Amha, Azeb. (2001). The Maale language. Leiden: CNWS.Google Scholar

Bender, Lionel M. (1994). The mystery languages of Ethiopia. In Marcus, Harold G. (ed.), New trends in Ethiopian studies. Papers from the 12th International Conference of Ethiopian Studies. Lawrenceville, NJ: Red Sea Press, 1153–1174.Google Scholar

Blažek, Václav. (1991). Comparative analysis of Ongota lexicon. Paper presented at the 21st Colloquium on African Language and Linguistics, Leiden.Google Scholar

Blažek, Václav. (2005). Cushitic and Omotic strata in Ongota, a moribund language of uncertain affiliation from Southern Ethiopia. Archiv Orientální 73: 43–68.Google Scholar

Blažek, Václav. (2007). Nilo-Saharan stratum of Ongota. In Reh, Mechthild and Payne, Doris L. (eds.), Advances in Nilo-Saharan Linguistics: Proceedings of the 8th Nilo-Saharan Linguistics Colloquium, University of Hamburg, August 22–25, 2001. Köln: Köppe, 1–10.Google Scholar

Cupi, Loredana, Petrollino, Sara, Savà, Graziano, and Tosco., Mauro (2013). Preliminary notes on the Hamar verb. In Simeone-Senelle, Marie-Claude and Vanhove, Martine (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Cushitic and Omotic Languages. Köln: Köppe, 181–195.Google Scholar

Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. (1989). On language death in Eastern Africa. In Dorian, Nancy C. (ed.), Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 13–31.Google Scholar

Donaldson Smith, Arthur. (1896). Expedition through Somaliland to Lake Rudolf. The Geographical Journal 8: 121–137, 221–239.Google Scholar

Fleming, Harold C., Yilma, Aklilu, Mitiku, Ayyalew, et al. (1992/93). Ongota or Birale: A moribund language of Gemu-Gofa (Ethiopia). Journal of Afroasiatic Languages 3/3: 181–225.Google Scholar

Fleming, Harold C. (2006). Ongota: A decisive language in Africa prehistory. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Freeman, Dena, and Pankhurst, Alula (eds.). (2001). Living on the edge: Marginalised minorities of craftworkers and hunters in southern Ethiopia. Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University, Department of Sociology and Social Administration.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, and Voßen, Rainer. (2000). Khoisan. In Heine, Bernd and Nurse, Derek (eds.), African languages: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 99–122.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd. (1977). Bemerkungen zur Boni-Sprache (Kenia). Afrika und Übersee 60: 242–295.Google Scholar

Lydall, Jean, and Strecker., Ivo (1979). The Hamar of southern Ethiopia. I: Work journal. Hohenschaftlarn: Klaus Renner Verlag.Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian, Spajić, Siniša, Sands, Bonny, and Ladefoged, Peter. (1993). Phonetic structures of Dahalo. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere 36: 5–53.Google Scholar

Getu, Melesse. (1997). Local versus outsider forms of natural resources use and management: The Tsamako experience in South-West Ethiopia. In Fukui, Katsuyoshi, Kurimoto, Eisei, and Shigeta, Masayoshi (eds.), Ethiopia in broader perspective: Papers of the Thirteenth International Conference of Ethiopian Studies (ICES XIII), Kyoto, 12–17 December 1997. Vol. 2. Kyoto: Shokado, 748–767.Google Scholar

Nurse, Derek. (1986). Reconstruction of Dahalo history through evidence from loanwords. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 7(2): 267–305.Google Scholar

Savà, Graziano. (2002). Ts’amakko morphological borrowings in Ongota (or Birale). In Rapold, Christian and Savà, Graziano (eds.), Proceeding of the 1st International Symposium Ethiopian Morphosyntax in an Areal Perspective. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere 71: 75–93.Google Scholar

(2005). A grammar of Ts’amakko. Köln: Köppe.Google Scholar

Savà, Graziano (2010). The Ongota: A branch of Maale? Ethnographic, historic and linguistic traces of contact of the Ongota people. In Gabbert, Echi and Thubauville, Sophia (eds.), To live with others: Essays on cultural neighbourhood in southern Ethiopia. Köln: Köppe, 213–235.Google Scholar

