Book contents
- The Law of Freedom
- The Law of Freedom
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 The Counterpopular Dilemma
- 2 Constitutionalism and the Counterpopular Dilemma
- 3 Traversing the Dilemma
- 4 One Person, One Vote
- 5 Campaign Finance
- 6 Parties in Democracy
- 7 Race and Elections
- Conclusion
- Selected Bibliography
- Index
- References
Selected Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 July 2023
Book contents
- The Law of Freedom
- The Law of Freedom
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 The Counterpopular Dilemma
- 2 Constitutionalism and the Counterpopular Dilemma
- 3 Traversing the Dilemma
- 4 One Person, One Vote
- 5 Campaign Finance
- 6 Parties in Democracy
- 7 Race and Elections
- Conclusion
- Selected Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Law of FreedomThe Supreme Court and Democracy, pp. 313 - 320Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Selected Bibliography
Achen, C. H. and Bartels, L. M., Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government (Princeton University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. A., We the People, Volume 1: Foundations (Harvard University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Aleinikoff, T. A. and Issacharoff, S., “Race and Redistricting: Drawing Constitutional Lines after Shaw v. Reno” (1993) 92 Michigan Law Review 588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, S., “Arizona Free Enterprise v Bennett and the Problem of Campaign Finance” (2012) 2011 The Supreme Court Review 39Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, S. and Snyder, J. M. Jr., “The Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Elections: An Analysis of State and Federal Offices, 1942–2000” (2004) 1 Election Law Journal 315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenstos, S. R., “Disparate Impact and the Role of Classification and Motivation in Equal Protection Law after Inclusive Communities” (2016) 101 Cornell Law Review 1115Google Scholar
Baker, G. E., The Reapportionment Revolution: Representation, Political Power, and the Supreme Court (Random House, 1966)Google Scholar
Balkin, J. M., “Bush v. Gore and the Boundary between Law and Politics” (2001) 110 Yale Law Journal 1407Google Scholar
Barkow, R. E., “More Supreme than Court? The Fall of the Political Question Doctrine and the Rise of Judicial Supremacy” (2002) 102 Columbia Law Review 237Google Scholar
Bartels, L. M., Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age – Second Edition 2nd ed. (Princeton University Press, 2018)Google Scholar
Baude, W. and Sachs, S. E., “The Law of Interpretation” (2017) 130 Harvard Law Review 1079Google Scholar
Bellamy, R., Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy (Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, C. L., “Inequities in Districting for Congress: Baker v. Carr and Colegrove v. Green” (1962) 72 Yale Law Journal 13Google Scholar
Breyer, S., Active Liberty: Interpreting a Democratic Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Briffault, R., “Bush v. Gore as an Equal Protection Case” (2002) 29 Florida State University Law Review 325Google Scholar
Briffault, R., “Reforming Campaign Finance Reform: A Review of Voting with Dollars” (2003) 91 California Law Review 643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briffault, R., “McConnell v. FEC and the Transformation of Campaign Finance Law” (2004) 3 Election Law Journal 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briffault, R., “Defining the Constitutional Question in Partisan Gerrymandering” (2005) 14 Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 397Google Scholar
Brown, G. D., “Putting Watergate Behind Us: Salinas, Sun-Diamond, and Two Views of the Anticorruption Model” (2000) 74 Tulane Law Review 68Google Scholar
Bulman-Pozen, J., “Federalism All the Way Up: State Standing and ‘The New Process Federalism’” (2017) 105 California Law Review 1739Google Scholar
Cain, B. E., “Moralism and Realism in Campaign Finance Reform” (1995) 1995 University of Chicago Legal Forum 111Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. V., “Wesberry v. Sanders: A Case of Oversimplification” (1964) 9 Villanova Law Review 415Google Scholar
