Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T17:38:37.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The Safeguards Agreement – An Overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2010

Kyle W. Bagwell
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
George A. Bermann
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Petros C. Mavroidis
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The Agreement on Safeguards (the Safeguards Agreement or SA) establishes rules for the application of safeguard measures, a term understood to mean those measures provided for in Article XIX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), entitled “Emergency Action on Imports of Particular Products.” Although the World Trade Organization (WTO) SA was an agreement that did not exist in the form of a plurilateral code prior to the conclusion of the Uruguay Round, it is thus nevertheless clearly rooted in the GATT system and in Article XIX of the GATT in particular. More than with any other of the WTO's Agreements, it is the relationship between the new WTO Agreement on Safeguards and the original “safeguard” provision in the GATT that proved to be problematic.

In this chapter, first, safeguard measures are discussed in the larger context of the WTO system in general and WTO trade remedies in particular. Second, the conditions for the imposition of safeguard measures will be examined. Third, the chapter addresses the application of safeguard measures in place and time, and distinguishes between the various types of measures that may be imposed as a safeguard. Some conclusions are formulated at the end.

Safeguards in the WTO Context

Safeguards as a Trade Remedy

A safeguard measure is a unilateral way of providing additional protection to the domestic industry. In that respect, safeguards are akin to other forms of contingent trade protection, such as antidumping (AD) and countervailing measures (CVMs).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dam, K. 1970. The GATT: Law and International Economic Organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mavroidis, P. 2007. Trade in Goods. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. 2003. The Safeguards Mess: A Critique of WTO Jurisprudence. World Trade Review 3:216–296.Google Scholar
Wauters, J. 2010. “The Safeguards Agreement – An Overview,” this volume.
Bronckers, , “Selective Safeguard Measures in Multilateral Trade Relations: Issues of Protectionism” in GATT, European Community and United States Law (Kluwer, 1985)Google Scholar
Brown, and McCulloch, , “Nondiscrimination and the WTO Agreement on Safeguards,” 2(3) World Trade Review 2003, 327Google Scholar
Bronckers, , “Voluntary Export Restraints and the New GATT Safeguards Agreement,” in Bourgeois, , Berrod, , and Gippini-Fournier, (Eds.), The Uruguay Round Results: A European Lawyer's Perspective (Brussels, European Interuniversity Press, 1995), 273,275Google Scholar
Ahn, , “Restructuring the WTO Safeguard System,” in Matsushita, , Ahn, , and Chen, (Eds.), The WTO Trade Remedy System: East Asian Perspectives (Cameron May, London, 2006), 11–31Google Scholar
Bronckers, , “The Special Safeguard Clause in respect of China: (How) Will It Work?” in Matsushita, , and Ahn, (Eds.), WTO and East Asia: New Perspectives (Cameron May, London, 2004), 39–50Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, , “The Puzzle of WTO Safeguards and Regional Trade Agreements,” 7(1) Journal of International Economic Law 2004, 109, 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahn, , “Foe or Friend of GATT Article XXIV: Diversity in Trade Remedy Rules,” 11(1) Journal of International Economic Law 2008, 107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, , and Ortino, (Eds.), Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System (Oxford University Press, 2006), 109–148CrossRef
Bronckers, , “A Legal Analysis of Protectionist Measures Affecting Japanese Imports into the European Community – Revisited,” in Völker, (Ed.), Protectionism and the European Community (2nd ed., Kluwer, 1987), 57, 69–82Google Scholar
Bronckers, , “Selective Safeguard Measures in Multilateral Trade Relations: Issues of Protectionism” in GATT, European Community and United States Law (Kluwer, 1985)Google Scholar
Brown, and McCulloch, , “Nondiscrimination and the WTO Agreement on Safeguards,” 2(3) World Trade Review 2003, 327Google Scholar
Bronckers, , “Voluntary Export Restraints and the New GATT Safeguards Agreement,” in Bourgeois, , Berrod, , and Gippini-Fournier, (Eds.), The Uruguay Round Results: A European Lawyer's Perspective (Brussels, European Interuniversity Press, 1995), 273,275Google Scholar
Ahn, , “Restructuring the WTO Safeguard System,” in Matsushita, , Ahn, , and Chen, (Eds.), The WTO Trade Remedy System: East Asian Perspectives (Cameron May, London, 2006), 11–31Google Scholar
Bronckers, , “The Special Safeguard Clause in respect of China: (How) Will It Work?” in Matsushita, , and Ahn, (Eds.), WTO and East Asia: New Perspectives (Cameron May, London, 2004), 39–50Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, , “The Puzzle of WTO Safeguards and Regional Trade Agreements,” 7(1) Journal of International Economic Law 2004, 109, 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahn, , “Foe or Friend of GATT Article XXIV: Diversity in Trade Remedy Rules,” 11(1) Journal of International Economic Law 2008, 107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, , and Ortino, (Eds.), Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System (Oxford University Press, 2006), 109–148CrossRef
Bronckers, , “A Legal Analysis of Protectionist Measures Affecting Japanese Imports into the European Community – Revisited,” in Völker, (Ed.), Protectionism and the European Community (2nd ed., Kluwer, 1987), 57, 69–82Google Scholar
Sykes, A.O., “The Safeguards Mess: A Critique of WTO Jurisprudence,” 3 World Trade Review 2003, 261–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, A.O. “Safeguards Reform: The Injury Test,” in Trebilcock, M. and York, R., Fair Exchange: Reforming Trade Remedy Laws (Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute, 1990)Google Scholar
Horn, H. and Mavroidis, P. (Eds.), “US – Lamb: What Should Be Required of Safeguards Investigations?” in The WTO Case Law of 2001 (ALI Reporters series, Cambridge Press, 2003)
Jackson, J.H., Davey, W.J., and Sykes, A.O., International Economic Relations (Minneapolis West Group, 2002), 211–216Google Scholar
Sykes, A.O., “The Safeguards Mess: A Critique of Appellate Body Jurisprudence,” 2 World Trade Review 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, and Mavroidis, , “US – Line Pipe,” in Horn, H., and Mavroidis, P. (Eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2002 (ALI Reporters Series, Cambridge Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Sykes, A.O., “The Persistent Puzzle of Safeguards, Lessons from the Steel Dispute,” (2003) 7(3) Journal of International Economic LawGoogle Scholar
Horn, H. and Mavroidis, P. (Eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2002 (ALI Reporters Series, Cambridge Press, 2004)
Bown, C. and McCulloch, R., “Non-discrimination and the WTO Agreement on Safeguards,” 2(3) World Trade Review 2003, 327–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×