Book contents
- Language Aptitude Theory and Practice
- The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series
- Language Aptitude Theory and Practice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Editors and Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- 1 Language Aptitude Research
- Part I Revisiting and Refining Aptitude Tests
- Part II Aptitude Testing of Diverse Groups
- Part III Innovative Perspectives and Paradigms
- Part IV Aptitude–Treatment Interaction (ATI)
- Part V Final Commentaries
- 17 Reflections on Aptitude
- 18 Epilogue
- Index
- References
17 - Reflections on Aptitude
Theory, Research, and Measurement
from Part V - Final Commentaries
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 May 2023
By
Book contents
- Language Aptitude Theory and Practice
- The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series
- Language Aptitude Theory and Practice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Editors and Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- 1 Language Aptitude Research
- Part I Revisiting and Refining Aptitude Tests
- Part II Aptitude Testing of Diverse Groups
- Part III Innovative Perspectives and Paradigms
- Part IV Aptitude–Treatment Interaction (ATI)
- Part V Final Commentaries
- 17 Reflections on Aptitude
- 18 Epilogue
- Index
- References
Summary
The present volume has explored a very wide range of topics within the field of foreign language aptitude with sections covering aptitude test batteries, the testing of diverse groups, innovative perspectives, and pedagogic implications. Each chapter has made a considerable contribution to updating the topic of aptitude. Inevitably, though, the chapters have explored areas that transcend the different heading sections, making new connections and even announcing new areas for aptitude research. The present chapter highlights all of these insights and weaves them into the discussion of a series of themes which emerge, some traditional from established aptitude work and some reflecting the changes we have seen in recent years.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language Aptitude Theory and Practice , pp. 443 - 467Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 481–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamsson, N., & Smeds, H. (This volume). Is language aptitude immune to experience? Divergent evidence from bilingualism vs. blindness.Google Scholar
Bokander, L. (This volume). Exploring the predictive validity of the LLAMA language aptitude tests: A research synthesis.Google Scholar
Bokander, L., & Bylund, E. (2020). Probing the internal validity of LLAMA language aptitude tests. Language Learning, 70, 1, 11–47,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffington, J., & Morgan-Short, K. (2019). Declarative and procedural memory as individual differences in second language aptitude. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. L. (eds.), Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice. New York: Routledge, pp. 215–237.Google Scholar
Buffington, J., Demos, A. P., & Morgan-Short, K. (2021). The reliability and validity of procedural memory assessments used in second language acquisition research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 635–662.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1962). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In Glaser, R. (ed.), Training Research and Education. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 87–136.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1973). Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign language teaching. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2, 5–14.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, J. (2017). How stable is second language aptitude? Effects of second language learning and language analysis training on second language aptitude test scores. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Griffith University.Google Scholar
Chang, P., & Zhang, L. (This volume, Chapter 12). Variability of language aptitude and working memory in EFL learners’ listening development.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499–533.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2020). Skill acquisition theory. In VanPatten, B., Keating, G. D., & Wulff, S. (eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, pp. 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. J. (2019). Cognitive language aptitude. Language Learning, 68(S1), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12322Google Scholar
Godfroid, A., & Kim, K. M. (2021). The contributions of implicit–statistical learning aptitude to implicit second language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 606–634.Google Scholar
Granena, G. (2019). Cognitive aptitudes and L2 speaking proficiency: Links between LLAMA and Hi-LAB. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 313–336.Google Scholar
Granena, G. (2020). Implicit Language Aptitude. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L., Sternberg, R. J., & Ehrman, M. (2002). A theory-based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: The CANAL-F theory and test. Modern Language Journal, 84(3), 390–405.Google Scholar
Hughes, M., Golonka, E., Tseng, A., & Campbell, S. (This volume, Chapter 4.). The high-level language aptitude test battery (Hi-LAB): Development, validation, and use.Google Scholar
Jackson, D., & Maie, R. (This volume, Chapter 16). Implicit statistical learning and second language outcomes: A Bayesian meta-analysis.Google Scholar
Kane, M. T. (2006). Validation. In Brennan, R. L. (ed.). Educational Measurement, 4th. ed. Westport, CT; American Council on Education: Praeger Publishers, pp. 17–64.Google Scholar
Kepinska, O., de Rover, M., Caspers, J., & Schiller, N. O. (2017). On neural correlates of individual differences in novel grammar learning: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 98, 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.014Google Scholar
Kepinska, O., Pereda, E., Caspers, J., & Schiller, N. O. (2017). Neural oscillatory mechanisms during novel grammar learning underlying language analytical abilities. Brain and Language, 175, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2017.10.003Google Scholar