Savà, Graziano, and Tosco, Mauro. (2000). A sketch of Ongota, a dying language of southwest Ethiopia. Studies in African Linguistics 29(2): 59–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Savà, Graziano, and Tosco, Mauro (2003). The classification of Ongota. In Lionel Bender, M., Takács, Gabor, and Appleyard, David (eds.), Selected comparative-historical Afrasian linguistic studies in memory of Igor M. Diakonoff. München: Lincom Europa, 307–316.Google Scholar

Savà, Graziano, and Tosco, Mauro (2007). Review article of Fleming (2006). Aethiopica 10: 223–232.Google Scholar

Sobania, Neal W. (1980). The historical tradition of the peoples of the Eastern Lake Turkana Basin c. 1840–1925. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of London, S.O.A.S.Google Scholar

Stiles, Daniel. (1988). Historical interrelationships of the Boni with pastoral peoples of Somalia and Kenya. Kenya Past and Present 20: 38–45.Google Scholar

Tosco, Mauro. (1991). A grammatical sketch of Dahalo, including texts and a glossary. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar

Tosco, Mauro (1992). Dahalo: An endangered language. In Brenzinger, Matthias (ed.), Language death: Factual and theoretical explorations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 137–155.Google Scholar

Tosco, Mauro (1994). The historical reconstruction of a southern Somali dialect: Proto-Karre-Boni. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 15: 153–209.Google Scholar

Tosco, Mauro (1998). “People who are not the language they speak:” On language shift without language decay in East Africa. In Brenzinger, Matthias (ed.), Endangered languages in Africa. Köln: Köppe, 119–142.Google Scholar

Tosco, Mauro (2007). Something went wrong: On the historical reconstruction of the Dhaasanac verb. In Voigt, Rainer (ed.), From beyond the Mediterranean. Akten des 7. internationalen Semitohamitistenkongresses (VII. ISHaK), Berlin 13. bis 15. September 2004. Aachen: Shaker, 265–280.Google Scholar

Barnard, Alan. (2002). The foraging mode of thought. In Stewart, Henry, Barnard, Alan, and Omura, Keiichi (eds.), Self- and other images of hunter-gatherers. Senri Ethnological Studies 60. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology, 5–24.Google Scholar

Barnard, Alan (2007). From Mesolithic to Neolithic modes of thought. In Whittle, Alasdair and Cummings, Vicki (eds.), Going over: the mesolithic-neolithic transition in north-west Europe. Proceedings of the British Academy 144. London: The British Academy, 5–19.Google Scholar

Bleek, Dorothea F. (1956). A Bushman dictionary. American Oriental Series 41. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar

Budack, Kuno F. R. (1986). Die Klassifikation der Khwe-khwen (Naman) in Südwestafrika. In Voßen, Rainer and Keuthmann, Klaus (eds.), Contemporary studies on Khoisan, Vol. 1: Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung 5. Hamburg: Helmut Buske, 107–143.Google Scholar

Cashdan, Elizabeth. (1986). Hunter-gatherers of the northern Kalahari. In Voßen, Rainer and Keuthmann, Klaus (eds.), Contemporary studies on Khoisan, Vol. 1: Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung 5. Hamburg: Helmut Buske, 145–180.Google Scholar

Chen, Yu-Sheng, Olckers, Antonel, Schurr, Theodore G., et al. (2000). mtDNA variation in the South African Kung and Khwe and their genetic relationships to other African populations. American Journal of Human Genetics 66(4): 1362–1383.Google Scholar

Deacon, Hilary J., and Deacon, Janette. (1999). Human beginnings in South Africa: uncovering the secrets of the stone age. Cape Town/ Johannesburg: David Philip.Google Scholar

Denbow, James R. (1986). After the flood: A preliminary account of recent geological, archeological and linguistic investigations in the Okavango region of northern Botswana. In Voßen, Rainer and Keuthmann, Klaus (eds.), Contemporary studies on Khoisan, Vol. 1: Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung 5. Hamburg: Helmut Buske, 181–214.Google Scholar

Ehret, Christopher. (1982). The first spread of food production to southern Africa. In Ehret, Christopher and Posnansky, Merrick (eds.), The archeological and linguistic reconstruction of African history. Berkeley: University of California Press, 158–181.Google Scholar