Charles, G.-U. E., “Constitutional Pluralism and Democratic Politics: Reflections on the Interpretive Approach of Baker v. Carr” (2002) 80 North Carolina Law Review 1103Google Scholar
Charles, G.-U. E. and Fuentes-Rohwer, L., “Reynolds Reconsidered” (2015) 67 Alabama Law Review 485Google Scholar
Charles, G.-U. E. and Fuentes-Rohwer, L. E., “The Voting Rights Act in Winter: The Death of a Superstatute” (2015) 100 Iowa Law Review 1389Google Scholar
Charles, G.-U. E. and Fuentes-Rohwer, L., “Race and Representation Revisited: The New Racial Gerrymandering Cases and Section 2 of the VRA” (2018) 59 William and Mary Law Review 1559Google Scholar
Chen, J. and Rodden, J., “Cutting Through the Thicket: Redistricting Simulations and the Detection of Partisan Gerrymanders” (2015) 14 Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 331–45Google Scholar
Chen, J. and Stephanopoulos, N. O., “The Race-Blind Future of Voting Rights” (2021) 130 Yale Law Journal 778Google Scholar
Cox, A. B. and Miles, T. J., “Judicial Ideology and the Transformation of Voting Rights Jurisprudence” (2008) 75 The University of Chicago Law Review 1493Google Scholar
Cox, G. W. and Katz, J. N., Elbridge Gerry’s Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution (Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A., A Preface to Democratic Theory, Expanded Edition (University of Chicago Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution (Harvard University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality (Harvard University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Eisgruber, C. L., Constitutional Self-Government (Harvard University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisler, J., “The Deep Patterns of Campaign Finance Law” (2016) 49 Connecticut Law Review 57Google Scholar
Eisler, J., “Partisan Gerrymandering and the Illusion of Unfairness” (2018) 67 Catholic University Law Review 229Google Scholar
Eisler, J., “The Unspoken Institutional Battle over Anticorruption: Citizens United, Honest Services, and the Legislative-Judicial Divide” (2018) 9 First Amendment Law Review 363Google Scholar
Eisler, J., “Partisan Gerrymandering and the Constitutionalization of Statistics” (2019) 68 Emory Law Journal 979Google Scholar
Elmendorf, C. and Spencer, D., “Administering Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act After Shelby County” (2015) 115 Columbia Law Review 2143Google Scholar
Ely, J. H., Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Harvard University Press, 1980)Google Scholar
Eskridge, W. N., “Pluralism and Distrust: How Courts Can Support Democracy by Lowering the Stakes of Politics” (2004) 114 Yale Law Journal 1279Google Scholar
Fallon, R. H., “The Meaning of Legal ‘Meaning’ and Its Implications for Theories of Legal Interpretation” (2015) 82 The University of Chicago Law Review 1235Google Scholar
Fishkin, J. and Forbath, W. E., “The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution” (2014) 94 Boston University Law Review 671Google Scholar
Foley, E. B., “Philosophy, the Constitution, and Campaign Finance” (1998) 10 Stanford Law & Policy Review 23Google Scholar
Foley, E. B., “Due Process, Fair Play, and Excessive Partisanship: A New Principle for Judicial Review of Election Laws” (2017) 84 The University of Chicago Law Review 655Google Scholar
Fraga, B. L., The Turnout Gap: Race, Ethnicity, and Political Inequality in a Diversifying America (Cambridge University Press, 2018)Google Scholar
Fuentes-Rohwer, L., “Doing Our Politics in Court: Gerrymandering, Fair Representation and an Exegesis into the Judicial Role” (2003) 78 Notre Dame Law Review 527Google Scholar
Fuentes-Rohwer, L., “The Future of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in the Hands of a Conservative Court” (2010) 5 Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy 125Google Scholar
Gardner, J. A., “Madison’s Hope: Virtue, Self-Interest, and the Design of Electoral Systems” (2000) 86 Iowa Law Review 87Google Scholar
