Abramovich, V. & Courtis, C. (2002), Los derechos sociales como derechos exigibles, Barcelona: Trotta.Google Scholar

Ackerman, B. (1980), Social Justice in the Liberal State, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Ackerman, B. (1991), We the People, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Ackerman, B. (2007), The Failure of the Founding Fathers: Jefferson, Marshall and the Rise of Presidential Democracy, New York: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Ackerman, B. (2010), The Decline and Fall of the American Republic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ackerman, B. (2014), The Civil Rights Revolution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,Google Scholar

Alberdi, J. B. (1852) (1981), Bases y puntos de partida para la organización política de la República Argentina, Buenos Aires: Plus Ultra.Google Scholar

Alberdi, J. B. (1854) Sistema económico y rentístico de la confederación argentina, Valparaíso: Imprenta y Librería del Mercurio.Google Scholar

Alexander, L. & Schauer, F. (1997), “On Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation,” 110 Harv. L. Rev. 1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, L. & Schauer, F. (2000), “Defending Judicial Supremacy: A Reply,” 17 Const. Comment. 455.Google Scholar

Alexander, L. & Solum, L. (2005), “Popular? Constitutionalism?” 118 Harvard L. Rev. 1594.Google Scholar

Allan, T. (2016), “The Rule of Law,” in Dyzenhaus, D. & Thorburn, M., eds., Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 201–221.Google Scholar

Arato, A. (2017), The Adventures of the Constituent Power, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (2006), On Revolution, London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar

Atria, F. (2016), La forma del derecho, Marcial Pons, Madrid.Google Scholar

Ávila Santamaría, R. (2009), ed., Desafíos constitucionales. La Constitución ecuatoriana del 2008 en perspectiva, Tribunal Constitucional del Ecuador.Google Scholar

Bachtiger, A., Dryzek, J., Mansbridge, J., & Warren, M. (2018), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barber, B. (1984), Strong Democracy, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Basadre, J. (1949), Historia de la República del Perú, Lima,Editorial Cultura Antártica.Google Scholar

Bateup, C. (2007), “Expanding the Conversation: American and Canadian Experiences of Constitutional Dialogue in Comparative Perspective,” 21 Temp. Int´l L. J. 1.Google Scholar

Benedetti, M. & Sáenz, J. (2016), Las audiencias públicas ante la Corte Suprema, Buenos Aires, Siglo XXI.Google Scholar

Bentham, J. (1843), The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 6, The Online Library of Liberty. Liberty Fund, https://oll-resources.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/oll3/store/titles/1923/Bentham_0872-06_EBk_v6.0.pdf.Google Scholar

Bentham, J. (2002), The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. by Schofield, P., Pease-Watkin, C., & Blamires, C., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bergallo, P., Jaramillo, I. & Vaggione, J. (comps. 2018), El aborto en América Latina. Estrategias jurídicas para luchar por su legalización y enfrentar las resistencias conservadoras, Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar

Bickel, A. (1962), The Least Dangerous Branch, Connecticut, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Bolívar, S. (1951), Selected Writings of Bolívar, 2 vols., New York: The Colonial Press.Google Scholar

Bolívar, S. (1976), Doctrina del Libertador, Caracas: Biblioteca Ayacucho.Google Scholar

Bonilla, D. (1993), Constitutionalism on the Global South. The Activist Tribunals of India, South Africa, and Colombia, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brinks, D. & Blass, A. (2018), The DNA of Constitutional Justice in Latin America, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. (2000), Politics as Public Choice, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar

Burke, E. [1774] (1999), “Speech to the Electors of Bristol,” in Selected Works of Edmund Burke (4 vols.), vol. 4, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/659/20392.Google Scholar

Cepeda, M. (2004), “Judicial Activism in a Violent Context: The Origin, Role, and Impact of the Colombian Constitutional Court,” 3 Washington University Global Studies Law Review 259.Google Scholar

