
- 2 The International Investment Regime and Its Discontents
- Part I Process Legitimacy
- Part II Process Legitimacy
- Part III Output Legitimacy
- 10 The West and the Rest: Geographic Diversity and the Role of Arbitrator Nationality in Investment Arbitration
- 11 Mixing Methodologies in Empirically Investigating Investment Arbitration and Inbound Foreign Investment
- 12 Double Jeopardy? The Use of Investment Arbitration in Times of Crisis
- 13 Who Has Benefited Financially from Investment Treaty Arbitration? An Evaluation of the Size and Wealth of Claimants
- 14 Explaining China’s Relative Absence from Investment Treaty Arbitration
- 14.1 Introduction
- 14.2 Chinese Participation in the International Investment Regime
- 14.3 Patterns of Chinese Inward FDI from 2007: Further Adding to the Puzzle?
- 14.4 Understanding China’s Relative Absence from ITA
- 14.5 Concluding Remarks
- Annex 1 Chinese BITs with No ISDS Provisions
- Annex 2 Chinese BITs with Narrow ISDS Provisions
- Annex 3 Chinese TIPs with ISDS Provisions
- Annex 4 Chinese IIAs Signed but Not in Force/Terminated
- Annex 5 Chinese IIAs Containing Broad ISDS Provisions
- Part IV Legitimation Strategies
- Index
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Legitimacy of Investment ArbitrationEmpirical Perspectives, pp. 461Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022