Gardner, J. A., What Are Campaigns For? The Role of Persuasion in Electoral Law and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Gerken, H. K., “Understanding the Right to an Undiluted Vote” (2001) 114 Harvard Law Review 1663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerken, H. K., “The Costs and Causes of Minimalism in Voting Cases: Baker v. Carr and Its Progeny” (2002) 80 North Carolina Law Review 1411Google Scholar
Gerken, H. K., “Lost in the Political Thicket: The Court, Election Law, and the Doctrinal Interregnum” (2004) 153 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 503Google Scholar
Gilens, M., Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America (Princeton University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Gilens, M. Economic Inequality and Politics Power in American (Princeton University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Grofman, B. and King, G., “The Future of Partisan Symmetry as a Judicial Test for Partisan Gerrymandering after LULAC v. Perry” (2007) 6 Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 2Google Scholar
Grove, T. L. “The Lost History of the Political Question Doctrine” (2015) 90 New York University Law Review 1908Google Scholar
Grumbach, J. M. and Sahn, A., “Race and Representation in Campaign Finance” (2020) 114 American Political Science Review 206Google Scholar
Habermas, J., Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Polity Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Hajnal, Z. L., Dangerously Divided: How Race and Class Shape Winning and Losing in American Politics (Cambridge University Press, 2020)Google Scholar
Hasen, R. L., The Supreme Court and Election Law: Judging Equality from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore (New York University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Hasen, R. L., “Do the Parties or the People Own the Electoral Process?” (2000) 149 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 815Google Scholar
Hasen, R. L., “Buckley Is Dead, Long Live Buckley: The New Campaign Finance Incoherence of McConnell v. Federal Election Commission” (2004) 153 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 31Google Scholar
Hasen, R. L., “Reining in the Purcell Principle” (2017) 43 Florida State University Law Review 427Google Scholar
Hasen, R. L., “Race or Party, Race as Party, or Party All the Time: Three Uneasy Approaches to Conjoined Polarization in Redistricting and Voting Cases” (2018) 59 William and Mary Law Review 1837Google Scholar
Hasen, R. L. “The Supreme Court’s Pro-Partisanship Turn” (2020) 109 Georgetown Law Journal 50Google Scholar
Hayden, G. M., “The False Promise of One Person, One Vote” (2003) 102 Michigan Law Review 213Google Scholar
Highton, B., “Voter Identification Laws and Turnout in the United States” (2017) 20 Annual Review of Political Science 149Google Scholar
Hirschl, R., Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Harvard University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Issacharoff, S., “Judging Politics: The Elusive Quest for Judicial Review of Political Fairness” (1992) 71 Texas Law Review 1643Google Scholar
Issacharoff, S., “Private Parties with Public Purposes: Political Parties, Associational Freedoms, and Partisan Competition” (2001) 101 Columbia Law Review 274Google Scholar
Issacharoff, S., “Is Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act a Victim of Its Own Success?” (2004) 104 Columbia Law Review 1710Google Scholar
Issacharoff, S., “Beyond the Discrimination Model on Voting” (2013) 127 Harvard Law Review 95Google Scholar
Issacharoff, S., Fragile Democracies: Contested Power in the Era of Constitutional Courts (Cambridge University Press, 2015)Google Scholar
Issacharoff, S., “Outsourcing Politics: The Hostile Takeover of Our Hollowed-Out Political Parties” (2017) 54 Houston Law Review 845Google Scholar
Issacharoff, S. and Karlan, P. S., “Where to Draw the Line: Judicial Review of Political Gerrymanders” (2004) 153 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 541Google Scholar
Issacharoff, S. and Karlan, P. S., “The Hydraulics of Campaign Finance Reform” (1999) 77 Texas Law Review 1705Google Scholar