Chipman, N. (1833), Principles of Government, Burlington, IN.Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A. (2009), Why Not Socialism? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Colon Ríos, J. (2020), Constituent Power and the Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Contesse, J. (2015), “Subsidiarity in Inter-American Human Rights Law,” SELA, manuscript on file with the author.Google Scholar

Courtis, C. (2006), “Judicial Enforcement of Social Rights: Perspectives from Latin America,” in Gargarella, R.. Gloppen, Siri & Skaar, Elin, eds., Courts and Social Transformation in New Democracies. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Cover, R. (1983), “The Supreme Court, 1982 Term – Foreword: Nomos and Narrative” (1983). Faculty Scholarship Series. 2705, https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2705Google Scholar

Cover, R. (1985), “Violence and the Word,” 95 Yale L.J. 1601.Google Scholar

Crozier, M., Huntington, S., & Watanuki, J. (1975), The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission Paperback, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Da Silva, V. A. (2011), “Ideas e institucois constitutionais do século xx no Brasil,” in Valadés, D. et al., eds., Ideas e instituciones constitucionales en el siglo XX. México: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar

Dahl, R. (1956), A Preface to Democratic Theory, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, R. (1989), Democracy and Its Critics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, R. (2003), How Democratic Is the American Constitution? Connecticut, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

De Jongh, M. (2013), “Group Dynamics in the Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform,” Thesis, Grasten (Denmark), Toptryk Grafisk, at Utrecht University Repository, dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/275018.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. (2018), “Constitutional Rights as Bribes,” 50 Connecticut Law Review 769.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. (1975), “Hard Cases,” 88 Harvard Law Review 1057.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. (1977), Taking Rights Seriously, Harvard, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. (1997), “The Arduous Virtue of Fidelity: Originalism, Scalia, Tribe, and Nerve,” 65 Fordham Law Review.Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D. (2004), “The Left and the Question of Law,” 17 Can. J.L. & Jurisprudence, 7.Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D. (2010), Hard Cases in Wicked Legal Systems: Pathologies of Legality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D. (2012), “Response to Ian Shapiro, ‘On Non-Domination,’” 62 UTLJ 337.Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D. & Thorburn, M. (2016), Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Eberhardt, L. (2017), “La Revocatoria de Mandato en América Latina: una herramienta de participación y control al servicio de los ciudadanos (¿o de los gobernantes?),” Doctoral thesis, on file with author.Google Scholar

Echeverría, J. (2008), “Plenos poderes y democracia en el proceso constituyente ecuatoriano,” in Echeverría, J. & Montúfar, C., eds., Plenos poderes y transformación constitucional, Quito: Ediciones Abya-Yala.Google Scholar

Elster, J. (1983), Sour Grapes, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elster, J. (1986), “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory,” in Elster, J. and Hylland, A., eds., Foundations of Social Choice Theory, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 104–132.Google Scholar

Elster, J. (1988), Ulysses and the Sirens. Studies in Rationality and Irrationality, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elster, J. (2000), Ulysses Unbound, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elster, J. & Slagstad, R. (1988), Constitutionalism and Democracy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elster, J. et al. (2018), Constitutional Conventions, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Farrand, M., ed. (1937), The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Farrell, D., Suiter, J. & Harris, C. (2019), “Systematizing Constitutional Deliberation: The 2016–18 Citizens’ Assembly in Ireland,” 34 (1) Irish Political Studies 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferejohn, J. (2008), “Conclusion: The Citizens’ Assembly Model,” in Warren, M. & Pearse, H., eds., Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ferrajoli, L. (2008), Democracia y garantismo, Madrid: Trotta.Google Scholar

Fishkin, J. (1991), Democracy and Deliberation, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fishkin, J. (1997), The Voice of the People, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fishkin, J. (2009), When the People Speak, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fishkin, J., Kousser, T., Luskin, R. & Siu, A. (2015), “Deliberative Agenda Setting: Piloting Reform of Direct Democracy in California,” 13 (4) Perspectives on Politics 1030–1042.Google Scholar

