Book contents
- Law and Mind
- Law and the Cognitive Sciences
- Law and Mind
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- I Metatheory and Methodology
- II Ontology and Epistemology
- III Legal Doctrine and Cognitive Sciences
- 11 Private Law and Cognitive Science
- 12 Private Law and Cognitive Science: A Methodological Commentary
- 13 Responsibility, Liability, and Retribution
- 14 Guilt in Criminal Law: Guilt in Us or in the Stars?
- 15 The Insanity Defense
- 16 Thoughts on the Insanity Defence
- IV Evidence
- V Dissenting Opinions
- References
12 - Private Law and Cognitive Science: A Methodological Commentary
from III - Legal Doctrine and Cognitive Sciences
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 April 2021
- Law and Mind
- Law and the Cognitive Sciences
- Law and Mind
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- I Metatheory and Methodology
- II Ontology and Epistemology
- III Legal Doctrine and Cognitive Sciences
- 11 Private Law and Cognitive Science
- 12 Private Law and Cognitive Science: A Methodological Commentary
- 13 Responsibility, Liability, and Retribution
- 14 Guilt in Criminal Law: Guilt in Us or in the Stars?
- 15 The Insanity Defense
- 16 Thoughts on the Insanity Defence
- IV Evidence
- V Dissenting Opinions
- References
Summary
The paper is a commentary to Przemyslaw Palka’s analysis of the multidimensional relation between private law and cognitive science. One particular problem touched upon by Palka is further elaborated: the descriptive layer of the private law and its relation to the cognitive sciences. The emphasis is placed on two interrelated issues: presuppositions of the legal norms and the relationship between legal and scientific “images of man.”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Law and MindA Survey of Law and the Cognitive Sciences, pp. 249 - 254Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021