Issacharoff, S. and Pildes, R. H., “Politics as Markets: Partisan Lockups of the Democratic Process” (1998) 50 Stanford Law Review 643Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., and Westwood, S. J., “The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States” (2019) 22 Annual Review of Political Science 129Google Scholar
Kang, M. S., “The Bright Side of Partisan Gerrymandering” (2005) 14 Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 443Google Scholar
Kang, M. S., “When Courts Won’t Make Law: Partisan Gerrymandering and a Structural Approach to the Law of Democracy” (2007) 68 Ohio State Law Journal 1097Google Scholar
Kang, M. S., “Race and Democratic Contestation” (2008) 117 Yale Law Journal 734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, M. S., “Sore Loser Laws and Democratic Contestation” (2010) 99 Georgetown Law Journal 1013Google Scholar
Kang, M. S., “Gerrymandering and the Constitutional Norm against Government Partisanship” (2017) 116 Michigan Law Review 351Google Scholar
Kang, M. S. and Shepherd, J. M., “The Long Shadow of Bush v. Gore: Judicial Partisanship in Election Cases” (2016) 68 Stanford Law Review 1411Google Scholar
Karlan, P. S. and Levinson, D. J., “Why Voting Is Different” (1996) 84 California Law Review 1201Google Scholar
Kim, Y. and Chen, J., “Gerrymandered by Definition: The Distortion of ‘Traditional’ Districting Criteria and a Proposal for Their Empirical Redefinition” (2021) 2021 Wisconsin Law Review 101Google Scholar
Klarman, M. J., “The Puzzling Resistance to Political Process Theory” (1991) 77 Virginia Law Review 747Google Scholar
Klarman, M. J., “Majoritarian Judicial Review: The Entrenchment Problem” (1996) 85 Georgetown Law Journal 491Google Scholar
Klarman, M. J., “The White Primary Rulings: A Case Study in the Consequences of Supreme Court Decisionmaking” (2001) 29 Florida State University Law ReviewGoogle Scholar
Klarman, M. J., From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality (Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Kramer, L. D., The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review (Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Kuhner, T. K., Capitalism v. Democracy: Money in Politics and the Free Market Constitution (Stanford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Kuhner, T. K., Tyranny of Greed: Trump, Corruption, and the Revolution to Come (Stanford University Press, 2020)Google Scholar
Landau, D., Wiseman, H. J., and Wiseman, S. R., “Federalism for the Worst Case” (2020) 105 Iowa Law Review 1187Google Scholar
Lavine, H. G., Johnston, C. D., and Steenbergen, M. R., The Ambivalent Partisan: How Critical Loyalty Promotes Democracy (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Lessig, L., “What an Originalist Would Understand ‘Corruption’ to Mean” (2014) 102 California Law Review 1Google Scholar
Lessig, L., Republic, Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress – and a Plan to Stop It (Twelve, 2015)Google Scholar
Levinson, D. and Sachs, B. I., “Political Entrenchment and Public Law” (2015) 125 Yale Law Journal 400Google Scholar
Levinson, S., “One Person, One Vote: A Mantra in Need of Meaning” (2002) 80 North Carolina Law Review 1269Google Scholar
Lowenstein, D. H. and Steinberg, J., “The Quest for Legislative Districting in the Public Interest: Elusive or Illusory” (1985) 33 UCLA Law Review 1Google Scholar
Lucas, J. D., “Legislative Apportionment and Representative Government: The Meaning of Baker v. Carr” (1963) 61 Michigan Law Review 711Google Scholar
Manheim, L. M. and Porter, E. G., “The Elephant in the Room: Intentional Voter Suppression” (2018) 2018 Supreme Court Review 213Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J., “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’” (1999) 61 The Journal of Politics 628Google Scholar
McConnell, M. W., “The Redistricting Cases: Original Mistakes and Current Consequences Nineteenth Annual National Student Federalist Society” (2000) 24 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 103Google Scholar