Fiss, O. (1976), “Groups and the Equal Protection Clause,” 5 (2) Philosophy and Public Affairs 107–177.Google Scholar

Fiss, O. (2005), “El carácter indócil de la política,” 80 Lecciones y ensayos 1–25.Google Scholar

Forst, R. (2013), Justification and Critique: Towards a Critical Theory of Politics, New York: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S. (2013), The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S. (2020), “Comparative Political Process Theory,” 18 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1429–1457.Google Scholar

Gargarella, R. (1995), Nos los representantes, Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila.Google Scholar

Gargarella, R. (1998), “Full Representation, Deliberation, and Impartiality,” in Elster, J., ed., Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gargarella, R. (2005), El derecho a la protesta. El primer derecho, Buenos Aires: Ad Hoc.Google Scholar

Gargarella, R. (2010) The Legal Foundations of Inequality, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gargarella, R. (2012), “Law and Social Protests,” 6 Criminal Law and Philosophy 15–27.Google Scholar

Gargarella, R. (2013), Latin American Constitutionalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gargarella, R. (2014), La sala de máquinas de la Constitución. Dos siglos de constitucionalismo en América Latina (1810–2010), Buenos Aires: Katz ed.Google Scholar

Gargarella, R. (2020), “Constituent Power in ‘a Community of Equals’,” 41 Revus. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law, https://journals.openedition.org/revus/.Google Scholar

Gargarella, R. (2020a), “Diálogo democrático y emergencia en América Latina” (Democratic Dialogue and Emergency in Latin America) (June 10). Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law & International Law (MPIL) Research Paper No. 2020-21, c/ Jorge Roa. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3623812 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3623812.Google Scholar

Gargarella, R. (2020b), “Argentina: Facing Coronavirus in the Shadow of the Rule of Law,” Bill of Health. Harvard Law, https://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2020/06/08/argentina-global-responses-covid19/.Google Scholar

Gargarella, R. (2020c), “The Fight Against COVID-19 in Argentina: Executive vs Legislative Branch,” Verfassungsblog. On Matters Constitutional (June, 2020), https://verfassungsblog.de/author/roberto-gargarella/.Google Scholar

Gargarella, R. (2021), “From ‘Democracy and Distrust’ to a Contextually Situated Dialogic Theory,” 18(4) International Journal of Constitutional Law 1466–1473, https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa094.Google Scholar

Gargarella, R. (2022), “In the Name of the People. Review of Joel Colon Ríos’ Constituent Power” manuscript, to be published.Google Scholar

Garzón Valdés, E. (1992), “No pongas tus sucias manos sobre Mozart,” 19 Claves de la Razón Práctica 16–23.Google Scholar

Gilly, A. (1994), La revolución interrumpida, México: Ediciones Era.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T. (2021), “Notes on a Continuing Conversation,” 49 Revista Derecho del Estado (May–August).Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T. & Huq, A. (2018), How to Save a Constitutional Democracy, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gloppen, S., Wilson, B., et al (2010), Courts and Power in Latin America and Africa, London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Godoy, M. (2017), Devolver a Constituicao ao povo: critica a supremacia judicial e dialogos interinstitucionais. Belo Horizonte: Editora Forum.Google Scholar

Graber, M., Levinson, S., & Tushnet, M., eds. (2018), Constitutional Democracy in Crisis?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Greenberg, M. (2020) “Legal Interpretation and Natural Law,” Natural Law Colloquium Special Issue, 89 Fordham Law Review 109.Google Scholar

Guastini, R. (2017), Saggi scettici sull’interpretazione, Roma: Giappichelli.Google Scholar

Guzmán, J. (1979), “El camino político,” Revista Realidad, 13–23.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory on Law and Democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Halperín Donghi, T. (1980), Proyecto y Construcción de una Nación, Caracas: Biblioteca Ayacucho.Google Scholar