Ehret, Christopher (1998). An African classical age: eastern and southern Africa in world history, 1000 B.C. to A.D. 400. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar

Elderkin, Edward D. (1986). Diachronic inferences from basic sentence and noun phrase structure in Central Khoisan and Sandawe. In Rottland, Franz and Voßen, Rainer (eds.), Tagungsberichte des Internationalen Symposions “Afrikanische Wildbeuter”, Sankt Augustin, Januar 3–5, 1985, Vol. 2: Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 7. Hamburg: Helmut Buske, 131–56.Google Scholar

Elderkin, Edward D. (1989). The significance and origin of the use of pitch in Sandawe. PhD thesis, Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York.Google Scholar

Elphick, Richard. (1977). Kraal and castle: Khoikhoi and the founding of white South Africa. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Estermann, Carlos. (1959). Os habitantes do Namibe: observação prévia. Portugal em Africa 16: 322–330.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. (1963). The languages of Africa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Guerreiro, Manuel Viegas (1971). Vida humana no deserto de Namibe: Onguaia. Finisterra 6(11): 84–124.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom. (1998). The Kalahari Basin as an object of areal typology: A first approach. In Schladt, Mathias (ed.), Language, identity, and conceptualization among the Khoisan. Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung 15. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe, 137–169.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom (1999). Head-initial meets head-final: Nominal suffixes in eastern and southern Bantu from a historical perspective. Studies in African Linguistics 28(1): 49–91.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom (2002). Die Entlehnung pronominaler Elemente des Khoekhoe aus dem !Ui-Taa. In Schumann, Theda, Reh, Mechthild, Kießling, Roland, and Gerhardt, Ludwig (eds.), Aktuelle Forschungen zu afrikanischen Sprachen: Sprachwissenschaftliche Beiträge zum 14. Afrikanistentag, Hamburg, 11–14. Oktober 2000. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe, 43–61.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom (2003). Complex pronominals in Tuu and Ju, with special reference to their historical significance. Afrika und Übersee 86: 1–25.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom (2004a). Complex pronominals in Tuu and Ju, with special reference to their historical significance. Afrika und Übersee 87: 79–103.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom (2004b). Reconstruction through ‘de-construction’: The marking of person, gender, and number in the Khoe family and Kwadi. Diachronica 21(2): 251–306.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom (2005). Tuu as a language family. In Tom Güldemann, Studies in Tuu (Southern Khoisan). University of Leipzig Papers on Africa, Languages and Literatures 23. Leipzig: Institut für Afrikanistik, Universität Leipzig, 11–30.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom (2006a). Structural isoglosses between Khoekhoe and Tuu: The Cape as a linguistic area. In Yaron, Matras, McMahon, April, and Vincent, Nigel (eds.), Linguistic areas: Convergence in historical and typological perspective. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 99–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Güldemann, Tom (2006b). The San languages of southern Namibia: Linguistic appraisal with special reference to J. G. Krönlein’s N|uusaa data. Anthropological Linguistics 48(4): 369–395.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom (2008a). A linguist’s view: Khoe-Kwadi speakers as the earliest food-producers of southern Africa. In Sadr, Karim and Fauvelle-Aymar, François-Xavier (eds.), Khoekhoe and the earliest herders in southern Africa. Southern African Humanities 20, 93–132.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom (2008b). Greenberg’s “case” for Khoisan: The morphological evidence. In Ibriszimow, Dymitr (ed.), Problems of linguistic-historical reconstruction in Africa. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 19. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe, 123–153.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom (2013a). Phonetics and phonology: Kwadi. In Voßen, Rainer (ed.), The Khoesan Languages. London: Routledge, 87–88.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom (2013b). Typology. In Voßen, Rainer (ed.), The Khoesan languages. London: Routledge, 25–37.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom (in press). Person-gender-number marking from Proto-Khoe-Kwadi to its descendents: A rejoinder with particular reference to language contact. In Voßen, Rainer and Christa König (eds.), Patterns of linguistic convergence in Africa. Frankfurter Afrikanistische Blätter 27. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe. Retrieved from: www.iaaw.hu-berlin.de/de/region/afrika/afrika/linguistik/mitarbeiter/1683070/dokumente/khoe-kwadi-pronoun-contactGoogle Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, and Elderkin, Edward D.. (2010). On external genealogical relationships of the Khoe family. In Brenzinger, Matthias and König, Christa (eds.), Khoisan languages and linguistics: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium January 4–8, 2003, Riezlern/Kleinwalsertal. Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung 24. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe, 15–52.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, and Loughnane, Robyn. (2012). Are there “Khoisan” roots in body-part vocabulary? On linguistic inheritance and contact in the Kalahari Basin. In Güldemann, Tom, Holton, Gary, Loughnane, Robyn, and Robinson, Laura(eds.), Methodology in linguistic prehistory. Language Dynamics and Change 2, 2, 215–258.Google Scholar