Muirhead, R., The Promise of Party in a Polarized Age (Harvard University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Muirhead, R. and Rosenblum, N. L., “The Political Theory of Parties and Partisanship: Catching Up” (2020) 23 Annual Review of Political Science 95Google Scholar
Muller, D. T., “Perpetuating ‘One Person, One Vote’ Errors” (2016) 39 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 371Google Scholar
Muller, D. T., “Legislative Delegations and the Elections Clause” (2017) 43 Florida State University Law Review 717Google Scholar
Norris, P., Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior (Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Ortiz, D. R., “The Democratic Paradox of Campaign Finance Reform” (1998) 50 Stanford Law Review 893Google Scholar
Ortiz, D. R., “Duopoly versus Autonomy: How the Two-Party System Harms the Major Parties” (2000) 100 Columbia Law Review 753Google Scholar
Overton, S., “The Donor Class: Campaign Finance, Democracy, and Participation” (2004) 153 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 73Google Scholar
Parsons, G. M., “Gerrymandering & Justiciability: The Political Question Doctrine After Rucho v. Common Cause” (2020) 95 Indiana Law Journal 1295Google Scholar
Perry, M. J., The Constitution in the Courts: Law or Politics? (Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Persily, N. “Toward A Functional Defense of Political Autonomy” (2001) 76 New York University Law Review 750Google Scholar
Persily, N. “When Judges Carve Democracies: A Primer on Court-Drawn Redistricting Plans” (2006) 73 George Washington University Law Review 1131Google Scholar
Persily, N., “In Defense of Foxes Guarding Henhouses: The Case for Judicial Acquiescence to Incumbent-Protecting Gerrymanders” (2002) 116 Harvard Law Review 649Google Scholar
Persily, N. and Cain, B. E., “The Legal Status of Political Parties: A Reassessment of Competing Paradigms” (2000) 100 Columbia Law Review 775Google Scholar
Pettit, P., Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Pildes, R. H., “Principled Limitations on Racial and Partisan Redistricting” (1997) 106 Yale Law Journal 2505Google Scholar
Pildes, R. H., “Is Voting-Rights Law Now at War with Itself – Social Science and Voting Rights in the 2000s” (2002) 80 North Carolina Law Review 1517Google Scholar
Pildes, R. H., “The Constitutionalization of Democratic Politics” (2004) 118 Harvard Law Review 116Google Scholar
Pildes, R. H. and Niemi, R. G., “Expressive Harms, Bizarre Districts, and Voting Rights: Evaluating Election-District Appearances after Shaw v. Reno” (1993) 92 Michigan Law Review 483Google Scholar
Primus, R. A., “Equal Protection and Disparate Impact: Round Three” (2003) 117 Harvard Law Review 494Google Scholar
Przeworski, A., “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense” in Shapiro, I. and Hacker-Cordon, C. (eds.), Democracy’s Value (Cambridge University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Raviv, A., “Unsafe Harbors: One Person, One Vote and Partisan Redistricting” (2005) 7 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 1001Google Scholar
Rosenblum, N. L., On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship (Princeton University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Ross, B. L., “Democracy and Renewed Distrust: Equal Protection and the Evolving Judicial Conception of Politics” (2013) 101 California Law Review 1565Google Scholar
Ross, Bertrall II. and Spencer, D. M., “Passive Voter Suppression: Campaign Mobilization and the Effective Disfranchisement of the Poor” (2019) 114 Northwestern University Law Review 73Google Scholar
Scalia, A., “Originalism: The Lesser Evil” (1989) 57 University of Cincinnati Law Review 849Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E., American Government in Action Party Government (1942) (Routledge, 2004)Google Scholar
Schlesinger, J. A., Political Parties and the Winning of Office (University of Michigan Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Schuck, P. H., “The Thickest Thicket: Partisan Gerrymandering and Judicial Regulation of Politics” (1987) 87 Columbia Law Review 1325Google Scholar