Hamilton, A., Madison, J. & Jay, J. [1788] (1961), The Federalist Papers, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Hart, H. (1961), The Concept of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Holmes, S. (1988), “Precommitment and the Paradox of Democracy,” in Elster, J. & Slagstad, R., Constitutionalism and Democracy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huntington, S. (1983), American Politics: The Promise of Disharmony, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Jaksic, I. (1997), Andrés Bello. Selected Writings, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jefferson, T. (1999), Political Writings, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kelsen, H. (1967) (2005) Pure Theory of Law, New York: The Lawbook Exchange Ltd.Google Scholar

Kramer, L. (2005), The People Themselves. Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kymlicka, W. (1996), Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lafont, C. (2020), Democracy without Shortcuts. A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Landau, D. (2013), “Abusive Constitutionalism,” 47 UC Davis Law Review 189–260.Google Scholar

Landemore, H. (2013), Democratic Reason, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Landemore, H. (2014), “Inclusive Constitution-Making, The Icelandic Example,” 23(2) Journal of Political Philosophy, 166–191.Google Scholar

Landemore, H. (2014a), “We, All of the People. Five Lessons from Iceland’s Failed Experiment in Creating a Crowdsourced Constitution,” Slate, available at https://slate.com/technology/2014/07/five-lessons-from-icelands-failed-crowdsourced-constitution-experiment.html.Google Scholar

Landemore, H. (2020), Open Democracy. Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Lechner, N. (1991), “A la búsqueda de la comunidad perdida,” 129 Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales, UNESCO, 8.Google Scholar

Lerner, H. (2013), Making Constitutions in Deeply Divided Societies, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lerner, H. (2017), “Constituent Assemblies in Divided Societies,” in Elster, J., Gargarella, R. et al., Constituent Assemblies, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. (2008), Our Undemocratic Constitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Levitsky, S. & Ziblatt, D. (2018), How Democracies Die, New York: Crown.Google Scholar

Levy, R., Kong, H, Orr, G. & King, J. , eds. (2018), The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Liebenberg, S. (2012), “Engaging the Paradoxes of the Universal and Particular in Human Rights Adjudication. The Possibilities and Pitfalls of ‘Meaningful Engagement’,” 12 African Human Rights Law Journal 1–29.Google Scholar

Lima Lopes, J. (2008), O Direito na Historia, Sao Paulo: Editorial Atlas.Google Scholar

Luo, Z. & Przeworski, A. (2019), “Subversion by Stealth: Dynamics of Democratic Backsliding,” manuscript on file with the author.Google Scholar

Lutz, D. (1988), The Origins of American Constitutionalism, Baton Rouge: Louisiana University Press.Google Scholar

Manin, B. (1997), The Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, J. (1983), Beyond Adversary Democracy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Molina, G. (1970), Las ideas liberales en Colombia, Bogotá: Ediciones Tercer Mundo.Google Scholar

Moyn, S. (2010), The Last Utopia, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Moyn, S. (2018), “Human Rights Are Not Enough,” The Nation, www.thenation.com/article/human-rights-are-not-enough/.Google Scholar

Hogg, P. & Bushell, A. (1997), “The Charter Dialogue Between Courts and Legislatures,” 35 Osgoode Hall L. J. 75.Google Scholar

Manfredi, C. & Kelly, J. (1990), “Six Degrees of Dialogue: A Response to Hogg and Bushell,” 37 Osgoode Hall L. J. 513.Google Scholar

Manin, B. (1997), The Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Marx, K. [1843] (1978), “Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right,” in Tucker, R. ed., The Marx-Engels Reader, New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Marx, K. [1844] (1983) “Alienated Labor,” in The Portable Karl Marx, London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar

Michelman, F. (1969), “On Protecting the Poor Through the Fourteenth Amendment,” 83 Harvard Law Review 7.Google Scholar

Mill, J. [1859] 2003, On Liberty, London: Dover Publications Inc.Google Scholar

Molina, G. (1987), Las ideas liberales en Colombia, Bogotá: Tercer Mundo.Google Scholar

Murillo Toro, M. (1979), Obras Selectas, Bogotá: Camara de Representantes.Google Scholar