Lambelet, A. (This volume, Chapter 7). Testing language aptitude for recently arrived parent–child immigrant dyads.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2019). Six decades of language aptitude research: A comprehensive and critical review. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. L. (eds.), Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice. New York: Routledge, pp. 78–96.Google Scholar
Li, S., & Qian, J. (2021). Exploring syntactic priming as a measure of implicit language aptitude. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 1–32.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (2011). First and Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Michaud, G., & Ammar, A. (This volume, Chapter 14). Language aptitude and timing of form-focused instruction in TBLT.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (1988). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In Healy, A. F. & Bourne, F. J. (eds.), Foreign Language Learning: Psycholinguistic Studies on Training and Retention. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 339–364.Google Scholar
Novén, M., Schremm, A., Nilsson, M., Horne, M., & Roll, M. (2019). Cortical thickness of Broca’s area and right homologue is related to grammar learning aptitude and pitch discrimination proficiency. Brain and Language, 188(January 2018), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2018.12.002Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and Procedural Determinants of Second Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Perruchet, P. (2021). Why is the componential construct of implicit language aptitude so difficult to capture? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 677–691.Google Scholar
Petersen, C. R., & Al-Haik, A. (1976). The development of the Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36, 369–380.Google Scholar
Pimsleur, P. (1966). Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery (PLAB). New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Pimsleur, P. (1968). Language aptitude testing. In Davies, A. (ed.), Language Testing Symposium: A Psycholinguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 98–106.Google Scholar
Purpura, J., Brown, J. D., & Schoonen, R. (2015). Improving the validity of quantitative measures in applied linguistics research. Language Learning, 65(S1), 37–75.Google Scholar
Reed, D., & Stansfield, C. (This volume, Chapter 2). The MLAT-Elementary: History, Adaptations and Current Uses.Google Scholar
Rogers, V., Meara, P., & Rogers, B. (This volume, Chapter 3). Testing language aptitude: LLAMA evolution and refinement.Google Scholar
Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R. (2018). The generative approach to SLA and its place in modern second language studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 417–442.Google Scholar
Saito, K., Suzukida, Y., & Sun, H. (2019). Aptitude, experience, and second language pronunciation proficiency development in classroom settings: A longitudinal study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(1), 201–225.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2015). Foreign language aptitude and its relationship with grammar: A critical overview. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 367–384.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2016). Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes. In Granena, G., Jackson, D., & Yilmaz, Y. (eds.), Cognitive Individual Differences in L2 Processing and Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 17–40.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2019). Language aptitude implicates language and cognitive skills. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. (eds.), Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice. New York: Routledge, pp. 56–77.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (This volume, Chapter 9). Testing Language Aptitude: Reanalysis of batteries and constructs.Google Scholar
Sparks, R. (This volume, Chapter 11). The Linguistic Coding Differences Hypothesis (LCDH) and L2 learning: A thirty-year retrospective.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y. (2017). Validity of new measures of implicit knowledge: Distinguishing implicit knowledge from automatized explicit knowledge. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(5) , 1229–1261.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y. (2021). Probing the construct validity of LLAMA_D as a measure of implicit learning aptitude: Incidental instructions, confidence ratings, and reaction time. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 663–676.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., DeKeyser, R., & Huang, Y. T. (This volume, Chapter 15). Implicit (not explicit) learning aptitude predicts the acquisition of difficult (not easy) structure: A visual-world eye-tracking study.Google Scholar
Turker, S., & Reiterer, S. (This volume, Chapter 10). The neurobiology of language aptitude, musicality and working memory.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2015). The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiologically motivated theory of first and second language. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, pp. 135–158.Google Scholar
Wen, Z. (2016). Working Memory and Second Language Learning: Towards an Integrated Approach. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Wen, Z. (2019). Working memory as language aptitude: The phonological/executive model. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. L., (eds.). Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice. New York: Routledge, pp. 187–214.Google Scholar
Wen, Z., & Skehan, P. (2021). Stages of acquisition and the P/E model of working memory: Complementary or contrasting approaches to foreign language aptitude? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 41, 6–24.Google Scholar
Xiang, H., Dediu, D., Roberts, L., et al. (2012). The structural connectivity underpinning language aptitude, working memory, and IQ in the perisylvian language network. Language Learning, 62(SUPPL. 2), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00708.xGoogle Scholar
Zhao, H., Luo, S., & Fu, A. (This volume, Chapter 6). Testing language aptitude for Chinese learners of foreign languages: FLAT-C vs. LLAMAGoogle Scholar