Schweigert, B. J., “‘Now for a Clean Sweep!’: Smiley v. Holm, Partisan Gerrymandering, and At-Large Congressional Elections” (2008) 107 Michigan Law Review 133Google Scholar
Sellers, J. S., “Election Law and White Identity Politics” (2019) 87 Fordham Law Review 63Google Scholar
Selmi, M., “Proving Intentional Discrimination: The Reality of Supreme Court Rhetoric” (1997) 86 Georgetown Law Journal 279Google Scholar
Shaw, K., “‘A Mystifying and Distorting Factor’: The Electoral College and American Democracy” (2021) 120 Michigan Law Review 1285Google Scholar
Siegel, R., “Why Equal Protection No Longer Protects: The Evolving Forms of Status-Enforcing State Action” (1997) 49 Stanford Law Review 1111Google Scholar
Sitaraman, G., The Crisis of the Middle-Class Constitution: Why Economic Inequality Threatens Our Republic (Alfred A. Knopf, 2017)Google Scholar
Smith, B. A., “Faulty Assumptions and Undemocratic Consequences of Campaign Finance Reform” (1996) 105 Yale Law Journal 1049Google Scholar
Smith, J. D., On Democracy’s Doorstep: The Inside Story of How the Supreme Court Brought “One Person, One Vote” to the United States (Hill and Wang, 2014)Google Scholar
Solum, L. B. “Originalism Versus Living Constitutionalism: The Conceptual Structure of the Great Debate” (2019) 113 Northwestern University Law Review 1243Google Scholar
Stephanopoulos, N. and McGhee, E., “Partisan Gerrymandering and the Efficiency Gap” (2015) 82 University of Chicago Law Review 831Google Scholar
Stephanopoulos, N. O., “Aligning Campaign Finance Law” (2015) 101 Virginia Law Review 1425Google Scholar
Stephanopoulos, N. O., “Disparate Impact, Unified Law” (2019) 128 Yale Law Journal 1478Google Scholar
Strauss, D. A., “Corruption, Equality, and Campaign Finance Reform” (1994) 94 Columbia Law Review 1370Google Scholar
Sullivan, K. M., “Two Concepts of Freedom of Speech” (2010) 124 Harvard Law Review 143Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R., “Political Equality & Unintended Consequence” (1994) 94 Columbia Law Review 1390Google Scholar
Teachout, Z., Corruption in America: From Benjamin Franklin’s Snuff Box to Citizens United (Harvard University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Tokaji, D. P., “Applying Section 2 to the New Vote Denial” (2015) 50 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 439Google Scholar
Tokaji, D. P., “Voting Is Association” (2017) 43 Florida State University Law Review 763Google Scholar
Tolson, F., “Reinventing Sovereignty?: Federalism as a Constraint on the Voting Rights Act” (2012) 65 Vanderbilt Law Review 1195Google Scholar
Tolson, F., “The Elections Clause and the Underenforcement of Federal Law” (2019) Yale Law Journal Forum 171Google Scholar
Tolson, F., “Election Law ‘Federalism’ and the Limits of the Antidiscrimination Framework” (2018) 59 William & Mary Law Review 2211Google Scholar
Tribe, L. H., “The Puzzling Persistence of Process-Based Constitutional Theories” (1990) 89 Yale Law Journal 1063Google Scholar
Tribe, L. H., “Bush v. Gore and Its Disguises: Freeing Bush v. Gore from Its Hall of Mirrors” (2001) 115 Harvard Law Review 170Google Scholar
Tuck, R., The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Modern Democracy (Cambridge University Press, 2016)Google Scholar
Tushnet, M., “Darkness on the Edge of Town: The Contributions of John Hart Ely to Constitutional Theory” (1980) 89 Yale Law Journal 1037Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. V., “Law and Prudence in the Law of Justiciability: The Transformation and Disappearance of the Political Question Doctrine” (2002) 80 North Carolina Law Review 1203Google Scholar
Waldron, J., “The Core of the Case against Judicial Review” (2006) 115 Yale Law Journal 1346Google Scholar
Waldron, J., “The Rule of Law and the Role of Courts” (2021) 10 Global Constitutionalism 91Google Scholar
Whittington, K. E., “Originalism: A Critical Introduction” (2013) 82 Fordham Law Review 375Google Scholar
Wright, J. S., “Politics and the Constitution: Is Money Speech?” (1975) 85 Yale Law Journal 1001Google Scholar
Zhang, E. R. and Cain, B. E., “Blurred Lines: Conjoined Polarization and Voting Rights” (2016) 77 Ohio State Law Journal 868Google Scholar