Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Acknowledgements
- Contents
- Note on Transliteration
- Introduction
- PART I TWO MODES OF RABBINIC LEADERSHIP
- PART II INTELLECTUAL CHALLENGE AND CONFLICT
- PART III LEADERS FACING COMMUNITIES IN UPHEAVAL
- PART IV CONFLICTING ATTITUDES TOWARDS EXILE, THE LAND, AND THE MESSIAH
- Bibliography
- Index of Passages Cited
- General Index
10 - Attempts to Control the Pulpit: Medieval Judaism and Beyond
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Acknowledgements
- Contents
- Note on Transliteration
- Introduction
- PART I TWO MODES OF RABBINIC LEADERSHIP
- PART II INTELLECTUAL CHALLENGE AND CONFLICT
- PART III LEADERS FACING COMMUNITIES IN UPHEAVAL
- PART IV CONFLICTING ATTITUDES TOWARDS EXILE, THE LAND, AND THE MESSIAH
- Bibliography
- Index of Passages Cited
- General Index
Summary
JACOB ANATOLI, son-in-law of the noted translator of Maimonides’ Guide for the Perplexed, Samuel ibn Tibbon, was the first philosophically trained Jew who left a record of his sermons. In the second quarter of the thirteenth century, he began to present homilies at wedding ceremonies or celebrations, though he notes that he did not have time to write down even a single line of what he said: ‘Then, as I got used to this discipline, I agreed to preach a little publicly each sabbath. But not long afterwards, I retreated from this path, seeing that it was considered improper by some of my companions.’ The book into which he incorporated his homiletical oeuvre, Malmad hatalmidim, contains several references to the opposition his preaching engendered.
The sermons themselves reveal an exegetical orientation, focusing on the Wisdom books of the Bible and the weekly lesson from the Pentateuch. Their philosophical content does not appear to be radical or obviously problematic, and Anatoli actually dissociates himself from extremist philosophical positions. Nevertheless, he was aware of the potential for opposition: ‘Although I am aware that this novel interpretation will be regarded as overly presumptuous, some men of learning even branding it as totally fantastic, nonetheless I persist in advancing it, willingly subjecting myself to their disparagement and revilement.’ In another sermon:
Thus, all who would serve God must be aware of the reason for the commandment while performing it, lest it become a ‘commandment learned by rote’ [Isa. 29: 13]; and therefore no one should blame me for trying to explain the reason, for if I provide a sufficient reason, it is to the good, and if I fail, I may inspire someone else to come up with a sufficient reason.
And in yet another:
Even though I know that this point of mine will not be accepted by many, because of the bad custom [that he has just criticized: excessive movement in prayer without attention of the heart], we have already said that Truth should not be bashful; she should call out at the head of busy streets [see Prov. 1: 21], on the heights of the town [see Prov. 9: 3], and if only one out of a thousand should accept her, Truth is obliged to have compassion for that one.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Leadership and ConflictTensions in Medieval and Modern Jewish History and Culture, pp. 237 - 250Publisher: Liverpool University PressPrint publication year: 2014