Haacke, Wilfrid H. G. (2002). Linguistic evidence in the study of origins: The case of the Namibian Khoekhoe-speakers (inaugural lecture). Windhoek: University of Namibia.Google Scholar

Hastings, Rachel. (2001). Evidence for the genetic unity of Southern Khoisan. In Bell, Arthur and Washburn, Paul (eds.), Khoisan: Syntax, phonetics, phonology, and contact. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 18. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, 225–246.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd, and Honken, Henry. (2010). The Kx’a family: A new Khoisan genealogy. Journal of Asian and African Studies 79: 5–36.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd, and Voßen., Rainer (1981). Sprachtypologie. In Heine, Bernd, Schadeberg, Thilo C., and Wolff, Ekkehard (eds.), Die Sprachen Afrikas. Hamburg. Buske, 407–444.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Trefor. (1988). The peoples of southern Africa: Studies in diversity and disease. Raymond Dart Lectures 24. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar

Köhler, Oswin. (1960). Sprachkritische Aspekte zur Hamitentheorie über die Herkunft der Hottentotten. Sociologus 10(1): 69–77.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Trefor (1981). Les langues khoisan, Section 1: présentation d’ensemble. In Perrot, Jean(ed.), Les langues dans le monde ancien et moderne, prèmiere partie: Les langues de l’afrique subsaharienne. Paris: CNRS, 455–482.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Trefor (1986). Allgemeine und sprachliche Bemerkungen zum Feldbau nach Oraltexten der Kxoe-Buschleute. In Rottland, Franz and Voßen, Rainer (eds.), Tagungsberichte des Internationalen Symposions “Afrikanische Wildbeuter,” Sankt Augustin, Januar 3–5, 1985, Vol. 2: Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 7. Hamburg: Helmut Buske, 205–272.Google Scholar

Livingstone, David. (1851). Second visit to the South African Lake Ngami. Extract of letter from Rev. Dr. Livingston, under Date Kolobeng, 24th August, 1850. Journal of the Royal Geographical Society of London 21: 18–24.Google Scholar

Livingstone, David (1858). Missionary travels and researches in South Africa. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Peter. (2002). The archaeology of Southern Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nurse, George T., and Jenkins, Trefor. (1977). Serogenetic studies on the Kavango peoples of south west Africa. Annals of Human Biology 4(5): 465–78.Google Scholar

Oliver, Roland, and Fagan, Brian M.. (1978). The emergence of Bantu Africa. In Fage, J. D. (ed.), The Cambridge history of Africa, Vol. 2: From c. 500 BC to AD 1050. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 342–409.Google Scholar

Pickrell, Joseph K., Patterson, Nick and Barbieri, Chiara (2012). The genetic prehistory of southern Africa. Nature Communications 3, Article 1143. Retrieved from: www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v3/n10/full/ncomms2140.htmlGoogle Scholar

Rottland, Franz, and Voßen, Rainer (eds.). (1986). Tagungsberichte des Internationalen Symposions “Afrikanische Wildbeuter”, Sankt Augustin, Januar 3–5, 1985, 2 vols. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 7. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar

Sands, Bonny E. (1998). Eastern and southern African Khoisan: Evaluating claims of distant linguistic relationships. Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung 14. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar

Sands, Bonny E. (2010). Juu subgroups based on phonological patterns. In Brenzinger, Matthias and König, Christa (eds.), Khoisan languages and linguistics: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium January 4–8, 2003, Riezlern/Kleinwalsertal. Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung 24. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe, 85–114.Google Scholar

