Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T13:21:08.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The Possibilities of Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Laura F. Edwards
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

Bella Newton was one of many Americans who gave meaning to the broad legal changes put in place by Congressional Republicans. Newton, an African American woman in North Carolina, did not set out to involve herself in the major constitutional questions of the day. She wanted only to defend her children, William and Susan, against the actions of an angry white neighbor, Alexander Noblin. The incident began in the spring of 1869 when William and Susan took a short cut across Noblin’s land on the way home from school. Noblin ordered the children off. From there, the situation deteriorated rapidly. Noblin tried to assault Susan. William threw a rock at Noblin’s head, frustrating his attempt. Then, as the children made their escape, Noblin tried to assert his authority one final time. In William’s words, he “shook his penis at us.” After learning of the incident, Bella Newton’s first response was in keeping with local customs. She publicized her complaint in the neighborhood and then made an informal bargain with Noblin, agreeing to drop the matter in exchange for one dollar and ten pounds of bacon. Noblin delivered on his end of the deal, but Newton had a change of heart and filed charges with the justice of the peace, turning the incident into a legal matter involving her rights and those of her children. Much to his chagrin, Noblin learned that his actions carried different consequences than they had before the enactment of the Reconstruction Amendments: Noblin was indicted for assault at the spring term of the Superior Court.

Congressional Republicans rallied in support of the extension of federal power to bring the states of the former Confederacy in line with what they saw as broad, national principles. But consensus fell apart after that: even within the Republican Party, there was no agreement as to what, exactly, the Reconstruction Amendments were meant to accomplish. Reliance on the compliance of state governments only muddied the waters, dispersing responsibility for enforcing the amendments and, in the process, diluting their meaning.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Edwards, Laura F., “Sexual Violence, Gender, Reconstruction, and the Extension of Patriarchy in Granville County, North Carolina,” North Carolina Historical Review 68 (1991): 237–60Google Scholar
Johnson, Suzanne Stone and Johnson, Robert Allison, eds., Bitter Freedom: William Stone’s Record of Service in the Freedmen’s Bureau (Columbia, SC, 2008), p. xii
Cimbala, Paul A., Under the Guardianship of the Nation: The Freedmen’s Bureau and the Reconstruction of Georgia, 1865–1870 (Athens, GA, 1997
Nieman, Donald G., To Set the Law in Motion: The Freedmen’s Bureau and the Legal Rights of Blacks, 1865–1868 (Millwood, NY, 1980
Pateman, Carole, The Sexual Contract (Stanford, CA, 1988
Hall, Catherine, White, Male, and Middle-Class: Explorations in Feminism and History (New York, 1992
Harris, Cheryl I., “Whiteness as Property.” Harvard Law Review 106 (1993): 1923–2015Google Scholar
Welke, Barbara Young, Law and the Borders of Belonging in the Long Nineteenth Century United States (New York, 2010
Bercaw, Nancy D., Gendered Freedoms: Race, Rights, and the Politics of Household in the Delta, 1861–1875 (Gainesville, FL, 2003
Edwards, Laura F., Gendered Strife and Confusion: The Political Culture of Reconstruction (Urbana, IL, 1997
Litwack, Leon F., Been in the Storm So Long: The Aftermath of Slavery (New York, 1979
Fields, Barbara J., Slavery and Freedom on the Middle Ground: Maryland during the Nineteenth Century (New Haven, CT, 1985
Foner, Eric, Nothing But Freedom: Emancipation and Its Legacy (Baton Rouge, LA, 1983
Gross, Ariela J., Double Character: Slavery and Mastery in the Antebellum Southern Courtroom (Princeton, NJ, 2000
Penningroth, Dylan C., The Claims of Kinfolk: African American Property and Community in the Nineteenth-Century South (Chapel Hill, NC, 2003
Zackin, Emily, Looking for Rights in all the Wrong Places: Why State Constitutions Contain America’s Positive Rights (Princeton, NJ, 2014), p. 68n4
Williams, Heather, Self-Taught: African American Education in Slavery and Freedom (Chapel Hill, NC, 2005
Davis, Hugh, “We Will Be Satisfied with Nothing Less”: The African American Struggle for Equal Rights in the North during Reconstruction (Ithaca, NY, 2011
Douglas, Davison M., Jim Crow Moves North: The Battle Over Northern School Segregation, 1865–1954 (New York, 2005
Woodward, C. Vann, The Strange Career of Jim Crow (New York, 1955
Rabinowitz, Howard N., Race Relations in the Urban South, 1865–1890 (New York, 1978
Rose, Willie Lee, Rehearsal for Reconstruction: The Port Royal Experiment (New York, 1964
Saville, Julie, The Work of Reconstruction: From Slave to Wage Laborer in South Carolina, 1860–1870 (New York, 1994
Edwards, Laura F., “Status without Rights: African Americans and the Tangled History of Law and Governance in the Nineteenth-Century U.S. South,” American Historical Review 112 (2007): 365–93Google Scholar
Bryant, Jonathan M., How Curious a Land: Conflict and Change in Greene County, Georgia, 1850–1885 (Chapel Hill, NC, 1996
Ross, Michael A., “Obstructing Reconstruction: John Archibald Campbell and the Legal Campaign Against Louisiana’s Republican Government, 1868–1873,” Civil War History 49 (2003b): 235–53Google Scholar
Cott, Nancy F., The Bonds of Womanhood: “Women’s Sphere” in New England, 1780–1835 (New Haven, CT, 1977
Faulkner, Carol, Women’s Radical Reconstruction: The Freedmen’s Aid Movement (Philadelphia, 2003
Jeffrey, Julie Roy, The Great Silent Army of Abolition: Ordinary Women and the Anti-Slavery Movement (Chapel Hill, NC, 1998
Hewitt, Nancy A., Women’s Activism and Social Change: Rochester, New York, 1822–1872 (Ithaca, NY, 1984
Brown, Elsa Barkley, “Negotiating and Transforming the Public Sphere: African American Political Life in the Transition from Slavery to Freedom,” Public Culture 7 (1994): 107–26Google Scholar
Glymph, Thavolia, Out of the House of Bondage: The Transformation of the Plantation Household (New York, 2008
Williams, Lou Falkner, The Great South Carolina Ku Klux Klan Trials, 1871–1872 (Athens, GA, 2004), p. 2
Rable, George C., But There Was No Peace: The Role of Violence in the Politics of Reconstruction (Athens, GA, 1984
Rosen, Hannah, Terror in the Heart of Freedom: Citizenship, Sexual Violence, and the Meaning of Race in the Postemancipation South (Chapel Hill, NC, 2009
Trelease, Allen W., White Terror: The Ku Klux Klan Conspiracy and Southern Reconstruction (New York, 1971

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The Possibilities of Rights
  • Laura F. Edwards, Duke University, North Carolina
  • Book: A Legal History of the Civil War and Reconstruction
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139017695.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The Possibilities of Rights
  • Laura F. Edwards, Duke University, North Carolina
  • Book: A Legal History of the Civil War and Reconstruction
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139017695.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The Possibilities of Rights
  • Laura F. Edwards, Duke University, North Carolina
  • Book: A Legal History of the Civil War and Reconstruction
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139017695.006
Available formats
×