Nino, C. (1987), ed., Presidencialismo vs. Parlamentarismo, Buenos Aires: Consejo para la Consolidación de la Democracia.Google Scholar

Nino, C. (1991), The Ethics of Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nino, C. (1997), The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, G. (2007), “Las crisis perpetuas de la democracia,” 3(1) Polis 11–20.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, G. (2010), Democracia, agencia y Estado. Teoría con intención comparativa, Buenos Aires: Prometeo.Google Scholar

Parkinson, J. & Mansbridge, J. (2012), Deliberative systems. Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.Google Scholar

Petter, A. (2003), “Twenty Years of Charter Justification: From Liberal Legalism to Dubious Dialogue,” 52 UNB Law Journal 187–199.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. (2012), On the People’s Terms, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Phillips, A. (1995), The Politics of Presence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pincione, G. & Tesón, F. (2006), Rational Choice and Democratic Deliberation, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pitkin, H. (1972), The Concept of Representation, Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press.Google Scholar

Posner, E. & Vermeule, A. (2010), The Executive Unbound: After the Madisonian Republic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Post, R. & Siegel, R. (2004), “Popular Constitutionalism, Departmentalism, and Judicial Supremacy,” Faculty Scholarship Series No. 178. Yale Law School, https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/178.Google Scholar

Post, R. & Siegel, R. (2007), “Roe Rage: Democratic Constitutionalism and Backlash,” 42 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 373–433.Google Scholar

Priestley, J. (1791), Lectures on History and General Policy, Dublin.Google Scholar

Przeworski, A. (2019), Crisis of Democracy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Przeworski, A. & Sprague, J. (1988), Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Przeworski, A., Stokes, S., & Manin, M., eds. (1999), Democracy, Accountability and Representation, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1991), Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Roach, K. (2001), “Constitutional and Common Law Dialogues Between the Supreme Court and Canadian Legislatures,” 80 La Revue du Barreau Canadien 481–533.Google Scholar

Roach, K. (2004), “Dialogic Judicial Review and its Critics,” 23 Supreme Court Law Review, 49–104.Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Garavito, C. (2011), “Beyond the Courtroom: The Impact of Judicial Activism on Socioeconomic Rights in Latin America,” 89 (7) Texas Law Review 1669–1698.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, G. (1991), The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Rossi, J. & Filippini, L. (2010), “El derecho internacional en la justiciabilidad de los derechos sociales,” in Arcidiácono, P et al., Derechos sociales: justicia, política y economía en América Latina, Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre-Universidad de Los Andes.Google Scholar

Sandel, M. (1996), Democracy’s Discontent. America in Search of a Public Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sandel, M. (2020), The Tyranny of Merit, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Salazar, D. (2015), “My Power in the Constitution: The Perversion of the Rule of Law in Ecuador,” SELA, Yale University, at www.law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/SELA15_Salazar_CV_Eng.pdf.Google Scholar

Scanlon, T. (1984), “Rights, Goals and Fairness,” in Waldron, J., ed., Theories of Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Scalia, A. (1996), “Judicial Adherence to The Text of Our Basic Law: A Theory of Constitutional Interpretation.” Speech delivered at the Catholic University of America on October 18,www.proconservative.net/PCVol5Is225ScaliaTheoryConstlInterpretation.shtml.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J. (2008), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London: Harper Classics.Google Scholar

Setala, M. (2017), “Connecting Deliberative Mini-Publics to Representative Decision Making,” 56(4) European Journal of Political Research 846–863.Google Scholar

Shapiro, I. (2012), “On Non-domination,” 62 UTLJ 293.Google Scholar

Sigalet, G., Webber, G., & Dixon, R. (2019), Constitutional Dialogue, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stone, G. (2018), “It Can’t Happen Here. The Lessons of History,” in Sunstein, C. ed., Can It Happen Here? Authoritarianism in America, New York: Library of Congress.Google Scholar