Schultze, Leonhard. (1928). Zur Kenntnis des Körpers der Hottentotten und Buschmänner. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar

Smith, Andrew B. (1990). On becoming herders: Khoikhoi and San ethnicity in southern Africa. African Studies 49: 50–73.Google Scholar

Smith, Andrew B. (1996). Khoi/San relationships: Marginal differences or ethnicity. In Skotnes, Pippa (ed.), Miscast: negotiating the presence of the Bushmen. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press, 249–251.Google Scholar

Smith, Andrew B. (2005a). Origins and spread of African pastoralism. History Compass 3, AF 187: 1–7.Google Scholar

Smith, Andrew B. (2005b). The concepts of ‘Neolithic’ and ‘Neolithisation’ for Africa? Before Farming 1, article 2: 1–6. Retrieved from: https://online.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/loi/bfarmGoogle Scholar

Snyman, Jan W. (1997). A preliminary classification of the !Xũũ and Žu|’hõasi dialects. In Haacke, Wilfrid H. G. and Elderkin, Edward D. (eds.), Namibian Languages: Reports and Papers. Namibian African Studies 4. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe, 21–106.Google Scholar

Soodyall, Himla, and Jenkins, Trefor. (1992). Mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms in Khoisan populations from Southern Africa. Annals of Human Genetics 56: 315–324.Google Scholar

Soodyall, Himla, and Jenkins, Trefor (1998). Khoisan prehistory: The evidence of genes. In Bank, Andrew (ed.), The Proceedings of “The Khoisan Identities and Cultural Heritage Conference,” organized by the Institute for Historical Research, University of the Western Cape, held at the South African Museum, Cape Town, July 12–16, 1997. Cape Town: Infosource, 374–382.Google Scholar

Traill, Anthony. (1986). Do the Khoi have a place in the San? New data on Khoisan linguistic relationships. In Rottland, Franz and Voßen, Rainer (eds.), Tagungsberichte des Internationalen Symposions “Afrikanische Wildbeuter”, Sankt Augustin, Januar 3-5, 1985, vol. 1. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 7(1): 407–430.Google Scholar

Vedder, Heinrich. (1997 [1934]). Das alte Südwestafrika: Südwestafrikas Geschichte bis zum Tode Mahareros 1890. Windhoek: Namibia Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft.Google Scholar

Voßen, Rainer. (1984). Studying the linguistic and ethno-history of the Khoe-speaking (central Khoisan) peoples of Botswana, research in progress. Botswana Notes and Records 16: 19–35.Google Scholar

Voßen, Rainer (1997). Die Khoe-Sprachen: Ein Beitrag zur Erforschung der Sprachgeschichte Afrikas. Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung 12. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar

Voßen, Rainer (2007). Languages of the desert … and what they can tell us about the economic history of southern Africa. In Möhlig, Wilhelm J. G., (ed.), Cultural change in the prehistory of arid Africa. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 18. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe, 175–185.Google Scholar

Voßen, Rainer (ed.). (2013). The Khoesan languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Voßen, Rainer, and Keuthmann, Klaus (eds.). (1986). Contemporary Studies on Khoisan, 2 vols. Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung 5. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar

Werner, H. (1906). Anthropologische, ethnologische und ethnographische Beobachtungen über die Heikum- und Kungbuschleute, nebst einem Anhang über die Sprachen dieser Buschmannstämme. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 38(3): 241–68.Google Scholar

Westphal, Ernst O. J. (1963). The linguistic prehistory of Southern Africa: Bush, Kwadi, Hottentot, and Bantu linguistic relationships. Africa 33: 237–265.Google Scholar

Westphal, Ernst O. J. (1971). The click languages of southern and eastern Africa. In Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Linguistics in Sub-Saharan Africa. Current Trends in Linguistics 7. The Hague/ Paris: Mouton, 367–420.Google Scholar

Westphal, Ernst O. J. (1980). The age of “Bushman” languages in southern African pre-history. In Snyman, Jan W. (ed.), Bushman and Hottentot Linguistic Studies (papers of seminar held on July 27, 1979). Miscellanea Congregalia 16. Pretoria: University of South Africa, 59–79.Google Scholar