Storing, H. (1981), The Complete Anti-Federalist, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Strauss, D. (2018), “Law and the Slow-Motion Emergency,” in Sunstein, C. ed., Can it Happen Here? Authoritarianism in America, New York: Library of Congress.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. (1985), “Interest Groups in American Public Law,” 38 (1) Stanford Law Review 29–87.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. (1993), “Against Positive Rights,” 2 East European Constitutional Review 35.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. (1993), The Partial Constitution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. (1996), “The Supreme Court 1995 Term: Foreword: Living Things Undecided,” 110 Harvard Law Review 6.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. (2001), “Social and Economic Rights? Lessons from South Africa,” Chicago Unbound, University of Chicago Law School.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. (2006), The Second Bill of Rights, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C., ed. (2018), Can It Happen Here? Authoritarianism in America, New York: Library of Congress.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C., Schkade, D. , & Ellman, L. (2004), “Ideological Voting on Federal Courts of Appeals: A Preliminary Investigation,” 90 Virginia Law Review 301.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C., Schkade, D. , Ellman, L. , & Sawicki, A. (2006), Are Judges Political?: An Empirical Analysis of the Federal Judiciary, New York: Brookings Inst.Google Scholar

Suteu, S. (2015), “Constitutional Conventions in the Digital Era: Lessons from Iceland and Ireland,” 38 (2) Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 251.Google Scholar

Suteu, S. & Tierney, S. (2018), “Squaring the Circle? Bringing Deliberation and Participation Together in Processes of Constitution-Making,” in Levy, R. et al., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Svampa, M. (2019), “Hacia dónde se mueven las placas tectónicas?” Brecha, available at https://brecha.com.uy/hacia-donde-se-mueven-las-placas-tectonicas/?fbclid=IwAR1yj90_22dQzcOmooLIfcx8CGNwE0zA7vhzEQmkCBk4WnarODxPUnBXHAI.Google Scholar

Tullock, G., Seldon, A., & Brady, G. (2002), Government Failure: A Primer in Public Choice, Indianapolis: Cato Institute.Google Scholar

Tushnet, M. (2003), “Non-Judicial Review,” 40 Harv. J. on Legisl. 453–492.Google Scholar

Tushnet, M. (2008), Weak Courts, Strong Rights, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Tushnet, M. (2009), “Dialogic Judicial Review,” 61 Ark. L. Rev. 205.Google Scholar

Unger, R. (1996), What Should Legal Analysis Become? London: Verso Press.Google Scholar

Valencia Villa, A. (1992), El pensamiento constitucional de Miguel Antonio Caro, Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar

Van Reybrouck, D. (2017), Against Elections: The Case for Democracy, London: Random House.Google Scholar

Vile, M. (1967), Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Villa, M. A. (2011), A historia das constituicoes brasileiras, San Pablo: Leya.Google Scholar

Waldron, J. (1999), Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Waldron, J. (1999a), The Dignity of Legislation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Waldron, J. (1999b), “Deliberation, Disagreement, and Voting,” in Koh, H. & Slye, R., Deliberative Democracy and Human Rights, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Waldron, J. (2009), “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review,” 115 Yale Law Journal 1348–1406.Google Scholar

Waldron, J. (2016), Political Political Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

White, M. (1987), Philosophy, The Federalist, and the Constitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Whittington, K. (2002), “Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation: Three Objections and Responses,” 80 N.C.L. Rev. 773–783.Google Scholar

Williams, M. (2018), “Book Review: The Adventures of the Constituent Power. Arato, Andrew, Cambridge University Press, 2018,” Constellations Issue Online, March 20, 2019.Google Scholar

Winterton, G. (1998) “Australia’s Constitutional Convention 1998,” 5(1) Agenda 97–109.Google Scholar

Wood, G. (1966), “A Note on Mobs in the American Revolution,” XXIII(4) William and Mary Quarterly 635–642.Google Scholar

Wood, G. (1969), The Creation of the American Republic, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Wood, G. (1991), The Radicalism of the American Revolution, New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar

Wood, G. (2002), The American Revolution. A History, New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar

Young, A. (2017), Democratic Dialogue and the Constitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar